why can't a lawyer accept payment from a 3rd party

by Doris Donnelly 6 min read

Rule 3-310 (F) provides that an attorney may not accept payment for representing a client from anybody other than the client unless the attorney complies with certain requirements. First, there must be no interference with the attorney’s independent professional judgment or with the attorney-client relationship.

Rule 3-310(F) provides that an attorney may not accept payment for representing a client from anybody other than the client unless the attorney complies with certain requirements. First, there must be no interference with the attorney's independent professional judgment or with the attorney-client relationship.Apr 11, 2016

Full Answer

Can a lawyer accept money from a third party?

Jun 06, 2018 · An attorney may not breach his/her duty to preserve client confidences, as required by Business & Professions Code § 6068(e), by disclosing confidential information to a third party. In addition, for an attorney to accept payment from a third party, a client’s informed written consent is required after a full disclosure of the actual and reasonably foreseeable adverse …

Can a lawyer refuse to accept payment for representing a client?

The short answer is yes, you may. However, when a third party wants to pay the legal fees for another, several ethical issues must be addressed. NHRPC 1.8(f) outlines the three criteria that must be met before you may accept payments from a third party. 1 First, the client must give informed consent. Second, there can be no interference with the lawyer’s independence of …

When a third party is paying the Bills?

Apr 28, 2016 · Third, the attorney must obtain the written consent of the client before the attorney may accept payment from a third party. A good practice is to discuss payment terms directly in the engagement agreement and confirm that though a third party will be paying the bills, she shall have no authority to direct the representation or have access to confidential client information …

Can a third party be the payor of an engagement agreement?

Oct 26, 2015 · The Supreme Court held that third-party payment of attorney fees is permissible provided the following six conditions are satisfied (Id. at 495-96): (1) The informed consent of the client is secured; (2) The third-party payer is prohibited from, in any way, directing, regulating or interfering with the lawyer’s professional judgment in ...

image

What is NHRPC 1.15?

Under NHRPC 1.15 (e), an attorney has a duty to promptly notify a client or third party upon receipt of funds in which a client or third party has an interest. Additionally, under NHRPC 1.15 (e), a lawyer also has a duty to promptly deliver to the client or third party any funds or other property that the client or third person is entitled to receive. Lastly, section (f) of NHRPC 1.15 makes it clear that a lawyer must keep separate and secure all property in their possession in which two or more persons claim interest until the dispute over ownership is resolved.

Do you have to sign a separate agreement with a third party to pay retainer?

If a third party will be paying the retainer, you should also require the payor to sign a separate agreement that not only spells out the limitations on your right to disclose client information, and the absence of the payor’s right to influence your services, but also specifies how any future legal fees will be paid and how any unused retainer funds will be refunded and to whom.

Can a parent request a parenting schedule?

In addition, in situations such as yours, the parents who are also grandparents, may request a parenting schedule that benefits them, and that may conflict with the best interests of your client and his or her children and family. If that is the case, you must decline the third-party payments, if acceptance of such payments would likely influence or impair your ability to exercise your independent professional judgment on behalf of your client.

What is MPR 1.2?

MPR 1.2 allows you to limit your representation of the client, provided that the limitation is reasonable under the circumstances and the client has provided informed consent. If your agreement with the client is silent or unclear as to any limitation on the scope of your representation, that scope is determined by considering what the client might reasonably have expected under the circumstances. Discussions you had with the payor about the scope of the payor’s payment obligations, to which the client was not privy, would not be considered. Carefully drafted agreements with the client and the payor will decrease the chances that you are obligated to provide the client with a broader set of legal services than the payor has agreed to pay for.

Do you have to have a written agreement with the payor?

If you want to enforce the payor’s undertaking to pay for your services to the client, you should have a written agreement with the payor too. As discussed, to reinforce the differing statuses of the payor and the client, it is best for this to be a separate agreement in which the payor agrees to pay for the services to be rendered to the client.

Can a lawyer accept compensation for representing a client?

A lawyer shall not accept compensation for representing a client from one other than the client unless: (1) the client gives informed consent; (2) there is no interference with the lawyer's independence of professional judgment or with the client-lawyer relationship; and.

Do you have to keep client information confidential?

Second, you must strictly maintain the client’s confidential information as required under Business and Professions Code section 6068, subdivision (e). Often a person paying the bill, particularly a parent or other close relative who is genuinely interested in helping the client, will want to be informed about what is going on in the case and offer input on the attorney’s strategy. Also, they may want details about what services they are paying for.

Can an attorney interfere with a client's independent judgment?

First, there must be no interference with the attorney’s independent professional judgment or with the attorney-client relationship. This means that just because a person is paying the bills she doesn’t get to direct the representation.

About the Author

Mark Bassingthwaighte, Esq. is a Risk Manager with ALPS Property & Casualty Insurance Company. In his tenure with the company, he has conducted over 1,000 law firm risk management assessment visits, presented numerous continuing legal education seminars throughout the United States, and written extensively on risk management and technology.

Subscribe Like what you've read?

Enjoy our blog posts with lunch! Enter your email address and we'll send you an email each time a new blog post is published.

Can a landlord refuse to accept payment from a 3rd partyif the lease does not prohibit this and the rent is paid on time?

We paid rent on time with through a 3rd party (mother) and the landlord would not accept it. She said that they do not accept 3rd party payments. I looked over the lease and it does say anywhere in the lease that 3rd party payments are not accepted. Now they are trying to evict us and lock us out because they are saying we did not pay the rent.

Answers

If your written lease does not prevent a third party from paying your rental payment and payment by your mother was timely tendered to your landlord by your mother but was refused by your landlord, there is no legal basis for an eviction proceeding against you.

image

Conflicts of Interest

Confidentiality

  • Confidentiality is another aspect of the attorney-client relationship that may be impacted in a third-party payor situation. The payor may want to monitor the matter to keep track of what she is paying for, but your duty of confidentiality runs to the client alone. As with the conflicts issue, you may wish to state in your agreement with the payor ...
See more on americanbar.org

Scope of Representation

  • The scope of your representation of the client and the scope of what the payor has agreed to pay for may or may not be the same, and it is important to have a clear understanding of both at the outset. MPR 1.2allows you to limit your representation of the client, provided that the limitation is reasonable under the circumstances and the client has provided informed consent. If your agree…
See more on americanbar.org

Getting Paid

  • If you want to enforce the payor’s undertaking to pay for your services to the client, you should have a written agreement with the payor too. As discussed, to reinforce the differing statuses of the payor and the client, it is best for this to be a separate agreement in which the payor agrees to pay for the services to be rendered to the client. The retention agreement with the client should …
See more on americanbar.org