13 reasons why lawyer trial defense strategy

What happened to Justin and Alex in 13 reasons why?

Quick summary: Justin is out of jail and going to be adopted by Clay’s parents; Alex and Jess are dating; Ryan (yes, he still exists) is taking a gap year to travel; Tony and his boyfriend are cool; Olivia is moving to New York to live Hannah’s dream for her. But before Olivia leaves, she has something important to show Clay: Hannah’s Reasons Why.

Who is Sonya Struhl in 13 reasons why Season 2?

Sonya Struhl is a recurring character who appears in the second season of 13 Reasons Why. She is portrayed by Allison Miller. Sonya is a smart and ambitious young litigator. She replaced Lainie Jensen as litigator for the school in the Andrew and Olivia Baker vs The Evergreen County School District.

Are Bryce and Justin BFFs in 13 reasons why?

Taking a page from Arrested Development, 13 Reasons Why goes full Boyfights for the beginning of “The Box of Polaroids.” In the Bryce and Justin friendship origin story, the third-graders become BFFs after Bryce comes to Justin’s aide during a fight and steals him a Twinkie.

Why is Jessica’s testimony important in 13 reasons why?

Jessica’s turn This feels like an important early season episode because this is Jessica’s testimony. She’s the one who was first raped by Bryce, and she’s the only one who can get the truth out there. The first two episodes, while focusing on other characters, were building to this moment.

What are three problems defense attorneys face?

The Challenges of Defense Attorney CareersNegative Public Perception. Media coverage of crimes and suspects poses challenges for defense attorneys. ... Difficult Clients. Challenging clients and their families are often more taxing than public misconceptions, though. ... Limited Time and Resources. ... Job Pressure and Stress.

What are the four major criminal law defenses?

That is why criminal attorneys employ various criminal defense strategies in order to create reasonable doubt for their clients. When it comes to criminal cases, there are usually four major criminal defense strategies that criminal attorneys employ: innocence, constitutional violations, self-defense, and insanity.

What is a defense strategy in court?

A defense strategy is a product of a defendant and defense attorney fitting together the version of the truth that is most likely to produce a satisfactory defense outcome–a verdict of not guilty, a verdict of guilt of a lesser charge, or an acceptable plea bargain.

How do you win a court with a powerful loophole?

1:335:06What It Takes To Win In Court - YouTubeYouTubeStart of suggested clipEnd of suggested clipBy moving to strike or dismiss. It then the defendant files an answer and affirmative fencesMoreBy moving to strike or dismiss. It then the defendant files an answer and affirmative fences defendants job now is to show the plaintiff does not have the greater weight of evidence. His.

What are the 7 procedural defenses?

Some common procedural defenses are entrapment by the government, false confession by witnesses, falsified evidence, denial of a speedy trial, double jeopardy, prosecutorial misconduct, and selective prosecution.

What are the 6 legal defenses?

These are six conventional approaches to defending people from criminal prosecution.Affirmative Defense.Coercion and Duress.Abandonment and Withdrawal.Self-Defense.Defense-of-Others.Violations of Constitutional Rights.

How can a defense attorney defend a guilty client?

A criminal lawyer can still defend the client by arguing that the evidence does not prove the elements of the offence beyond reasonable doubt. If the client gives evidence denying guilt or makes a statement claiming their innocence, the solicitor must stop acting for them.

What is the most common argument of a defense attorney?

Common Defense Strategies in Criminal CourtNo intent to commit the crime (accident)Mistake of fact.The crime was committed out of duress or necessity.Police misconduct or a violation of your rights.Intoxication (may still result in other charges)Self-defense.Insanity (may still result in institutionalization)

How can a defendant win a court case?

FOUR THINGS TO REMEMBER TO WIN A COURT CASETell the Court Everything That It Wants to Know. ... Know the Facts and Questions of Law. ... Present Your Case Convincingly. ... Avoid Lengthy Unreasonable Arguments & Tiresome Cross Examination.

How do you sway a judge in your favor?

How to Persuade a JudgeYour arguments must make logical sense. ... Know your audience.Know your case.Know your adversary's case.Never overstate your case. ... If possible lead with the strongest argument.Select the most easily defensible position that favors your case.Don't' try to defend the indefensible.More items...•

How do you impress a judge?

Be Respectful of The Judge At All Times When Speaking – And When Listening. “Your Honor.” If you want to impress the judge, make those two words part of your courtroom vocabulary. Your thoughtfulness is a sign of respect for the position the judge holds.

What color should a woman wear to court?

What Color Should a Woman Wear to Court? Darker, more serious colors are preferable, and bright colors should be avoided. The best colors to wear to court are “conservative” colors (white, blue, navy, gray, and the like) and to steer clear of crazy patterns and shocking fashion statements.

What is the second season of 13 Reasons Why?

The second season of 13 Reasons Why was all about getting justice for Hannah Baker, and that meant most of the new episodes took place inside a courtroom. While Hannah told her story through posthumous cassette tapes in Season 1, her story was retold through other perspectives via testimonies from the tapes' subjects in the court case at the center of the new season, adding a whole lot more information and context to Hannah's story. So, how does Hannah's trial end in 13 Reasons Why Season 2? The verdict may have come as a shock to many viewers.

What lawsuit did Olivia Baker file against Liberty High School?

At the center of the new season is Mrs. Baker's lawsuit against the school district. Following her daughter's death, we learn that Olivia Baker filed a suit against Liberty High School claiming that the school was negligent after her daughter exhibited signs that she may be suicidal.

Why is 13 Reasons Why criticized?

Principal Bolan makes a meta point. Season 1 of 13 Reasons Why was criticized for glorifying suicide as a means of escaping the world but still living on forever after they die, as well as encouraging copycats. In a conversation between Principal Bolan and Clay, the show seems to point to this very criticism.

Why does Marcus lie?

His father gives him one piece of advice before taking the stand: “look out for yourself first.” Marcus has no trouble doing that, lying about his date with Hannah at the diner, saying that she pushed him out of the booth when he tried to hold her hand. Then he says that Hannah used the date to try and get Marcus to hook her up with Bryce. He’s spinning one lie after another, and it comes so easily to him. It’s horrifying to watch, and the next day he’s back at school high-fiving all of his classmates. What a scumbag. At least Porter gives him a small dose of real talk.

Why doesn't Jessica mention Bryce in her testimony?

With Jessica not mentioning Bryce during her testimony because she knows it’s her word against his, with race and gender playing a huge factor in her decision to stay silent, Clay and Tony go looking for Justin. They find him in Oakland, living on the streets. Clay convinces him to come back by saying that Jessica wants him back. She doesn’t, and it’s a selfish move on Clay’s part that could blow up in his face. It could also give Jessica the witness she needs to tell the truth about Bryce.

Why did the Bakers refuse the offer?

Before long though Clay’s mom is telling him that the Bakers have refused the school’s final offer, largely because the board included a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the deal, and that the trial is set to begin the very next day. 2. Tyler is the first witness.

Is there a trial in Hannah?

At the end of last season, it looked like Hannah’s parents, the Bakers, were going to settle their lawsuit against the school, meaning there’d be no need for a trial. Clay even mentions that at the beginning of this season premiere.

Who defended the school in the Andrew and Olivia Baker vs Evergreen County trial?

Through the season, Sonya defended the school during the Andrew and Olivia Baker vs The Evergreen County School District trial. She revealed and made testifiers reveal a lot of information about Hannah and the testifiers themselves, like Mr. Baker's affair and Zach and Hannah's relationship. She was able to convince the jury that the school was not responsible for Hannah's death.

What did Sonya do in the Evergreen County trial?

Through the season, Sonya defended the school during the Andrew and Olivia Baker vs The Evergreen County School District trial. She revealed and made testifiers reveal a lot of information about Hannah and the testifiers themselves, like Mr. Baker's affair and Zach and Hannah's relationship. She was able to convince the jury ...

I wonder where Mrs Jensen must have messed up to make her own son request to the dad a divorce

In the episode in season 2 where Justin ran off and It was just clay and matt in the morning, where Clay technically wanted a divorce by requesting they just move somewhere as the two of them.

Is Charlie the only character in 13 Reasons Why who has a nice healthy relationship with their parent (s)?

I tried to think about someone else except him, but couldn't come up with anyone. Maybe I missed someone?

What is Sam Meehan's law practice?

Sam Meehan’s experience spans all phases of litigation, including managing and conducting discovery, mediation and arbitration, as well as extensive motion practice. His practice focuses on defending corporate and individual clients in government enforcement investigations, white collar criminal matters, and complex commercial litigation. Most recently, he represented clients in connection with investigations and enforcement actions brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). Sam maintains an active pro bono practice, and recently defended a prominent LGBTQ+ civil rights organization in several contract disputes related to event cancellations caused by the coronavirus pandemic.#N#Prior to joining Waymaker, Sam advised some of the nation’s largest union pension and health funds on ERISA and related matters. He also completed a post-bar fellowship with the Santa Clara County District Attorney, where he worked in the gangs unit, where he made multiple court appearances prosecuting members of a notorious international gang involved in methamphetamine distribution.#N#Sam received his law degree from the University of Southern California’s Gould School of Law, where he received the USC Law Merit Scholarship. During law school, he externed in the Sex Crimes Division of the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s office. Before attending law school, he worked as a researcher for Ocean Champions, a non-profit ocean conservancy group. He graduated with high honors from the University of California, Berkeley, with a B.A. in political science.

What is anti-SLAPP motion?

Argued and won anti- SLAPP motion in which trial court held defamation allegations against client were protected under California’s Anti-SLAPP statute, struck the complaint in its entirety and granted client fees and costs.