who was the lawyer who represented the board of education topeka

by Prof. Mario Greenfelder DDS 7 min read

Harold R.
As Attorney General of Kansas, Harold Fatzer argued the case for the appellees (Kansas) in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka
Board of Education of Topeka
Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the court ruled that U.S. state laws establishing racial segregation in public schools are unconstitutional, even if the segregated schools are otherwise equal in quality.
https://en.wikipedia.org › Brown_v._Board_of_Education
. Mr. Fatzer served as Kansas Supreme Court Justice from February 1949 to March 1956.
Jun 8, 2021

Who were the plaintiffs in Brown v Topeka Board of Education?

Kansas Plaintiffs, 1954 Brown v. Topeka Board of Education Mrs. Marguerite Emerson and sons, Claude Arthur Emmerson and George Robert Emmerson Mrs. Shirla Fleming and sons, Duane Dean Fleming and Silas Hardrick Fleming

What was the significance of the Board of Education of Topeka?

Board of Education of Topeka was a landmark 1954 Supreme Court case in which the justices ruled unanimously that racial segregation of children in public schools was unconstitutional.

What happened to the school board of Topeka in 1952?

By the fall of 1952, the school board of Topeka had been transformed by elections to a group whose majority did not want segregation and did not want to defend it. Kansas Attorney General Harold Fatzer, who would later become chief justice of the Kansas Supreme Court, was not enthusiastic about the state's side of the case.

Who was the first black lawyer in Brown v Board of Education?

Documents Related to Brown v. Board of Education. Charles Hamilton Houston Born in 1895, Charles Houston was the first African American editor of the Harvard Law Review, dean of Howard University Law School, chief counsel to the NAACP, and the first African American lawyer to win a case before the Supreme Court.

image

Who were the attorneys for Topeka Board of Education?

Thurgood Marshall. Thurgood Marshall led a life in the pursuit of equality, and was on a path destined to lead him to the U.S. Supreme Court. ... Robert Carter. Carter was part of the legal team that developed the NAACP's strategy for ending segregation.Jack Greenberg. ... Charles Scott. ... John Scott. ... Charles Bledsoe.

Who was the lawyer for the Brown vs Board of Education?

Thurgood MarshallThe U.S. Supreme Court case, Brown v. Board of Education, was bundled with four related cases and a decision was rendered on May 17, 1954. Three lawyers, Thurgood Marshall (center), chief counsel for the NAACP's Legal Defense Fund and lead attorney on the Briggs case, with George E. C. Hayes (left) and James M.

Who was the lawyer that handled the case Brown v the Board of Education of Topeka Ka He later becomes the 1st African American to sit on the Supreme Court )?

Thurgood MarshallThurgood Marshall, the head of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, served as chief attorney for the plaintiffs. (Thirteen years later, President Lyndon B. Johnson would appoint Marshall as the first Black Supreme Court justice.)

Who was the main attorney who argued the Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka Kansas case before the U.S. Supreme Court?

Thurgood MarshallIn Brown v. Board of Education, the attorney for the plaintiffs was Thurgood Marshall. He later became, in 1967, the first African American to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court.

Who was involved in the Brown vs Board of Education case?

When Linda was denied admission into a white elementary school, Linda's father, Oliver Brown, challenged Kansas's school segregation laws in the Supreme Court. The NAACP and Thurgood Marshall took up their case, along with similar ones in South Carolina, Virginia, and Delaware, as Brown v. Board of Education.

Did Thurgood Marshall win the Brown vs Board of Education?

Having won these cases, and thus, establishing precedents for chipping away Jim Crow laws in higher education, Marshall succeeded in having the Supreme Court declare segregated public schools unconstitutional in Brown v. Board of Education (1954).

Was Thurgood Marshall half white?

Thurgood Marshall's Family Marshall was born to Norma A. Marshall and William Canfield on July 2, 1908. His parents were mulatottes, which are people classified as being at least half white.

Who replaced Thurgood Marshall?

Clarence ThomasMarshall retired during the administration of President George H. W. Bush in 1991, and was succeeded by Clarence Thomas.

What did Linda Brown do?

Linda Carol Brown (February 20, 1943 – March 25, 2018) was an American campaigner for equality in education. As a schoolgirl in 1954, Brown became the center of the landmark 1951 United States civil rights case Brown v. Board of Education.

Who wrote the dissenting opinion in Brown v. Board of Education?

In South Carolina, Judge J. Waties Waring issued a dissenting opinion in which he called segregation in education “an evil that must be eradicated.” In Delaware, the court found that the 11 Black children named in the case were entitled to attend the white school in their communities.

What was the defendant's argument in Brown vs Board of Education?

Background and Facts of the Case They argued that keeping black students separate from white students violated the equal protection and due process clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. Brown v.

What did the Supreme Court decide in Brown v. Board of Education?

In Brown v. Board of Education, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously that racial segregation in public schools violated the Fourteenth Amendmen...

What is the significance of Brown v. Board of Education?

Brown v. Board of Education is considered a milestone in American civil rights history and among the most important rulings in the history of the U...

What was the aftermath of Brown v. Board of Education?

After the Brown v. Board of Education decision, there was wide opposition to desegregation, largely in the southern states. Violent protests erupte...

When was Brown v. Board of Education decided?

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Brown v. Board of Education on May 17, 1954. The case had been argued before the Court on December 9, 1952, and rea...

Who was the attorney for the plaintiffs in Brown v. Board of Education?

In Brown v. Board of Education, the attorney for the plaintiffs was Thurgood Marshall. He later became, in 1967, the first African American to serv...

What was the Board of Education of Topeka?

Board of Education of Topeka, involved a Kansas statute permitting racial segregation in some of the state's elementary schools. In many states African American students were placed in schools that were inferior to those attended by white children. The plaintiffs in Topeka did not charge that the schools' facilities their children attended were ...

Who was the Kansas Attorney General?

Kansas Attorney General Harold Fatzer, who would later become chief justice of the Kansas Supreme Court, was not enthusiastic about the state's side of the case. However, he could not concede that Kansas' law was unconstitutional.

What was the main issue of the 1952 Supreme Court case?

Following the 1952 oral argument, the Supreme Court justices remained deeply divided over the question of whether to uphold racial segregation in education. At the conclusion of the Court's session, the justices delayed their decision by asking the parties to present additional arguments. Five questions were issued to the parties, focusing on the original understanding of the Fourteenth Amendment and on judicial power to abolish segregation even if such abolition had not been contemplated by the writers of the Amendment and those who ratified it. The Court scheduled reargument on October 12, 1953. But those plans changed on September 9, 1953, when Chief Justice Fred Vinson died of a heart attack at the age of 63.

What states were segregated in the Brown case?

Four others permitted school boards to segregate. Those four were Wyoming, Kansas, New Mexico, and Arizona. The Brown case was the first case to be argued to the court.

Why did the Supreme Court rule that school boards must make a prompt and reasonable start toward full compliance?

Because its decision applied to all public schools in a variety of local conditions, the Supreme Court was concerned about how to design a remedy. It directed the parties to submit additional briefs and return for another argument in 1955, this time concerning the relief that should be ordered. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled that school boards must make a "prompt and reasonable start toward full compliance" and that the courts would monitor school boards to make sure they were putting compliance plans in place and following them.

Why did Wilson lose the Brown case?

He had a feeling that he would lose the case because, as he said later, "history and social conscience had simply overtaken the law.".

Did the plaintiffs in Topeka charge that the schools' facilities their children attended were inferior?

The plaintiffs in Topeka did not charge that the schools' facilities their children attended were inferior, but that segregation itself did psychological and educational damage to black children forced to attend schools isolated from the other children in the community.

Who worked to recruit plaintiffs willing to stand up to the school board while also researching and recruiting expert witnesses?

Charles Bledsoe worked to recruit plaintiffs willing to stand up to the school board while also researching and recruiting expert witnesses.

Who was the first white attorney for the NAACP?

As the first white attorney for the NAACP, Jack Greenberg helped to argue Brown v. Board of Education at the U.S. Supreme Court level.

Who took over the Bolling v Sharpe case?

Nabrit took over Charles Hamilton Houston's work on the Bolling v. Sharpe case which went to the U.S. Supreme Court alongside four others.

Who was responsible for starting the oral argument of Bolling v. Sharpe?

George E.C. Hayes was responsible for starting the oral argument of Bolling v. Sharpe, the case which originated in the District of Columbia

Who was the legal team that developed the NAACP's strategy for ending segregation?

Carter was part of the legal team that developed the NAACP’s strategy for ending segregation.

Who was the lawyer who argued Lucy v Adams?

After working with Charles H. Houston, Shores went on to argue the Lucy v. Adams case before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Who was assigned to the Davis case?

Oliver Hill was assigned to the Davis case, and agreed to help them if they would try to integrate, not equalize the schools.

Who was the Supreme Court Justice in Kansas?

Fatzer served as Kansas Supreme Court Justice from February 1949 to March 1956. Jack Greenberg. Jack Greenberg, who was born in 1924, argued on behalf of the plaintiffs in the Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka case, and worked on the briefs in Belton v. Gebhart.

Who was the dean of Howard University in the Brown v. Board of Education case?

Their case eventually became one of five included in the landmark 1954 case, Brown v. Board of Education. Spottswood W. Robinson, III, who was born in 1916, taught law at Howard University, in Washington, DC, and eventually became dean of the school. He made his mark on the history of Brown v.

What was the precedent in Ferguson v. Brown?

Ferguson ruling of the United States Supreme Court as precedent. The plaintiffs claimed that the "separate but equal" ruling violated the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. In 1954, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Brown v.

Who was the plaintiff in the Belton v. Gebhart case?

Ethel Louise Belton#N#Ethel Belton and six other adults filed suit on behalf of eight Black children against Francis B. Gebhart and 12 others (both individuals and state education agencies) in the case Belton v. Gebhart. The plaintiffs sued the state for denying to the children admission to certain public schools because of color or ancestry. The Belton case was joined with another very similar Delaware case, Bulah v. Gebhart, and both would ultimately join four other NAACP cases in the Supreme Court ruling in Brown v. Board of Education. Belton was born in 1937 and died in 1981.

Why was Brown v. Board of Education important?

This grouping of cases from Kansas, South Carolina, Virginia, the District of Columbia, and Delaware was significant because it represented school segregation as a national issue, not just a southern one. Each case was brought on the behalf of elementary school children, involving all-Black schools that were inferior to white schools.

Who was the lead defendant in Bolling v. Sharpe?

C. Melvin Sharpe , acting as President of the Board of Education of the District of Columbia from 1948 to 1957, was named as the lead defendant in the case Bolling v. Sharpe. Earl Warren. Chief Justice Earl Warren, who was born in 1891, secured a unanimous decision in Brown v.

Who was Robert Carter?

Robert L. Carter. Born in 1917, Robert Carter, who served as an attorney for the plaintiffs in Briggs v. Elliott, was of particular significance to the Brown v. Board of Education case because of his role in the Briggs case.

Who argued the Board of Education of Topeka?

Board of Education of Topeka was argued on December 9, 1952; the attorney who argued on behalf of the plaintiffs was Thurgood Marshall, who later served as an associate justice of the Supreme Court (1967–91). The case was reargued on December 8, 1953, to address the question of whether the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment would have understood ...

When did the Board of Education of Topeka decide to integrate public schools?

Board of Education of Topeka (II), argued April 11–14, 1955, and decided on May 31 of that year, Warren ordered the district courts and local school authorities to take appropriate steps to integrate public schools in their jurisdictions “with all deliberate speed.”.

Why was the plaintiff's right to equal protection violated in Gebhart v. Belton?

Belton (1952), however, the Delaware Court of Chancery, also relying on Plessy, found that the plaintiffs’ right to equal protection had been violated because the African American schools were inferior to the white schools in almost all relevant respects.

When was Brown v Board of Education argued?

Brown v. Board of Education was argued on December 9, 1952. The attorney for the plaintiffs was Thurgood Marshall, who later became the first African American to serve on the Supreme Court (1967–91). The case was reargued on December 8, 1953, to address the question of whether the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment would have understood it to be inconsistent with racial segregation in public education. The 1954 decision found that the historical evidence bearing on the issue was inconclusive.

What was the Supreme Court ruling in 1954?

Supreme Court ruling ( Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka) in 1954 that declared racial segregation of public schools to be unconstitutional.

When was Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka?

1951 Brown et al. v. The Board of Education of Topeka, et al.

What was the significance of the 1954 Oliver Brown v Topeka Board of Education case?

The 1954 Oliver Brown et al. v Topeka Board of Education et al. revolutionized the legal framework for the nation’s race relations, sparked the Modern Civil Rights Movement, and inspired struggles for freedom and equality around the world.

What did Scott do in the 1960s?

During the mid-1960s, Scott worked as a voluntary lawyer with the Lawyers Constitutional Defense Committee traveling to Mississippi to aid civil rights workers; he also served as a national legal counsel for the Congress of Racial Equality's (CORE).

Who was McKinley Burnett?

McKinley Burnett (1897-1968), President of the Topeka Chapter of the NAACP. For two years, Mr. Burnett lobbied the Topeka school board, convened community meetings, wrote letters and helped recruit litigants for the Topeka case in the 1954 Brown v. Board Supreme Court decision.

Who was the plaintiff in the 1954 Supreme Court case?

Reverend Oliver L. Brown (1918-1961), named plaintiff in 1954 U.S. Supreme Court decision. "I personally feel that this case has a deep bearing upon the hearts of our teachers. Certainly we must make an effort for them...Secondly, I feel that this decision holds a better future...for every child indicated...Every citizen of the United States needs equal education in order that the society in which we live may be met with intelligence." Topeka Journal, May 17, 1954

Is Topeka racially segregated?

Although the federal district court ruled in favor of the defendants, it also found Topeka’s racially segregated schools to be comparably equal, especially in their building facilities and faculty. This finding fit perfectly in the NAACP-Legal Defense Fund’s decades long court battle to overthrow the 1896 Plessey v.

Who was the lead attorney in the Brown v Board of Education case?

Supreme Court case, Brown v. Board of Education, was bundled with four related cases and a decision was rendered on May 17, 1954. Three lawyers, Thurgood Marshall (center), chief counsel for the NAACP’s Legal Defense Fund and lead attorney on the Briggs case, with George E. C. Hayes (left) and James M. Nabrit (right), attorneys for the Bolling case, are shown standing on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court congratulating each other after the Court’s decision declaring segregation unconstitutional.

When was Brown v. Board of Education?

Attorneys for Brown v. Board of Education, May 17, 1954

image