Nov 21, 2019 · On Wednesday, Gordon D. Sondland returned to the House impeachment inquiry, his memory significantly refreshed, and effectively rewrote his own testimony last month about President Trump’s ...
Nov 06, 2019 · A lawyer for Fiona Hill, who previously served as the top White House expert on Russia, is pushing back against claims made by a Trump-appointed diplomat whose deposition transcript was publicly ...
Oct 25, 2019 · Robert Luskin, the legal counselor of Gordon Sondland, has openly disputed parts of U.S. diplomat William Taylor’s testimony regarding the Ukraine Scandal. This would be the latest of many incongruencies on this witch hunt led by the Democrats in the House against President Donald Trump.
Oct 08, 2019 · “Pursuant to the House of Representatives’ impeachment inquiry, we are hereby transmitting a subpoena that compels you to appear at a deposition on October 16, 2019, at 9:30 a.m. at the Capitol, HVC-304, and to produce the documents set forth in the accompanying schedule by October 14, 2019,” the Chairmen wrote. Subpoena for Deposition
During the hearing, Sondland undercut a key Trump defense and simultaneously confirmed a claim from the whistleblower complaint that triggered the impeachment inquiry. Zelensky “had to announce the investigations,” Sondland said, referring to the probes into Biden’s family and the 2016 election.
Sondland implicated Pence, Pompeo and Mulvaney. Republicans have argued that Giuliani could have been running a shadow foreign policy without the involvement or knowledge of other senior White House and State Department officials, but Sondland contradicted that several times in his testimony. Play.
Sondland recounted several conversations between himself and Trump about Ukraine opening two investigations: one into Burisma, a company where former Vice President Joe Biden’s son was on the board, and another into conspiracies about Ukrainian meddling in the 2016 US election.
Sondland also testified that he had told Pence he had “concerns that the delay in (military) aid had become tied to the issue of investigations” before Pence had a meeting with Zelensky in Warsaw, Poland, on September 1, implying Pence was aware of the “investigations” in the first place.
Sondland: Yes, there was a quid pro quo. David Holmes, a U.S. diplomat in Ukraine, testifies before the House Intelligence Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Nov. 21, 2019, during a public impeachment hearing of President Donald Trump's efforts to tie U.S. aid for Ukraine to investigations of his political opponents.
David Holmes, a U.S. diplomat in Ukraine, testifies before the House Intelligence Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Nov. 21, 2019, during a public impeachment hearing of President Donald Trump's efforts to tie U.S. aid for Ukraine to investigations of his political opponents. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)
Under aggressive questioning from Democrats, Sondland refused to say he realized that Trump was asking Ukraine to investigate the Bidens. He wouldn’t go there. Instead, he said he knew only that Trump and Giuliani wanted Zelensky to probe Burisma.