Full Answer
Nevertheless, the opinion cautions that, when contact is made, the lawyer must advise the person that, if indeed he/she is represented by counsel, he/she should refer the communication to that counsel. Id. What If the Other Party Initiates Contact with You?
In that instance, the lawyer may therefore proceed to contact that person directly. Nevertheless, the opinion cautions that, when contact is made, the lawyer must advise the person that, if indeed he/she is represented by counsel, he/she should refer the communication to that counsel. Id. What If the Other Party Initiates Contact with You?
The legal field is vast and complex, and you’ll find that many lawyers specialize in a particular area of law. If you find yourself in need of a lawyer, make sure they have the expertise to handle your unique situation.
There are times when an attorney may be able to represent a client despite an apparent conflict of interest, although the rules on this can vary by state. For example, a lawyer may be able to accept an individual as their client if: The lawyer believes they can provide " competent and diligent " representation to all affected clients;
Primary tabs. Attorney-client privilege refers to a legal privilege that works to keep confidential communications between an attorney and their client private. Communications made to and by a lawyer in the presence of a third party may not be entitled to this privilege on grounds that they are not confidential.
Rule 4.02(a) generally provides that, in representing a client, a lawyer shall neither communicate nor “cause or encourage” another to communicate about the subject of the representation with a person or entity the lawyer “knows to be represented by another lawyer” without consent of the other lawyer.
(a) In representing a client, a lawyer shall not communicate directly or indirectly about the subject of the representation with a person* the lawyer knows* to be represented by another lawyer in the matter, unless the lawyer has the consent of the other lawyer.
Right to counsel means a defendant has a right to have the assistance of counsel (i.e., lawyers) and, if the defendant cannot afford a lawyer, requires that the government appoint one or pay the defendant's legal expenses.
The no contact rule There has long been an ethical prohibition on a solicitor contacting the client of another solicitor directly without the express permission of that solicitor or the existence of very urgent circumstances. Such a prohibition is now contained in professional conduct and practice rules.
Parties to a matter may communicate directly with each other, and a lawyer is not prohibited from advising a client concerning a communication that the client is legally entitled to make.
In order to determine whether an attorney may represent a potential new client or an existing client in a new matter, the attorney must (1) identify the client; (2) determine whether a conflict exists; (3) decide if representation could be undertaken despite the conflict; and, (4) get consent from all clients involved ...
Scott Aalsberg Esq. A: The lawyer should be responsive to your questions within 24-48 hours after you left a message. If the lawyer is not responsive, perhaps he or she is on vacation and unable to return.
(A) While representing a client, a member shall not communicate directly or indirectly about the subject of the representation with a party the member knows to be represented by another lawyer in the matter, unless the member has the consent of the other lawyer.
Usually, pro bono attorneys do not get paid. But there is the possibility that a pro bono attorney may receive some amount of compensation — or at least not lose money for taking the case. Lawyers who take pro bono cases may also receive waivers of court costs and other filing fees.
At present, only solicitors and barristers can represent other people in court. This means that, without leave of the court, you cannot speak for a friend in court, except as a character witness. However, as it can make their job easier, many magistrates and judges will grant such 'leave'.
In criminal cases, if you cannot afford a lawyer, the court will appoint a lawyer for you, like a public defender. But in civil cases, you do not have the right to a court-appointed lawyer so, if you cannot afford your own lawyer, you have to represent yourself.
When defendants are arrested, they must be brought before a judge within a specified period of time. This appearance is known as an arraignment or...
You should not assume that an appointed lawyer will be less capable than a private attorney you pay. Appointed counsel may perform as well as, or e...
If, at any point during your case, you are dissatisfied with your appointed counsel and come up with the funds (perhaps from family or friends) to...
1. Can you help me complete my financial statement for the court? 2. What other resources can you, or the court, provide for my defense? 3. If I ge...
You should: follow through on what you agree to do. prepare a written summary and chronology of events. tell your lawyer everything. understand that your lawyer has a duty to keep whatever you say confidential. inform your lawyer of new developments. respect your lawyer's time and schedule.
When you initially retain counsel, your lawyer should: explain the options available in your legal matter. discuss strategy.
Bar associations tasked with monitoring attorneys go after lawyers who steal or violate specific ethical rules—not lawyers who just aren't very good. Part of the reason is that what constitutes a "good job" is somewhat relative. For instance, a client might expect an acquittal in a criminal case.
Communication problems create problems in all types of relationships—including between an attorney and client. If you don't know what's going on in your lawsuit, you might assume you have a bad lawyer. To the contrary, your attorney could be doing a great job. Either way, a lawyer who doesn't communicate case progress is invariably increasing, not decreasing, your stress.
When you hire a lawyer, it's important that your fee agreement is in writing and that you understand it. It's a simple way to avoid a common cause of contention with clients—the legal bills.
For instance, it's common to hear less frequently from a lawyer who is in trial. But someone in the office should be able to explain when you'll hear from your attorney and assure you that the office is handling your case appropriately. Find out how to hire the right attorney.
For instance, a client might expect an acquittal in a criminal case. However, other private criminal attorneys might consider a reduction from a felony to a misdemeanor charge a job well done.
Appointed lawyers come from either a public defender’s office or from a panel of local private attorneys approved by the court. Do not assume that an appointed lawyer will be less capable than a private attorney you pay. Appointed counsel may perform as well as, or even better than, a private attorney.
How a Lawyer Gets Appointed. When defendants are arrested, they must be brought before a judge within a specified period of time. This appearance is known as an arraignment or initial appearance. At that time, a judge will ask defendants if they can afford an attorney.
If the court appoints the public defender’s office, that office will assign one of its attorneys to the case. If the court appointed a private attorney from its panel, it may assign a lawyer from a list of attorneys on duty that day for court appointments.
Public defenders and appointed private attorneys know the local judges and prosecutors. They have likely appeared before your judge and negotiated with your prosecutor on many prior occasions. This experience gives them insight that translates into good advice and proven strategies.
You do not have to be unemployed to get a free lawyer. The courts usually look at your overall financial situation. Defendants do not get to choose their appointed counsel. The court will appoint the local public defender’s office or a local private attorney from an approved panel.
By Martin I. Kaminsky (Greenberg Traurig) and Maren J. Messing (Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler)
The starting point is Rule 4.2 (a) of the New York Rules of Professional Conduct (NYRPC).
The Rule applies regardless of how the possible communication arises. It does not matter if the other party initiates it, requests it, consents to it or tells the lawyer he/she does not feel the need to have his lawyer included.
Rule 4.2 prohibits contact when a lawyer “knows” that a person is represented by counsel. NYRPC Rule 4.2. It does not say “has reason to know;” and Rule 1.0 (k) defines knowledge as “actual knowledge of the fact in question.” NYRPC Rule 1.0 (k).
An attorney letter of representation is a legal document that explaining that an attorney or law firm is now the acting legal representation for an individual, group, or business. It is used in any number of legal situations such as professional malpractice, car accidents, business lawsuits, family law issues like divorce ...
The most common scenario when individuals choose to hire an attorney is in personal injury cases or accident cases, especially if the insurance company is being difficult and their case goes to court. In these types of cases, an attorney representation letter will be sent when an individual, such as Linda: Decides to initiate a legal claim ...
The letter will include information about who is being represented, by whom, and why. The letter should also include: The names of attorneys or paralegals who are the lead on the case, The scope of any injuries, so that an adjuster can review the case,
If you are notified of a legal case filed against you, or you file a legal case against someone else, it is very likely that you have an attorney who represents you and your interests. Once you hire an attorney, they will send a legal letter of representation to any other attorneys or parties involved in your case.
The general rule is that, by allowing a third party to be present for a lawyer-client conversation, the defendant waives the privilege. That generally means that the prosecution can force the third party to reveal the contents of the conversation.
Put more specifically, the third person must be present while fulfilling a role that furthers the defendant's legal representation. The person might be part of the lawyer's staff, an outside party with relevant expertise (for instance, an investigator), an interpreter, or even a relative who acts in an advisory role.
On the other hand, a Missouri court found that a defendant charged with second degree murder had waived the attorney-client privilege because of a family member's presence at a client-lawyer meeting. During a prior divorce case, the defendant brought her daughter to a meeting with her family law attorney.
Because the daughter wasn't essential in conveying information to the lawyer and wasn't reasonably necessary to protect her mother's interests, her presence at the meeting destroyed the privilege. So, the family law attorney's testimony about the meeting—given at the murder trial—was admissible. ( State v.
Despite the general rule, there's an exception in most states: In general, when a third person is present, the attorney-client privilege continues to apply if that third person is there in order to aid the cause. Put more specifically, the third person must be present while fulfilling a role that furthers the defendant's legal representation.
A defendant might very well expect confidentiality when talking with a lawyer in front of a loved one. And it may be unlikely that the prosecution ever finds out about the meeting or calls the loved one to testify. But, if the prosecution tries to force a friend or loved one to the witness stand, then the role that this person played becomes crucial.
Relatives and Friends. A defendant might very well expect confidentiality when talking with a lawyer in front of a loved one. And it may be unlikely that the prosecution ever finds out about the meeting or calls the loved one to testify.
True legal advice forms an agreement between an attorney and his or her client based on a particular legal matter the client is experiencing. In a nutshell, legal advice has the following characteristics: Requires legal knowledge, skill, education and judgment. Applies specific law to a particular set of circumstances.
Legal information obtained from free online legal websites, including a law firm or attorney's own website. Advice from friends, family members, or former clients of a lawyer. Information you hear on the radio. Information you read on social media websites. Information you see in news periodicals or on billboards.
What Legal Advice is Not. While legal advice is specific, direct, and proposes a course of action, legal information, on the other hand, is factual, generic, and does not address any one particular cause of action. To help avoid the confusion that often comes with legal information, websites and individuals will often go to great lengths ...
As a general matter, only a lawyer may give actual legal advice, whereas any non-lawyer may recite legal information. Furthermore, it is generally illegal for a non-lawyer or unlicensed attorney to offer legal advice or otherwise represent someone other than himself or herself in a court of law. Unlike legal information, legal advice refers to ...
In the legal field, however, one of the legal duties every lawyer must observe is to avoid conflicts of interest when it comes to their clients. In fact, if a lawyer represents a client knowing that there's a conflict of interest, they can be disciplined by the state bar and sued by the client for legal malpractice.
There are a variety of conflicts of interest that can prevent a lawyer from taking on a particular case. The conflict may occur between the prospective client and one of the attorney's current or former clients. There can also be concerns if a client's interests are in conflict with the lawyer's professional or personal relationships.
While an attorney may be able to easily identify a conflict, sometimes they're not always easy to spot. Because of this, it's the attorney's responsibility to perform regular conflict checks when taking on a new client.
An attorney can not only answer any questions you may have about the scope of an attorney's obligations to their client, they can also answer other questions you may have about the law.
It's also important to note that a law firm may be able to represent a client even though a single attorney had a conflict of interest, if a "firewall" can be successfully put around the attorney with the conflict. This essentially means that the matter would not be discussed with or around the attorney with the conflict, ...
It's also possible for there to be an issue if the potential client's interests are at odds with the attorney's own interests. A conflict of interest can also occur at the law firm level. For example, even if an attorney working at a law firm didn't personally work on a particular matter (because someone else at the firm handled it), ...
The lawyer believes they can provide " competent and diligent " representation to all affected clients; The representation isn't illegal in any way; The lawyer isn't representing two clients against each other in the same lawsuit; and. Each affected client provides informed consent in writing.