who defended lawyer for british soldiers after boston massacre

by Birdie Franecki 5 min read

The Boston Massacre, in which British redcoats
redcoats
Red coat (also spelled as "redcoat") or scarlet tunic was a military garment used widely, though not exclusively worn, by most regiments of the British Army, Royal Marines, and some colonial units within the British Empire, from the 17th to the 20th centuries.
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Red_coat_(military_uniform)
killed five American civilians. Adams defended the British officer Thomas Preston and his soldiers in two separate trials.
Apr 2, 2020

Who was John Adams — defense attorney for British soldiers?

John Adams — Defense Attorney for British Soldiers? Why a Founding Father represented British soldiers during the Boston Massacre Trials aptain Thomas Preston and eight British soldiers were on trial for murder. They would need an excellent attorney to represent them with a jury full of anti-British colonists.

Who did John Adams defend in the Boston Massacre?

Adams defended the British officer Thomas Preston and his soldiers in two separate trials. Can you talk about the balancing act Adams undertook to defend all his clients without alienating his fellow Bostonians, many of whom fervently supported the broader patriot cause?

Who was on trial for the Boston Massacre?

Next on trial were the eight soldiers under Preston’s command on the night of the Boston Massacre. There was a different jury for this trial and they were, once again, sequestered. During the seven-day trial, more than eighty witnesses were called to testify.

What testimony did the defense have in the Boston Massacre?

Witnesses recalled how the mob had repeatedly called for the British soldiers to be killed. Particularly effective testimony for the defense came from Dr. John Jeffries, who had tended to one of the colonists killed on the night of March 5, 1770.

image

Who were the lawyers in the Boston Massacre trial?

The prosecution lawyers were Robert Treat Paine and Samuel Quincy. The defense team included John Adams, Josiah Quincy, Jr. (Samuel Quincy's brother), Sampson Salter Blowers, and Robert Auchmuty. Both trials lasted longer than one day, which was rare at this time for Massachusetts courts.

Who was the lawyer who defended the 8 British soldiers?

John Adamsaptain Thomas Preston and eight British soldiers were on trial for murder. They would need an excellent attorney to represent them with a jury full of anti-British colonists. Who would be willing to take on such a task? Patriot and Founding Father John Adams stepped up to the job.

Why did Adams defend British soldiers?

Without hesitation Adams agreed to defend the soldiers and their captain. Above all, John Adams believed in upholding the law, and defending the innocent. Adams was convinced that the soldiers were wrongly accused, and had fired into the crowd in self-defense.

What is Crispus Attucks legacy?

Over the almost 250 years since his death, Crispus Attucks has remained a symbol for various movements advocating for African American rights, from Abolitionism to the Civil Rights Movement. 21st Century movements have been no different.

Who was the African American sailor killed in the Boston Massacre?

Crispus AttucksCrispus Attucks, a sailor of mixed African and Indigenous ancestry, died in Boston on March 5, 1770 after British soldiers fired two musket balls into his chest. His death and that of four other men at the hands of the 29th Regiment became known as the Boston Massacre.

Who was Captain Preston?

Thomas Preston ( c. 1722—c. 1798) was a British officer, a captain who served in Boston in the Province of Massachusetts Bay. He commanded troops in the Boston Massacre in 1770 and was tried for murder, but he was acquitted.

Did John Adams participate in the Boston Tea Party?

Adams Reacts to the Boston Tea Party When he returned the very next morning, he was shocked that the Sons of Liberty undertook such a foolhardy course, but was nonetheless pleasantly surprised.

What did John Adams do?

Adams was a Massachusetts delegate to the Continental Congress and became a leader of the revolution. He assisted Jefferson in drafting the Declaration of Independence in 1776. As a diplomat in Europe, he helped negotiate a peace treaty with Great Britain and secured vital governmental loans.

Who was the first colonist killed in the Boston Massacre?

After a soldier was knocked down, someone fired into the crowd, confused, and killed the first colonist in the Revolutionary War — Crispus Attucks. Panic ensued, and soldiers fired into the crowd of colonists. After the skirmish ended, five of the colonists had been killed.

How did the Boston Massacre impact the legal system?

The impact on today’s legal system. The Boston Massacre trials served as a landmark case for the new justice system in the colonies. This trial was the first time that a jury was sequestered, which is now typical practice in high profile cases. The standard of reasonable doubt was also introduced during this trial.

Why was Boston important to the British?

Boston was a major port for trade as well as a hotbed for Patriot activity and organization. Britain stationed a large garrison of troops in the city with the aim of controlling unruly colonists who were resisting customs officials. On March 5, 1770, a crowd gathered outside the Customs House that was being guarded by the British.

What did Adams and the defense argue about the crowd?

Adams and the defense argued that the crowd was endangering the soldiers’ lives and they acted in self-defense. He called witnesses that described how the crowd verbally threatened the soldiers and threw objects at them. Witnesses recalled how the mob had repeatedly called for the British soldiers to be killed.

How many soldiers were found not guilty of murder?

After deliberating for three hours, the jury found all eight soldiers not guilty of murder. Two of the men were found guilty of the lesser charge of manslaughter and their penalty was reduced to branding on the thumb. The other six soldiers were completely cleared of all charges.

What was the Boston Massacre called?

Before the trial, Loyalists and Patriots engaged in a propaganda war. Patriot cartoons and articles painted the riot as an all-out attack by aggressive British soldiers. Paul Revere even published a cartoon which he named The Bloody Massacre, leading the riot to be known as the Boston Massacre.

What were the tensions between the British and the American colonies?

American colonists wanted more independence and control over their economy. The Americans were prospering on their own and desired to break free of colonial control.

Who was the British grenadier who was involved in the Boston Massacre?

Photo Courtesy of Independence National Historical Park. The crowd strained forward in the Queen Street courtroom on October 17, 1770. Murmurs and rumblings of anger filled the air. Captain Thomas Preston, a British grenadier, shifted his feet nervously and felt the sweat rising to his brow.

Who was the lawyer who was the only hope for Preston and his men?

That is what these Bostonians wanted! The only hope for Preston and his men lay with this short, stocky country lawyer—a colonial American after all—John Adams, and his too young assistant Josiah Quincy. Seven months had passed since the “horrid, bloody massacre” took place on the 5thof March.

What did Adams mean by the phrase "Plea of Clergy"?

The “Plea of Clergy” meant that instead of death, the two men would be branded on the thumbs as first offenders, never to be permitted to violate the law again.

Early Life

John Adams was born on October 30, 1735, to his father, John Adams Sr., and his mother, Susanna Boylston, and had two younger brothers, Peter and Elihu.

Boston Massacre

The Boston Massacre was a conflict in Boston on March 5, 1770. British soldiers shot and killed many people, perceiving them as a mob, and leading patriots including Paul Revere and Samuel Adams heavily publicized the event.

Boston massacre trial

Following the Boston Massacre, Captain Thomas Preston, eight British soldiers, and five British civilians were charged for murder. They were exposed to the possibility of execution and could not find a defense team as they would have to defend them in the anti-British city of Boston.

Balancing Act of Adams to defend his clients without distancing his fellow Bostonians

These days, criminal defense lawyers regularly take John Adams’s defense of the British soldiers to to represent specific clients. He did not blame the city for initiating the riot and focused on facts.

Conclusion

It is generally unsatisfying to get a mixed verdict in a case involving so much passion and emotion. However, these cases serve as a compelling example, and the Boston Massacre trial was among these trials.

image

Trouble in The Colonies

The Search For Justice

  • Governor Thomas Hutchinson arranged to have the accused soldiers removed to an island in Boston Harbor. The Attorney General issued murder indictments for Captain Thomas Preston and eight other soldiers for their participation in the riot. Before the trial, Loyalists and Patriots engaged in a propaganda war. Patriot cartoons and articles painted the riot as an all-out attack …
See more on historyofyesterday.com

The Trial Begins

  • Preston’s trial began on October 24, 1770. For the first time, the jury was sequestered away from family and friends for the duration of the trial. The key question was whether or not Preston had given the order to fire. Preston strongly denied giving any such order. Witness testimony was mixed, with some saying he gave the order and others declaring he did not. Adams was able to i…
See more on historyofyesterday.com

The Verdict Is Delivered

  • In his closing statements, Adams reminded the jury of the law of self-defense. He recalled testimony that the crowd was chanting to kill the British soldiers. Adams implored the jury to consider how they would react when a mob was calling for their death. He entreated the jury to judge the case based on facts and evidence, rather than their Patriot...
See more on historyofyesterday.com

The Impact on Today’S Legal System

  • The Boston Massacre trials served as a landmark case for the new justice system in the colonies. This trial was the first time that a jury was sequestered, which is now typical practice in high profile cases. The standard of reasonable doubt was also introduced during this trial. In his instructions, one of the judges reminded the jurors that they needed to be “convinced beyond a r…
See more on historyofyesterday.com

Early Life

Boston Massacre

  • The Boston Massacre was a conflict in Boston on March 5, 1770. British soldiers shot and killed many people, perceiving them as a mob, and leading patriots including Paul Revere and Samuel Adams heavily publicized the event. Boston, the capital of the Massachusetts Bay, was a significant shipping town and a center of resistance to unpopular taxation acts by the British Par…
See more on historyten.com

Boston Massacre Trial

  • Following the Boston Massacre, Captain Thomas Preston, eight British soldiers, and five British civilians were charged for murder. They were exposed to the possibility of execution and could not find a defense team as they would have to defend them in the anti-British city of Boston. John Adams realized that there was a lot at stake for colonial America, and it was important for the a…
See more on historyten.com

John Adams’ Role in The Boston Massacre Trial

  • In the trial, Adams said that Captain Preston had never ordered his soldiers to fire. He also put forward that those who had shot into the crowd did so entirely for self-defense. He called the people involved in the mob who provoked the soldiers “outlandish Jack tars.” H” persuaded and won th” case releasing Preston and six of his soldiers on all c...
See more on historyten.com

Conclusion

  • It is generally unsatisfying to get a mixed verdict in a case involving so much passion and emotion. However, these cases serve as a compelling example, and the Boston Massacre trial was among these trials. The Boston massacre could have led to a revolution, but it did not, as people accepted it was a very controversial verdict. For firing against the orders of Captain Prest…
See more on historyten.com