why would a lawyer call for a peremptory challenge

A peremptory challenge is used by attorneys in the jury selection process to excuse potential jurors without providing a reason why. In this lesson you will learn about the use of peremptory strikes, as well as the laws designed to protect the integrity of the process.

Full Answer

What is a peremptory challenge in criminal law?

Apr 17, 2020 · A peremptory challenge can be a major part of voir dire. A peremptory challenge also allows attorneys to veto a potential juror on a 'hunch'. The idea behind peremptory challenges is that if both parties have contributed in the configuration of the jury, they will find its verdict more acceptable.

How many peremptory challenges can a lawyer file?

Jul 19, 2017 · The reasons why a party, or more likely the attorney, will choose to file a peremptory challenge may vary. An attorney could have a personality conflict with a judge, the judge may have a perceived bias on an important issue in the case, there may be uncertainty as to how a judge may rule on a specific issue of the case, the judge may be new to the bench and his or …

Does a prospective juror’s race influence peremptory challenge use?

One of a limited number of special jury challenges given to each party before trial. A peremptory challenge results in the exclusion of a potential juror without the need for any reason or explanation - unless the opposing party presents a prima facie argument that this challenge was used to discriminate on the basis of race, ethnicity, or sex.

What is the balancing test for a peremptory challenge?

A peremptory challenge is used by attorneys in the jury selection process to excuse potential jurors without providing a reason why.

What is an example of a peremptory challenge?

What are the benefits of peremptory challenges?

Why would an attorney use a peremptory challenge quizlet?

When should a peremptory challenge not be used?

What is a challenge for cause?

How many peremptory challenges is each lawyer allowed to have in the state of NC?

What is the meaning of peremptory challenge?

What is the difference between a peremptory challenge and a challenge for cause quizlet?

What does a peremptory challenge do quizlet?

What is the difference between a challenge for cause and a peremptory challenge?

What does challenge mean in court?

How many challenges for cause does each lawyer receive?

What is a Peremptory Challenge?

A peremptory challenge is the act of removing a potential juror from a trial without explicit reason. The defendant and prosecutor are granted this power; the goal is that by balancing the power to remove jurors, biases can be eliminated, and the ensuing trial will be fair.

Reasons for a Peremptory Challenge

Peremptory challenges occur during the process of jury selection, or voir dire, and are one of the ways the legal system attempts to ensure a fair trial. Ideally, peremptory challenges are used to minimize the risk of bias on the part of jurors who may unconsciously pick a side in the trial in a way that subverts their entirely rational judgment.

Examples of Peremptory Challenge

A series of Supreme Court cases illustrate both the relatively recent controversy about peremptory challenges and the attempts to preserve them in the American legal system.

The Impact of a Peremptory Challenge

The ideal impact of a peremptory challenge is that a trial is fairer and more fully rational than if such challenges were not used to create a better jury. How is it that removing a juror without an explicit rationale could achieve fairness? The answer to this question comes down to the idea of balance.

What happens if you use peremptory challenges to excuse all of the Hispanic males from the jury

If you use your peremptory challenges to excuse all of the Hispanic males from the jury pool, you are setting yourself up for a Batson challenge.

Why are jurors excluded from a trial?

Jurors may also be excluded because the attorneys and the judge believe that the juror, for whatever reason, can't be fair. This is called a 'for cause' challenge. The number of peremptory challenges given to each side depends on the jurisdiction and the type of case.

What did the Supreme Court rule about Batson?

The Supreme Court ruled that using peremptory challenges to exclude potential jurors based solely on their race constituted a violation of the defendant's Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights.

What is the Batson challenge?

Now, if a defendant suspects that the prosecution has used its peremptory challenges for the explicit purpose of eliminating potential jurors based on their race, the defendant can make an objection to the discriminatory composition of the jury. This objection is known as a Batson challenge.

How does the Supreme Court rule in Miller El v. Dretke?

Dretke case, the Supreme Court ruled that a defendant may use statistical analysis to prove that the prosecution used peremptory challenges to exclude jurors based on race. For example, Juror 22 and Juror 42 answer the same questions and give the same answers during jury selection. They both are Army veterans. They both work in construction. They both attend church regularly. Juror 22 is African American and Juror 42 is white. If the prosecution uses a peremptory challenge to excuse Juror 22 (and not Juror 42), the defendant can use a comparison of the two similar jurors in order to prove the racial motivation behind the prosecution's selection.

How to overcome the Batson challenge?

To overcome a Batson challenge, the prosecution must offer a neutral explanation for excusing the jurors. If the prosecution can't provide such an explanation, the defendant may get a new trial. Imagine you are a prosecutor in a large city.

What is the process of jury selection?

The jury selection process, also know as 'voir dire', involves attorneys from each side taking turns picking the jurors they believe will favor their position over their opponent's. The term peremptory challenge refers to the practice of excusing potential jurors without providing a reason why. Jurors may also be excluded because the attorneys and the judge believe that the juror, for whatever reason, can't be fair. This is called a 'for cause' challenge.

What is a peremptory challenge?

In a legal context, the term peremptory refers to a decisive challenge with no opportunity given for debate, denial, or refusal. A peremptory challenge may be used by either party to a legal action in the jury-selection phase, to dismiss a potential juror without stating a reason. Other peremptory orders may be made by the court, ...

What is the peremptory process?

While the term peremptory may be used to refer to a variety of rulings, orders, or decisions in the U .S. legal system, its most common use is in the jury selection process. When a jury is needed for a trial, potential jurors report to the courthouse, where they go through a selection process known as voir dire. During this process, the judge and the parties’ attorneys question each potential juror to determine whether any have a bias toward the case or the defendant.

What is the purpose of jury trial?

The purpose of a jury trial is to ensure that court cases are heard, considered, and decided by an unbiased panel of the defendant’s peers. Empaneling jurors who are prejudiced about the case before it even begins would not meet this goal. The voir dire process allows the parties to weed out jurors who, for some reason, may not be able to provide an impartial opinion, or who may not be able to serve without distractions, such as a health problem, or small children left at home during a long trial.

What was the precedent in the Baston case?

As such, the matter was returned for a new trial. The precedent set by Baston has since been expanded to include dismissal by peremptory challenge of individuals based on sex.

Why is excluding jurors based on race bad?

wrote that excluding jurors based on race not only violates the rights of the accused to a fair and unbiased trial, but is “devastating to the community at large,” because it “undermines public confidence in the fairness of our system of justice.”.

What is a jury in a trial?

Jury – A group of people sworn to render a verdict in a trial, based on evidence presented.

How old is William from the frat party?

For example: William has been charged with sexual assault of a young woman at a frat party on campus. William is a 19-year old white college student from an affluent family, and enjoys a position of stature among his fellow students.

How did the prosecution use peremptory strikes?

Flowers claimed the prosecution used peremptory strikes in a racially discriminatory way by the disparate questioning of black jurors, by responding differently to voir dire answers from black jurors, and by mischaracterizing the black jurors’ responses to voir dire answers. Id. at 1124. The Court rejected each of these claims. Id. at 1135. The defense argued that black jurors answered more questions than white jurors, which the state acknowledged as a possible sign of discrimination but concluded that “[D]isparate questioning is not dispositive of racial discrimination.” Id. at 1125. Further, the court found that each of the prosecution’s race neutral reasons for striking the five black jurors were well represented by the evidence. Id. at 1135. The defense argued that many of the race neutral reasons were applicable to white jurors who had not been struck. Id. at 1126-35 (arguing in favor of the prosecution’s facially neutral reasons for all five black panelists struck). The Court relied on various distinctions to qualify the prosecutions’ reasons, thus rejecting Flowers’ claims of discriminatory treatment to black jurors. Id. at 1135.

What case held that racial classifications remain impermissible when they are visited upon all persons?

Powers v. Ohio , 499 U.S. 400 (1991)at 410. Subsequent cases have modified the Batson holding and provide some clarity of how Batson violations are analyzed.

What was the Supreme Court's decision in Flowers v. Mississippi?

The Supreme Court of Mississippi on appeal of Flowers VIdecided that the trial court did not err in accepting the prosecution’s peremptory strikes and denying Flower’s Batson challenge. Flowers v. Miss., 240 So.3d 1082, 1116-35 (2017). During jury selection of Flowers VI, DA Evans exercised peremptory strikes for six jurors, after accepting the first black juror. Id. at 1122. The trial court found a prima facie case of discrimination because five of the six jurors struck were black, which was ultimately denied. Id. On appeal, the defense asked the Supreme Court of Mississippi to review the trial court’s rejection of the Batsonchallenge. Id.

What is the legal issue in Batson v. Kentucky?

Legal issue: peremptory challenges The critical case regarding peremptory challenges is Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986). Batson established that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment forbids prosecutors from exercising their peremptory challenges to strike potential jurors solely on account of their race. The Court outlined a three-step balancing test to determine if a prosecutor has exercised a peremptory challenge is a racially impermissible manner:

What are the problems with the post-Batson case?

Post-Batson case decisions have been described as “indeterminate, unprincipled, and ineffective.1One aspect that has led to these problems is the legal ambiguity concerning evidentiary framework that is necessary for a proper understanding of empirical results in Batson cases. Later Supreme Court cases laid parameters that helped courts apply the proper understanding to subsequent Batson cases. A study created by David Baldus, focuses on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court case, Commonwealth v. Harold Wilson, which successfully argued for dismissal of a Batson-like claim by using statistical evidence and Supreme Court guidance. The evidence compared the use of peremptory strikes in Wilsonwith the use of peremptory strikes by previous district attorneys.

What was the court finding in Foster v. Batson?

To illustrate, in Foster, the court found that the prosecutor had engaged in impermissible racial discrimination in striking two prospective black jurors. In noting the evidence that pointed to a Batson violation, the court explained that the State gave shifting explanations for the strike, the State misrepresented the record, and there was a persistent focus in the prosecutor’s file on race, including the placement of the letter ‘B’ next to each black prospective juror’s name.

Can a race-based challenge avoid a Batson challenge?

Another study which demonstrated how race-based peremptory challenges could avoid a Batson Challenge and exclude African-Americans from jury participation was conducted by Samuel Sommers and Michael Norton.3The authors recruited three groups of college students, law students, and attorneys who participated in a mock jury selection process. Across all three samples, the authors found that a prospective juror’s race does indeed influence peremptory challenge use; moreover, when justifying their peremptory challenge use, participants rarely cited race as an influential factor, instead claiming racially neutral reasons for their use of peremptory challenges. As such, the authors conclude that the use of Batson Challenges is flawed, since prosecutors can and likely do use race-neutral reasons to excuse their racially-biased peremptory challenges.

What is a peremptory challenge?

Peremptory Challenge. The right to challenge a juror without assigning, or being required to assign, a reason for the challenge.During the selection of a jury, both parties to the proceeding may challenge prospective jurors for a lack of impartiality, known as a challenge for cause. A party may challenge an unlimited number ...

Why are peremptory challenges so difficult?

These challenges, however, have become more difficult to exercise because the U.S. Supreme Court has forbidden peremptory strikes based on race or gender.

Why did white prosecutors use their peremptory challenges to remove African Americans from the jury when the criminal defendant was

Critics claimed that white prosecutors used their peremptory challenges to remove African Americans from the jury when the criminal defendant was also African American because the prosecutors thought that the potential jurors would be sympathetic to a member of their own race.

Why did white prosecutors use peremptory challenges?

Critics claimed that white prosecutors used their peremptory challenges to remove African Americans from the jury when the criminal defendant was also African American because the prosecutors thought that the potential jurors would be sympathetic to a member of their own race. This constituted racial discriminationand a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause.

What is the Supreme Court ruling in Batson?

In an extension of Batson, the Supreme Court of Connecticut ruled that the Equal Protection Clause barred the prosecutor from striking prospective jurors based on their religious affiliation. The court, in State v. Hodge, 726 A.2d 531 (Conn.1999), distinguished religious beliefs and religious affiliations. It held that litigants could strike prospective jurors whose religious beliefs would prevent them from performing their duties as jurors.

Which state took an early giant leap from the typical Batson analysis to recognize gender as an impermissible reason to

On the other side of the spectrum, North Dakota took an early, giant leap from the typical Batson analysis to recognize gender as an impermissible reason to use a peremptory challenge on a juror before the United States Supreme Court addressed this issue in J.E.B.

When did the peremptory challenge come under legal attack?

Peremptory challenges came under legal attack in the 1980s.

What is a peremptory challenge?

A challenge for cause is an objection to a juror alleging that the juror is incapable or unfit to serve on the jury. You have A peremptory challenge is made to a juror without assigning any reason. You have ten peremptory challenges.

What is the difference between a peremptory challenge and a challenge for cause?

There are two basic differences between a challenge for cause and a peremptory challenge. A lawyer may generally use a peremptory challenge without giving a reason. Second, the number of challenges for cause available to the attorneys is unlimited, while the number of peremptory challenges is limited by statute. Click to see full answer.

Reasons For A Peremptory Challenge

• Peremptory challenges occur during the process of jury selection, or voir dire, and are one of the ways the legal system attempts to ensure a fair trial. Ideally, peremptory challenges are used to minimize the risk of bias on the part of jurors who may unconsciously pick a side in the trial in a way that subverts their entirely rational judgment.

See more on study.com

Examples of Peremptory Challenge

The Impact of A Peremptory Challenge