Connecticut Law About Recusal (Disqualification of Judicial Authority) These links connect to resources available and are provided with the understanding that they represent only a starting point for research. This web page has many external links to valuable resources. Please view our Linkage Policy for more information.
Mar 01, 2022 · It is relevant that one or both parties could reasonably foresee that the lawyer would probably be a witness. The conflict of concern principles stated in Rules 1.7, 1.9 and 1.10 have no application to this view of the problem. Reading: Rule 3.7 Lawyer As Witness ...
Mar 18, 2015 · Rules) are published in the Connecticut and posted online. Recusal-6 § 38. Motion for disqualification for cause (mandatory grounds) ... Affidavit in Support of Motion to Recuse Judge – State CASE LAW Kevin L. Hoffkins v. Dianne Hart-D'amato 187 Conn. App. 227, 235, 201 A.3d 1053 (2019). “[…]we conclude that the ...
Sep 26, 2015 · Connecticut Rules Regarding Expert Witness Depositions and Interrogatories. Under Section 13-4 (c) (1) of the Connecticut Practice Book, experts that a party expects to call a trial may be subject to deposition. The Connecticut rules do not impose a specific time limit on such depositions, but Section 13-27 (e) provides that the court may increase or decrease the …