who is a lawyer who defended the british soldiers accused of the killing of innocent colonists

by Mr. Orion Konopelski 4 min read

John Adams

Who was John Adams — defense attorney for British soldiers?

John Adams — Defense Attorney for British Soldiers? Why a Founding Father represented British soldiers during the Boston Massacre Trials aptain Thomas Preston and eight British soldiers were on trial for murder. They would need an excellent attorney to represent them with a jury full of anti-British colonists.

What was the most important case in colonial American history?

In the new book John Adams Under Fire: The Founding Father’s Fight for Justice in the Boston Massacre Murder Trial, Dan Abrams and coauthor David Fisher detail what they call the “most important case in colonial American history” and an important landmark in the development of American jurisprudence.

Who did John Adams defend in the Boston Massacre?

Adams defended the British officer Thomas Preston and his soldiers in two separate trials. Can you talk about the balancing act Adams undertook to defend all his clients without alienating his fellow Bostonians, many of whom fervently supported the broader patriot cause?

Who killed five colonists?

Eight British soldiers and their officer in charge, Captain Thomas Preston, faced charges for murdering five colonists. Not far from the Custom House, a 34-year-old Boston attorney sat in his office and made a difficult decision.

What lawyer defended the British soldiers involved in the massacre?

John AdamsAs noted in the 2008 HBO mini-series chronicling the life and career of John Adams (1735-1826), as a young lawyer the future president served as counsel for the defense in the trial of eight British soldiers accused of murder during a riot in Boston on March 5, 1770.

Who defended the colonists?

John AdamsJohn Adams Defends the British It took seven months to arraign Preston and the other soldiers involved in the Boston Massacre and bring them to trial. Ironically, it was American colonist, lawyer and future President of the United States John Adams who defended them.

Who was the lawyer who defended the 8 British soldiers?

John AdamsThirty-five year old John Adams, a prominent lawyer in Boston who would go on to become the second president of the United States, was asked to take on the unpopular assignment of defending Capt. Preston and the eight British soldiers. Notes on the Boston Massacre trials, by John Adams, 1770, "Captn. Prestons Case" ...

Who defended the Boston Massacre soldiers?

President John AdamsEight soldiers, one officer, and four civilians were arrested and charged with murder, and they were defended by future U.S. President John Adams.

Why John Adams defended the British soldiers?

Without hesitation Adams agreed to defend the soldiers and their captain. Above all, John Adams believed in upholding the law, and defending the innocent. Adams was convinced that the soldiers were wrongly accused, and had fired into the crowd in self-defense.

Who was Captain Preston?

Thomas Preston ( c. 1722—c. 1798) was a British officer, a captain who served in Boston in the Province of Massachusetts Bay. He commanded troops in the Boston Massacre in 1770 and was tried for murder, but he was acquitted.

What does Paul Revere's engraving say?

Revere's most effective piece of anti-British propaganda was “The Bloody Massacre,” a full-color rendering of the 1770 melee that came to be known as the Boston Massacre.

Why was defending the British soldiers a difficult decision for him to make?

Why was defending the British soldiers a difficult decision for him to make? He didn't like the British soldiers but he needed a case that he could win. What does Sam Adams say to to John Adams during the protest march and how does he respond. How Much influence does Abigail Adams appear to have over John?

Who defended British after Boston Massacre?

John AdamsAlthough a devout patriot, John Adams agreed to risk his family's livelihood and defend the British soldiers and their commander in a Boston courtroom. At stake was not just the fate of nine men, but the relationship between the motherland and her colonies on the eve of American Revolution.

Who fought in the Boston Massacre?

The Boston Massacre was a street fight that occurred on March 5, 1770, between a "patriot" mob, throwing snowballs, stones, and sticks, and a squad of British soldiers. Several colonists were killed and this led to a campaign by speech-writers to rouse the ire of the citizenry.

Which colonial leader argued that the Boston Massacre was a fight for the American Liberty?

The Boston Massacre helped galvanize Boston and the colonies against the mother country. Samuel Adams, a signer of the Declaration of Independence, played a leading role in framing the March 5 incident as a battle for American liberty.

Who was the British officer in charge of the Boston Massacre?

Eight British soldiers and their officer in charge, Captain Thomas Preston, faced charges for murdering five colonists. Not far from the Custom House, a 34-year-old Boston attorney sat in his office ...

How old was John Adams when he was a lawyer?

Not far from the Custom House, a 34-year-old Boston attorney sat in his office and made a difficult decision. Although a devout patriot, John Adams agreed to risk his family’s livelihood and defend the British soldiers and their commander in a Boston courtroom. At stake was not just the fate of nine men, but the relationship between ...

What happened in Boston on March 6th 1770?

The blood remained fresh on the snow outside Boston’s Custom House on the morning of March 6 , 1770. Hours earlier, rising tensions between British troops and colonists had exploded into violence when a band of Redcoats opened fire on a crowd that had pelted them with not just taunts, but ice, oyster shells and broken glass. Although the soldiers claimed to have acted in self-defense, patriot propaganda referred to the incident as the Boston Massacre. Eight British soldiers and their officer in charge, Captain Thomas Preston, faced charges for murdering five colonists.

Who is the author of John Adams Under Fire?

In the new book John Adams Under Fire: The Founding Father’s Fight for Justice in the Boston Massacre Murder Trial, Dan Abrams and coauthor David Fisher detail what they call the “most important case in colonial American history” and an important landmark in the development of American jurisprudence. Abrams, who is also the chief legal affairs ...

Did Captain Preston order his men to fire?

Stunningly so. I think the verdicts are almost exactly what we would see today. It’s obvious to me that Captain Preston didn’t order his men to fire, and he was acquitted. They could have convicted all the soldiers for the actions of one or two of them, but they didn’t—because there simply wasn’t evidence that the others were involved in the shooting. And I think that’s an amazing testament to the jurors of the day.

Did the British use reasonable doubt?

Yes, they were using British law, but there was also this sense that the colonists wanted their own system of law, so some of the rules were different. This was the first time reasonable doubt had ever been used as a standard. It was the first time a jury was sequestered. This was definitely a case of firsts.

Did Adams blame the city for the skirmish?

Adams didn’t blame the city for initiating the skirmish. He kept it very, very focused on the facts of this particular instance—what happened, who was there, the specific individuals—and did not make it a broader indictment of the Sons of Liberty and others who had supported violence against the British soldiers.

Early Life

John Adams was born on October 30, 1735, to his father, John Adams Sr., and his mother, Susanna Boylston, and had two younger brothers, Peter and Elihu.

Boston Massacre

The Boston Massacre was a conflict in Boston on March 5, 1770. British soldiers shot and killed many people, perceiving them as a mob, and leading patriots including Paul Revere and Samuel Adams heavily publicized the event.

Boston massacre trial

Following the Boston Massacre, Captain Thomas Preston, eight British soldiers, and five British civilians were charged for murder. They were exposed to the possibility of execution and could not find a defense team as they would have to defend them in the anti-British city of Boston.

Balancing Act of Adams to defend his clients without distancing his fellow Bostonians

These days, criminal defense lawyers regularly take John Adams’s defense of the British soldiers to to represent specific clients. He did not blame the city for initiating the riot and focused on facts.

Conclusion

It is generally unsatisfying to get a mixed verdict in a case involving so much passion and emotion. However, these cases serve as a compelling example, and the Boston Massacre trial was among these trials.

Trouble in The Colonies

Image
Tensions between colonists and their British overlords intensified throughout the mid-18th century. American colonists wanted more independence and control over their economy. The Americans were prospering on their own and desired to break free of colonial control. Britain felt that the colonies had only flourished because …
See more on historyofyesterday.com

The Search For Justice

  • Governor Thomas Hutchinson arranged to have the accused soldiers removed to an island in Boston Harbor. The Attorney General issued murder indictments for Captain Thomas Preston and eight other soldiers for their participation in the riot. Before the trial, Loyalists and Patriots engaged in a propaganda war. Patriot cartoons and articles painted the riot as an all-out attack …
See more on historyofyesterday.com

The Trial Begins

  • Preston’s trial began on October 24, 1770. For the first time, the jury was sequestered away from family and friends for the duration of the trial. The key question was whether or not Preston had given the order to fire. Preston strongly denied giving any such order. Witness testimony was mixed, with some saying he gave the order and others declaring he did not. Adams was able to i…
See more on historyofyesterday.com

The Impact on Today’S Legal System

  • The Boston Massacre trials served as a landmark case for the new justice system in the colonies. This trial was the first time that a jury was sequestered, which is now typical practice in high profile cases. The standard of reasonable doubt was also introduced during this trial. In his instructions, one of the judges reminded the jurors that they needed to be “convinced beyond a r…
See more on historyofyesterday.com

Early Life

Boston Massacre

  • The Boston Massacre was a conflict in Boston on March 5, 1770. British soldiers shot and killed many people, perceiving them as a mob, and leading patriots including Paul Revere and Samuel Adams heavily publicized the event. Boston, the capital of the Massachusetts Bay, was a significant shipping town and a center of resistance to unpopular taxation acts by the British Par…
See more on historyten.com

Boston Massacre Trial

  • Following the Boston Massacre, Captain Thomas Preston, eight British soldiers, and five British civilians were charged for murder. They were exposed to the possibility of execution and could not find a defense team as they would have to defend them in the anti-British city of Boston. John Adams realized that there was a lot at stake for colonial America, and it was important for the a…
See more on historyten.com

John Adams’ Role in The Boston Massacre Trial

  • In the trial, Adams said that Captain Preston had never ordered his soldiers to fire. He also put forward that those who had shot into the crowd did so entirely for self-defense. He called the people involved in the mob who provoked the soldiers “outlandish Jack tars.” H” persuaded and won th” case releasing Preston and six of his soldiers on all c...
See more on historyten.com

Conclusion

  • It is generally unsatisfying to get a mixed verdict in a case involving so much passion and emotion. However, these cases serve as a compelling example, and the Boston Massacre trial was among these trials. The Boston massacre could have led to a revolution, but it did not, as people accepted it was a very controversial verdict. For firing against the orders of Captain Prest…
See more on historyten.com