On November 2, 2006, Jeffrey Deskovic’s indictment charging him with murder, rape, and possession of a weapon was dismissed on the grounds of actual innocence. Postconviction DNA testing both proved Deskovic’s innocence and identified the real perpetrator of a 1989 murder and rape.
Jeffrey Deskovic, then 16 years old, was a classmate of the victim’s. He became a suspect because he was late to school the day after the victim disappeared. Police also believed he seemed overly distraught at the victim’s death, visiting her wake three times.
Deskovic’s alleged confession occurred after six hours, three polygraph sessions, and extensive questioning by detectives between sessions. One of the detectives accused Deskovic of having failed the test and said he had been convinced of Deskovic’s guilt for several weeks.
During the confession, Deskovic sobbed. By the end of the interrogation, he was under the table, curled up in the fetal position, crying. The Biological Evidence. The victim was found naked and her autopsy revealed genital trauma.
Deskovic said, “I lost my temper” and admitted he had hit the victim in the head with a Gatorade bottle, put his hand over her mouth and kept it there too long.
In October 2014, a federal jury awarded him $41 million in his civil rights lawsuit against Putnam County. He used $1.5 million of his compensation money to start The Jeffrey Deskovic Foundation for Justice, which fights wrongful convictions and assists those exonerated.
In September 2006, the semen was matched to convicted murderer Steven Cunningham, who was in prison for strangling the sister of his live-in girlfriend. On September 20, 2006, Jeff Deskovic was released from prison when his conviction was overturned.
Deskovic would not entertain the thought of leaving until his lawyer asked him for his proper clothes and shoe size in order to buy him a suit. It was having the luxury of choosing his own clothes made him truly feel like a free man.
To decide on which clients to take, Deskovic and his team ask three main questions: Does the applicant have at least a plausible claim of actual innocence based on something objective? Is there a potential way to win? How much time and financial resources is it going to take?
Deskovic often felt out of place in social situations and unable to communicate with people. He also lacked the knowledge of how to use most technology, given the fact that most of it did not exist before his incarceration.
Deskovic also lost most of his friends during his time in prison, and lost touch with most of his extended family. Deskovic’s grandmother would visit, however she passed away while he was still incarcerated. As the years went on, even Deskovic’s mother started visiting only once every six months. Like many formerly incarcerated individuals, Deskovic reentered the world basically alone, and he had to navigate it by himself.
After officially becoming a lawyer, Deskovic founded his Jeffrey Deskovic Foundation for Justice. In 2009, the foundation gained non-profit status from the IRS, and by 2011, they were working out of a true office, conducting a full-fledged business.
Getting their representation turned Deskovic’s situation around. With their help, the new DNA evidence was able to be resubmitted to court. When Deskovic’s lawyer arrived to inform Deskovic of his liberation, he did not believe it. For hours, Deskovic would not let himself dare to hope that this was really true.
On November 2, 2006, Jeff Deskovic’s indictment charging him with murder, rape, and possession of a weapon was dismissed on the grounds of actual innocence. Postconviction DNA testing both proved Deskovic’s innocence and identified the real perpetrator of a 1989 murder and rape.
Jeff Deskovic, then 16 years old, was a classmate of the victim. He became a suspect because he was late to school the day after the victim disappeared. Police also believed he seemed overly distraught at the victim’s death, visiting her wake three times.
On September 20, 2006, Jeff Deskovic was released from prison when his conviction was overturned. Following an apology from the assistant district attorney, the court dismissed Deskovic’s indictment on the grounds of actual innocence on November 2, 2006.
Deskovic’s alleged confession occurred after six hours, three polygraph sessions, and extensive questioning by detectives between sessions. One of the detectives accused Deskovic of having failed the test and said he had been convinced of Deskovic’s guilt for several weeks. According to the detective, Deskovic then stated he realized three weeks ago he might be the responsible party. Deskovic was asked to describe the crime and began speaking in the third person, switching to first person part way through the narrative. Deskovic said, I lost my temper and admitted he had hit the victim in the head with a Gatorade bottle, put his hand over her mouth and kept it there too long. During the confession, Deskovic sobbed. By the end of the interrogation, he was under the table, curled up in the fetal position, crying.
Jeffrey Deskovic Angel Chevrestt. Jeffrey Deskovic spent 16 years in prison after being wrongly convicted of raping and strangling a Peekskill high school classmate in 1990. Now he says he’s been wronged again.
After handing over $1,020,000, Deskovic anxiously waited for a contract laying out his agreement with Viollis and Murphy. Four years later it has yet to arrive, court papers say.
DNA from the crime scene was matched to a convicted murderer who later confessed to killing Correa. Deskovic, who is single, sued Putnam County, and in 2014 a federal jury awarded him $40 million. The county paid out $10 million. Now Deskovic says he is prepared to seek justice again.
Since his release Jeff has obtained a master's degree in criminal justice, become a strong advocate for criminal justice reform, testified before state legislatures and, using funds from his lawsuit settlements, established the Jeffrey Deskovic Foundation for Justice to help others who have been wrongfully convicted. The foundation achieved its first victory in January 2013 by assisting in the release of William Lopez, 54, a New York state prisoner who served over 23 years for a murder he didn't commit.
JEFF DESKOVIC: I was born in Tarrytown in 1973 and I was raised in Peekskill, which is in Westchester County, New York.
JD: I was arrested at 16 but turned 17 before the trial came around, so technically I was 17 at the time I was wrongfully convicted.
JD: Tax fraud with alleged mafia connections as well. Her office argued that the prosecution was somehow prejudiced by those four days, and that the court should simply rule that I was late without getting to the merits of the issues I was arguing – which included, among other things, my innocence argument based on DNA. The court sided with the district attorney and that meant I was time barred, so was only able to argue the procedural ruling against me.
I wanted to testify at the Huntley hearing as to what happened in the interrogation room because, if I had done so and the judge had believed me, then that would have resulted in the statements being suppressed and hence the charges would have been dismissed.
JD: Yes. Every time I made a court appearance I was on the front page of a number of newspapers, and the articles were written from a guilt-oriented perspective. So I believe that set the tone for things, and it's a fiction to believe that jurors aren't affected by adverse media coverage – or that judges and prosecutors can't be swayed or even emboldened by negative coverage.
Finally, after six months they decided to take my case. Pirro had left office and been replaced by her successor, and they got the new DA to agree to allow me to have further DNA testing through the databank. The results actually matched the perpetrator, whose DNA was in the database – only because he was left free while I was doing time for his crime. He struck again, killing another victim, a woman, three-and-a-half years later.