Luke 10:25-28. And behold, a certain lawyer — A doctor of the law; stood up and tempted him — Greek, εκπειραζων αυτον, trying him. It seems this lawyer was one of the multitude which attended Jesus when the seventy returned, and having listened to what he said to his disciples in private, concerning their enjoying a happiness which many prophets and kings had desired in …
Verses 25-37. - The question of the lawyer. The Lord answers with the parable of the good Samaritan. Verse 25. - And, behold, a certain lawyer.It seems (as has already been noticed) probable that in St. Luke's general account of our Lord's teaching during the six months which immediately preceded the last Passover, certain events which took place at a short visit which …
Oct 26, 2010 · you see jesus was born of water and spirit and took the narrow gate to above the kingdom of light and to the holy father(the creator the source of everything that is from the beguinning to the end.) because he was pure of heart. that is also why he add understanding over duality in truth with the right balence in all things,that is why they called him master. but in fact …
Jun 30, 2019 · Is Jesus called our Master and Lord ? Some trinitarians who claim that Jesus is God use Jude 1-4 as evidence that Jesus is referred to both our Master and our Lord. This they say means that Jesus is being equated to God the father. They will usually use versions of the Bible like the NASB when making this claim.
The disciples went and woke him, saying, “Master, Master, we’re going to drown!” He got up and rebuked the wind and the raging waters; the storm subsided, and all was calm (Luke 8:24, NIV).
The air was warm, the grass danced in the breeze, the clouds were high and fluffy. Jesus’ followers enjoyed the company of best friends. Comrades, involved in something greater than themselves, they must have felt exhilarated as they breathed the fresh sea air and jumped into the sailing boat to cross the cool, green lake.
Most of the time, when Jesus was referred to as Master, those addressing Him were calling Him Teacher. In this instance, however, I think other things were racing through the minds of the sinking disciples.
And when the Pharisees heard that Jesus had silenced the Sadducees, they themselves gathered together.
Strong's 1320: A teacher, master. From didasko; an instructor.
now you know why they called him master. he add a higher knowledge of reality below and above. that is why it is written the one that comes from above is above all.
Jesus had no servants, yet they called him master. Why? | Inward Quest
In everyday speech, we use the term “lawyer ” to mean an attorney, one who represents another in a legal courtroom. The Bible, however, attaches another definition—a religious one. When you encounter the word “lawyer” in Scripture, concentrate on the “law” root. The “law” here is the Mosaic Law, the codified system of rules ...
Acts 5:34: “Then stood there up one in the council, a Pharisee, named Gamaliel, a doctor of the law, had in reputation among all the people, and commanded to put the apostles forth a little space;….” (According to Acts 22:3, Gamaliel was one of the rabbinical mentors of Saul of Tarsus [later the Apostle Paul].
The scribes were originally simply men of letters, students of Scripture, and the name first given to them contains in itself no reference to the law; in course of time, however, they devoted themselves mainly, though by no means exclusively, to the study of the law.
The “law” here is the Mosaic Law, the codified system of rules and regulations meant to govern Israel in JEHOVAH God’s ways as the nation lived in His land, the Promised Land. The suffix “ –er ” means “one who practices.”. A “lawyer,” therefore, was an expert or scholar of the Mosaic Law.
One “lawyer,” speaking on behalf of the others, claims that the Lord Jesus insulted them in Luke 11:45 by telling the truth. Some “lawyers” sided with the Pharisees against Christ when He healed a disabled man on the Sabbath (Luke 14:1-3).
A lawyer seems to be identical to a “scribe” (this latter appellation emphasizes the man’s ability to write/copy Scripture and other religious texts). The word is comparable to “doctor.” This is not a medical doctor (physician)—please note—but a doctor of theology (what we would call a “Th.D.”). He was a very learned man in Jewish religion and skilled in the interpretation and application of the Mosaic Law. While not an exact equivalent, it may help to understand him as a theologian (as we think of one).
Furthermore, skill in the Scripture does not necessarily lead to faith. The aforementioned lawyers were experts in the Hebrew Bible and Hebrew religion and yet it was all head knowledge. Most of them did not have a positive heart attitude toward God’s Word.
In his book Mere Christianity, C.S. Lewis pointed out that it is logically inconsistent to say (as many people do), "I am ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I cannot accept His claim to be God.". As Lewis said, “That is the one thing we must not say.
Jesus was therefore pointing out that the religious class was undeserving of the salutation because no one was good except God. Now let us look at the passage closely. This unidentified man comes to the scene and makes his salutation, perhaps not conscious of the divine ramification of his greeting.
Jesus answered, If I honour myself, my honour is nothing: it is my Father that honoureth me; of whom ye say, that he is your God: In Mark 10:18 Jesus did refuse to be called good (it doesn't matter how we are trying to change it) from the answer he gave to the rich. NO ONE IS GOOD EXCEPT GOD ALONE.
By ascribing that title to Jesus, the young man was indicating that Jesus was, in fact, God, since only God is truly perfectly good.
As Lewis said, “That is the one thing we must not say. A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic — on the level with the man who says he is a poached egg — or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You must make your choice.
The question assumes that "Jesus refused to be called good.". In fact, Jesus' question in Mark 10:18 does not constitute a refusal to be called good. He simply asked the man addressing Him why he had called Him "good.". Big difference.
First, by the man's own statement, Jesus was "good.". Secondly, it was (and still is) axiomatic to a devout Jew (or Christian) that "no one is good but God.". It would be difficult, if not futile, to argue against either premise as both are overwhelmingly confirmed by scripture, experience and evident reason.