Answer (1 of 4): This was explained quite poignantly by Dumbledore in one sentence in the books and Harry immediately understood the reason behind it. In the scene, which might have been in either book five or six, idk right now, Harry asks Dumbledore why he …
Jul 31, 2019 · Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows, JK Rowling “Throughout her books, Rowling has tried to portray the limitations of law – just …
Nov 29, 2017 · 7 Entering the Chamber of Secrets. Opening the Chamber of Secrets was the only offense that caused a student to ever be expelled from Hogwarts. Although Harry and Ron didn’t open the chamber, they did waltz on in without any academic repercussions. The Chamber of Secrets was located in the girl’s bathroom.
Mar 15, 2018 · The journey of the young wizard, from a stowaway orphan who lived under the stairs at his cruel aunt's home into the prophesied hero who defeated the world's darkest villain, was nothing short of ...
The answer is No. In the case of Harry Potter, Albus Dumbledore announced himself as a Witness for the defence, and not any kind of legal representation, so it seems even in cases where an attorney would very much be called for, none are to be found.Dec 7, 2016
A third-party with legal knowledge might speak on behalf of a defendant, fulfilling a similar role to that of a modern barrister. However, no wizarding lawyers seemed to exist, and the practise of having a spokesperson on behalf of a defendant appeared to be rare.
As Potter fans will know, in The Order of The Phoenix, the Wizengamot tried to prosecute Harry Potter for the crime of performing underage magic – without any kind of representation.Jul 31, 2019
One of his first and most effective acts as Minister, was replacing Dementors, the unreliable guards of Azkaban, with Aurors. By 2019, Hermione Granger had succeeded Kingsley Shacklebolt as Minister for Magic.
Harry Potter at his trial for using underage magic British witches and wizards between the ages of eleven and seventeen were permitted to use magic within school, but not outside it, as legislated in the Decree for the Reasonable Restriction of Underage Sorcery.
The most famous of these members, of course, was Harry's godfather Sirius Black, who barely made it to adulthood before he was disowned by the family for rejecting the Blacks' pure-blood ideals and running away from home.Nov 2, 2018
Fudge didn't have a reason to distrust him, so he didn't charge him for that. However, during the patronus problem, Fudge, who is a complete coward and does not want to embrace the fact that Voldemort is back, seems to have taken a disliking to both Harry and Dumbledore.Jul 27, 2014
However, being an underage wizard, Harry was not supposed to perform magic outside Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. As a result, he was formally accused of performing underage magic and was expelled by the Ministry of Magic.
Harry describes Umbridge to Sirius Black, saying that she's vile enough to be a Death Eater, despite not being one herself. Umbridge is also depicted to be a prejudiced person, despising half-breeds and Muggle-born witches and wizards to the point of firing Hagrid due to his half-giant status.
Extremist wizards wanted war against Muggles, but the wider community instead opted for secrecy: an international law enforced by each country's Ministry of Magic, which was responsible for concealing societies, controlling magical beasts, beings and spirits, and making sure wizards don't blow everyone's cover.Jan 24, 2018
During the Battle of Hogwarts, Thicknesse was stationed within the ranks of the Death Eaters and fought with them against the castle's defenders. He was amongst a group of masked and hooded Death Eaters who successfully penetrated Hogwarts, and duelled with Percy Weasley.
an AurorThe Golden Trio took over the Ministry: Ron became an Auror as well, while Hermione worked her way up in the Deptartment of Magical Law Enforcement. “Harry and Ron utterly revolutionized the Auror Department at the Ministry of Magic. They are now the experts.May 1, 2017
Dumbledore apologising for not making Harry a Prefect is small comfort at the end of a year of Hell for Harry, which ended with the death of Harry’s godfather, Sirius—which is almost entirely due to Dumbledore’s negligence and his deliberately ignoring Harry all year.
Dumbledore looks at him with a profound sadness and says, "I believed that you had quite enough to be going on with in the first place". Dumbledore didn't want Harry to be burdened by even more responsibility than he already was, what with the whole "Boy Who Lived" thing, the prophecy, his fame, his traumati.
Dumbledore didn’t make Harry a prefect because he seemed to think that Harry “had enough responsibility to be going on with.” (OotP ch 37) Dumbledore might have been right, actually, if Dumbledore hadn’t f***ed things up in so many other ways.
Harry immediately decides that he doesn’t want to tell Hermione what he has seen and he lies to Hermione about why his lessons have stopped. AGAIN Harry is desperately unhappy; he feels as though the memory of it was eating him from inside (OP575/653) OP29.) But he continues to hide his feelings from Hermione.
It was a bad idea making Ron a Prefect, because it was obviously going to make Harry feel more worthless than he already did. If Neville had got the Prefect badge instead of Ron, it wouldn’t have been such a crushing blow to Harry.
In the long scene in his office where he explains everything to Harry, he says that Harry might have been wondering why he was not made a Prefect, and explains that he though Harry had “quite enough responsibility, to be getting on with.”.
No, he didn’t! It was another terrible decision amidst a whole year of terrible decisions that Dumbledore made, beginning with isolating Harry at the Dursleys after the end of the Triwizard Tournament when Harry needed his friends the most (and therapy too).
It’s no Nurmengard, but the island prison guarded by soul-sucking dementors raises some serious ethical dilemmas.
Given a bit of thought, even the likes of a Longbottom (sorry, Neville) could realise the wizarding high court has some serious flaws.
Throughout the books, Harry’s animagus godfather is pursued by the Ministry of Magic, accused and convicted of murdering of 12 Muggles and one wizard. But there’s just one problem with this: he didn’t do it. As fans will know, it was actually Peter Pettigrew behind the bloodshed, with best friend Black framed for these crimes.
The concept sounds simple enough: the unbreakable vow is an oath a witch or wizard makes to another that, if broken, causes them instant death. However, as muggle lawyers will tell you, the legalities can get more tangled than a clump of devil’s snare.
That’s right: turns out Dobby the house-elf is actually a touch point for some serious legal and ethical issues.
Harry Potter, looking in the Pensieve, saw Council of Magical Law trials taking place for Igor Karkaroff and Ludo Bagman, as well the sentencing of the Death Eaters (the Lestranges and Barty Crouch Jnr) who had used the Cruciatus Curse on Alice and Frank Longbottom.
Rappaport’s Law. Rappaport's Law was instituted by Emily Rappaport, the 15th President of MACUSA, in 1790. The law completely segregated the No-Maj and magical communities in the United States following one of the most serious breaches of the International Statute of Secrecy of all time.
The International Statute of Wizarding Secrecy is a wizarding law which was instituted in 1689 and put into effect in 1692 in order to hide the existence of witches and wizards from the Muggles who persecuted them. This law was probably a direct outcome of the Salem Witch Trials of 1692-93 in Massachusetts Colony of North America. 1692 was also the same year that the Magical Congress of the United States (MACUSA) was founded with the main goal of hunting down the Scourers who turned over witches and wizards to the Puritan judges.
A wizarding courtroom. "All new wizards must accept that, in entering our world, they abide by our laws.". — The laws of wizarding society [src] Magical law is the system of rules that are created and enforced through social or governmental institutions to regulate behaviour.
Decree for Justifiable Confiscation. The Decree for Justifiable Confiscation is a wizarding law that allows the Ministry of Magic the authority to confiscate the contents of any will in case they suspect of it being an illegal item. The Ministry can keep the possessions for investigation for 31 days.
Harry Potter correctly thought he was in for serious punishment for swelling Marjorie Dursley, yet was reassured by Cornelius Fudge that the powers-that-be " don’t send people to Azkaban just for blowing up their aunts ". This was of course only because Cornelius had an interest in Harry being free.
Rappaport's Law was repealed in 1965.
In Prisoner of Azkaban, Hermione received a Time Turner from Professor McGonagall as way of attending more classes. She had to get special permission from the Ministry of Magic to have it, and could only use it for academic purposes.
In the beginning of Sorcerer’s Stone, Dumbledore uses his welcome speech to tell the entire student body that the third-floor corridor is “ out of bounds to everyone who does not wish to die a very painful death.”
The Triwizard Tournament had been banned for over a century because of its dangerous nature. However, the Ministry of Magic revived the Tournament in The Goblet of Fire as long as one rule was followed: no one under the age of 17 was allowed to enter the competition.
These three curses are the Killing Curse (Avada Kedavra ), Cruciatus Curse (Crucio), and the Imperius Curse (Imperio). Harry Potter has used two of these spells, and was still able to avoid Azkaban and stay at Hogwarts.
Opening the Chamber of Secrets was the only offense that caused a student to ever be expelled from Hogwarts. Although Harry and Ron didn’t open the chamber, they did waltz on in without any academic repercussions.
After Ginny is taken into the Chamber of Secrets, Gilderoy Lockhart was assigned to find his way into the Chamber of Secrets. However, when Harry and Ron visit him to tell him what they know, they catch him attempting to flee Hogwarts.
Maybe Umbridge deserved to be dragged off by a pack of Centaurs, but she was still a Ministry Official and the acting Headmistress of Hogwarts when Harry and Hermione led her into the Forbidden Forest.
The Sword of Gryffindor had been an instrumental tool in destroying horcruxes throughout Harry Potter lore. Dumbledore used it to destroy the Gaunt family ring. Harry retrieved it from the frozen lake, after it presented itself to him, and Ron used it to destroy the locket that was causing his buddy so much mental anguish. Despite knowing its powers, Harry offered the sword to Griphook in exchange for him helping them get into Bellatrix Lestrange's vault at Gringotts, and he made good on his end of the bargain.
In the opening shot of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2, dementors loomed over Hogwarts Castle, and Professor Snape — who'd never exactly been the cheery sort himself — observed from on high how much devastation the Dark Lord's looming presence had caused his school. Students marched in silence without glee.
After he successfully vanquished the Helga Hufflepuff's cup and the Diadem of Rowena Ravenclaw (two of the last remaining horcruxes), and tasked Hermione and Ron with killing the snake, Harry set off on what he knew would be a suicide mission, to allow Voldemort to strike him with an Avada Kedavra spell in the forest.
Instead, Snape got a split-second to give him a teardrop full of memories, so that he could show him his gut-wrenching backstory of unrequited love of Harry's mum Lily.
There was an interesting Easter egg contained in Harry's first shot of the last film. As he's mourning by Dobby's beachfront grave, he looked in a triangular fragment of a mirror the elf had possessed — thanks to the circular nature of his glasses, it created the symbol of the Deathly Hallows in the reflection. It was a wink to how all three elements would eventually be his to do with what he wished.
And his obvious contempt for Harry at Hogwarts was due to his similarity to his pseudo-bully dad James, but despite his distaste for those personality traits, he really was trying to protect Harry all the while, so he could fulfill his destiny to defeat the Dark Lord.
Voldemort got his hands on one — the Elder Wand — while Harry had been casually given the cloak in his earliest days at Hogwarts, not knowing its strength. He eventually recovers the Stone, too, after kissing his Snitch goodbye with the intention of sacrificing himself.
Despite this, Voldemort believed that the wand was not performing at the epic level that legend told, and so he ordered his snake Nagini to murder Snape, in order to ensure that the mastery of the Elder Wand would pass to him, since he believed Snape to be the wand's master for killing Dumbledore.
The answer has nothing to do with Hallows. Harry didn't die because Voldemort used Harry's blood to resurrect himself, taking Harry's mother's protection inside him. This made it so Voldemort can touch Harry, but it also tied Harry to life for as long as Voldemort lives. reply | flag *.
Okay, so we know that when Voldemort tried to kill Harry the first time in Godrick's Hollow, he failed because of the love that his mother protected him with.
Lily's protection guards Harry from harm AT the Dursley house, which is the reason they had to move him to the burrow when he came of age. I do suppose that Lily's protection would fade then, but because Lily's/Harry's blood was used to bring Voldemort back, it lived on.
This was the lesson of the story of the three brothers. The third brother learned that death was not to be feared but embraced at the proper time. Harry learned that death was not to be feared because there was another life afterward. The only use the Hallows had was in teaching him that lesson.
Voldemort took Harry's blood and rebuilt his body with it, which means he also took in Lily's protection. In effect, he made himself a horcrux for Harry and tethered him to life. Harry couldn't die while Voldemort still lived. End of story.
No, Voldemort killed the horcrux part of Harry because, yes harry was a horcrux. Interesting fact: Why harry awoke on platform 9 3/4 is because that was where he was when he was between his two worlds, the muggle world and the wizard world. reply | flag *. message 10: by Laura (new) - rated it 5 stars.
Rowling gives children absolutely everything they could possibly want: . Humour, which isn’t normally a big feature in fantasy of this type (for the plot of the Harry Potter series is every bit as dark as that of, say, Lord of the Rings) and humour is the number one preference of most children.
Lots of magic. While children’s writers of fantasy are always being exhorted to “go easy on the magic”, this is because of editorial prejudice.
In an interview with Emma Watson, who played Hermione Granger in the Harry Potter films, Joanne Rowling stated that the reason for the Hermione/Ron pairing (and perhaps by implication Harry and Hermione not ending up together) was "wish fulfillment .". “I wrote the Hermione/Ron relationship as a form of wish fulfillment,” she says.
Both Harry and Hermione were nerds whereas Ron was funny and charming and Ginny was hot. Don’t get me wrong, Hermione is the embodiment of a great best friend as well as an awesome person and a great character study. Also Harry was already weighed down by responsibilities and tensions.
But when Hermione and Ron fought (even before having fights due to jealousy or as a couple….), it was like a 3rd world war. At least Ron and Hermione had sparks flying, even if it was in a fight. It was almost funny. Both Harry and Hermione were nerds whereas Ron was funny and charming and Ginny was hot.
Oh and btw if somehow subconsciously, Harry was inspired by his own parents, Lily was more like Ginny than Hermione in personality. Ginny is very smart and ferocious too. Coming to storyline, when Harry was setting off on his own in 6th part, Hermione and Ron accompanied him, true.
Even if Ron and Hermione always fought, they were well paired in the worldly sense. Even if Ron and Hermione weren’t together, Harry and Her mione would have a very dull romance as it was more like brother and sister. Let us assume for a minute that JK didn’t write any chemistry between either of the pairs.
However, a Harry/Hermione pairing is also not credible. Harry and Hermione never showed the slightest bit of romantic interest in each other in the books. Even if Hermione and Ron's relationship may not have been likely, as JKR has admitted, that does not imply that Harry and Hermione would get together.
By contrast, a relationship between Ginny and Harry, who had genuine, strong feelings for each other, and no history of animosity (in contrast to Ron and Hermione) is credible. Ginny and Harry have a good relationship.
After his success directing the Home Alone films, Chris Columbus was hired as the director for the first two Harry Potter films. Ever wondered why the first two feel particularly child-friendly? Well, that’s down to Chris.
Directing eight films in eleven years is quite the feat for any seasoned director. However, the prospect of signing on to all the Harry Potter films was not the reason that the directors changed so many times.