who was the lawyer agains gideon

Did Gideon have a lawyer in prison?

From his prison cell, Gideon penned his own petition for habeas corpus, first going to the Florida Supreme Court. The state's high court followed the law that existed at the time and held that Gideon was not entitled to a lawyer at government expense. But Gideon did not stop there.

Who represented Gideon before the Supreme Court?

Abe Fortas, a Washington, D.C., attorney and future Supreme Court justice, represented Gideon for free before the high court. He eschewed the safer argument that Gideon was a special case because he had only had an eighth-grade education.

Who was Clarence Gideon’s lawyer?

On August 5, 1963, Clarence Gideon again appeared before Judge Robert L. McCrary in the Panama City Courthouse, and this time he had an experienced trial lawyer, W. Fred Turner, to defend him. All of the publicity resulted in a heavily bolstered prosecution team.

Who is Gideon?

Clarence Earl Gideon was an unlikely hero. He was a man with an eighth-grade education who ran away from home when he was in middle school. He spent much of his early adult life as a drifter, spending time in and out of prisons for nonviolent crimes.

Who was Gideon's lawyer in his second trial?

Fred TurnerFred Turner. Fred Turner is the Bay County, Fla., criminal defense lawyer who represented Clarence Gideon at his second trial after the Supreme Court had ruled with Gideon and had remanded the case.

Who was Gideon's lawyer who argument his appeal to the Supreme Court?

On January 15, 1963, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Gideon v. Wainwright. Abe Fortas, a Washington, D.C., attorney and future Supreme Court justice, represented Gideon for free before the high court.

Who was the witness against Gideon?

Gideon must not have been aware of this. The first of the State's two witnesses was Ira Strickland, Jr., the proprietor of the Bay Harbor Poolroom. He testified that the poolroom had been locked the evening before the break-in.

Why did the judge deny Gideon a lawyer?

At trial, Gideon appeared in court without an attorney. In open court, he asked the judge to appoint counsel for him because he could not afford an attorney. The trial judge denied Gideon's request because Florida law only permitted appointment of counsel for poor defendants charged with capital offenses.

Who was the state of Florida attorney in Gideon's trial?

Wainwright holding that a criminal defendant who cannot afford to hire a lawyer must be provided one at no cost. At Gideon's first trial in August 1961, he was denied legal counsel and was forced to represent himself, and was convicted....Clarence Earl GideonCriminal penaltyMultiple sentences8 more rows

Who was the plaintiff in Gideon v. Wainwright?

Clarence Earl GIDEONClarence Earl GIDEON, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections. Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute.

Who committed the crime in Gideon's Trumpet?

Turner suggested to the jury that it was really Cook himself who had committed the crime. He was in a good position to speak about Cook because he had represented Cook in two other cases. Lawyers themselves bear some of the responsibility for the failures since the Gideon decision.

Why was the Betts case overruled?

Justice Black dissented, arguing that denial of counsel based on financial stability makes it so that those in poverty have an increased chance of conviction, which violates the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause. This decision was overruled in 1963 in Gideon v. Wainwright.

What did Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black Think about Gideon's appeal?

After the Florida Supreme Court denied his petition, Gideon appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which reviewed his case in 1963. The Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision written by Justice Hugo Black, ruled that Gideon's conviction was unconstitutional because Gideon was denied a defense lawyer at trial.

What happened Gideon v. Wainwright?

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court established that the Fourteenth Amendment creates a right for criminal defendants who cannot pay for their own lawyers to have the state appoint attorneys on their behalf.

Was Gideon's punishment appropriate?

No, Gideon's punishment was not appropriate because he was sentenced 5 years in prison, even though it was only petty larceny.

Who won Gideon v. Wainwright?

In 1963, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of Gideon, guaranteeing the right to legal counsel for criminal defendants in federal and state courts. Following the decision, Gideon was given another trial with an appointed lawyer and was acquitted of the charges.

How did Gideon get relief from his conviction?

Gideon sought relief from his conviction by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Florida Supreme Court. In his petition, Gideon challenged his conviction and sentence on the ground that the trial judge’s refusal to appoint counsel violated Gideon’s constitutional rights. The Florida Supreme Court denied Gideon’s petition.

What court did Gideon file a petition in?

The Florida Supreme Court denied Gideon’s petition. Gideon next filed a handwritten petition in the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court agreed to hear the case to resolve the question of whether the right to counsel guaranteed under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution applies to defendants in state court.

Why did the Florida Supreme Court deny Gideon's request for a court appointed attorney?

Lower Court Ruling: The trial judge denied Gideon’s request for a court-appointed attorney because, under Florida law, counsel could only be appointed for a poor defendant charged with a capital offense. The Florida Supreme Court agreed with the trial court and denied all relief.

What was Gideon's charge?

Gideon was charged with breaking and entering with the intent to commit a misdemeanor, which is a felony under Florida law.

Which amendment did Brady v. Brady violate?

455 (1942), held that the refusal to appoint counsel for an indigent defendant charged with a felony in state court did not necessarily violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Which amendment guarantees a fair trial?

The Court held that the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of counsel is a fundamental right essential to a fair trial and, as such, applies the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In overturning Betts, Justice Black stated that “reason and reflection require us to recognize that in our adversary system of criminal justice, any person haled into court, who is too poor to hire a lawyer, cannot be assured a fair trial unless counsel is provided for him.” He further wrote that the “noble ideal” of “fair trials before impartial tribunals in which ever defendant stands equal before the law . . . cannot be realized if the poor man charged with crime has to face his accusers without a lawyer to assist him.”

Who was the attorney who represented Gideon in the Supreme Court case?

On January 15, 1963, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Gideon v. Wainwright. Abe Fortas , a Washington, D.C., attorney and future Supreme Court justice, represented Gideon for free before the high court. He eschewed the safer argument that Gideon was a special case because he had only had an eighth-grade education.

What case did Gideon file?

At the time, the Supreme Court had already dealt with several cases concerning the right to counsel. In Powell v. Alabama (1932)—which involved the “ Scottsboro Boys ,” nine black youths who had been ...

What was Gideon v. Wainwright?

Wainwright, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 18, 1963, ruled (9–0) that states are required to provide legal counsel to indigent defendants charged with a felony. ...

Which Supreme Court case established the right of indigent defendants to a court-appointed attorney?

…accused in such cases as Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), which established the right of indigent defendants to a court-appointed attorney, and Miranda v. Arizona (1966), which specified a code of conduct for police interrogations of criminal suspects held in custody. After the Supreme Court’s ruling in Brown v. Board of… …

Why did Gideon v Cochran get a writ of habeas corpus?

Gideon subsequently petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus from the Florida Supreme Court, arguing that, because he had not had an attorney, he had been denied a fair trial. The suit was originally Gideon v. Cochran; the latter name referred to H.G. Cochran, Jr., the director of Florida’s Division of Corrections.

When was counsel not required in a felony case?

Brady, however, (1942), the Court decided that assigned counsel was not required for indigent defendants in state felony cases except when there were special circumstances, notably if the defendant was illiterate or mentally challenged. Get a Britannica Premium subscription and gain access to exclusive content.

When was Gideon acquitted?

The decision thus overturned Betts v. Brady. Gideon was granted a retrial, and he was acquitted in 1963. Josh Ashenmiller The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica.

What was Clarence Gideon accused of?

Clarence Gideon was accused of a felony in Panama City, Florida and convicted after the trial judge denied Gideon’s request to have counsel appointed to represent him. The Supreme Court agreed to hear Gideon’s case and granted him a new trial, ruling that legal assistance is “fundamental and essential to a fair trial” and that due process requires states to provide a lawyer for any indigent person being prosecuted for a serious crime. After being retried with the help of a local attorney, who had the time and skill to investigate his case and conduct a competent defense, Gideon was acquitted of all charges.

What is the legacy of Gideon v. Wainwright?

“If an obscure Florida convict named Clarence Earl Gideon had not sat down in his prison cell with a pencil and paper to write a letter to the Supreme Court, and if the Court had not taken the trouble to look for merit in that one crude petition ... the vast machinery of American law would have gone on ...

What is the Supreme Court's recognition of the right to counsel in the criminal justice system?

The Supreme’s Court recognition in Gideon that “lawyers in criminal courts are necessities, not luxuries,” and its guarantee of the right to counsel in the state criminal process, has had a profound impact on the operation and aspirations of the American criminal justice system.

When was the defense of indigent persons accused of crime?

Defense of Indigent Persons Accused of Crime. November 1, 1963. On March 18, 1963, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Gideon v. Wainwright, unanimously holding that defendants facing serious criminal charges have a right to counsel at state expense if they cannot afford one.

Was Gideon acquitted of all charges?

After being retried with the help of a local attorney, who had the time and skill to investigate his case and conduct a competent defense, Gideon was acquitted of all charges. The right to appointed counsel has been extended to misdemeanor and juvenile proceedings.

What does the Sixth Amendment Say

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense .

The Role of the Fourteenth Amendment in the Gideon case

One of the most difficult concepts for 21 st century Americans to grasp is the idea that the rights and protections of the Bill of Rights only applied to the federal government prior to the passage of the 14 th Amendment in 1868.

Subsequent Development of the Right to Counsel

After Gideon, the court continued to define exactly what the right to counsel means and Missouri took appropriate actions to comply with the court’s holdings:

Teaching Gideon

There are a number of outstanding resources for teaching the Gideon case, which provide background information, lesson plans and interesting activities:

What was the Gideon case?

Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966), the Supreme Court further extended the rule to apply during police interrogation. The Gideon decision led to the Civil Gideon movement, which tackles the justice gap by calling for the right to counsel for low-income litigants in civil cases.

How long did Gideon serve in prison?

At the conclusion of the trial, the jury returned a guilty verdict. The court sentenced Gideon to serve five years in the state prison.

What were the criteria for civil litigation before Gideon?

Before Gideon, civil litigants were able to access counsel only based on the following three stringent criteria: whether the case had implications had any implications for a private corporation; whether their not receiving counsel would render the trial unfair or in some way compromised in procedure; and whether the case affected the government's interests. After Gideon, many more litigants were eligible for counsel, giving rise to the "Civil Gideon movement".

How did Gideon die?

The jury acquitted Gideon after one hour of deliberation. After his acquittal, Gideon resumed his previous life and married sometime later. He died of cancer in Fort Lauderdale on January 18, 1972, at age 61. Gideon's family in Missouri accepted his body and laid him to rest in an unmarked grave.

What changes have been made to the criminal justice system since the Gideon decision?

Many changes have been made in the prosecution and legal representation of indigent defendants since the Gideon decision. The decision created and then expanded the need for public defenders which had previously been rare. For example, immediately following the decision, Florida required public defenders in all of the state's circuit courts. The need for more public defenders also led to a need to ensure that they were properly trained in criminal defense in order to allow defendants to receive as fair a trial as possible. Several states and counties followed suit. Washington D.C., for instance, has created a training program for their public defenders, who must receive rigorous training before they are allowed to represent defendants, and must continue their training in order to remain current in criminal law, procedure, and practices. In 2010, a public defender's office in the South Bronx, The Bronx Defenders, created the Center for Holistic Defense, which has helped other public defender offices from Montana to Massachusetts, developed a model of public defense called holistic defense or holistic advocacy. In it, criminal defense attorneys work on interdisciplinary teams, alongside civil attorneys, social workers, and legal advocates to help clients with not only direct but also collateral aspects of their criminal cases. More recently the American Bar Association and the National Legal Aid and Defender Association have set minimum training requirements, caseload levels, and experience requirements for defenders. There is often controversy whether caseloads set upon public defenders give them enough time to sufficiently defend their clients. Some criticize the mindset in which public defense lawyers encourage their clients to simply plead guilty. Some defenders say this is intended to lessen their own workload, while others would say it is intended to obtain a lighter sentence by negotiating a plea bargain as compared with going to trial and perhaps having a harsher sentence imposed. Tanya Greene, an ACLU lawyer, has said that that is why 90 to 95 percent of defendants do plead guilty: "You've got so many cases, limited resources, and there's no relief. You go to work, you get more cases. You have to triage."

What is the significance of Gideon v Wainwright?

335 (1963), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously held that in criminal cases states are required under the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution to provide an attorney to defendants who are unable to afford their own attorneys.

What is the difference between Doughty vs Maxwell and Gideon?

In this case, the Supreme Court granted certiorari and reversed the decision of the Ohio court in Doughty, which held that regardless of Gideon, the defendant waived their right to appointed counsel by entering a plea of guilty. The underlying alleged crime and trial in Doughty took place in Ohio, which had its own way of interpreting the right to counsel, as do many states. Pennsylvania and West Virginia also deemed that the right to counsel was waived when a plea of guilty was entered. Depending upon one's viewpoint, rules such as these could be seen as an attempt by a state to establish reasonable rules in criminal cases or as an attempt to save money even at the expense of denying a defendant due process. This varies a great deal from federal law, which generally has stricter guidelines for waiving the right to counsel. An analogous area of criminal law is the circumstances under which a criminal defendant can waive the right to trial. Under federal law, the defendant can only waive their right to trial if it is clear that the defendant understands the "charges, the consequences of the various pleas, and the availability of counsel". State laws on the subject are often less strict, making it easier for prosecutors to obtain a defendant's waiver of the right to trial.

Why did Gideon defend himself at his first trial?

First trial. Being too poor to pay for counsel, Gideon was forced to defend himself at his trial after being denied a lawyer by the trial judge, Robert McCrary Jr. At that time, Florida law only gave indigent defendants no-cost legal counsel in death penalty cases.

How did Gideon die?

After his acquittal, Gideon resumed his previous way of life and married for a fifth time some time later. He died of cancer in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, on January 18, 1972, at age 61. Gideon's family had him buried in an unmarked grave in Hannibal.

What would happen if Clarence Gideon had not been in prison?

If an obscure Florida convict named Clarence Earl Gideon had not sat down in prison with a pencil and paper to write a letter to the Supreme Court; and if the Supreme Court had not taken the trouble to look at the merits in that one crude petition among all the bundles of mail it must receive every day, the vast machinery of American law would have gone on functioning undisturbed. But Gideon did write that letter; the court did look into his case; he was re-tried with the help of competent defense counsel; found not guilty and released from prison after two years of punishment for a crime he did not commit. And the whole course of legal history has been changed.

How long was Gideon in prison?

On August 4, 1961, Gideon was convicted of breaking and entering with intent to commit petty larceny, and on August 25, Judge McCrary gave Gideon the maximum sentence, five years in state prison. Gideon v. Wainwright.

What amendment did Judge McCrary violate?

He concluded that Judge McCrary had violated his constitutional right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, applicable to Florida through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

How many people were freed in the Gideon case?

About 2,000 convicted people in Florida alone were freed as a result of the Gideon decision; Gideon himself was not freed, but instead received another trial. He chose W. Fred Turner to be his lawyer for his retrial, which occurred on August 5, 1963, five months after the Supreme Court ruling.

Why did Gideon tell the taxi driver to keep the taxi ride secret?

Furthermore, although in the first trial Gideon had not cross-examined the driver about his statement that Gideon had told him to keep the taxi ride a secret, Turner's cross-examination revealed that Gideon had said that to the cab driver previously because "he had trouble with his wife.".

Gideon Appeals

Gideon was outraged by the verdict, particularly the fact that he had been denied counsel. He applied to the Florida Supreme Court for a writ of habeas corpus, an order freeing him on the ground that he was illegally imprisoned.

Suggestions for Further Reading

The Guide To American Law. St. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing Co., 1984.

Abe Fortas

• Abe Fortas was the editor in chief of the Yale Law Journal. After graduation he served as a faculty member at Yale. He then went to work for the government during the New Deal. In 1946 he was a founding partner of Arnold, Fortas & Porter. It became a very prominent Washington, D.C., law fir…

See more on nacdl.org

Abe Krash

Conclusion

Notes

A Conversation with Bruce R. Jacob