The main reason executors ask beneficiaries to sign a release and indemnity before they undertake distributions of the estate’s assets is to receive legal confirmation of their work and their estate accounting to date.
Full Answer
Mar 07, 2013 · It is much more common to have a beneficiary sign a document that confirms review and approval of the accounting provided and , perhaps, a consent to the proposed distribution. A "release" goes further and waives claims you might otherwise have. If you are not comfortable with this, by all means consult with counsel.
Oct 23, 2021 · Executors want you to sign a release to ensure that they are protected from personal liability for the work they have done executing the estate. It also ensures they won’t have to claw back any assets or distribute them in some new way after they’ve already distributed everything there is to be distributed.
Jul 13, 2010 ·
When a beneficiary calls and a lawyer chooses to engage in a conversation, the lawyer must walk a careful line between providing general information about the estate (which is okay) and providing legal advice to a beneficiary (which is not okay). Another consideration at play is the attorneys’ fees.
The real answer is that the lawyer doesn’t represent the beneficiaries. When a beneficiary calls and a lawyer chooses to engage in a conversation, the lawyer must walk a careful line between providing general information about the estate (which is okay) and providing legal advice to a beneficiary (which is not okay).
Although it seems elemental, the first step for any lawyer in any case is to identify the client. In a probate matter, the estate’s attorney generally represents the Personal Representative, in his or her fiduciary capacity. What does that really mean?
In a probate matter, the estate’s attorney generally represents the Personal Representative, in his or her fiduciary capacity. What does that really mean? That means that the lawyer works with the Personal Representative so long as that person is acting in the estate’s best interest.
A lawyer’s time is considered an expense involving estate administration. In Washington, these expenses are prioritized ahead of any estate distributions to the beneficiaries.
So that beneficiary, and any other beneficiaries who will receive percentage distributions, will ultimately receive less money. Since, again, the lawyer represents a fiduciary and must seek to act in the estate’s best interest, often it is in the estate’s best interest if the lawyer does not communicate excessively with the beneficiaries.
Otherwise, one problematic beneficiary can unfairly reduce the other beneficiaries’ distributions. Also, unfortunately, some beneficiaries who suspect that they are being shafted by the estate choose to take matters into their own hands.
Under Probate Code section 16004.5, a Trustee cannot require a beneficiary to sign a release in exchange for making a distribution of Trust assets, provided that the Trust distribution is required to be made as stated in the Trust document.
That’s what gives the Trustee finality. While it is true that a Trustee cannot force you to sign a release, a release may be the cheapest alternative to finalizing a Trust administration. Just do us one favor. Don’t sign anything until you have a full understanding of all actions your Trustee took while acting as Trustee.
For example, if you are entitled to an outright distribution of your share of the Trust estate, then a Trustee cannot force you to sign a release before receiving your distribution. That sounds fair, but there are a few exceptions to the rule. First, this rule does not apply to a voluntarily release or discharge of liability.
Fourth, a Trustee is allowed to withhold any part of a Trust distribution that is in dispute. If there is a Trust contest lawsuit, or some other lawsuit that puts the Trust assets at risk of being paid to someone else, then the Trustee has the right to retain the disputed property until all court action is finalized.
But if your Trust distribution is $100,000, then a court-approved accounting becomes a more significant expense. In any event, the law allows a Trustee to seek court approval of a Trust accounting because it allows the Trustee to finalize the Trust administration. Once a court approves a Trust accounting, then all actions reported in ...
Second, the Trustee has the right to withhold a reasonable reserve of Trust assets to pay for anticipated Trust expenses, including taxes, debts , trustee and accounting fees , and other costs of administration.
A reasonable reserve will vary depending on the size of the Trust estate and the anticipated expenses. In most cases, however, the Trustee should be able to distribute most Trust assets to you even while retaining a reasonable reserve. A reasonable reserve should never be your entire Trust distribution ...
It is appropriate for executors to request that beneficiaries sign a release and indemnity before they make any distributions from the estate assets. The timing of the request in relation to making any distributions is important. However, if any beneficiary refuses to sign such a document, then the executor cannot force any beneficiary to do so. It may be advisable for the directors of charitable beneficiaries to refuse signing such a document to fulfill their fiduciary obligations in certain circumstances. However, in such instances, the executor will be able to formally pass the estate’s accounts as an alternative course of action.
1. Executors cannot require beneficiaries to sign releases in order to access their inheritance.
In Brighter Estate, the Ontario Court of Justice found that while it is appropriate for executors to request an estate’s beneficiaries to sign a release before they receive any portion of their inheritance, “it is quite another matter for [an executor] to require execution of the release before making payment.”.
It is also worth noting that executors retain the discretion to decide when distributions should be made to beneficiaries, including whether a full passing of accounts is necessary in the absence of a release and indemnity.
In order for releases to be enforceable, they must be signed BEFORE distributions are made to beneficiaries. A recent judgment from Alberta clarifies the time at which executors should seek releases from beneficiaries if they choose to do so.
However, if any beneficiary refuses to sign such a document, then the executor cannot force any beneficiary to do so. It may be advisable for the directors of charitable beneficiaries to refuse signing such a document to fulfill their fiduciary obligations in certain circumstances.
Any loss of charitable assets due to the directors’ inactivity or failure to act could make the directors liable for breach of their fiduciary duties, or possibly even breach of trust, which could ultimately result in such directors having to pay damages to the organization, or worse, criminal liability.
It is quite proper for an executor (or trustee, to use the current expression) to accompany payment with a release which the beneficiary is requested to execute. But it is quite another matter for the trustee to require execution of the release before making payment; that is manifestly improper .” 5 (emphasis added) ...
The Courts seem to be of the view that it is well within the rights of an executor to ask beneficiaries for a release prior to making a distribution. As one judge stated, “There is nothing improper in attending to an interim distribution to some of the beneficiaries provided sufficient funds remain on hand for the remaining beneficiaries ...
It is normal for executors to wait until they receive a tax clearance certificate from the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) before making a final distribution from an estate, because prior to receiving the clearance certificate, the executor is personally liable if the estate has unpaid taxes 1. However, once all the estate debts are ascertained ...
Her brother Alan, refused to sign a release of the executrix, and a consent waiving the passing of accounts. One of the main assets in the estate was the deceased’s home. Alan did not agree with the evaluation of the home or what his sister, Katherine, the executrix claimed for “executor’s fees.”. Katherine’s lawyer wrote to Alan ...
In court, Katherine the executrix, justified requiring the release and approval as a precondition to a final distribution to Alan. She claimed that he was not entitled to any distribution without signing a release. This is what the court had to say, “….
That is incorrect. A final release from the beneficiaries is not required. The Queen’s Bench Rules require that an executrix to provide a release only if she wishes to be discharged without passing her accounts. She has the option of passing her accounts.
The Queen’s Bench Rules require that an executrix to provide a release only if she wishes to be discharged without passing her accounts. She has the option of passing her accounts.
That’s a long time for a trustee to have to look in the rear-view mirror for beneficiary claims. Probate Code section 16004.5 (a) states that a “trustee may not require a beneficiary to relieve the trustee of liability as a condition for making a distribution or payment to, or for the benefit of, the beneficiary, ...
When a beneficiary sues a trustee for breach of duty, the statute of limitations (per Probate Code section 16460) generally runs for three years from when the beneficiary knew or should have known of the breach. That’s a long time for a trustee to have to look in the rear-view mirror for beneficiary claims.
Trustees understandably want to wrap up trust administration without having to worry about being sued by beneficiaries. When a beneficiary appears to be litigious, the trustee may want to dangle a preliminary or final asset distribution as a carrot to get the beneficiary to sign a release.
Probate Code section 16004.5 (a) states that a “trustee may not require a beneficiary to relieve the trustee of liability as a condition for making a distribution or payment to, or for the benefit of, the beneficiary, if the distribution or payment is required by the trust instrument.”.
The trustee may maintain a reserve fund for reasonably anticipated expenses, including accounting and legal fees. The trustee may withhold a distribution if it is “reasonably in dispute.”.