who was gideon's lawyer in his second trial in the case gideon v wainwright

by Georgette Harvey 8 min read

Fred Turner

What was the decision in Gideon v Wainwright?

Fred Turner, Gideon’s lawyer at the second trial, later became a Circuit Judge in Bay County. He had access to court records and during the three-year period while the two of us often discussed the Gideon case, he sent me a copy of the “Pre-Sentence Investigation” report.

Which amendment was violated in the Gideons v Wainwright case?

Gideon sought relief from his conviction by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Florida Supreme Court. In his petition, Gideon challenged his conviction and sentence on the ground that the trial judge’s refusal to appoint counsel violated Gideon’s constitutional rights. The Florida Supreme Court denied Gideon’s petition.

What did the case Gideon v Wainwright accomplish?

Oct 24, 2018 · November 1, 1963. On March 18, 1963, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Gideon v. Wainwright, unanimously holding that defendants facing serious criminal charges have a right to counsel at state expense if they cannot afford one. The time that has passed since Gideon have demonstrated that effective legal assistance for all persons ...

What were the arguments in Gideon v . Wainwright?

Second trial. About 2,000 convicted people in Florida alone were freed as a result of the Gideon decision; Gideon himself was not freed, but instead received another trial. He chose W. Fred Turner to be his lawyer for his retrial, which occurred on August 5, 1963, five months after the Supreme Court ruling.

image

Who was Gideon's lawyer in Gideon v Wainwright?

W. Fred TurnerThe decision did not directly result in Gideon being freed; instead, he received a new trial with the appointment of defense counsel at the government's expense. Gideon chose W. Fred Turner to be his lawyer in his second trial. The retrial took place on August 5, 1963, five months after the Supreme Court ruling.

Did Gideon have a lawyer in the Supreme Court?

Clarence Earl Gideon was a career criminal whose actions helped change the American legal system. Accused of committing a robbery, Gideon was too poor to hire a lawyer to represent him in court. After he was found guilty and sentenced to five years in prison, Gideon took his case to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Why was Gideon denied a lawyer?

Lower Court Ruling: The trial judge denied Gideon's request for a court-appointed attorney because, under Florida law, counsel could only be appointed for a poor defendant charged with a capital offense. The Florida Supreme Court agreed with the trial court and denied all relief.

Did Gideon win his second trial?

At his second trial, which took place in August 1963, with a court-appointed lawyer representing him and bringing out for the jury the weaknesses in the prosecution's case, Gideon was acquitted.

Who represents Gideon at the trial at the end of the movie?

Fred TurnerFortas goes to trial against the prosecutor, and wins the case so Gideon can be tried again, this time with an attorney. While Gideon is disappointed by having to go through a retrial, he is given an excellent attorney in the area by the name of Fred Turner (played by Lane Smith).

Was Gideon's trial unfair?

Several months later, on March 18, 1963, the US Supreme Court gave its final decision. They agreed with Mr. Gideon. His trial had been unfair because he had been denied the right to a lawyer.

Was Gideon v. Wainwright unanimous?

In 1963, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of Gideon, guaranteeing the right to legal counsel for criminal defendants in federal and state courts. Following the decision, Gideon was given another trial with an appointed lawyer and was acquitted of the charges.

Who was the plaintiff in Gideon v. Wainwright?

Clarence Earl GIDEONClarence Earl GIDEON, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections. Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute.

What was the case of Gideon v Wainwright?

1 Gideon was convicted of breaking and entering with intent to commit petit larceny in Bay County, Florida. He sought review and won before the United States Supreme Court. The Supreme Court returned his case to Florida where he was acquitted at a second trial. 2

When was Gideon's first trial?

Gideon’s first trial was scheduled for August 4, 1961. At the outset of that trial, the following colloquy took place: The Court: The next case on the Docket is the case of the State of Florida, Plaintiff vs. Clarence Earl Gideon, Defendant.

What was the law of the land in Betts v. Brady?

Brady, which was the law of the land in 1961, was that the Constitution did not require the appointment of counsel in every state non-capital felony case involving an indigent defendant . 69 Betts did provide, however, that counsel should be appointed whenever one or more special circumstances were present which would make it difficult for a defendant to receive a fair trial without the assistance of counsel. 70 “Specialized circumstances” included such factors as the seriousness or complexity of the case, 71 extreme youth or lack of experience, 72 lack of education, 73 unfamiliarity with court procedure, 74 or inability to understand the English language. 75

How long was Gideon in prison?

40 By the summer of 1961, he had spent one year in a juvenile correctional institution and approximately eighteen years in adult prisons.

Who was William Harris?

William Harris was the Assistant State Attorney who prosecuted in both Gideon trials. Harris was a tall, large, muscular-looking man. 60 He was a very capable trial lawyer, 61 and had a “presence” in the courtroom. 62 Lawyers who worked with or otherwise knew Mr. Harris described him as “quick,” and said he could be “funny” in court. 63 Mr. Harris’s colleagues considered him “old school, rough, tough, a fine lawyer.” 64 He was extremely “plain spoken,” 65 and always spoke his mind. He has been described as “gruff on the outside,” but “with a heart of gold”and a “great sense of fairness.” 66 “Everyone liked him,” according to a fellow lawyer. 67

What did Judge McCrary say to the jurors after Harris had examined the prospective jurors?

Judge McCrary then said to the jurors, “Gentlemen, since this Defendant is not represented by Counsel, I want to ask you some questions on his behalf.” 91 McCrary asked the following:

How old was Judge McCrary at the time of Gideon's trial?

At the time of Gideon’s first trial, Judge McCrary was 45 years old. 47 He was a heavyset man of average height. Those who knew him said that when McCrary was on the bench “he was all business.” 48 He “followed the law.” 49 He was a “very good judge, calm and thoughtful.” 50 He was slow to anger, but kept order and did not tolerate any disturbances in his courtroom. 51 McCrary never took it personally if a witness, lawyer, or spectator misbehaved. 52 Fred Turner was not as complimentary as others in describing McCrary. He told me that McCrary had been a Lieutenant Colonel in the Field Artillery who “looked straight ahead, with blinders.” 53

What was Gideon's crime?

He spent much of his early adult life as a drifter, spending time in and out of prisons for nonviolent crimes. Gideon was charged with breaking and entering with the intent to commit a misdemeanor, which is a felony under Florida law. At trial, Gideon appeared in court without an attorney.

Why did the Florida Supreme Court deny Gideon's request for a court appointed attorney?

Lower Court Ruling: The trial judge denied Gideon’s request for a court-appointed attorney because, under Florida law, counsel could only be appointed for a poor defendant charged with a capital offense. The Florida Supreme Court agreed with the trial court and denied all relief.

Which amendment guarantees a fair trial?

The Court held that the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of counsel is a fundamental right essential to a fair trial and, as such, applies the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In overturning Betts, Justice Black stated that “reason and reflection require us to recognize that in our adversary system of criminal justice, any person haled into court, who is too poor to hire a lawyer, cannot be assured a fair trial unless counsel is provided for him.” He further wrote that the “noble ideal” of “fair trials before impartial tribunals in which ever defendant stands equal before the law . . . cannot be realized if the poor man charged with crime has to face his accusers without a lawyer to assist him.”

What is the meaning of the case Betts v Brady?

455 (1942), held that the refusal to appoint counsel for an indigent defendant charged with a felony in state court did not necessarily violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court granted Gideon’s petition for a writ of certiorari – that is, agreed to hear Gideon’s case and review the decision of the lower court – in order to determine whether Betts should be reconsidered.

What is the legacy of Gideon v. Wainwright?

“If an obscure Florida convict named Clarence Earl Gideon had not sat down in his prison cell with a pencil and paper to write a letter to the Supreme Court, and if the Court had not taken the trouble to look for merit in that one crude petition ... the vast machinery of American law would have gone on ...

What was Clarence Gideon accused of?

Clarence Gideon was accused of a felony in Panama City, Florida and convicted after the trial judge denied Gideon’s request to have counsel appointed to represent him. The Supreme Court agreed to hear Gideon’s case and granted him a new trial, ruling that legal assistance is “fundamental and essential to a fair trial” and that due process requires states to provide a lawyer for any indigent person being prosecuted for a serious crime. After being retried with the help of a local attorney, who had the time and skill to investigate his case and conduct a competent defense, Gideon was acquitted of all charges.

Was Gideon acquitted of all charges?

After being retried with the help of a local attorney, who had the time and skill to investigate his case and conduct a competent defense, Gideon was acquitted of all charges. The right to appointed counsel has been extended to misdemeanor and juvenile proceedings.

How long was Gideon in prison?

On August 4, 1961, Gideon was convicted of breaking and entering with intent to commit petty larceny, and on August 25, Judge McCrary gave Gideon the maximum sentence, five years in state prison. Gideon v. Wainwright.

What happened to Gideon?

Gideon, after years of defiant behavior and chronic 'playing hooky', quit school after eighth grade, aged 14, and ran away from home , living as a homeless drifter. By the time he was sixteen, Gideon had begun compiling a petty crime profile. He was arrested in Missouri and charged with robbery, burglary, and larceny.

Who was Clarence Gideon?

multiple sentences. Clarence Earl Gideon (August 30, 1910 – January 18, 1972) was a poor drifter accused in a Florida state court of felony theft. His case resulted in the landmark 1963 U.S. Supreme Court decision Gideon v. Wainwright, holding that a criminal defendant who cannot afford to hire a lawyer must be provided one at no cost.

How many people were freed in the Gideon case?

About 2,000 convicted people in Florida alone were freed as a result of the Gideon decision; Gideon himself was not freed, but instead received another trial. He chose W. Fred Turner to be his lawyer for his retrial, which occurred on August 5, 1963, five months after the Supreme Court ruling.

Who played Gideon in Gideon's Trumpet?

Gideon was portrayed by Henry Fonda in the 1980 made-for-television film Gideon's Trumpet, based on Anthony Lewis ' book of the same name. The film was first telecast as part of the Hallmark Hall of Fame anthology series, and co-starred Jose Ferrer as Abe Fortas, the attorney who pleaded Gideon's right to have a lawyer in the US Supreme Court. Fonda was nominated for an Emmy Award for his portrayal of Gideon.

What would happen if Clarence Gideon had not been in prison?

If an obscure Florida convict named Clarence Earl Gideon had not sat down in prison with a pencil and paper to write a letter to the Supreme Court; and if the Supreme Court had not taken the trouble to look at the merits in that one crude petition among all the bundles of mail it must receive every day, the vast machinery of American law would have gone on functioning undisturbed. But Gideon did write that letter; the court did look into his case; he was re-tried with the help of competent defense counsel; found not guilty and released from prison after two years of punishment for a crime he did not commit. And the whole course of legal history has been changed.

How did Gideon die?

After his acquittal, Gideon resumed his previous way of life and married for a fifth time some time later. He died of cancer in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, on January 18, 1972, at age 61. Gideon's family had him buried in an unmarked grave in Hannibal.

What does the Sixth Amendment Say

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense .

The Role of the Fourteenth Amendment in the Gideon case

One of the most difficult concepts for 21 st century Americans to grasp is the idea that the rights and protections of the Bill of Rights only applied to the federal government prior to the passage of the 14 th Amendment in 1868.

Subsequent Development of the Right to Counsel

After Gideon, the court continued to define exactly what the right to counsel means and Missouri took appropriate actions to comply with the court’s holdings:

Teaching Gideon

There are a number of outstanding resources for teaching the Gideon case, which provide background information, lesson plans and interesting activities:

image

Abe Fortas

  • Abe Fortas was the editor in chief of the Yale Law Journal. After graduation he served as a faculty member at Yale. He then went to work for the government during the New Deal. In 1946 he was a founding partner of Arnold, Fortas & Porter. It became a very prominent Washington, D.C., law fir…
See more on nacdl.org

Abe Krash

  • Abe Krash was a partner of Abe Fortas at Arnold, Fortas & Porter.20 He was the principal lawyer with Fortas on the brief in the Gideoncase. In their brief, the petitioners argued that a defendant in a criminal case cannot effectively prepare a defense and defend himself or herself at trial. Usually, an indigent is in jail and, therefore, is unable to investigate or question witnesses. Not trained in t…
See more on nacdl.org

Conclusion

  • Clarence Gideon did not have a lawyer at his first trial, in 1961, but from that point on he had the very best representation that our legal system could provide. He was assisted in his case by the American Civil Liberties Union,57 which was an amicus in the case, and by the attorneys general of 22 states, who filed an amicus brief in his behalf in the Supreme Court,58 and by others includ…
See more on nacdl.org

Notes

  1. 372 U.S. 335 (1963).
  2. This information was obtained from Wikipedia.
  3. 214 F.2d 862 (D.C. Cir. 1954).
  4. Daniel McNaghten’s Case, 8 Eng. Rep 718 (1843). Under this test, to establish a defense based on insanity it must be proven that, at the time of committing the act the defendant was labori…
  1. 372 U.S. 335 (1963).
  2. This information was obtained from Wikipedia.
  3. 214 F.2d 862 (D.C. Cir. 1954).
  4. Daniel McNaghten’s Case, 8 Eng. Rep 718 (1843). Under this test, to establish a defense based on insanity it must be proven that, at the time of committing the act the defendant was laboring under...

A Conversation with Bruce R. Jacob

  • Bruce Jacob, who represented Florida before the U.S. Supreme Court in Gideon v. Wainwright, has handled countless pro bono cases during his career. In addition to writing a profile of Clarence Gideon’s lawyers, he agreed to answer a few questions about the case and about the state of indigent defense. The Champion: When you argued Gideon v. Wainwrightin the Supreme Court, d…
See more on nacdl.org