John Adams — Defense Attorney for British Soldiers? Why a Founding Father represented British soldiers during the Boston Massacre Trials aptain Thomas Preston and eight British soldiers were on trial for murder. They would need an excellent attorney to represent them with a jury full of anti-British colonists.
Adams defended the British officer Thomas Preston and his soldiers in two separate trials. Can you talk about the balancing act Adams undertook to defend all his clients without alienating his fellow Bostonians, many of whom fervently supported the broader patriot cause?
Next on trial were the eight soldiers under Preston’s command on the night of the Boston Massacre. There was a different jury for this trial and they were, once again, sequestered. During the seven-day trial, more than eighty witnesses were called to testify.
John Adams was joined by Josiah Quincy and Robert Auchmuty to defend Preston against the charge of murder. Even though Preston had only drawn a sword, he was charged with murder because he was the officer in charge and responsible for the men under him.
John Adamsaptain Thomas Preston and eight British soldiers were on trial for murder. They would need an excellent attorney to represent them with a jury full of anti-British colonists. Who would be willing to take on such a task? Patriot and Founding Father John Adams stepped up to the job.
John AdamsAs noted in the 2008 HBO mini-series chronicling the life and career of John Adams (1735-1826), as a young lawyer the future president served as counsel for the defense in the trial of eight British soldiers accused of murder during a riot in Boston on March 5, 1770.
revolutionary John AdamsHe recruited Robert Treat Paine, a prosperous attorney in Southern Massachusetts and Rhode Island. It was ironic that revolutionary John Adams took the job of defending the King's soldiers while loyal prosecutor , Samuel Quincy, of proving them guilty.
Eight soldiers, one officer, and four civilians were arrested and charged with murder, and they were defended by future U.S. President John Adams.
Without hesitation Adams agreed to defend the soldiers and their captain. Above all, John Adams believed in upholding the law, and defending the innocent. Adams was convinced that the soldiers were wrongly accused, and had fired into the crowd in self-defense.
Richard Palmes was a Boston resident at the time of the Boston massacre in 1770.
Crispus AttucksCrispus Attucks, a sailor of mixed African and Indigenous ancestry, died in Boston on March 5, 1770 after British soldiers fired two musket balls into his chest. His death and that of four other men at the hands of the 29th Regiment became known as the Boston Massacre.
Preston denied that he gave an order to fire and was supported by three defense witnesses, while four witnesses for the prosecution swore that he had given the order. The massacre label stood even after a Boston jury later acquitted Captain Preston and four of the soldiers of all charges.
Adams Reacts to the Boston Tea Party When he returned the very next morning, he was shocked that the Sons of Liberty undertook such a foolhardy course, but was nonetheless pleasantly surprised.
Thomas Preston ( c. 1722—c. 1798) was a British officer, a captain who served in Boston in the Province of Massachusetts Bay. He commanded troops in the Boston Massacre in 1770 and was tried for murder, but he was acquitted.
Adams was born in the Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1735. A Harvard-educated lawyer, he early became identified with the patriot cause; a delegate to the First and Second Continental Congresses, he led in the movement for independence.
No malice was found. All eight men were found not guilty of murder. Two, Hugh Montgomery and Matthew Kilroy, were found guilty of manslaughter. A defense lawyer to the last, Adams negotiated the sentences of Montgomery and Kilroy using and ancient precedent of English law.
He agreed to represent Preston and the soldiers, joined by fellow Patriot Josiah Quincy.
John Adams, 1766 Wikimedia Commons. C. aptain Thomas Preston and eight British soldiers were on trial for murder. They would need an excellent attorney to represent them with a jury full of anti-British colonists. Who would be willing to take on such a task?
The jury found Preston not guilty after a six-day hearing. Boston Massacre lithograph, Henry Pelham Wikimedia Commons. Next on trial were the eight soldiers under Preston’s command on the night of the Boston Massacre. There was a different jury for this trial and they were, once again, sequestered.
Adams and the defense argued that the crowd was endangering the soldiers’ lives and they acted in self-defense. He called witnesses that described how the crowd verbally threatened the soldiers and threw objects at them. Witnesses recalled how the mob had repeatedly called for the British soldiers to be killed.
After deliberating for three hours, the jury found all eight soldiers not guilty of murder. Two of the men were found guilty of the lesser charge of manslaughter and their penalty was reduced to branding on the thumb. The other six soldiers were completely cleared of all charges.
The impact on today’s legal system. The Boston Massacre trials served as a landmark case for the new justice system in the colonies. This trial was the first time that a jury was sequestered, which is now typical practice in high profile cases. The standard of reasonable doubt was also introduced during this trial.
Before the trial, Loyalists and Patriots engaged in a propaganda war. Patriot cartoons and articles painted the riot as an all-out attack by aggressive British soldiers. Paul Revere even published a cartoon which he named The Bloody Massacre, leading the riot to be known as the Boston Massacre.