Jesus gave the lawyer credit when he gave a right answer. When the man gave the correct response to Jesusâ questions, He told him, â You have answered rightly; do this and you will live â (10:28). Jesusâ words served as a positive reinforcement of the truth.
Full Answer
Jesus gave the lawyer credit when he gave a right answer. When the man gave the correct response to Jesusâ questions, He told him, âYou have answered rightly; do this and you will liveâ (10:28). Jesusâ words served as a positive reinforcement of the âŚ
The Jewish lawyer who approached Jesus wanted to know what he must do to inherit eternal life. He was looking at his own works and trying to justify himself. He was thinking that what he did was enough. On one level, Jesus' answer about the good Samaritan pointed out that this man didn't love like he should.
Dec 19, 2021 ¡ Jesus gave the lawyer credit when he gave a right answer. When the man gave the correct response to Jesusâ questions, He told him, âYou have answered rightly; do this and you will liveâ (10:28). Jesusâ words served as a positive reinforcement of the âŚ
Apr 22, 2017 ¡ 35 Then one of them, a lawyer, asked Him a question, testing Him, and saying, 36 âTeacher, which is the great commandment in the law?â 37 Jesus said to him, ââYou shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind.â 38 This is the first and great commandment.
The only character in the Bible who comes close to filling the job of a prosecuting attorney is Tertullus, an orator who was knowledgeable of Roman law and who was paid by the Jews to present their initial case against Paul before Governor Felix ( Acts 24:1 ).
Israel was under the legal jurisdiction of Rome during Jesusâ time, so when the Bible mentions âteachers of the lawâ ( Luke 5:17) or âlawyersâ ( Luke 14:3, ESV ), it is referring to the religious leaders who were experts in the Mosaic Law. The modern-day court system, with prosecuting attorneys and defense attorneys, ...
Then the defense lawyer argues for the innocence of his client or points to some extenuating circumstance. In the case of the Christian, the extenuating circumstance is Jesusâ sacrifice, which paid our debt to the Lawgiver and allowed us to go free, despite our guilt according to the Law ( Romans 8:1â5 ).
Another ethical challenge some lawyers face is the question of defending a client who he or she knows is guilty. A Christian lawyer should not knowingly defend a guilty client if the defense would involve falsehood, excusing the crime, or blame-shifting.
The Bible mentions human accusersâthose who bring a charge against another in front of a court or magistrateâ but they are usually witnesses, not lawyers for the prosecution ( Luke 12:58; Matthew 5:25 ).
The concept of prosecutors and defense attorneys, or advocates, is a biblical one. We have a spiritual Advocate in Jesus Christ, the righteous ( 1 John 2:1 ). He defends our cause before the Judge, God the Father. There is a prosecuting attorney, too: the Accuser, Satan ( Revelation 12:10 ).
Third, on principle, it is wrong to acquit a guilty man, because we must all come to the recognition of our guilt before God if we are to be saved ( James 2:10; Romans 3:19â20, 28; 8:1â2 ). Defending a client knowing of his guilt is no different, morally, from aiding and abetting the crime itself. Return to:
Jesus undermines the lawyerâs standing in order to show that the lawyer, like all the rest of humanity, needs not to stand his ground but to see the face of grace, and then to move, to repent. It is important to keep in view that the story Jesus told the lawyer was a parable, not an example story.
Luke says the lawyer intended to put Jesus to the test, and to do so, he asks two questions.
The lawyer depended upon the concepts âlove Godâ and âlove neighborâ to remain fixed and stable, a system of religious justification, and, again like most of us, he had found a sweet spot in that religious system that allowed him to be satisfied with himself and his life.
Jesus was not born to justify the righteous; he was born, as the angels over Bethlehem proclaimed, to be a savior. In Jesus, the system is not standing still. God is moving toward humanity in mercy and calling humanity to move toward God in repentance. And that is why Jesus throws the lawyer into the ditch beside the Jericho road.
But they so quickly settle into commonplace religious respectability. Love of God and neighbor become âgo to church and be nice to others.â. God first, others second, me last. Thereâs no âIâ in âTeam.â. Weâve recited this in Vacation Bible School just before ...
But that is precisely the beginnerâs blunder committed by the well-known Torah attorney who shows up in the tenth chapter of the Gospel of Luke. At this point in Luke, Jesus has âset his face to go to Jerusalemâ (9:51) and is beginning the long journey to the city of his destiny, the city of his death, the city of his glory.
In one breathtaking move, the court is turned upside down. The lawyer is now in the dock; the lawyer is now the one on trial. No longer the solicitor prosecuting the case, the lawyer is now the accused defending his righteousness. So, the lawyer, now suddenly the defendant, seeks to do what every accused person desires.
One of the lawyers answered him, âTeacher, in saying these things you insult us also.â And he said, âWoe to you lawyers also! For you load people with burdens hard to bear, and you yourselves do not touch the burdens with one of your fingers. Woe to you! For you build the tombs of the prophets whom your fathers killed. So you are witnesses and you consent to the deeds of your fathers, for they killed them, and you build their tombs. Therefore also the Wisdom of God said, âI will send them prophets and apostles, some of whom they will kill and persecute,â ...
âTeacher, which is the great commandment in the Law?â And he said to him, âYou shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the great and first commandment.
There are six things that the Lord hates, seven that are an abomination to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that make haste to run to evil, a false witness who breathes out lies, and one who sows discord among brothers.
A truthful witness saves lives, but one who breathes out lies is deceitful.
Therefore whoever relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever does them and teaches them will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
Understanding this, that the law is not laid down for the just but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who strike their fathers and mothers, for murderers,
There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus.
The lawyer examines the writings of those who claim to be eyewitnesses of the resurrection to establish as near as possible the time that they actually wrote. Then â and this is very important â the lawyer examines the behavior of the eyewitnesses and the impact of their behavior on the surrounding population.
One lawyer that America needed was Lewis Wallace (1827-1905). In addition to his lawyering he also found time to be a Union general in the Civil War and after the war became governor of New Mexico for three years.
Lawyers are of necessity, experts on motive. The behavior of the eyewitnesses in their personal lives â and deaths â and the extent and effect of their preaching to others is crucial in determining their motives. It is evident from early reliable written historical accounts that the eyewitnesses of the resurrection lived holy lives and died rather than deny their faith.
The famous Harvard law professor Simon Greenleaf, considered by many to be the greatest authority on legal evidences, turned his talents toward examining the evidences for the resurrection and became convinced that the resurrection of Christ is historical fact.
Wallace studied the evidence and concluded â contrary to his predisposition â that Jesus Christ did indeed rise from the dead and was seen by His disciples. Wallace went on to write the famous book Ben Hur: A Tale of the Christ which was made into one of Hollywoodâs most acclaimed films.
We can therefore have every confidence in the truth of the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
The ancient historical, manuscript and archaeological evidence points to the fact that the gospels were written very soon after the time of Christ. The ancient records indicate that the early church grew very rapidly very early in its history. This clearly infers that both the writings and early missionary work occurred too early for legendification to occur. It would take several decades or even several generations for the rise of legends to occur. These facts also discredit legend theory.
In Luke 10 the lawyer is an individual âlearned in the law.â. However, he is learned in holy law. The Torah, or Five Books of Moses, is the core of that Law. Hereâs where it gets tricky, though. A lawyer who was also a Pharisee â as many of them were â would regard the oral law as equally binding. (This oral law eventually became ...
Many of the more popular modern translations (ASV, ESV, KJV, NKJV, RSV, NRSV) use the English word lawyer to translate the Greek nomikos (νοΟΚκĎĎ, Strongâs 3544), which Vineâs Complete Expository Dictionary defines as âlearned in the law.â The NIV captures this with its translation of the term as âexpert in the law.â
The Pharisees, on the other hand, tended to be interested in politics only when it affected their religious practices. The term Pharisee itself seems to stem from the idea of separation. This concept fits well with the Pharisaic practice of separating themselves from other people.
Adherence to the law, both the Torah and the oral law, was foremost in importance to this party. The Pharisees did not seem to object to the name Pharisee. This is somewhat surprising since the word was probably a term of derision.
The Sadducees were primarily aristocrats . Most were priests, but not all priests were Sadducees. (Emil SchĂźrer points this out in his five-volume History of the Jewish People in the Time of Jesus Christ .) It was the âaristocratic priests: those who by their possessions and offices also occupied influential civil positionsâ (Second Division, Volume 2, p. 30) who were the substance of the Sadducee party. This group was highly political, generally more interested in retaining power than in providing spiritual leadership.
As noted above, the Pharisees separated themselves from any potential source of defilement. They refused to associate with anyone who did not observe the law as scrupulously as they did. Fellow Pharisees were their principal associates, and they viewed their group as a community, calling themselves neighbors.