Although a prosecutor regularly deals with police officers, witnesses, and victims, the prosecutorâs primary obligation is not to serve the interests of these parties. However sympathetic to the suffering of a victim, the prosecutor is also not the victimâs lawyer. Instead, the prosecutorâs duty is to serve the cause of justice.
Full Answer
(Cal. 1983) (en banc) (victim was a deputy prosecutor in same office prosecuting case); People v. Greer, 561 P.2d 1164 (Cal. 1977) (victimâs mother employed in prosecutorâs office and benefited from aggressive prosecution of defendant). 5 These impressions are from my own experience as a prosecutor for ten years in New
Apr 23, 2020 ¡ âThe prosecutor has more control over life, liberty and reputation than any other person in America.â â Former U.S. Attorney General and Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson. Prosecutors hold tremendous power, having wide discretion in whether or not to bring criminal charges against someone and what those charges should be.
Apr 17, 2016 ¡ It was our office policy to speak with every victim in person if possible - especially if we were offering a plea to the defendant that would allow him future contact with the victim. You aren't required to go talk to the prosecutor. But if they subpoena you, it's a totally different ballgame and can get stressful. Maybe call the office and ask to speak to the victim advocate. âŚ
Oct 17, 2017 ¡ Prosecutors are most likely to reach that conclusion when the defendant has taken responsibility for the crime. Making restitution to the crime victim, attending counseling to address the crimeâs underlying cause, or moving away from the crime victim may help convince a prosecutor that the crime is unlikely to be repeated and that dropping the charge will not âŚ
Prosecutorial misconduct occurs when a prosecutor intentionally breaks a law or a code of professional ethics while prosecuting a case. While prosecutors are responsible for following the law themselves and making sure that those in law enforcement who work on an investigation or prosecution do the same, âprosecutorial misconductâ is a term typically reserved for serious and intentional violations.
In the Dewayne Brown case, for example, a long-buried email chain uncovered more than a decade after Brownâs trial revealed that the trial prosecutor, Dan Rizzo, had deliberately hidden phone records from Brownâs defense attorney that supported Brownâs alibi.
78 (1935), Justice Sutherland characterized prosecutorial misconduct as âoverstepp [ing] the bounds of that propriety and fairness which should characterize the conduct of such an officer in the prosecution of a criminal offense.â In the years since Berger, advocates for the wrongly convicted have increasingly focused on prosecutorsâ failure to disclose favorable evidence â what are known as âBradyâ violations, after the 1963 case of Brady v. Maryland â as one of the most harmful and pervasive forms of prosecutorial misconduct.
Early, open and mandatory discovery is a systematic change that makes it much easier for prosecutors to avoid mistakes, and much harder for those who might be tempted to cheat to get away with hiding evidence of a personâs innocence.â
In the years since Berger, advocates for the wrongly convicted have increasingly focused on prosecutorsâ failure to disclose favorable evidence â what are known as âBradyâ violations, after the 1963 case of Brady v. Maryland â as one of the most harmful and pervasive forms of prosecutorial misconduct.
Prosecutors hold tremendous power, having wide discretion in whether or not to bring criminal charges against someone and what those charges should be. But they also have constitutional obligations to ensure that those accused of a crime receive all the evidence that might aid the accused personâs defense before trial.
Brian Stolarz visiting his client Dewayne Brown in a Texas prison. Brown's case was featured in "The Innocence Files" series for the pervasive prosecutorial misconduct. Photo courtesy of Brian Stolarz.
The prosecutor is doing his/her due diligence to make sure that your decision to be uncooperative with the State is not due to duress by the defendant or anyone else. Often times they need to notate the file to indicate that they attempted to speak with you and get your side of the story.
I was a domestic violence prosecutor for several years. There are a lot of reasons that a prosecutor would want to speak with you, and none of them are ominous. I often dealt with victims that didn't consider themselves victims and didn't want my help - and that's fine.
He wants to speak with you becauswe that is his job. You are free to speak with him or not, that is your choice. If you get subpoenaed then you will have a harder decision to make but, either way, there cannot be a plea in the case if the State...
Prosecutors have control over the criminal cases to which they are assigned. They often engage in plea bargaining that results in the dismissal of some charges in exchange for a conviction on other charges. Prosecutors also have the authority to drop all charges before trial, even in the absence of a plea bargain.
Prosecutors are most likely to reach that conclusion when the defendant has taken responsibility for the crime. Making restitution to the crime victim, attending counseling to address the crimeâs underlying cause, or moving away from the crime victim may help convince a prosecutor that the crime is unlikely to be repeated and that dropping the charge will not endanger society.
When the alleged victim doesnât want the case to be prosecuted, the prosecutor might be worried that the victim has been threatened or pressured to ask for charges to be dropped. Prosecutors will rarely drop charges under those circumstances, and might instead charge the defendant with intimidating the victim.
When prosecutors drop all charges without a trial, they often condition that agreement on the defendantâs participation in a deferred adjudication program. The defendant typically pleads guilty or no contest to an offense, so no trial takes place.
Prosecutors are particularly reluctant to drop charges if that decision is opposed by the arresting officer. Prosecutors are most likely to drop charges when the arresting officer doesnât care.
On the other hand, if the alleged victim makes a persuasive argument that a prosecution will harm the relationship more than help it, the prosecutor might decide to drop the charges. When the alleged victim explains that the statement given to the police overstated the events that actually occurred, the prosecutor might also elect to drop ...
Criminal convictions can have harsh consequences, including the loss of employment or the denial of security clearance. When a defendantâs criminal conduct was not particularly serious, the prosecutor might agree that it does not warrant a conviction.
This has become absolutely standard practice. The prosecutor will âstackâ charges to build such a scary potential sentence, that even actually innocent people will be intimidated into pleading guilty, rather than face whatâs called the â trial penalty â â that very scary long sentence if they should somehow be convicted at trial. Not surprisingly, the nature of the deal offered by the prosecutor will be driven by how strong a case he/she thinks they would have in court â the weaker the case, the better the deal.
Now that youâve been arrested and initially charged, the prosecutor is going to come to you (and your attorney) with a plea deal. This can be even before an indictment, because if he/she can get you to plead guilty now, then he/she doesnât have to spend time and effort taking the case to a grand jury, much less to trial. In this case (your case) the prosecutor comes to you (your attorney) and says, âThis is what Iâm charging you with.â The prosecutor then lists the charges and the prison sentences that accompany each:
If the defendant takes the deal, the prosecutor doesnât have to take the case to trial, and possibly not even to a grand jury, both of which are a lot of work and require a lot of time on the part of the prosecutor. This has become absolutely standard practice. The prosecutor will âstackâ charges to build such a scary potential sentence, ...
Moreover, it seems that few states separately document complaints against prosecutors. APM Reports sent a questionnaire to the lawyer discipline agencies in all 50 states. Of the 15 states that responded, only three tracked the number of prosecutors who had been the subject of complaints or investigations.
Despite those rulings, Evans went on to prosecute Flowers three more times. He has never received any public discipline from The Mississippi Bar.
The Mississippi Supreme Court reversed Flowers' first and second convictions due to misbehavior by Evans, including arguing facts that weren't in evidence. Yet when Evans tried Flowers a third time, the high court found that he engaged in misconduct again. In overturning Flowers' third conviction, the justices ruled that the prosecution had struck prospective jurors based on their race â what's known as a Batson violation, named after the 1986 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that banned the practice. In their ruling, the state Supreme Court justices wrote that Flowers' case "presents us with as strong a prima facie case of racial discrimination as we have ever seen in the context of a Batson challenge."
In a 1935 ruling in Berger v. United States, the U.S. Supreme Court broadly defined how a prosecutor should behave: "He may prosecute with earnestness and vigor â indeed, he should do so. But, while he may strike hard blows, he is not at liberty to strike foul ones.
But when prosecutors strike foul blows â and we know that they do â they rarely face any consequences. This is true even for documented misconduct that takes place inside the courtroom and for repeat offenders.
They have immunity from civil liability â you can't sue them â and it's almost unheard of for a prosecutor to face criminal penalties for something he or she did in court, like knowingly putting a lying witness on the stand or withholding evidence that points away from a defendant's guilt.
But in practice, they almost never lose their seats, and in Mississippi, as in many other states, they can't be recalled by voter referendum.
An "Affidavit of Non-Prosecution" may be submitted. It is a sworn statement saying you don't want charges pursued.
In most jurisdictions, victims of criminal acts are granted varying rights and privileges. Usually, a prosecutor is at least willing to listen to what the alleged victim has to say regarding a case. That being said, it is best to speak with either the prosecutor, or at least a criminal defense attorney who deals with these sorts of matters in that courthouse. Good luck to you...
Attorneys donât get to pick their jurors. Instead, using a mixture of intense questioning, keen observation, and stereotyping, they get to eliminate people they think would hurt their case. âItâs not like a baseball team where you can choose your team members,â says Jeffrey Frederick, Director of Jury Research Services at the National Legal Research Group and author of Mastering Voir Dire and Jury Selection. âItâs not who I want, itâs who I donât want. What we try to do is think of what backgrounds, life experiences, cognitive styles, opinions, and values jurors might have that would make them less receptive to our case.â Clues like demographics and personality can improve a lawyerâs chance of predicting a jurorâs stance on a verdict by up to 15 percent. Here are a few things lawyers take into consideration when trying to figure you out.
Indeed, research shows that if you donât vibe well with an attorney, youâre more likely to decide against their argument. âOne attorney told me, 'If I can tell they donât like me, I get rid of them,ââ King says.
For example, âif itâs a medical malpractice case and thereâs a woman and all of her friends are nurses, that might bias her a little bit,â says Matthew Ferrara, Ph.D, a trial consultant and forensic psychologist. And if you have friends or family in law enforcement, thatâs a big red flag. âIn a criminal case, relationship to someone in law enforcement is paramount,â Ferrara says. âPeople who are probation officers, police officers, jailers or are related to the same type of profession would be probably viewed as biased toward the prosecution.â
One common question presented to jurors is, âAre there any religious beliefs that prevent you from passing judgment on another person?â Frederick says this is to weed out people whose faith might impede their ability to view a case objectively .
The plaintiff attorney or prosecutor will generally look for people more inclined to trust authority.
One quick way to get dismissed from a jury, according to Tom King , a former Deputy Prosecutor in Indiana, is to voice strong opinions about the legal system: âSay, âIâve read about these criminal prosecutions where the police and the prosecutors made up evidence and I just donât think itâs a fair system.ââ
Leaders, contrarians, and independent thinkers can be pivotal in a verdict. These people have the potential to rally the rest of the group behind a unanimous decision, which is great for the plaintiff or the prosecutor.