why you need a lawyer for a strict liablity case

Working with a skilled attorney who understands strict liability gives you the solutions you need to achieve a successful outcome in your case. There are many other factors related to strict liability such as the intent of the legislature and elements related to mental state.

Full Answer

What do you need to know about strict liability cases?

Get the legal definition, examples, and everything you need to know about strict liability cases. The basis for most personal injury lawsuits is negligence. In a negligence lawsuit, the plaintiff (the person suing) must prove that the defendant (the person being sued) was at “fault” for the plaintiff’s injuries.

When should I contact a strict liability lawyer?

If you have been injured and believe you have a strict liability claim, you should contact a local personal injury lawyer as soon as possible. Your lawyer will be able to advise you of your rights, assist you in gathering evidence, and will help build your case.

How do you win a strict liability lawsuit?

In order to win a strict liability lawsuit, the plaintiff must show the following: The plaintiff must show that the defendant’s activities were unreasonably hazardous or that the defendant had control over the product.

What are the Common defenses to strict liability?

Another common defense to strict liability is called “assumption of the risk.” The gist of this defense is that the plaintiff knew and appreciate the risk created by a particular condition and voluntarily assumed that risk anyway. “Assumption of the risk” is a common defense to strict liability claims.

How does a plaintiff win a strict liability claim?

To prevail in strict liability, the plaintiff must show that the product was defective when it left the defendant's control. If the defendant can show the product it made is not, so to speak, the product that injured the plaintiff, then the defendant is not liable.

What must a plaintiff prove in a strict liability case?

In order to successfully prove a strict liability case, a plaintiff must show: Proof of injury; That the defendant's actions or product caused the injury or damages; and. That the activities of the defendant were unreasonably hazardous or that the defendant had control over the product.

How do you prove strict liability tort?

The plaintiff must show proof of injury; The plaintiff must prove that the defendant's actions or product caused the injury; and. The plaintiff must show that the defendant's activities were unreasonably hazardous or that the defendant had control over the product.

In what situations will a court impose a strict liability standard?

Strict liability is imposed on defendants whose activities are abnormally dangerous and/or involve dangerous animals and on defendants whose products are defective.

How do you defend against strict liability?

Common defenses to claims of strict liability are assumption of risk, statute of limitations, statute of repose, and federal preemption.

What do you need to prove in a strict liability case?

To win a strict liability case, first, you must be injured. Second, you must prove that the defendant's product or actions caused the injury. As long as their conduct resulted in your injuries and the case falls under strict liability rules, you can make a claim for your damages without having to demonstrate fault.

Is strict liability negligence?

In a negligence lawsuit, the plaintiff contends that the defendant's negligence or recklessness caused their injuries. In a strict liability lawsuit, the defendant is liable for damages even if he or she was not negligent or at fault.

How is strict liability applied?

Strict liability leads to liability regardless of fault. If the cause of action were one of strict liability, then the defendant would be held liable even though they were not at fault, that is, the defendant's actions were not intentional, reckless or negligent.

What are the exceptions of strict liability?

Exceptions to the rule of Strict Liability:Plaintiff's own fault:Act of God.Consent of the plaintiff:Act of a third party:Statutory Authority:

In which case is a plaintiff most likely to sue based on strict liability?

Under strict liability, an injured consumer could potentially recover damages from the product's manufacturer and the retailer who sold the goods. In which case is a plaintiff most likely to sue based on strict liability? Injury caused by a tiger that escapes from a zoo.

What is strict liability?

Strict liability makes a defendant liable for harm caused by their products or activities regardless of fault. In many cases involving strict liability, a defendant is required to pay damages to the plaintiff because of their violation of a law, even if the defendant was not negligent in their actions or had any intent to cause harm to ...

Why was a plaintiff intentionally hit by a car going 15 miles over the speed limit?

This would likely be the case where a plaintiff deliberately crossed a street when they were not supposed to and were subsequently hit by a car going 15 miles over the speed limit because the plaintiff was partly responsible for putting themselves into the position where they were injured.

What are some examples of abuse of a product?

An example of abusing the product would be if the plaintiff uses a bowl in a microwave multiple times even though the bowl manufacturer specifically warns the bowl should only be used one time. The last time that the plaintiff uses the bowl, it falls apart and causes the plaintiff third degree burns.

Is contributory negligence a defense to strict liability?

For instance, contributory negligence is not a defense to strict liability unless the plaintiff knew the risks involved and knowingly and unreasonably put themselves in harm’s way. Other traditional defenses include: Assumption of the Risk: The plaintiff knew of and voluntary assumed the risks associated with an abnormally dangerous activity ...

What is strict liability?

Strict liability is a legal doctrine that holds a party responsible for their actions or products without the plaintiff having to prove fault or intent. Strict liability provides a basis for the imposition of liability regardless of fault. Tweet this. In other words, the law isn’t concerned with the intention or mental state ...

What are the two most common defenses to a strict liability claim?

Therefore, the two most common defenses to a strict liability claim are that the defendant didn’t engage in the abnormally dangerous activity or didn’t have control over the animal or product, and that something else (such as a third party) caused the plaintiff’s injury.

What is the basis of a strict liability lawsuit?

Get the legal definition, examples, and everything you need to know about strict liability cases. The basis for most personal injury lawsuits is negligence. In a negligence lawsuit, the plaintiff (the person suing) must prove that the defendant (the person being sued) was at “fault” for the plaintiff’s injuries.

What is an unreasonably dangerous condition?

A product was sold in an “unreasonably dangerous” condition, The unreasonably dangerous condition existed at the time the product left the defendant’s control , and. The dangerous condition was the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injuries.

How long does a personal injury case last?

The exact statute of limitations varies by state (and by case type ), but it’s generally between 2 and 3 years for most personal injury lawsuits.

What did Sam do to John's house?

Sam happily agrees and arrives at John’s house with a folding chair and a bag of popcorn. Sam sits in the chair and watches John set off explosives and is injured by shrapnel. While John’s activity is undoubtedly dangerous, he may argue that Sam assumed the risk of any harm.

Does strict liability apply to every case?

Strict liability doesn’t apply to every case. For instance, it doesn’t apply to a car accident. When a car accident occurs, the plaintiff will have to establish negligence by proving that the defendant was at fault for the accident. Strict liability applies to three common types of civil cases: those involving animals.

What is legal protection when a company is in strict liability?

Strict liability can make it difficult for individuals and businesses to protect themselves from being held liable for injuries or damages sustained by another party. Automobile accidents, animal safety, and other types of cases can all be impacted by the presence of strict liability clauses.

Why is strict liability important?

Strict liability is an important factor in maintaining safety in high-risk environments by encouraging individuals, employers, and other parties to implement the means to prevent injuries and damages. Construction, manufacturing, and other potentially dangerous work settings are typically subject to strict liability.

What is strict liability?

Strict liability plays a role in torts, criminal cases, product liability, and other areas of law. It represents the legal responsibility of one party for any injuries or damages caused to another. Strict liability is also referred to as absolute liability and can serve as the liability standard in both civil and criminal cases.

Why do we have to recall defective products?

In some cases, defective products must be recalled to protect consumers from future injuries. A manufacturer can be held strictly liable if no recall notice is given in light of the risk of injury. But manufacturers can also be held responsible in the absence of any proof that they were negligent in their actions.

How long do you have to file a lawsuit for product liability?

In addition, any lawsuits related to product liability must be filed within the 10-year period following the sale of the product.

What is strict liability?

Strict liability is a legal term referring to the holding of an individual or entity liable for damages or losses, without having to prove carelessness or mistake. The doctrine of strict liability is commonly applied to cases involving defective products. Such a claim relies, not on wrongdoing, but on the inherent hazards of the situation or product. To explore this concept, consider the following strict liability definition.

What is the assumption of risk?

Assumption of risk refers to situations in which a plaintiff knowingly and voluntarily assumed the risks inherent in a certain dangerous activity, when he chose to participate. This may apply in extreme sporting activities, such as sky diving and rock climbing. It may also apply to a plaintiff employed in a fundamentally dangerous profession. Because the injured party in both of these scenarios knew beforehand of the dangers and risks, yet made a conscious choice to engage in the activity anyway, strict liability does not apply.

What is tort in law?

In civil law, a tort is an intentional or negligent act, a civil wrong, as opposed to a criminal act, which causes harm to another. A tort, then, is the basis for a civil lawsuit, and includes such acts as negligence, assault, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and products liability. A strict liability tort holds a person ...

What is the meaning of "liability"?

Noun. Liability incurred for causing damage or harm to life, limb, or property without the necessity of proving intent or negligence.

What are some examples of dangerous animals?

Commonly thought-of examples of dangerous animals include dogs kept for fighting or serious protection, such as pit bulls and rottweilers. Dogs are not the only animals that may fall under this category, however. Situations and animals that may subject the owner to strict liability include:

What happened to ABC Construction?

ABC Construction company is building a road through a rural area when it encounters a rocky promontory. Although the area is rather close to a housing district, they decide to blast away the rock. A child, playing in a yard two blocks away is hit by a piece of flying rock, causing a deep laceration. ABC Construction was just going about its business, and took the usual precautions for such blasting, so negligence isn’t an issue.

What happens if Marco sues his neighbor?

If Marco attempts to sue the neighbor for medical expenses and other damages, based on strict liability, as the dog is obviously dangerous. Marco is unlikely to win his case, however, as he knew the dog might be dangerous before he intentionally taunted the dog to wind him up into a frenzy.

What is strict liability?

Strict liability is a legal doctrine that holds a party responsible for their actions or products, without the plaintiff having to prove negligence or fault. When someone partakes in ultrahazardous activities such as keeping wild animals, using explosives, or making defective products, then they may be held liable if someone else is injured.

How to win a strict liability lawsuit?

In order to win a strict liability lawsuit, the plaintiff must show the following: 1 The plaintiff must show proof of injury; 2 The plaintiff must prove that the defendant’s actions or product caused the injury; and 3 The plaintiff must show that the defendant’s activities were unreasonably hazardous or that the defendant had control over the product.

What is consumer product liability?

Consumer Product Liability: If a product is defective, causes injury, and makes the product dangerous, the manufacturer or seller of the product will be liable under strict liability. While the categories may be different, there is a shared theme between the three categories. The categories are dangerous and require a high degree ...

What does a plaintiff have to prove?

The plaintiff must prove that the defendant’s actions or product caused the injury; and. The plaintiff must show that the defendant’s activities were unreasonably hazardous or that the defendant had control over the product.

What does a lawyer do?

Your lawyer will be able to advise you of your rights, assist you in gathering evidence, and will help build your case. Your case may be settled out of court, but in the event that your case goes to trial, your attorney will represent your best interests in court.

Is blasting a hazardous activity?

An ultrahazardous activity, like blasting (using explosive to blow large amounts of rock/earth) is clearly dangerous and is often conducted by professionals who had to learn how to handle and use something so dangerous. A product manufacturer has the unique position of earning and keeping the public’s trust.

Is a manufacturer liable for product injuries?

In some unique cases, a manufacturer may not be held fully liable for product injuries due to the chain of supply . For example, a baby food company (one of the most strictly regulated manufacturers) creates a formula. They safely package and ship the formula, and the formula is safe to eat without any danger.

What is strict liability in civil tort?

Typically, in order to be guilty of a crime, you must have committed an illegal act (called the actus reus) with the intent to commit that particular crime (the mens rea ).

Why are strict liability trials limited?

Because strict liability crime trials are so focused on the facts of what happened, not the intent, defenses in these cases are limited. A good factual defense — the idea that the prosecutor is just wrong about what happened — is usually the best option.

Why is strict criminal liability important?

By removing the need to prove a person’s intent, or mens rea, strict criminal liability helps address serious, obvious societal harm. This guards against otherwise bad actors escaping criminal punishment. In other words, it shouldn’t matter that you didn’t think you were too drunk to drive. You did drive, and you were drunk.

What is strict liability?

Strict liability is also a doctrine in tort law. A tort is a civil wrong, or injury for which a person can sue in the courts. Tort cases (like negligence or car accident lawsuits) are different from criminal cases because they do not have to involve an illegal act, and they do not result in anybody going to jail.

What is good faith?

3. Good Faith: A Potential Defense. Even people who think that strict liability crimes are necessary may disagree that they should be applied in all cases. Some scholars and court systems have argued that people who act in good faith should not be punished for strict liability crimes.

What is the moral component of criminal law?

Criminal law — and to a lesser extent civil tort law — has a strong moral component. The law seeks to punish genuine wrongdoing. To ensure that morally innocent people are not punished, prosecutors have to prove all aspects of a criminal case beyond a reasonable doubt. This is the highest standard of proof.

What are the two types of product defects?

In civil strict product liability cases, there are two main kinds of product defects. The first is a manufacturing defect, caused by a problem that arose in the making of the product. The second, a design defect, arises because something about the design or concept of the product itself is unsafe.

Strict Liability vs. Negligence

Neither negligence or strict liability torts require intent, and both have a few things in common. Strict liability occurs because companies and people are obligated to make their products, animals, or actions safe and requires no wrongful intent on the part of the defendant. The difference comes when looking at the level of care or duty required.

Possession of Animals

In common law, the liability of owning a dangerous animal was usually seen in trespassing animal cases. If a person owned livestock that escaped and caused damage to another person's property, the owner was held liable for damages. Most states have statutes that deal with these animals and whether or not the owner attempted to fence them in.

Ultrahazardous Activities

The majority of courts today hold that strict liability applies when a person is engaging in ultrahazardous activities. Ultrahazardous activities contain a high degree of risk. The Restatement of Torts looks at six factors when deciding if an activity is abnormally dangerous. They include:

Liability That Doesn’T Depend on Actual Negligence Or Intent to Harm

What Is Strict Liability?

What Types of Cases Are Strict Liability Claims?

Defenses to Strict Liability

• To establish strict liability, the plaintiff needs to prove that: 1. The defendant engaged in the abnormally dangerous activity or had control over the animal or product, and 2. The abnormally dangerous activity, animal, or product caused the plaintiff’s injury. Therefore, the two most common defenses to a strict liability claim are that the defend...

See more on enjuris.com