At first Plato believed that law was too general and abstract, and that it failed to recognize the differences between people. He eventually realized that it would be difficult to find a philosopher king and that without one, who could rule without being corrupted? Therefore, there was a need for Law. Need help with your writing assignment?
But that impression is misleading. From ethics to epistemology, Philosophy addresses ideas that have real-world concepts. Even when philosophical discussions themselves are abstract, the way we address them reflects and develops the ways in which we arrive at what we hold to be the truth.
One of the best things about studying Philosophy is that it’s one of the world’s oldest fields of study. As long as humans have existed, we’ve been asking questions such as wondering where we come from, why we’re here, and whether any divine powers control our existence.
However since all people are unequal, the ideal ruler would be a “Philosopher King” – selected not by birth but on the basis of his or her achievements, education, and ability to rule. At first Plato believed that law was too general and abstract, and that it failed to recognize the differences between people.
Do lawyers have to be good at arguing? Yes, law students have to be good at arguing, but most law students do not have to be good public speakers. If you are new to law school or have not been yet, you might be surprised to find out that many lawyers never actually appear in court.
Whereas lawyers are interested in what the law is on a specific issue in a specific jurisdiction, philosophers of law are interested in identifying the features of law shared across cultures, times, and places.
7:459:42Philosophical Reasoning: Crash Course Philosophy #2 - YouTubeYouTubeStart of suggested clipEnd of suggested clipSo sound arguments should always be your goal the reason that deduction is prized by philosophers.MoreSo sound arguments should always be your goal the reason that deduction is prized by philosophers. And lots of other.
Laws Of Conversation: How To Argue Like A LawyerIdentify The Issue And Don't Deviate From It. Recognise the main point of discussion and stick with it. ... Leave Emotion At The Door! Emotion will never win an argument. ... Be Wary Of Shifting Dialogues.
There can be little doubt that the philosophy major provides the best preparation for an education and career in the law. First, philosophy consistently ranks first among pre-law majors in average LSAT score, surely the most important criterion for admission to law schools.
Philosophy is of great service to law; it not only helps in analysis but equally in organization of thought and building of systems. There is reasoning in law known as 'legal reasoning' the branches of philosophy known as logic and epistemology aid legal science in this area.
Philosophers do not just argue. They argue in the right way, for the right reasons, with plausible premises that must necessarily support some sort of conclusion. When you get right down to it, that's really what philosophy is; a process of a priori argumentation that seeks to come to some new conclusion.
The study of philosophy enhances a person's problem-solving capacities. It helps us to analyze concepts, definitions, arguments, and problems. It contributes to our capacity to organize ideas and issues, to deal with questions of value, and to extract what is essential from large quantities of information.
Here's How To Win Any ArgumentGet Your Opponent to Empathize With You. According to Business Insider's video, Aristotle believed in three different methods of influence — one of which was pathos. ... Get Your Opponent to See Your Point of View. ... Convince Your Opponent of Your Credibility. ... Use the Socratic Method.
Most lawyers will readily agree that to “think like a lawyer” is to think differently than others. For some, this is unsettling because the rational, analytical processes one gains while learning to “think like a lawyer” can make them feel that their core values are being challenged or even changed.
Half of the time, lawyers are not arguing before a judge or with opposing counsel. They argue with their clients, bosses and co-workers. And sometimes they have to keep their mouths shut unless they want to get fired.
They don't just talk about the facts; they present them. They give their audience visible, tangible proof that the case is as they say it is by providing concrete evidence, clothing, pictures of the crime scene or the victim, documents etc. They're Reasonable – Great lawyers appeal to reason.