Irving Whitehead, Buck’s lawyer, did little on her behalf. He called no witnesses to dispute Laughlin or other “experts” who favored sterilization. Not surprisingly, a judge upheld the decision to sterilize Carrie Buck. Whitehead promptly filed an appeal on her behalf in the Virginia Court of Appeals.
The Court accepted, without evidence, that Carrie and her mother were promiscuous and that the three generations of Bucks shared the genetic trait of feeblemindedness. Thus, it was in the state's best interest to have Carrie Buck sterilized.
The Supreme Court and the Sterilization of Carrie Buck. The case, later known as Buck v. Bell, was first heard in the Circuit Court for Amherst County on November 18, 1924. At the trial Aubrey Strode, the lawyer for Priddy and the Lynchburg Colony, offered “scientific evidence” that Carrie Buck ought to be sterilized.
In 1925 the court found the law constitutional and determined that Buck was a suitable candidate for sterilization, calling her a “potential parent of socially inadequate offspring.” After the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals affirmed the ruling, Buck v.
Forced sterilization remains legal today at the federal level in the U.S. because of a 1927 Supreme Court case known as Buck v. Bell.
In 1927, the US Supreme Court case Buck v. Bell set a legal precedent that states may sterilize inmates of public institutions. The court argued that imbecility, epilepsy, and feeblemindedness are hereditary, and that inmates should be prevented from passing these defects to the next generation.
By 1940, twenty-eight states had authorized compulsory sterilization. The path to these laws was paved in 1927 when the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Buck v. Bell and upheld a state's right to sterilize a person deemed unfit to have children.
According to a circa 1927 publication released by the ERO, the goal of eugenics was "to improve the natural, physical, mental, and temperamental qualities of the human family." Regrettably, this sentiment manifested itself in a widespread effort to prevent individuals who were considered to be "unfit" from having ...
In 1927, Buck v. Bell upheld Virginia's Eugenical Sterilization Act, authorizing the state of Virginia to forcibly sterilize Carrie Buck, a young, poor white woman the state determined to be unfit to procreate.
Over time, this method of population control grew in prominence and, unfortunately, is still prevalent today in the 21st century through the sterilizations of female detainees in immigration detention centers. As early as 1927, the Supreme Court of the United States legitimized early eugenic sterilization procedures.
Mrs. John Dobbs was the foster mother of Vivian Buck, Carrie's daughter. To demonstrate that the infant was an imbecile, like her mother and grandmother, Mrs. Dobbs waved a coin in front of Vivian's face and determined that the infant could not follow the coin with her eyes.
Sterilization rates under eugenic laws in the United States climbed from 1927 until Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535 (1942). While Skinner v. Oklahoma did not specifically overturn Buck v.
In 1927, the U.S. Supreme Court decided, by a vote of 8 to 1, to uphold a state's right to forcibly sterilize a person considered unfit to procreate. The case, known as Buck v. Bell, centered on a young woman named Carrie Buck, whom the state of Virginia had deemed to be "feebleminded."
Eugenics is the control of reproduction to alter a plant or animal species, and some U.S. eugeni- cists believed that human society could be improved by this means. A leading eugenicist, the zoologist Charles B. Davenport, urged immigration restriction to keep America from pollution by "inferior" genetic stock.
The purpose of the eugenics movement was to: rid society of people considered to be unfit.
The eugenics movement took root in the United States in the early 1900's, led by Charles Davenport (1866-1944), a prominent biologist, and Harry Laughlin, a former teacher and principal interested in breeding.
Buck died in a nursing home in 1983; she was buried in Charlottesville near her only child, Vivian, who had died at age eight.
Sterilization is a permanent method of birth control. Sterilization procedures for women are called tubal ligation. The procedure for men is called vasectomy. How does tubal ligation work to prevent pregnancy? Tubal ligation closes off the fallopian tubes.
The American eugenics movement was formed during the late nineteenth century and continued as late as the 1940s.
Passage of Laws Indiana was the first state to pass a compulsory sterilization law, with the law coming into effect in 1907 (Stern 2007, p.
Bell trial. Carrie Elizabeth Buck (July 3, 1906 – January 28, 1983) was the plaintiff in the United States Supreme Court case Buck v.
The story of Carrie Buck's sterilization and subsequent court case was made into a television drama in 1994, Against Her Will: The Carrie Buck Story with actress Marlee Matlin portraying Buck as an intellectually disabled woman.
The surgery, carried out while Buck was an inmate of the Virginia State Colony for Epileptics and Feebleminded, took place under the authority of the Eugenical Sterilization Act of 1924, part of the Commonwealth of Virginia's eugenics program.
According to American historian Paul A. Lombardo, politicians wrote the law to benefit a malpracticing doctor avoiding lawsuits from patients that were the victims of forced sterilization.
When she was in sixth grade, the Dobbses removed her to have her help with housework. Carrie Buck's foster mother Alice Dobbs, holding Buck's daughter Vivian Buck. At 17, Buck became pregnant as a result of being raped by Alice Dobbs' nephew, Clarence Garland.
In order to ensure that the family could not reproduce, Carrie Buck's sister Doris was also sterilized when she was hospitalized for appen dicitis, although she was never informed of this sterilization.
Her commitment may have been due to the family's embarrassment because Carrie's pregnancy was the result of being raped by the Dobbs' nephew.
Carrie Buck, in full Carrie Elizabeth Buck Eagle Detamore, (born July 2, 1906?, Charlottesville, Virginia, U.S.—died January 28, 1983, Waynesboro, Virginia), American woman who was the plaintiff in the case of Buck v. Bell (1927), in which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of compulsory eugenics -based sterilization ...
After the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals affirmed the ruling, Buck v. Bell was argued before the U.S. Supreme Court in 1927. The court, in an 8–1 decision, upheld the law’s constitutionality. In the majority opinion, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., wrote that “three generations of imbeciles are enough.”.
Supreme Court of the United States, final court of appeal and final expositor of the Constitution of the United States. Within the framework of litigation, the Supreme Court marks the boundaries of authority between state and nation, state and state, and government and citizen.…
In the case of Buck v. Priddy, Amherst County Circuit Court judge Bennett T. Gordon upholds the order to sterilize Carrie Buck, an inmate at the Virginia State Colony of Epileptics and Feeble-Minded. The case was appealed to the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals and then the U.S. Supreme Court, which in 1927 also upheld the order.
This day came J. H. Bell, Superintendent of the State Colony for Epileptics and Feeble-Minded, the successor in office of A. S. Priddy, Superintendent, deceased, and moved the Court that this suit proceed against him and in his name in the place and stead of the said A. S. Priddy, Superintendent, who has departed this life, and it appearing to the Court that the said J. H. Bell , Superintendent as aforesaid, is the successor in office of the said A. S. Priddy, Superintendent, and no sufficient cause having been shown against it, on said motion and by consent of the parties by counsel it is ordered that the said suit proceed against the said J. H. Bell, Superintendent of the State Colony for Epileptics and Feeble-Minded as aforesaid.
A Virginia statute allowed for the forced sterilization of “feeble minded” people to protect the “health of the state.”. Carrie Buck, who was mentally disabled, as was her mother and daughter, was ordered to be sterilized pursuant to the statute. Buck challenged the law on constitutional grounds, arguing that it violated due process ...
Buck challenged the law on constitutional grounds, arguing that it violated due process and equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment. The lower courts upheld the law and the order for sterilization. The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the lower courts.
Buck v. Bell is significant because it legitimized eugenic sterilization, and it sparked many states to adopt their own involuntary sterilization statutes. In fact, Adolf Hitler cited Buck v. Bell as a model for his forced sterilization law to prevent “hereditarily diseased offspring.”. The Nazis even used Buck v.
The purpose of the law was to promote the “health of the patient and the welfare of society.”. The sterilization only took place after a hearing on the propriety of such action.
Buck challenged the Virginia statute, arguing that it is a violation of due process and equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment .
Bell as a defense during the Nuremburg trials following World War II. Buck v. Bell has not been expressly overturned. However, Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535 (1942) made forced sterilization so difficult that it discouraged the practice. By 1963, sterilization laws were almost entirely out of use.
The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the lower courts. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, writing for the majority, stated that the Virginia statute was constitutional, and noted that “three generations of imbeciles are enough.”. Buck v. Bell Case Brief.
Irving Whitehead was the lawyer appointed to represent Carrie Buck at the trial in Amherst County. Whitehead betrayed Carrie, colluding with his supposed adversary, Aubrey Strode, presenting no witnesses, and doing only a minimal job of cross examination.
The 17 year-old protagonist of the Buck vs. Bell case, Carrie Buck, was pitted against an array of doctors, lawyers, and eugenicists who were intent on sterilizing her, including John Bell, the superintendent of the Virginia Colony for Epileptics and Feeb
Aubrey Strode represented Dr. Priddy, who had come to have Buck declared feebleminded and suitable for compulsory sterilization. Irving Whitehead, a lifelong friend to Strode and one of the first board members of the colony, represented Buck in a manner that seems to have been halfhearted. Whitehead's fee was paid by the colony.
In the brief he submitted to the Supreme Court, Whitehead claimed Fourteenth Amendment protection of a person's "full bodily integrity." He also predicated the "worst kind of tyranny" if there were no "limits of the power of the state (which, in the end, is nothing more than the faction in control of the government) to rid itself of those citizens deemed undesirable." Strode, in contrast, likened compulsory sterilization to compulsory vaccination.
Carrie Elizabeth Buck (July 3, 1906 – January 28, 1983) was the plaintiff in the United States Supreme Court case Buck v. Bell, after having been ordered to undergo compulsory sterilization for purportedly being "feeble-minded" by her foster parents after their nephew raped and impregnated her. She had given birth to an illegitimate child without the means to support them. The surgery, carried …
Carrie Buck was born in Charlottesville, Virginia, the first of three children born to Emma Buck; she was soon joined by half-sister Doris Buck and half-brother Roy Smith. Little is known about Emma Buck except that she was poor and married to Frederick Buck, who abandoned her early in their marriage. Emma was committed to the Virginia State Colony for Epileptics and Feebleminded after being accused of immorality, prostitution, and having syphilis.
Virginia's General Assembly passed the Eugenical Sterilization Act in 1924. According to American historian Paul A. Lombardo, politicians wrote the law to benefit a malpracticing doctor avoiding lawsuits from patients that were the victims of forced sterilization. Eugenicists used Buck to legitimize this law in the 1927 Supreme Court case Buck v. Bell through which they sought to gain legal permission for Virginia to sterilize Buck.
In order to ensure that the Buck family could not reproduce, her sister Doris was also sterilized without consent when she was hospitalized for appendicitis. She later married and she and her husband attempted to have children; she did not discover the reason for their lack of success until 1980.
Buck was released shortly after her sterilization was performed. On May 14, 1932, she married …
Paul A. Lombardo, a Professor of Law at Georgia State University, spent almost 25 years researching the Buck v. Bell case. He searched through case records and the papers of the lawyers involved in the case. Lombardo eventually found Carrie Buck and was able to interview her shortly before her death. Lombardo has alleged that several people had manufactured evidence to make the state's case against Carrie Buck, and that Buck was actually of normal inte…
• The Relf Sisters, two African American sisters who were involuntarily sterilized in Montgomery, Alabama in 1973
• Reilly, Philip R. (1987). "Involuntary Sterilization in the United States: A Surgical Solution". The Quarterly Review of Biology. 62 (2): 153–170. doi:10.1086/415404. PMC 1682199. PMID 3299450.
• Kühl, Stefan (1994). The Nazi Connection: Eugenics, American Racism, and German National Socialism. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-508260-9.
• Carrie Buck at Find a Grave
• "Sterilization Act of 1924" by N. Antonios at the Embryo Project Encyclopedia
• Biography at Encyclopedia Virginia