why lawyer says conflict of interest

by Lelah Bradtke 6 min read

In general, when an attorney is said to have a legal conflict of interest, it typically means they are working on a case or with clients that have adverse interests without their permission. Some common attorney conflict of interest examples may include the following actions:

[8] Even where there is no direct adverseness, a conflict of interest exists if there is a significant risk that a lawyer's ability to consider, recommend or carry out an appropriate course of action for the client will be materially limited as a result of the lawyer's other responsibilities or interests.

Full Answer

What constitutes a conflict of interest for an attorney?

What Constitutes A Conflict Of Interest? Conflicts of interest represent a severe ethical violation that occurs when attorneys put one client’s interest before that of another client. An attorney’s loyalties should be singular, not divided. Any conflict must be disclosed immediately, even if it is only a potential or perceived conflict.

Does my lawyer have a conflict of interest?

To determine whether a conflict of interest exists, a lawyer should adopt reasonable procedures, appropriate for the size and type of firm and practice, to determine in both litigation and non-litigation matters the persons and issues involved.

Would it be a conflict of interest if a lawyer?

Why were you out there on that day doing this?” April Turner said. The public defender did not reveal what the conflict of interest was, but Conley must now retain new legal representation for his next hearing.

Is it a conflict of interest when you lawyer is?

Lawyers and law practices are prohibited from acting where a conflict of interest exists, or where there is a perception of a conflict. There are three common scenarios where a lawyer or law practice may come across a conflict of interest: representing one client against a former client;

image

What is an example of a conflict of interest in law?

For example, if the client is looking to sue a particular business that happens to be owned by the lawyer's brother-in-law, there's a clear conflict of interest for the attorney. It's also possible for there to be an issue if the potential client's interests are at odds with the attorney's own interests.

What usually happens in a conflict of interest case?

What is a Conflict of Interest? A conflict of interest occurs when an individual's personal interests – family, friendships, financial, or social factors – could compromise his or her judgment, decisions, or actions in the workplace. Government agencies take conflicts of interest so seriously that they are regulated.

What is conflict of interest in legal terms?

A conflict of interest exists if a legislator has any interest or engages in any business, transaction, or professional activity, or incurs any obligation, which is in substantial conflict with the proper discharge of his or her duties in the public interest.

What are the two major causes of conflict of interest in law?

There are two different sets of circumstances which may constitute a concurrent conflict of interest. One is when the representation of one client would be directly adverse to the other client. [4] This occurs when the interests of one client requires the lawyer to act against the interest of his other client.

What are the 4 types of conflict of interest?

Conflict of InterestContractual or legal obligations (to business partners, vendors, employees, employer, etc.)Loyalty to family and friends.Fiduciary duties.Professional duties.Business interests.

What are the consequences of conflict of interest?

When conflict of interest does occur, it can erode public and internal trust, damage the organization's reputation, hurt the business financially, and in some cases, even break the law. This issue impacts organizations across the board – non-profits, public sector, and private sector.

What are the three types of conflicts of interest?

Part 3: Different types of conflicts of interestfinancial conflict;non-financial conflict;conflict of roles; or.predetermination.

Are conflicts of interest illegal?

Like other types of illegal or unethical activities, conflict of interest activities carry the risk of consequences. Federal and state laws have been set up to criminalize conflicts of interest in the public sector, and in certain circumstances, conflict of interest can result in prosecution.

How do you identify conflict of interest?

If you and a relative are both lawyers, it is generally considered a conflict of interest for you to represent opposing parties. A lawyer may represent his or her own relatives, but it is a conflict of interest when the lawyer is representing a party opposing their relatives.

What happens if a lawyer has a conflict of interest?

If a conflict does arise between the clients' interests, the lawyer or law practice must cease acting for one or both of the parties immediately.

How do you avoid conflict of interest?

How to Prevent Conflicts of InterestAsk Employees to Disclose Any Conflicts of Interest. Honesty really is the best policy. ... Create a Conflict of Interest Policy. ... Avoid Nepotism. ... Create a plan for managing conflicts of interest in your small business.

Why is conflict of interest important?

Actual conflicts of interest or commitment can compromise the integrity of research or result in serious financial consequences. While these consequences could be significant, if everyone follows the established processes, it will ensure the integrity and reputation of the Institute and all of its faculty and staff.

What are some examples of conflicts of interest between an attorney and a client?

An attorney should carefully evaluate if there are current or previous personal dealings with a potential client. Examples would be a romantic relationship, friendship, or other affiliation.

What is conflict of interest?

A conflict of interest is defined as a conflict between professional duties and private interests, or when there is a conflict between the duty to one client and another. As you know, this term always has a negative connotation, as well it should.

What is a conflict between an attorney and a third party?

Conflicts involving third parties. An attorney should represent the client without having their judgment affected by other parties. This type of conflict may arise when a client’s fees are being paid for by a third party.

What happens if an attorney represents both parties in a divorce case?

Another scenario: A party seeks representation from an attorney to sue a neighbor in a civil claims case. If the attorney also represents the neighbor’s business, there would be a potential conflict of interest.

Can an attorney take on a new client?

An attorney may not take on a new client who has interests that are adverse to the former client’s interests. The grey area here exists in defining what time frame determines a “former” client. There is no legal definition, and the attorney must decide this in an objective manner.

Do clients have to be ethically represented?

All clients are entitled to ethical representation by their attorney, and clients should expect that they will be represented without bias. One area where bias may present itself is conflict of interest.

Can a lawyer have sex with a client in Minnesota?

Minnesota is specific about the first in their Rules of Professional Conduct, stating “A lawyer is prohibited from engaging in sexual relationships with a client unless the sexual relationship predates the formation of the client-lawyer relationship.”. Affiliations could be, for example, group memberships.

What is an actual conflict of interest?

A conflict is considered “actual” if a person’s attorney took actions or refrained from taking actions that harmed the person being defended and benefitted another individual.

Why is ineffective counsel challenging?

Creating a successful ineffective counsel claim can be particularly challenging because courts tend to presume that a lawyer’s representation was constitutionally adequate. One of the most common bases that our law firm recognizes for ineffective assistance of counsel claims involves conflicts of interest.

Why did the San Antonio judge lose his appeal?

Three years after being sentenced to federal prison for the receipt of bribes from a San Antonio lawyer, a former district judge lost an appeal. Part of the appeal alleges that the man’s former attorneys convinced him not to cooperate with an FBI investigation because these attorneys were among those being investigated. Due to this conflict of interest, the former judge argues that a violation occurred of his Sixth Amendment right to effective counsel.

Can conflicts of interest happen?

While conflicts of interest should not happen, it is, unfortunately, the case that they sometimes do. If you need to create a strong appeal for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, do not hesitate to contact the Federal Criminal Law Center today.

Did the former judge waive a claim of conflict of interest?

In the ruling that was issued, the appellate court found that the former judge had waived a claim of conflict of interest even though no hearing was held to discuss these allegations. The court found that even if the judge was ignorant of a potential risk of conflicts as well as his right to non-conflicted counsel, the former judge still waived any conflict of interest issues. The former judge’s attorney has already expressed his disagreement with the court’s decision and announced plans to appeal the ruling.

What is a conflict of interest in a lawyer?

[8] Even where there is no direct adverseness, a conflict of interest exists if there is a significant risk that a lawyer's ability to consider, recommend or carry out an appropriate course of action for the client will be materially limited as a result of the lawyer's other responsibilities or interests. For example, a lawyer asked to represent several individuals seeking to form a joint venture is likely to be materially limited in the lawyer's ability to recommend or advocate all possible positions that each might take because of the lawyer's duty of loyalty to the others. The conflict in effect forecloses alternatives that would otherwise be available to the client. The mere possibility of subsequent harm does not itself require disclosure and consent. The critical questions are the likelihood that a difference in interests will eventuate and, if it does, whether it will materially interfere with the lawyer's independent professional judgment in considering alternatives or foreclose courses of action that reasonably should be pursued on behalf of the client.

Why do conflict cases exist?

A conflict may exist by reason of substantial discrepancy in the parties' testimony, incompatibility in positions in relation to an opposing party or the fact that there are substantially different possibilities of settlement of the claims or liabilities in question.

What is informed consent?

[18] Informed consent requires that each affected client be aware of the relevant circumstances and of the material and reasonably foreseeable ways that the conflict could have adverse effects on the interests of that client . See Rule 1.0 (e) (informed consent). The information required depends on the nature of the conflict and the nature of the risks involved. When representation of multiple clients in a single matter is undertaken, the information must include the implications of the common representation, including possible effects on loyalty, confidentiality and the attorney-client privilege and the advantages and risks involved. See Comments [30] and [31] (effect of common representation on confidentiality).

Why is a lawyer asked to represent several individuals seeking to form a joint venture likely to be materially limited in?

For example, a lawyer asked to represent several individuals seeking to form a joint venture is likely to be materially limited in the lawyer's ability to recommend or advocate all possible positions that each might take because of the lawyer's duty of loyalty to the others.

What are the critical questions in a lawyer?

The critical questions are the likelihood that a difference in interests will eventuate and, if it does, whether it will materially interfere with the lawyer's independent professional judgment in considering alternatives or foreclose courses of action that reasonably should be pursued on behalf of the client.

What are the principles of a lawyer?

General Principles. [1] Loyalty and independent judgment are essential elements in the lawyer's relationship to a client. Concurrent conflicts of interest can arise from the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client or a third person or from the lawyer's own interests. For specific Rules regarding certain concurrent conflicts ...

Can a client terminate a lawyer's representation?

[21] A client who has given consent to a conflict may revoke the consent and, like any other client, may terminate the lawyer's representation at any time. Whether revoking consent to the client's own representation precludes the lawyer from continuing to represent other clients depends on the circumstances, including the nature of the conflict, whether the client revoked consent because of a material change in circumstances, the reasonable expectations of the other client and whether material detriment to the other clients or the lawyer would result.

Why should a lawyer examine whether a conflict of interest exists?

A lawyer should examine whether a conflict of interest exists not only from the outset but throughout the duration of the retainer because new circumstances or information may establish or reveal a conflict of interest. For example, the addition of new parties in litigation or in a transaction can give rise to new conflicts of interest that must be addressed.

How to determine if there is a conflict of interest?

To determine whether there is a conflict of interest that would prevent you from acting for a client: 1 First, determine if there is a conflict of interest. 2 Second, if there is a conflict of interest, determine whether you may act despite the conflict of interest

Why is disclosure required?

Disclosure is an essential requirement to obtaining a client’s consent and arises from the duty of candour owed to the client. Where it is not possible to provide the client with adequate disclosure because of the confidentiality of the information of another client, the lawyer must decline to act.

What are the duties of a former client?

Duties owed to a former client reflected in Rule 3.4-10 can also impair client representation and loyalty. Since the duty of confidentiality continues after the retainer has been completed, the duty of confidentiality owed to a former client may conflict with the duty of candour owed to a current client if information from the former matter would be relevant to the current matter. Lawyers also have a duty not to act against a former client in the same or a related matter even where the former client’s confidential information is not at risk. In order to determine the existence of a conflict of interest, a lawyer should consider whether the representation of the current client in a matter includes acting against a former client. Rules 3.4-10 and 3.4-11 deal specifically with the lawyer’s obligations when acting against a former client.

What is the duty of confidentiality in Rule 3.4-2?

Rule 3.4-2 permits a lawyer to act in a conflict in certain circumstances with the clients’ consent. The duty of confidentiality reflected in Rule 3.3-1 owed to both current and former clients may limit a lawyer’s ability to obtain client consent as permitted under Rule 3.4-2 because the lawyer may not be able to disclose the information required for proper consent. Where there is a conflict of interest and consent cannot be obtained for this reason, the lawyer must not act. In this regard, Rule 3.4-2 provides that client consent does not permit a lawyer to act where there would be actual impairment rather than merely the risk of impairment.

Why is open ended consent ineffective?

Therefore the more comprehensive the explanation of the types of future representations that might arise and the actual and reasonably foreseeable adverse consequences of those representations, the greater the likelihood that the client will have the requisite understanding. A general, open-ended consent will ordinarily be ineffective because it is not reasonably likely that the client will have understood the material risks involved. If the client is an experienced user of the legal services involved and is reasonably informed regarding the risk that a conflict may arise, such consent is more likely to be effective, particularly if, for example, the client is independently represented by other counsel in giving the consent and the consent is limited to future conflicts unrelated to the subject of the representation.

What should a lawyer inform the client of?

In making disclosure, the lawyer should therefore inform the client of the relevant circumstances and the reasonably foreseeable ways that the conflict of interest could adversely affect the client’s interests. This would include the lawyer’s relations to the parties and any interest in or connection with the matter.

What is the other authority for a lawyer?

Other authority will allow other attorneys in the firm to undertake representation adverse to the declined client, so long as the attorney who conducted the consultation is screened away from the case. This view is reflected in Restatement of the Law Third, The Law Governing Lawyers section 15 (2) (a) and ABA Rules of Model Professional Conduct, Rule 1.18.

Can an attorney disqualify an attorney who conducted the initial consultation?

The answer varies by jurisdiction. Many strictly disqualify the attorney who conducted the initial consultation, along with anyone else in that attorney's firm. For a comprehensive discussion of the issue and a leading authority for this view, see ABA Op. 90-358 (1990).

What does it mean when an attorney has a conflict of interest?

In general, when an attorney is said to have a legal conflict of interest, it typically means they are working on a case or with clients that have adverse interests without their permission. Some common attorney conflict of interest examples may include the following actions:

What are the conflicts of interest in a lawsuit?

A conflict of interest is a simultaneous representation of parties with opposing interests without their consent. The following are conflicts of interest that can lead to a malpractice claim: 1 Simultaneous representation of a man and a woman in divorce proceedings. 2 Simultaneous representation of two businesses who are suing each other. 3 Representation of a client whose interests conflict with those of a present or former client. 4 Lawyer’s private interests conflict with his professional interests – taking a case against a close personal friend. 5 Lawyer, or anyone related to or associated with the lawyer, has a direct or indirect financial interests in the outcome of the case.

What Other Actions by a Lawyer Can Lead to a Malpractice Claim?

There are several actions that a lawyer can take which may lead to a malpractice claim. Some examples of such actions may include:

What If I Gave My Attorney Permission to Commit an Action That Constitutes Malpractice?

There are certain situations wherein a client’s permission to commit malpractice may serve as a legal defense for an attorney who is being sued for committing an action that constitutes malpractice. For example, an attorney may raise this defense if a client’s consent was informed and could be used as a defense against that particular claim. Some cases may require that the client’s consent be in writing before it can be used as a legal defense.

How to recover damages from a lawyer?

In order to recover damages, a client will need to undergo the process of suing for conflict of interest if they believe their attorney has committed malpractice. This will typically require hiring a new lawyer, filing a malpractice claim in court, and following the necessary procedures used in most lawsuits (e.g., submitting requests for discovery).

What to do if you believe your attorney has committed an act of legal malpractice?

If you believe that your attorney has committed an act of legal malpractice or has an interest that conflicts with the issues in your case, you should speak to a local lawyer who specializes in such actions immediately for further legal guidance.

How to prove informed consent?

The attorney must prove that a client’s consent was informed by showing that they had full knowledge about the risks and consequences of following through with an action that constitutes malpractice. For instance, if an attorney explains the details of a plea deal to the extent that their client both understands and tells them to accept it, then this type of knowledge and permission would be considered an example of informed consent.

What is a conflict of interest in a lawyer?

Under this rule, the conflict of interest might be the attorney’s relationship with a third party, such as a close friend who stands to benefit or lose depending on the outcome of a case. Perhaps the relationship would not actually taint the lawyer’s representation of his client, but the perception that such a conflict exists may be strong enough to cause outsiders to question the attorney’s loyalty to the client.

Why do lawyers have inside information?

4. The attorney has “inside information” on the matter because of a former client. 5. Circumstances exist that may call into question the lawyer’s professional independence, loyalty, or confidentiality. The thing to remember is that attorneys are bound by rules designed to keep their practices ethical.

What are the rules for lawyers in Mississippi?

Mississippi’s ethics rules for attorneys say: A lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation of that client will be directly adverse to another client, unless the lawyer reasonably believes: (1) the representation will not adversely affect the relationship with the other client; and.

Why do attorneys decline to represent you?

If an attorney declines to represent you because of a conflict of interest, it is likely that such a decision is also in your best interests.

What is the first thing I have to do when prospective clients ask to speak to me about a case?

When prospective clients ask to speak to me about a case, the first thing I have to do is to conduct a “conflict check” – a review of my current and past dealings and associations – to try and avoid conflicts of interest. Conflicts of interest can be actual or perceived, but can have serious implications in either form. Attorneys can find themselves in hot water and even put their clients at risk if they aren’t thorough in their investigation of potential conflicts

Do attorneys have to be careful when taking on new cases?

Attorneys must be careful when taking on new cases to make sure they are aware of the interests of past clients . The last thing you want is for your attorney to realize he has a conflict because of a previous client in the middle of your case! Conflict of interest checks aren’t only for small or single-lawyer firms.

Can a lawyer represent a client?

A lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation of that client may be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client or to a third person, or by the lawyer's own interests, unless the lawyer reasonably believes: (2) the client has given knowing and informed consent after consultation.

What conflicts with a lawyer's interests?

Conflicts With The Lawyer’s Interests — Generally. A lawyer must consider whether a client’s interests conflict with the lawyer’s personal or business interests. Again, the issues directly relate to the lawyer’s duty of loyalty to the client.

Why was a Colorado lawyer suspended?

In People v. Wright, 698 P.2d 1317 (Colo. 1985), the Colorado Supreme Court suspended a lawyer for, in part, investing a client’s trust funds in a mining venture that the lawyer represented and in which the lawyer was also heavily invested. The lawyer failed to disclose his personal investment in the venture to the clients. The mining venture failed, and the client’s trust funds were lost. The court found that the lawyer had “allowed his personal interests to affect the exercise of his professional judgment on behalf of his client in violation of DR 5-101 (A).” Id. at 1320. Because of the conflict of interest and other ethical lapses, the lawyer received a two-year suspension. Id. ; People v. Mason, 938 P.2d 133 (Colo. 1997) (lawyer suspended after he took an interest in a client’s mountain cabin that was the subject of litigation); People v. Bennett, 843 P.2d 1385 (Colo. 1993) (lawyer disbarred).

What is a lawyer's transaction and terms?

the transaction and terms on which the lawyer acquires the interest are fair and reasonable to the client and are fully disclosed and transmitted in writing in a manner that can be reasonably understood by the client;

What is informed consent?

the client gives informed consent, in a writing signed by the client, to the essential teams of the transaction and the lawyer’s role in the transaction, including whether the lawyer is representing the client in the transaction.

What happens if there is a significant risk in a matter?

If there is a “significant risk” that the lawyer’s interest in the matter will cause the lawyer to materially limit the representation of the client, then there is a conflict and the lawyer may not undertake the representation absent informed consent from the client.

Can a lawyer have conflicting interests?

There are numerous circumstances in which the lawyer and client may have conflicting interests . The conflict may be as innocuous as the lawyer owning stock in a large corporation that a client intends to sue or as suspect as the lawyer having an undisclosed interest in a business in which the client intends to invest.

Can a lawyer be involved in a business transaction?

A lawyer may not participate in a business or financial transaction with a client, except a standard commercial transaction in which the lawyer does not render legal service, unless: the client has adequate information about the terms of the transaction and the risks presented by the lawyer’s involvement in it;

When a lawyer acquires an ownership interest in the subject of the representation, it will be more difficult for a?

In addition, when the lawyer acquires an ownership interest in the subject of the representation, it will be more difficult for a client to discharge the lawyer if the client so desires. The Rule is subject to specific exceptions developed in decisional law and continued in these Rules.

What is business transaction between client and lawyer?

[1] A lawyer's legal skill and training, together with the relationship of trust and confidence between lawyer and client, create the possibility of overreaching when the lawyer participates in a business, property or financial transaction with a client, for example, ...

What is the purpose of paragraph (b) of the law?

Paragraph (b) applies when the information is used to benefit either the lawyer or a third person , such as another client or business associate of the lawyer. For example, if a lawyer learns that a client intends to purchase and develop several parcels of land, the lawyer may not use that information to purchase one of the parcels in competition with the client or to recommend that another client make such a purchase. The Rule does not prohibit uses that do not disadvantage the client. For example, a lawyer who learns a government agency's interpretation of trade legislation during the representation of one client may properly use that information to benefit other clients. Paragraph (b) prohibits disadvantageous use of client information unless the client gives informed consent, except as permitted or required by these Rules. See Rules 1.2 (d), 1.6, 1.9 (c), 3.3, 4.1 (b), 8.1 and 8.3.

Does paragraph D prohibit a lawyer representing a client in a transaction concerning literary property?

Paragraph (d) does not prohibit a lawyer representing a client in a transaction concerning literary property from agreeing that the lawyer's fee shall consist of a share in ownership in the property, if the arrangement conforms to Rule 1.5 and paragraphs (a) and (i). Financial Assistance.

Can a lawyer accept a gift?

If a client offers the lawyer a more substantial gift, paragraph (c) does not prohibit the lawyer from accepting it, although such a gift may be voidable by the client under the doctrine of undue influence, which treats client gifts as presumptively fraudulent. In any event, due to concerns about overreaching and imposition on clients, a lawyer may not suggest that a substantial gift be made to the lawyer or for the lawyer's benefit, except where the lawyer is related to the client as set forth in paragraph (c).

Can a lawyer represent an indigent client without fee?

A lawyer representing an indigent client without fee, a lawyer representing an indigent client pro bono through a nonprofit legal services or public interest organization and a lawyer representing an indigent client pro bono through a law school clinical or pro bono program may give the client modest gifts.

Can a lawyer take unfair advantage of an unrepresented client?

Nevertheless, in view of the danger that a lawyer will take unfair advantage of an unrepresented client or former client, the lawyer must first advise such a person in writing of the appropriateness of independent representation in connection with such a settlement .

image

Representing Clients with Differing Interests Simultaneously

Personal Conflicts of Interest Between Attorney and Client

  • This can be difficult to avoid. An attorney should carefully evaluate if there are current or previous personal dealings with a potential client. Examples would be a romantic relationship, friendship, or other affiliation. Minnesota is specific about the first in their Rules of Professional Conduct, stating “A lawyer is prohibited from engaging in sexual relationships with a client unless the sex…
See more on cbsh.net

Current and Former Client Conflicts

  • As an attorney builds their practice, this becomes increasingly difficult to avoid. An attorney may not take on a new client who has interests that are adverse to the former client’s interests. The grey area here exists in defining what time frame determines a “former” client. There is no legal definition, and the attorney must decide this in an objective manner. It is possible, for example, t…
See more on cbsh.net

Conflicts Involving Third Parties

  • An attorney should represent the client without having their judgment affected by other parties. This type of conflict may arise when a client’s fees are being paid for by a third party. An example would be a minor who needs representation and whose fees are being paid for by their parents. If the parents feel that they are entitled to privileged c...
See more on cbsh.net

General Principles

  • Loyalty and independent judgment are essential elements in the lawyer's relationship to a client. Concurrent conflicts of interest can arise from the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client or a third person or from the lawyer's own interests. For specific Rules regarding certain concurrent conflicts of interest, see Rule 1.8. For former client conflicts of interest, see R…
See more on americanbar.org

Identifying Conflicts of Interest: Directly Adverse

  • Loyalty to a current client prohibits undertaking representation directly adverse to that client without that client's informed consent. Thus, absent consent, a lawyer may not act as an advocate in one matter against a person the lawyer represents in some other matter, even when the matters are wholly unrelated. The client as to whom the representation is directly adverse is likely to feel …
See more on americanbar.org

Identifying Conflicts of Interest: Material Limitation

  • Even where there is no direct adverseness, a conflict of interest exists if there is a significant risk that a lawyer's ability to consider, recommend or carry out an appropriate course of action for the client will be materially limited as a result of the lawyer's other responsibilities or interests. For example, a lawyer asked to represent severa...
See more on americanbar.org

Lawyer's Responsibilities to Former Clients and Other Third Persons

  • In addition to conflicts with other current clients, a lawyer's duties of loyalty and independence may be materially limited by responsibilities to former clients under Rule 1.9 or by the lawyer's responsibilities to other persons, such as fiduciary duties arising from a lawyer's service as a trustee, executor or corporate director.
See more on americanbar.org

Personal Interest Conflicts

  • The lawyer's own interests should not be permitted to have an adverse effect on representation of a client. For example, if the probity of a lawyer's own conduct in a transaction is in serious question, it may be difficult or impossible for the lawyer to give a client detached advice. Similarly, when a lawyer has discussions concerning possible employment with an opponent of the lawyer…
See more on americanbar.org

Interest of Person Paying For A Lawyer's Service

  • A lawyer may be paid from a source other than the client, including a co-client, if the client is informed of that fact and consents and the arrangement does not compromise the lawyer's duty of loyalty or independent judgment to the client. See Rule 1.8(f). If acceptance of the payment from any other source presents a significant risk that the lawyer's representation of the client wil…
See more on americanbar.org

Prohibited Representations

  • Ordinarily, clients may consent to representation notwithstanding a conflict. However, as indicated in paragraph (b), some conflicts are nonconsentable, meaning that the lawyer involved cannot properly ask for such agreement or provide representation on the basis of the client's consent. When the lawyer is representing more than one client, the question of consentability m…
See more on americanbar.org

Informed Consent

  • Informed consent requires that each affected client be aware of the relevant circumstances and of the material and reasonably foreseeable ways that the conflict could have adverse effects on the interests of that client. See Rule 1.0(e) (informed consent). The information required depends on the nature of the conflict and the nature of the risks involved. When representation of multipl…
See more on americanbar.org

Consent Confirmed in Writing

  • Paragraph (b) requires the lawyer to obtain the informed consent of the client, confirmed in writing. Such a writing may consist of a document executed by the client or one that the lawyer promptly records and transmits to the client following an oral consent. See Rule 1.0(b). See also Rule 1.0(n) (writing includes electronic transmission). If it is not feasible to obtain or transmit th…
See more on americanbar.org

Revoking Consent

  • A client who has given consent to a conflict may revoke the consent and, like any other client, may terminate the lawyer's representation at any time. Whether revoking consent to the client's own representation precludes the lawyer from continuing to represent other clients depends on the circumstances, including the nature of the conflict, whether the client revoked consent because …
See more on americanbar.org