why are democrat congressmen acting as hillary's lawyer

by Fay Cole 5 min read

What does the indictment of Hillary's lawyer mean?

The Indictment of Hillary Clinton's Lawyer is an Indictment of the Russiagate Wing of U.S. Media The DOJ's new charging document, approved by Biden's Attorney General, sheds bright light onto the Russiagate fraud and how journalistic corruption was key.

Does the rule of law apply to Democrats?

A case could be made that the Mueller investigation itself destroyed evidence when it wiped clean the Strzok and Page cellphones to delete text messages requested by IG Horowitz. Yet being a Democrat means never having to say you’re sorry because the rule of law only applies to Republicans and conservatives.

What do Democrats not worry about?

Democrats never worry about financial ruin or Mueller going after their families ( In like Flynn ).

Did Roger Stone lie to Congress?

We know that Stone has been accused of lying to Congress, of “obstruction,” and “witness tampering.”

Who was critical of Hillary Clinton's demurral?

Robert Reich has been critical of Hillary's demurral on Glass-Steagall. After a Clinton adviser suggested in July she would not push to reenact it, Reich called the decision a "big mistake economically because the repeal of Glass-Steagall led directly to the 2008 Wall Street crash, and without it we're in danger of another one," wrote Reich, now a professor at the University of Berkeley.

Who sold out the Democratic Party?

But the Clintons and the DLC (Democratic Leadership Council) sold out the Democratic party to

Did Hillary Clinton support the TPP?

Not only does Hillary support the TPP, she helped negotiate it as Obama's secretary of state. She called it "the gold standard in trade agreements to open free, transparent, fair trade."

Who lied to Congress?

Clapper lied to Congress, as did Brennan and Comey, who can only remember things when he has a $15 million book to write. McCabe lied to the IG. Barack Obama weaponized federal agencies to attack his political opponents. Hillary sold her office as Secretary of State for money. Strzok disregarded his oath of office and used his power to attempt to destroy Trump. In fact, he guaranteed he’d destroy Trump. Then in testimony before Congress, he smirked with more arrogance than any Covington kid could ever muster. Yet, no arrests.

What did Sally Yates do to the Flynn investigation?

Sally Yates opened the Flynn investigation under the pretense that he violated the Logan Act, a 1799 law widely believed unconstitutional and never successfully used to prosecute anyone, and a law he didn’t violate since talking to the Russian ambassador was his job as National Security Advisor.

Did Sally Yates violate the Logan Act?

Sally Yates opened the Flynn investigation under the pretense that he violated the Logan Act, a 1799 law widely believed unconstitutional and never successfully used to prosecute anyone, and a law he didn’t violate since talking to the Russian ambassador was his job as National Security Advisor. Yet, John Kerry and his negotiations with the mullahs after Trump canceled the Iran deal was ignored.

Should people fear prosecution?

Apparently, in America today the only people who should fear prosecution are those who disagree with the “ones we’ve been waiting for” because if you’re a Democrat, you can’t get arrested in this town.

Does Mueller believe in false statements?

Real crimes go unaddressed, while misstatements about lawful actions warrant incarceration. Mueller is fond of false-statement charges where the underlying actions aren’t illegal; he also loosely interprets the definition of “lie.”

Why were poll watchers sent home?

If all the ballot counting was being done professionally and honestly, why were poll watchers sent home? If there’s nothing to hide, why hide it? Yet they were sent home -- for a broken water main that wasn’t really broken. Oddly, after the poll watchers were dismissed, thousands of ballots were removed from a hiding place under a table and counted. This gives new meaning to the term “getting out the vote” -- No?

Why are they impeaching a president who has left office?

Why are they impeaching a president who has left office? The Democrats say they’re doing it because Donald Trump must be prevented from running again in four years. But if Joe Biden really received more votes than any candidate in history, wouldn’t they relish the chance to do it again? In 2020 we were certainly hoping they’d nominate Hillary again, so Trump could beat her again.

What was the odd behavior during the election challenges?

The odd behavior continued during the election challenges. The Democrats fought every request for a recount or an audit. Election records were hidden, destroyed, or lost. They’ve even been implying that election challenges are tantamount to insurrection -- asking that anyone questioning the election be disciplined. Wouldn’t the winning party welcome an audit and debate to prove it actually won?

Who is the only Democratic presidential candidate to never go to law school?

Through nine consecutive presidential elections, this means that only one Democratic nominee for president or vice president—peanut farmer and Navy officer Jimmy Carter —never attended law school, nor enjoyed deep familial connections to the legal profession. Those familial connections have also extended to spouses of the Democratic nominees.

How many times did the GOP pick lawyers?

While the overwhelming majority of Democratic nominations (78 percent) went to attorneys, the GOP chose lawyers only three times—Bob Dole in 1996 and Dan Quayle for two vice presidential nods in ’88 and ‘92—for 18 spots on their national ticket. While Mitt Romney did earn a Harvard Law degree in 1975 ...

What was the Lilly Ledbetter Act?

On a similar note, the Democrats in Charlotte repeatedly cited the Lilly Ledbetter Act as a monumental achievement of the Obama administration in finally guaranteeing that the women of America would at long last receive equal pay for equal work.

Did Mitt Romney have a law degree?

While Mitt Romney did earn a Harvard Law degree in 1975 (as part of an elite joint program when he simultaneously earned his MBA), and even passed the bar in Michigan, he never practiced law before beginning his business career with the Boston Consulting Group shortly after graduation.

Do Democrats protect the downtrodden?

Democrats fancy themselves protectors of the downtrodden, but they mostly advance the interests of the legal profession, writes Michael Medved.

Do Democrats hold lobbyists in lower esteem than lawyers?

But Democrats can hardly take comfort in the fact that the American people hold lobbyists and Congress in even lower esteem than lawyers, especially since most lobbyists and a disproportionate number of legislators worked first as attorneys.

Who says Robert Mueller must be investigated?

Rudy Guiliani says Robert Mueller must be investigated after allowing Spygate evidence to be destroyed

Is there any serious effort to charge Democrats at all?

There aren’t any serious efforts to charge Democrats at all

Has any Democrat been indicted by Mueller?

And yet, you’ll notice, not a single Democrat has been indicted by Mueller. Oh, there have been some Democratic Deep State figures fired from the Justice Department and FBI — Peter Strzok, Andrew McCabe, and James Comey, to begin with — but none of them have been charged for committing some of the exact same process crimes as Stone and former Trump National Security Advisor Michael Flynn: Lying to federal investigators or lying to Congress. (Related: BOMBSHELL: Christopher Steele admits he wrote “Russia dossier” so Hillary could challenge 2016 election results: PROOF Deep State is real.)