12 angry men how did the boy get his lawyer

What is the legal subject relevant to the movie 12 Angry Men?

2. Legal Subjects Relevant to the Movie. The legal subject relevant to the movie 12 Angry Men is Criminal Law. 3. Handling of the Case as a Juror. As a juror in this case, I would have listened to the evidence and likely been swayed in much the same way as the jurors who thought the boy guilty at the beginning of deliberations.

What is the tone of the story 12 Angry Men?

Mar 26, 2019 · The story I chose was 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose written in 1957. Twelve men were picked to sit on a jury for a murder trial. The accused was an 18-year-old boy. He was on trial for murdering his father. If he is convicted, he'll receive a death sentence. This sets the tone for the Play. Bothered by the heat

When was the book Twelve Angry Men published?

Oct 03, 2014 · Though I find D’Angelo’s take on 12 Angry Men plausible, I still believe the boy received his appropriate judgement of innocent. The image painted by the prosecuting attorney forges the jury to believe that the kid ‘must be guilty’ based on his upbringing, socio-economic standing, past relationships and troubles with the law.

What did the Boy say to his father at the murder scene?

What issue does Juror 8 have with the defendant's lawyers?

How does juror #8 feel about the defendant's lawyer? #8 thinks the defendant's lawyer didn't give the case enough attention, fully do his job, believe his client, want the case, and was apathetic.

Did the jury get the case right in 12 Angry Men?

In Twelve Angry Men adapted by Reginald Rose, the jurors came to the right decision; in this case, with the evidence presented, the 19-year-old man is innocent!

What is the evidence against the boy in 12 Angry Men?

One of the biggest pieces of evidence against the young man on trial is the unique knife that was used to kill his father. A store owner reported selling this same type of knife to the kid earlier in the night.

What was the court case in 12 Angry Men?

"12 Angry Men" focuses on a jury's deliberations in a capital murder case. A 12-man jury is sent to begin deliberations in the first-degree murder trial of an 18-year old Puerto Rican boy accused in the stabbing death of his father, where a guilty verdict means an automatic death sentence.

Why did juror #12 change his vote?

He changes his vote initially because many of the other jurors have, but they convince him he should do it because he believes the boy might not be guilty. Juror Eight - Protagonist of the play, he is the first one to stand up for the boy and say he might not be guilty.

Why did juror 7 change his vote?

Juror 7 is also shown to be ethnocentric and xenophobic when he insults the immigrant Juror 11. When Juror 7 switches his vote to "Not guilty" because he had enough, the immigrant Juror 11 gets mad and humiliates Juror 7, telling him that he has no right to play like this with the man's life.

What is brought up to refute the woman's claim?

What is brought up to refute that the woman's claim that she watched the boy kill his father? The women didn't wear her eyeglasses to bed so she couldn't have seen clearly who it was. What piece of stage business forces the jurors to think about the woman and her glasses?

What happens at the end of 12 angry jurors?

The film ends when the friendly Jurors 8 (Mr. Davis) and 9 (Mr. McCardle) exchange names, and all of the jurors descend the courthouse steps to return to their individual lives... never to see each other again.

Why does Juror 3 change his vote?

Juror 3 changed his vote after realizing that all of his anger toward the defendant was a direct result of his bad relationship with his son. Due to his change of vote from guilty to not guilty, Juror 3 shows growth in character and is therefore considered dynamic.Dec 15, 2021

Why did the foreman change his vote?

Changing His Vote At first, the foreman votes that the defendant is guilty of killing his father but, in Act III of the play, he changes his vote to 'not guilty' when Juror Number Five is able to demonstrate that a switchblade would not be used from an upward angle because switchblades are used underhanded.Dec 14, 2021

What does deadlocked mean in a trial?

When there are insufficient jurors voting one way or the other to deliver either a guilty or not guilty verdict, the jury is known as a “hung jury” or it might be said that jurors are “deadlocked”. The judge may direct them to deliberate further, usually no more than once or twice.

What does Juror #11 do for a living?

Biography. Number Eleven was Orignally from Germany, He Escaped. He was also a "watch maker",Now he's a Juror who feels self-conscious about his foreign accent. He is very serious about democracy and America's legal system.

What is the story of 12 angry men?

The story I chose was 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose written in 1957. Twelve men were picked to sit on a jury for a murder trial. The accused was an 18-year-old boy. He was on trial for murdering his father. If he is convicted, he’ll receive a death sentence. This sets the tone for the Play. Bothered by the heat making the room uncomfortable, the jurors had to cast a preliminary vote which came out to eleven guilty and one not guilty. Juror Eight was the only person to vot not guilty and demanded that they discussed the case further. Juror Eight began to question the prosecution’s arguments. The knife was originally was thought to be a unique knife and narrowed it down to the accused. He argued that the knife was a common knife and that anyone could’ve had that style knife and killed his father. This was explained by the following text in the play:

Who was the last one to hold out in Twelve Angry Men?

The last one to hold out, Juror Three, finally changed his vote to not guilty at the end. The boy was acquitted of all charges. Twelve Angry Men was a glimpse of the American legal justice system during the era that if was filmed.

What did Juror Eight argue about the knife?

He argued that the knife was a common knife and that anyone could’ve had that style knife and killed his father. This was explained by the following text in the play:

Do you hear the names of the jurors in the play?

You never hear the names of the jurors, anyone involved in the case, or even the witnesses. The lack of names given in the play was a reminder that it’s not the single person that matters in a jury. It’s the jury and its part in the judicial process. The defendant is mentioned as either defendant, accused, or boy.

What is the plot of 12 angry men?

As the 12 Angry Men plot opens, a judge is giving a jury instructions as they are preparing to go into deliberations. They are sitting on a murder case where the accused is a young Hispanic man. As the jury gets settled in, they take a quick vote to see where they stand. It appears that the kid is guilty and 11 of the jurors are quick to rule so.

What does Henry Fonda do in Juror 8?

It is quite incredible that Juror #8 is on this list considering what Henry Fonda does for most of the movie. He sits at a table, he washes his face, and in the big action sequence he paces a equivalent to walking once or twice around the table.

Why did Juror 9 change his vote?

The vote was now 10-2. Someone (Juror 9) changed his vote. Not because he was convinced, but because he thought the conversation should continue. Juror 8 slowly, but methodically, questioned every fact in order to get to the truth. As each layer unraveled, the number of people who were sure of the kid’s guilt dwindled.

How does jury work?

The jury system works. It works because people who make up the jury take the process seriously. They discuss the issues. They ask each other questions and they debate, sometimes loudly, to get to the bottom of what they had heard in the courtroom.

What is the purpose of a court case?

A court case is about presenting facts. Whether it is a civil case or a criminal case, the goal is to present facts. Each side may disagree on what is fact and each side may have different views as to what the facts mean. That is where the jury comes in. They need to wade through everything they hear and decide what they believe the truth is. Sometimes the facts may not fit the circumstance and that is where having an impartial jury is vital to our legal system.

What is the accused kid in the play?

Accused kid. Although the accused youth never appears as a character on stage, discussion of his actions and motivations drives the play. The youth is referred to as a “kid” by many of the jurors. He grew up in a slum without a mother, and is an immigrant—all facts that color the jurors ideas about him and his guilt.

What does Juror Eight say in Act 1?

Juror Eight replies that he wants to be heard out. He explains that “slum kid s” get tough and angry because “we” – meaning society – are always knocking them down. ... (full context) Act 2. ...that he would vote “not guilty” if he could see any evidence in the accused kid ’s favor.

What happens if there is no reasonable doubt in your mind?

The life of another is at stake. If there is a reasonable doubt in your minds as to the guilt of the accused . . . then you must declare him not guilty. If, however, there is no reasonable doubt, then he must be found guilty. Whichever way you decide, the verdict must be unanimous.

What is the most serious charge in the first degree?

Act 1 Quotes. Murder in the first degree—premeditated homicide—is the most serious charge tried in our criminal courts. You've heard a long and complex case, gentlemen, and it is now your duty to sit down to try and separate the facts from the fancy. One man is dead. The life of another is at stake.

Who holds the knife in the direction of Eight's belly?

Three looks long and hard at juror Eight and weaves a bit from side to side as he holds knife with point of it in direction of Eight’s belly. Eight speaks quietly, firmly.] Not guilty. [ Three turns knife around and Eight takes it by handle.

Did the shorter kid stab his father?

It seems like the shorter kid should not have stabbed his taller father with a downward stroke. (full context) Eight points out that the kid was an experienced knife fighter; he was sent to reform school for stabbing someone else.... (full context) ...who has used such a knife before would never stab downward.