If you have been arrested by the police, there are many things you should do. For example, you should generally remain calm and silent and get an attorney who can advise you of your rights and help you with complicated criminal laws and the legal system. There are also many things you shouldn’t do if you’ve been arrested.
 · If you have been arrested by the police, there are many things you should do. For example, you should generally remain calm and silent and get an attorney who can advise you of your rights and help you with complicated criminal laws and the legal system. There are also many things you shouldn’t do if you’ve been arrested.
 · Without a legal counsel, confessing to police makes their case absolutely concrete without the possibility of a beneficial concession. The far better option, even when guilty, is to remain silent during the arrest and wait for a lawyer to …
You have the right to remain silent. Any statements you make can and will be used against you in court. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford to hire one, a lawyer will be appointed to represent you.
The right of a suspect or an accused to remain silent in the U.S. is rooted in the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution which states that “no person… shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” According to the U.S. Supreme Court, to be a witness means to testify.
The right to remain silent is based on the the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It guarantees that we will not be required to testify against ourselves. Specifically, the 5th Amendment reads: “No person . . . shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.”
The Right to Remain Silent The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects people from being compelled to give testimony that could incriminate them. This is not the same as saying that a person has a right to silence at all times. In some situations, police may use silence itself as incriminating evidence.
The law in the state of California is clear. You are only allowed to be held without charges for a total of 48 hours or less.. Our office does not practice criminal defense, but we can refer you to a criminal defense attorney.
These include situations such as: The suspect is being asked questions that are standard booking procedures. The situation involves an emergency hostage situation or negotiation. The person is unaware that they are speaking with a police officer.
The Fifth Amendment establishes the right to remain silent and the right not to be a witness against yourself in a criminal case. This important constitutional amendment means you do not have to provide an answer that would incriminate you.
Know Your Rights: What Are Miranda Rights?Who Is Ernesto Miranda? ... You Have the Right to Remain Silent. ... Anything You Say can Be Used Against You in a Court of Law. ... You Have the Right to Have an Attorney Present. ... If You Cannot Afford an Attorney, One Will Be Appointed to You. ... Arrest Without the Reading of Miranda Rights.More items...
The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees that an individual cannot be compelled by the government to provide incriminating information about herself – the so-called “right to remain silent.” When an individual “takes the Fifth,” she invokes that right and refuses to answer questions or provide ...
The Fifth Amendment creates a number of rights relevant to both criminal and civil legal proceedings. In criminal cases, the Fifth Amendment guarantees the right to a grand jury, forbids “double jeopardy,” and protects against self-incrimination.
Officers must provide Miranda warnings whenever theyinterrogate someone who is in custody. “Interrogation” includes not onlyexpress questioning, bu...
In a closely contested 2013 decision, the United States Supreme Court held that prosecutors can, under appropriate circumstances, point to an out-o...
The 2013 Supreme Court decisionraises weighty questions, such as whether it’s reasonable to place the onus ofasserting constitutional rights on eve...
Here are 4 Reasons to Keep Quiet Around the Police and keep yourself safe later. Police officers simply do not have the time to interrogate those they feel are free of wrongdoing when a situation occurs which requires police action.
Nine times out of ten, police assure those they question that they would be “better off” if they came clean immediately––implying the consequences would be less harsh by simplifying the legal process and making their job easier. These enticing propositions are vague for a reason: they’re completely unsubstantiated.
Without a legal counsel, confessing to police makes their case absolutely concrete without the possibility of a beneficial concession. The far better option, even when guilty, is to remain silent during the arrest and wait for a lawyer to oversee the next step of the legal proceeding.
The more practical question is what, exactly, an out-of-custody person must say to inquisitive police officers in order to effectively claim the right to silence. Courts have indicated that they should make clear that they are invoking their Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
According to the Court, the prosecution can comment on the silence of a suspect who:
At trial, they argued that his reaction to the officer's shell-casing question suggested his guilt. The Court ruled that this argument by the prosecutors was proper—the defendant had not clearly indicated that he intended to assert his Fifth Amendment right when asked about the shell casings.
Defendant Must Clearly Assert Right to Silence. In the case that led to this new rule, a police officer who was investigating a murder asked the suspect (and eventual defendant), who was not then in custody, a series of questions over the course of an hour. The officer did not Mirandize the suspect.
Supreme Court held that prosecutors can, under appropriate circumstances, point to an out-of-custody suspect's silence in response to police questioning as evidence of guilt. ( Salinas v. Texas, 133 S. Ct. 2174 (2013).)
Being "in custody" describes a situation in which a reasonable person in the suspect's shoes would not feel free to leave. The corollary of Miranda warnings is that the prosecution cannot use a suspect's silence as evidence of guilt in a court of law—otherwise the warnings would be meaningless.
Officers must provide Miranda warnings whenever they interrogate someone who is in custody. " Interrogation " includes not only express questioning but also any words or actions that police officers should know are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response. Being "in custody" describes a situation in which a reasonable person in the suspect's shoes would not feel free to leave.
Remain Silent: If you have been arrested or suspect that you are the subject of a criminal investigation - DO NOT TALK ABOUT YOUR CASE WITH THE POLICE OR ANYONE OTHER THAN A CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY .
The average motorist stopped by a police officer who asks them, "Would you mind if I search your vehicle, please?" will probably consent to the officer's search without realizing that they have every right to deny the officer's request.
If a free society depends upon an informed citizenry exercising oversight of its government, then more people need to know how to handle themselves in a police encounter.
Saying something like, "Officer, I know you want to do your job, but my attorney has told me never to consent to any searches of my private property" is a respectful but sufficient way to help protect your rights.
If you consent to a search, you give up one of the most important constitutional rights you have —your protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.
Do Not Consent to Searches and Seizures: If a police officer asks your permission to search you, your house or car, you are under no obligation to consent. The officer may be asking you because they may not have enough evidence to search without your consent.
Anything you say can be held against you. Talking to a police officer, is almost always a no-win situation.
If the detective wants to arrest you, then your attorney will schedule your surrender. If the detective wants to arrest you but does not have enough evidence to make an arrest, and your attorney speaks to him, you will not be arrested. If you go to the precinct, any statement you make WILL be used against you and you will be arrested.
Scenarios If You Are Guilty. If you are guilty of the crime the detective is investigating, and you admit your guilt, your admission will be used against you . It is always a possibility to eventually plead guilty, and perhaps receive a plea deal, if you actually are guilty.
The privilege against self-incrimination serves as a protection to the innocent, as well as to the guilty - use it.
Finally, if you are convicted after a trial and it is shown that you lied to the police by claiming you did not commit the charged crime, you could ultimately receive a harsher punishment from the judge.
If the detective has any evidence, even mistaken or unreliable, to show that anything you have said in your statement is false, your answers can be used to convict you, even if the false information is not a specific act of the crime.
Even if you are completely innocent, only tell the truth and say nothing incriminating, there is still a chance that your answers can be used to convict you. This is especially the case if your answers are not written by you because the statement was oral or was written by the detective but not signed by you, and the detective does not recall the answers with 100% accuracy.
If you are innocent and only tell the truth, it is likely that you will give the police some little tidbit of information that can eventually be used to convict you. This piece of information could be as minute as where you were on the day the crime took place.
Think about the answers to the first two questions you asked. If you’re not being detained and you’re not being arrested, chances are you are free to go. The police cannot keep you without probable cause or reasonable suspicion.
If you’re being detained, ask why. It could be innocuous, which can ease some of your panic. But, as with an arrest, understanding the situation you’re in will help you formulate your responses and your next actions.
If they disregard this and continue anyway, call your lawyer ASAP. Be sure to choose an entertainment lawyer who can handle a variety of legal issues. This could be an illegal search and seizure since the law requires officers to have warrants. An exception is if they have extreme examples of reasonable suspicion or probable cause).
So if they’re asking to search your things or asking to enter your home/your car, that usually means they don’t have a warrant and are asking for your consent. Ask whether they have a warrant and if they say no, then you can legally refuse the officers. If they disregard this and continue anyway, call your lawyer ASAP.
In general, you shouldn’t give your consent to police officers. They need warrants to search you, your property, or your home. They also need an arrest warrant if they’ve come specifically to arrest you.
Or perhaps they are attempting to pin a crime on you. Whatever the case with voluntary interactions, you can end the interaction legally at any time. You also cannot be searched by the police or have your things searched if you don’t consent.
You also cannot be detained illegally. If they say you aren’t free to go and it later comes out that they had no cause to hold you, that’s something to take up with your lawyers. Usually, if you are free to go it’s called a “voluntary interaction” with police.
Making an intentionally false statement in response to a law enforcement question about an investigation is a crime often referred to as “misprision.”. When considering whether to make a report, remember that you do not have to be certain that a crime has been committed or will be committed.
If you tell the police the getaway car was red, but the next day you remember it was white, that’s an honest mistake. While it’s alright to make an honest mistake in describing what you saw, you should not intentionally mislead the authorities. Providing a false report to the police is itself a crime.
In some states, veterinarians have a duty to report instances of animal cruelty. Each state and the federal government has its own definitions of who is a protected person, which events trigger a duty to report, and who is a mandatory reporter.
Governments typically enact such laws to protect persons who may be particularly vulnerable, such as children, the disabled, and the elderly. And some professionals have mandatory reporting requirements even where no vulnerable victims are involved.
The reason for not requiring intervention or reporting is to leave policing to the professionals and to avoid turning all citizens into informants. For example, imagine taking a walk in the park on your day off. You see a masked man running toward you with a purse in his hand. He’s being chased by an elderly woman.
As a general rule, members of the public are not legally required to intervene when they witness a crime, nor must they report it to the police. In some situations, depending on the specifics of state law, they may make a citizens’ arrest, but that is an option, not a requirement. The reason for not requiring intervention or reporting is to leave policing to the professionals and to avoid turning all citizens into informants.
That failure is usually a misdemeanor, but it can be a felony. Prosecutions for failure to report are very rare and usually involve strong evidence of a serious harm that could have been prevented if a person with a duty to make a report had done so.
Eric Guster, a civil rights defense attorney based in Birmingham, Ala., told AlterNet that people should record verbal interactions with officers because it will be a matter of “he said, she said” if a cop slaps handcuffs on you for cursing at him.
In Minneapolis, a black person is 8.86 times more likely to be arrested than a white person for disorderly conduct, according to the ACLU.
There are no statistics available to determine how many citizens are arrested for cursing at officers, but courts around the country consistently rule in favor of defendants who find themselves behind bars for using profane, but protected speech against law enforcement.
Many officers who served as security for music concerts refused to protect the young hip hop group when they toured the country. During a Detroit concert, police rushed to the stage after Ice Cube started speaking lyrics from the song. The group fled the stage and were later questioned by the cops. No one was charged.
He was convicted and sentenced to three and a half to seven years in prison. The appeals court ruled Gonzalez wasn’t engaged in disorderly conduct just by virtue of shouting obscenities, and that this behavior wasn’t a “potential or immediate public problem.” And because he didn’t commit a crime, the cops had no probable cause to search him.
Being rude is not illegal, even if some of us sometimes wish it were. Being rude to cops, including cursing them out may be ill-advised, but it is protected speech.Yet that doesn’t mean you won’t end up in bracelets anyway.
That may be so, but Guster warns that it's still smart to keep your cool during a stop or interaction with law enforcement. The hassle going to court to fight the case, pay bail and secure a lawyer may not be worth it.