The adage a man who is his own lawyer has a fool for his client means that representing yourself in court is foolish. It comes from a perception that it is difficult for a person who does not have detailed knowledge of the law to present the evidence, arguments, and legal opinion that would convince a judge or jury to decide in his favour.
Jul 30, 2019 · It is an old law adage, copied from the Italian proverb of Che s’insegna, &c. that the man who is his own lawyer has a fool for his client. If he undertakes, of choice, to become so in making his will, he seems to us to verify the proverb in the most obvious and striking instance.
As with many proverbs, it is difficult to determine a precise origin but this expression first began appearing in print in the early 19th century. An early example comes in The flowers of wit, or a choice collection of bon mots, by Henry Kett, 1814: ...observed the eminent lawyer, "I hesitate not to pronounce, that every man who is his own lawyer, has a fool for a client.
a man on the make. a man on the street. a man or a mouse. a man who is his own lawyer has a fool for a client. a man who stands for nothing falls for anything. a man who stands for nothing will fall for anything. a man with a mission. a man without a smiling face must not open a shop.
The adage a man who is his own lawyer has a fool for his client means that representing yourself in court is foolish. It comes from a perception that it is difficult for a person who does not have detailed knowledge of the law to present the evidence, arguments, and legal opinion that would convince a judge or jury to decide in his favour.
Abraham Lincoln reportedly employed the following adage. Here are two versions: If you are your own lawyer you have a fool for a client. He who represents himself has a fool for a client.
ABRAHAM LINCOLN SAID: A man who represents himself, has a fool for a client.
It is an old law adage, copied from the Italian proverb of Che s’insegna, &c. that the man who is his own lawyer has a fool for his client. If he undertakes, of choice, to become so in making his will, he seems to us to verify the proverb in the most obvious and striking instance. For the ill consequences of his ignorance fall upon those whom he loves best, and wishes to benefit most.
Before you act, it’s Prudence soberly to consider; for after Action you cannot recede without dishonour: Take the Advice of some Prudent Friend; for he who will be his own Counsellour, shall be sure to have a Fool for his Client.
A counselor is a person who gives counsel, i.e., an adviser. Alternatively, a counsellor is an attorney, especially one who pleads cases in court. The context suggests to QI that the first interpretation is the most likely.
Benjamin Franklin (Fredd Wayne): No, that might be unwise, Sir. The man who defends himself in court has a fool for a lawyer and a jackass for a client.
Whoever, he stole it from me. In 1976 the famous statesman, lawyer, and quotation magnet Abraham Lincoln received credit for the saying in a Spokane, Washington newspaper. Lincoln died in 1865, so this attribution is very late, and it is not substantive: 9.
A man (or woman) who is his (her) own lawyer has a fool for his client.
This is tough stuff. You would be foolish if you try to represent yourself .
A lawyer may have the arrogant view that she or he knows the law and is an excellent advocate. Right or wrong in that analysis, as an involved party, the lawyer is unlikely to be as objective about the case as an independent counsel. That involvement, almost always emotionally charged, may distort the handling of the case, usually to the lawyer's detriment. Judges will often insist on shadow counsel even when the pro se defendant is a lawyer.
Because of this, many judges, especially in criminal cases, will require that the person representing himself or herself have a shadow counsel available to assist. The shadow counsel does not lead in the arguments or examinations, but is on call as will try to guide the pro se defendant or party informally.
However, it is also possible for a person to represent themselves, i.e. to be their own lawyer (and therefore, their own client). The adage a man who is his own lawyer has a fool for his client means that representing yourself in court is foolish.
There is the old adage in civil or criminal trials that describes a person who represents himself at trial: “He has a fool for a client.”
Normally, in a situation involving the insolvency of a company, the legal adviser would advise the members of the board of directors that their duty has shifted from representing the interests of the stockholders to the creditors and that they risk personal liability if they ignore their responsibility to the creditors of the business. However, if the attorney is an equity holder in this business, he might not give strong advice to the board to consider liquidating the company to pay creditors because of a wish to preserve his investment in the enterprise.
Because of the specialized nature of most of their practices , transactional attorneys often do not have the experience necessary to represent themselves in matters outside their specialty areas. For example, a securities attorney should probably not handle the legal documentation involved in the sale of his home.
Issues involving conflicts of interest can become especially acute when an attorney represents a business entity in which he is also an investor. Attorneys are routinely participants in investment partnerships, private businesses, banks, hospital districts and any number of commercial and not-for-profit businesses.
Judges typically keep the pro se defendant on a short leash during opening and closing arguments to prevent him from making factual statements without swearing to tell the truth first.
Practicing attorneys in a field, beyond the technical nuts and bolts of practicing law, develop expertise as to the customary and appropriate terms for a matter in a given instance, that is, what the particular market will allow.
Early in the 20th century, trial lawyers were capable of handling all litigation matters, whether they be criminal or civil. Many of the members of the Bar were sole practitioners in small law practices who handled all legal matters, from wills to criminal proceedings.
Lawyers get disbarred for sleeping with clients fairly routinely. Lesser discipline is rare. It’s a really stupid thing to do.
the judicial process is the generally accepted method of determining guilt or innocent, and that method requires a prosecution and a defence.
People should stop asking various variations of this stupid question about criminal defence lawyers defending a person who they know is ‘guilty’ — or have ‘irrefutable’ evidence of their guilty act.
Sure. Anyone can represent himself. We don't tend to represent ourselves though. This is for several reasons. One, when you represent yourself you lack perspective on your case. You have trouble seeing the strengths and weaknesses. Two, you are emotionally involved and that can make you unreasonable. Three, you may not know the practice area very well.
However, in the event that some further action is necessary, then the smartest decision a person can make is to allow an experienced trained professional to assist them in the resolution of the matter ; especially when the entire “weight" of the legal system is brought into play.
In many cases, because of the issues and often the “twists", or even simply because the extent of the damages and the possible exposure of the insurance company, the filing of a lawsuit will be required! In fact, statistics show that if a case potentially involves a settlement in excess of $100,000.00; that litigation will more likely than not be required! Simply, because any case with that amount of exposure will cause ALL parties (including the insurance company) to exercise as much “due diligence" as possible to determine whether the claim has merit.
All professionals, including but not limited to attorneys, physicians, accountants, dentists, but also “specialists" of all areas - all have one key factor in common: Years of education and Training! Training and education that if used in an “objective" and “meaningful" way, can and often does make the difference between winning and losing, and in extreme cases – “financial" demise, and loss of “freedom and liberty".
Next, when a “personally vested" emotional state is combined with all the complexities and nuances that every single legal matter involves, the answer becomes obvious: “He [and even a lawyer] who represents himself [TRULY] has a fool of a client!
President Lincoln was also an attorney, and yet – he felt compelled to make that statement? Why? Speaking from the perspective of an attorney that has been practicing law for over 20 years, the answer to me is actually as much “psychological" as it is “practical". In fact, as much of my practice consists of representing attorneys and other professionals in criminal matters, civil litigation, bankruptcy proceedings, and sales of structured settlements, and annuities, I have had the “unique" opportunity to see first-hand – just how true that statement actually is!
A. Because personal injury claims are generally handled on a “contingency basis"; the ONLY attorney fees charged will come from the FINAL settlement of the claim. Although, “costs" on occasion may be required (particularly if litigation is necessary); most experienced attorneys will ALSO ADVANCE those costs on your behalf at no interest as well.
Here are some versions of a pertinent adage: He who treats himself has a fool for a patient. A physician who treats himself has a fool for a patient. The person who is his own doctor has a simpleton for a patient.
It has been said that he who is his own lawyer, is sure to have a fool for his client; and that he who is his own physician is equally sure to have a fool for his patient.
1950 Copyright, Sir William Osler Aphorisms From His Bedside Teachings And Writings, Collected by Robert Bennett Bean M.D., Edited by William Bennett Bean M.D., Section: The Medical Student and The Student Practitioner, Quote Page 49, Henry Schuman Inc., New York. (Verified with scans)
1781, Some Observations on the Origin and Progress of the Atrabilious Constitution and Gout, Chapter V: Containing the irregular and complicated gout by William Grant M.D., Quote Page 6, Printed for T. Cadell, London. (Google Books Full View) link
In 1872 a character in a serialized story by William J. Flagg in “Harper’s New Monthly Magazine” contended that doing housework for oneself was desirable: 6
Besides, it is a well-known fact, that he who prescribes for himself has, generally, a fool for his patient; a man cannot be his own physician; disease, and anxiety, and doubt, and fear so enfeeble his mind and cloud his judgment, that he cannot prescribe, with any tolerable hope of success, for a disorder under which he himself labours.