Full Answer
Sep 20, 2017 ¡ Adam Jed. Adam Jed is an appellate lawyer who comes from the DOJ's Civil Division. Jed, a 2008 Harvard Law School graduate, once clerked for Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens. He has worked ...
Jun 07, 2019 ¡ The controversy over the selective editing of a voicemail from a former attorney of President Trump in the report by Robert Mueller has added fuel to the arguments against the appointment of ...
May 01, 2018 ¡ It could be that the Trump lawyers are bad enough to think that leaked questions could somehow obstruct Muellerâs ability to move forward. It shouldnât in any way, but a Trump lawyer can dream ...
Jun 29, 2020 ¡ The President has tweeted about Mueller more than three hundred times, and has repeatedly referred to the special counselâs investigation as a âscamâ and a âhoax.â. Barr and Graham agree ...
this decision was based on an office of legal counsel (olc) opinion that a sitting president is immune from criminal prosecution, and mueller's belief that it would be unfair to accuse the president of a crime even without charging him because he would have no opportunity to clear his name in court; furthermore it would undermine trump's ability âŚ
James Comey | |
---|---|
In office September 4, 2013 â May 9, 2017 | |
President | Barack Obama Donald Trump |
Deputy | Sean M. Joyce Mark F. Giuliano Andrew McCabe |
No. | Name | Term |
---|---|---|
6 | Robert Mueller | September 4, 2001 â September 4, 2013 |
7 | James Comey | September 4, 2013 â May 9, 2017 |
â | Andrew McCabe (Acting) | May 9, 2017 â August 2, 2017 |
8 | Christopher A. Wray | August 2, 2017 â Present |
Several of the team's lawyers came from Wilmer-Hale, where Mueller was recently a partner. Some are veteran federal prosecutors who have tried terrorism cases against al Qaeda operatives or mafia bosses. Others bring white-collar criminal expertise.
The scope of the investigation, individuals familiar with the matter have told CBS News, includes Russian interference in the election, Russian hacking, any other Russian influence, and possible financial wrongdoing. Mueller's team recently obtained records from Facebook regarding $100,000 in ad buys Russians made during and immediately after the 2016 presidential election. Between June 2015 and May of this year, about 3,000 ads connected with 470 "inauthentic accounts" were posted on Facebook, according to the social media giant.
He has spent most of his career at the Department of Justice. During the 1990s, Weissmann worked on a case related to the mafia and Russian organized crime that involved Felix Sater, a Trump business partner who is now a focus of Mueller's probe.
Aaron Zebley. Joining the prosecution team in June, Zebley had served as Mueller's chief of staff while he was FBI director. Before joining the special counsel's office, he was a partner at law firm WilmerHale, where he focused on cybersecurity issues. He also been senior counselor in the Justice Department's national security division, ...
Michael Dreeben. Dreeben currently serves as the deputy solicitor general in charge of overseeing the Justice Department's criminal appellate docket. According to the American Law Institute, Dreeben, who has argued more than 100 court cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, joins the team on a "part-time basis.".
James Quarles. Quarles served as an assistant special prosecutor as part of the Watergate Special Prosecution from 1973 until 1975. More recently, he also was a partner at WilmerHale. He also served as a law clerk in a U.S. District Court of Maryland in the early 1970s, according to Bloomberg.
Some the cases Andres oversaw include the prosecution of Robert Allen Stanford, who was convicted of operated an $8 billion Ponzi scheme, and the prosecution of several members of the Bonanno crime family, one of whom plotted to have him killed.
Muellerâs probe focused on Russian attempts to disrupt the 2016 election; possible coordination between associates of Trump and Russia; and whether financial crimes were committed by any of the presidentâs associates.
Mueller obtained thousands of emails from the Trump transition team and interviewed at least two dozen current and former Trump advisers, the presidentâs Trumpâs son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared Kushner; former White House Communications Director Hope Hicks ; former Press Secretary Sean Spicer; and former Chief of Staff Reince Priebus. Muellerâs team subpoenaed Trumpâs former chief strategist Stephen Bannon to testify before a grand jury, according to The New York Times. Muellerâs team never interviewed the president.
officials, Trump advisers, legal experts and journalists to give an inside look at the key moments of Muellerâs inquiry, which led to the indictments of more than 30 people. We followed the twists and turns of the investigation. Hereâs what we know:
Barr wrote in his summary that the report is divided into two parts: the results of the investigation into Russiaâs interference in the 2016 presidential election, and an examination of whether the president obstructed justice.
The counsel issued more than 2,800 subpoenas and interviewed around 500 witnesses.
Kilimnik and Manafort tried to convince associates to lie to investigators about the scope of their campaign, prosecutors allege. George Papadopoulos: The former foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI.
Barr said that Muellerâs team did not determine whether Trump illegally obstructed justice, writing: âwhile this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.â
In other words, far from authorizing a wide-ranging investigation of the President and his allies, the Justice Department directed Mueller to limit his probe to individuals who were reasonably suspected of committing crimes. Temperamentally as well as professionally, Mueller was inclined to follow this advice.
W. Bush Administration, and then, starting in 2001, the F.B.I. director for twelve years .
Mueller and his staff had low expectations for Trumpâs answers; the President didnât meet them. He said twenty-two times that he failed to ârecall,â and twelve times that he had no ârecollection.â. Muellerâs prosecutors did what they could at that late date: they wrote a letter.
McCabe told Mueller that Flynn had apparently lied to the agents about his conversations with Kislyak , and said that those statements should be on Muellerâs agenda, too. There was also the issue of possible obstruction of justice once Trump became President.
The President has tweeted about Mueller more than three hundred times, and has repeatedly referred to the special counselâs investigation as a âscamâ and a âhoax.â. Barr and Graham agree that the Mueller investigation was illegitimate in conception and excessive in executionâin Barrâs words, âa grave injusticeâ that was âunprecedented in American ...
These meetings demonstrate that, from the beginning, Mueller was instructed to conduct a narrow, fact-based criminal investigation.
At the meeting, Giuliani wanted to nail down a commitment from Mueller to follow a Justice Department policy, established by its Office of Legal Counsel (O.L.C.) in 1973 and reaffirmed in 2000, barring the indictment of a sitting President.
In July 2019, Mueller testified to Congress that a president could be charged with crimes including obstruction of justice after the president left office. In 2020, a Republican-appointed federal judge decided to personally review the report's redactions to see if they were legitimate.
In March 2020, federal judge Reggie Walton, appointed to his position by President George W. Bush, declared that he would personally review the redactions made in the Mueller report to ensure that the redactions were legitimate. This came during a lawsuit filed by the pro-transparency Electronic Privacy Information Center and media outlet BuzzFeed News to release the full, unredacted report under the Freedom of Information Act. Walton cited that he had concerns on whether the redactions were legitimate, due to Attorney General William Barr having displayed a "lack of candor" regarding the report.
This was first reported on April 30, 2019. Mueller thought that the Barr letter "did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance" of the findings of the special counsel investigation that he led. "There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation". Mueller also requested Barr release the Mueller report's introductions and executive summaries. The March 27 Mueller letter made no mention of media coverage.
Democrat Ted Lieu asked Mueller whether the reason he did not indict Trump was that Department of Justice policy prohibits the indictment of sitting presidents. Mueller originally confirmed that this was the reason. However, later that day, Mueller corrected his comments, stating that his team did not determine whether Trump committed a crime. Additionally, Mueller answered Republican Ken Buck that a president could be charged with obstruction of justice (or other crimes) after the president left office.
According to its authorizing document, which was signed by then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein on May 17, 2017, the investigation's scope included allegations that there were links or coordination between President Donald Trump 's presidential campaign and the Russian government as well as "any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation". The authorizing document also included "any other matters within the scope of 28 CFR § 600.4 (a) "; enabling the special counsel "to investigate and prosecute" any attempts to interfere with its investigation, "such as perjury, obstruction of justice, destruction of evidence, and intimidation of witnesses ".
The report was submitted to Attorney General William Barr on March 22, 2019, and a redacted version of the 448-page report was publicly released by the Department of Justice (DOJ) on April 18, 2019. It is divided into two volumes.
After the Special Counsel concluded its investigation on March 22, Barr sent Congress a four-page letter about the Special Counsel's conclusions on March 24. On April 30, it was reported Mueller sent a letter to Barr on March 27, that expressed concerns about his four-page letter to Congress. Barr called Mueller to discuss about the letter and its contents.
The report goes on to say that Trump's position as president made him an unusual subject, which kept Mueller from reaching a conclusion on obstruction.
Barr's decision to exonerate the president on the issue of obstruction was based, in part on the inability to prove intent because there was no crime to cover up. But Mueller said there may have been "other possible personal motives" for Trump's behavior.
The report lists 10 episodes of potential obstruction examined by Mueller's prosecutors. It is unclear which of the 10 were the subject of contention between Barr and Mueller. But legal theories that may have been in dispute include how heavily to weigh the OLC opinion, whether the lack of an underlying crime should be considered in determining Trump's intent, and whether Trump was rightfully exercising his executive powers by firing James Comey as FBI director.
Mueller goes on to cite other reasons why Trump could not be charged: There was no evidence of an underlying crime to establish intent, some of the evidence was ambiguous and many of the actions took place in public view. But it remains unclear how big of a factor the OLC's opinion was in Mueller's decision not to charge the president.
Julia Ainsley. Julia Ainsley is a correspondent covering the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice for the NBC News Investigative Unit.
Mueller seems to indicate here that Trump may have thought he committed a crime and could be working to cover up those actions. But he does not establish â in bold terms, at least â whether those motivations could have led the president to obstruct justice.
It is a crime to subvert an official truth-finding proceeding, like a grand-jury investigation, with a bad motive â like covering up personal wrongdoing or embarrassments. Obstruction can be a crime even if investigators fail to prove any underlying criminal offense.
Mr. Barr did not specify. But he said that âmostâ of Mr. Trumpâs actions investigated as potential obstruction of justice were âthe subject of public reportingâ and that âmanyâ of them âtook place in public view.â
More than two years of criminal indictments and steady revelations about Trump campaign contacts with Russians reveal the scope of the special counsel investigation.
Though nothing in the Constitution says a president cannot be indicted and criminally prosecuted while in office, the Justice Departmentâs Office of Legal Counsel has opined that presidents are temporarily immune from criminal charges during their terms.
Obstruction usually takes the form of corrupting evidence, like destroying documents or suborning perjury. Though made in impeachment proceedings, not criminal charges, the accusations against Mr. Nixon and Mr. Clinton both fit that category.
Mr. Trumpâs defenders, including his legal team, have objected to accusations that his actions impeded the Russia investigation. They disputed Mr. Comeyâs understanding that Mr. Trump was tacitly directing him to end the Flynn investigation and noted that firing the F.B.I. director does not end any particular investigation the bureau is pursuing.
Mueller sent his letter to Barr three days later, saying the resulting confusion threatened to undermine public confidence in the investigation. Justice Department officials said they were surprised by the tone of the letter, but they said Mueller was less pointed in their subsequent phone call. They said Barr also repeated ...
Trump's personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, told NBC News on Tuesday night that he had not been aware of Mueller's letter and that he did not understand what Mueller was taking exception to. "If he didn't want confusion, he should have made a decision," Giuliani said. "He was made special counsel to make decisions, ...
WASHINGTON â Special counsel Robert Mueller told Attorney General William Barr that the initial account of the Mueller report in Barr's four-page letter caused public confusion. Justice Department officials said that in a letter and a subsequent phone call, Mueller said Barr's March 24 letter, a four-page description of what Barr called ...
April 30, 201900:39. Barr is scheduled to testify about the investigation on Wednesday morning before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., a longtime member and former chairman of the committee, said in an interview with the New York newspaper Newsday that Barr was acting like Trump's personal lawyer, not the nation's lawyer. He promised to "ask him questions and give him a chance to show some independence.". "We'll see if he does," Leahy said.
The officials said that Mueller did not describe Barr's letter as inaccurate but that he thought it was resulting in misleading news coverage about the report. "He expressed frustration over the lack of context and the resulting media coverage regarding the special counsel's obstruction analysis," a Justice Department spokeswoman said.
The special counsel expressed frustration over the lack of context and substance of the letter that Barr made public. Robert Mueller, then the director of the FBI, at a hearing in Washington in September 2011. Brendan Hoffman / Getty Images file. WASHINGTON â Special counsel Robert Mueller told Attorney General William Barr ...