Law is an interesting avenue in which to test the integration between AI and people. Automation won’t be replacing the lawyer any time soon, but as AI evolves it will be able to increasingly assist the people in the industry, to become more educated about their options and to use their time more efficiently.
Ross, “the world’s first artificially intelligent attorney” built on IBM’s cognitive computer Watson, was designed to read and understand language, postulate hypotheses when asked questions, research, and then generate responses (along with references and citations) to back up its conclusions.
There are many reasons to believe AI could benefit the legal industry in ways as meaningful as the personal computer. Currently, the legal system relies on armies of paralegals and researchers to discover, index, and process information. For law firms at present, this reliance can be expensive, driving up the rates they charge.
“It may even be considered legal malpractice not to use AI one day,” says Tom Girardi, renowned civil litigator and the real-life inspiration for the lawyer in the movie, Erin Brockovich. “It would be analogous to a lawyer in the late twentieth century still doing everything by hand when this person could use a computer.”
Litigation analysis Lawyer AI can quickly review those precedents and help lawyers draft more accurate and appropriate documents based on that data. How can lawyer AI benefit the firm and the client? Using AI in law firms augments the abilities of legal professionals to do their jobs.
AI can process and index more data in far less time compared to lawyers. That means that lawyers and paralegals won't have to spend too much of their time doing repetitive work. They can focus on more crucial aspects of the job, such as strategy development.
Mathew C. Schwartz of Birmingham, the principal founder and managing partner of Southfield-based law firm Legal Genius, which runs frequent TV ads, pleaded guilty in October to two charges, including conspiracy to defraud the IRS, and is awaiting sentencing in U.S. District Court in Flint.
Document automation – Law firms use software templates to create filled out documents based on data input. Intellectual property – AI tools guide lawyers in analyzing large IP portfolios and drawing insights from the content. Electronic billing – Lawyers' billable hours are computed automatically.
No. Lawyers being replaced by AI is the classic fear and, fortunately, it's unfounded. Rather than replacing lawyers, AI will automate certain aspects of lawyers' jobs, typically the most routine ones. As a result, lawyers will have more time to focus on other tasks and accomplishments.
There are three aspects of the legal profession that artificial intelligence (AI) technology cannot replace: Expertise, ethics and humanity. “The ethical obligations of lawyers to promote the public interest is what sets the legal profession apart from businesses and commercial interests.
With legal technology, some paralegal tasks can easily be automated. But that doesn't mean that the role of paralegals will be completely eliminated soon. By automating certain parts of a paralegal's job—like repetitive document creation and client intake paperwork— paralegals become more valuable to a law firm.
More recently, AI has begun to be used to help draft contracts, predict legal outcomes, and even recommend judicial decisions about sentencing or bail. The potential benefits of AI in the law are real. It can increase attorney productivity and avoid costly mistakes.
AI-based software allows law firms to automate lower-level tasks, freeing time for attorneys to focus on complex analysis and client interaction. AI greatly enhances an attorney's ability to research, advise, and serve their clients. Some large firms already use AI-based tools to enhance their practices.
Specifically, legal AI helps legal professionals transform the legal industry by putting clients first in an unprecedented way. Here are just a few of the ways lawyers can take advantage of artificial intelligence:
The simplest and most common form of AI in law is e-discovery: The process of scanning electronic information to obtain non-privileged information relevant to a case or claim. E-discovery software allows lawyers to scan documents using search terms or specific parameters such as dates or geographic location. As a result, lawyers get almost instant responses—which is significantly faster than scanning hard copies. This extra time allows lawyers to discover more relevant information.
Smith.ai is an outsourcing platform that uses a “virtual receptionist” to answer calls for lawyers and law firms. The virtual receptionist is an actual human. However, Smith.ai uses AI with its chatbot features and when deciding how to log and route calls. Both the receptionist and chat features integrate with Clio.
The American Bar Association’s first rule covers “Competence,” and an attorney’s obligation to provide “competent representation to a client.” A comment was added to the rule in 2012, noting that the ability to competently practice law includes understanding “the benefits and risks associated with relevant technology.”
Machine learning is a subset of AI. It refers to humans training machines to learn based on data input. As opposed to simply performing (or mimicking) a human task, machine learning looks for patterns in data to draw conclusions from it.
One of the greatest inherent risks in artificial intelligence and machine learning is implicit bias. Humans build machines, and no matter how objective we try to be, humans are inherently biased. There is evidence that facial recognition technology, for example, has difficulty accurately identifying subjects who are female, black, and between the ages of 18-30. People blame this discrepancy on the creators and early subjects of the technology—as they were predominantly white males. Since law enforcement agencies widely use such technologies to help identify criminal suspects, the discrepancy is alarming.
No, AI will not replace lawyers anytime soon. Practicing law effectively requires a complex set of interactions between human beings. Artificial intelligence and machine learning cannot yet mimic these human-to-human interactions. While lawyer AI can automate many tasks lawyers do, AI will not automate lawyers.
An AI lawyer is a robot that can carry out some lawyer duties. These robot lawyers can perform tasks like conducting research and analyzing legal problems. And they can do all these in less time and with the highest level of accuracy. Many lawyers, are now incorporating AI or artificial intelligence in setting up their law offices and law firms.
Many organizations that use robot lawyers to draft and review contracts are seeing an increase in their output and productivity. In contract analysis, an AI lawyer can easily identify, extract data, and clarify the contents of a contract much easier and faster than human lawyers.
Corporate Lawyers. Most corporate organizations have lawyers whom they retain to keep them informed of their rights and obligations. Corporate lawyers also make sure that their clients or employers comply with corporate regulations and laws.
Lawyers involved in real estate are specialists in laws relating to property transactions and deals. In some jurisdictions, the law requires that the lawyers play a part in the real estate transaction. For example in Nigeria, only a lawyer can prepare a document that transfers an interest in a landed property.
For centuries lawyers have played a central role as protectors of the rule of law and rights of individual members. With the emergence of Artificial Intelligence, many groups have robots that guide them in running their organizations.
The robot legal consultants are now making legal services cost-effective by making it easier for people to access legal advice before meeting the human lawyer. An AI lawyer has advanced computing powers to search a huge amount of data and come up with information in seconds.
Many people who use lawyers in the management of their real estate properties are either too busy or do not want to run afoul of the law. Many applications and software in the market can help real estate owners track their interests and obligations.
The research community has belatedly started to address explainability in AI over the last few years. Much of the motivation for explaining machine learning models seems to come from regulation, but we think this misses the point.
When you go to a Lawyer and ask for a piece of advice that is outside of their expertise, do they give you an answer with complete confidence? Obviously not. Unfortunately, Machine learning models are generally bluffers: they’ll give you full confidence based on no evidence.
Addressing knowledge is an underserved area in machine learning. Neural networks are essentially big pattern matching machines. However, when a single piece of information contains most of what is needed to answer a question, neural networks generally fall short. Many would argue that machine learning models contain knowledge in the parameters.
Give a lawyer a contract slightly outside of their expertise, and they're likely to both offer better advice and learn quicker than somebody who is learning from scratch. Historically, machine learning did not follow this paradigm with every new task being learned afresh.
Following on from the success of this article, we have asked a handful of future-focused lawyers and in-house legal teams for their views.
However, for just a fraction of the time and expense, AI could be used to conduct time-consuming research, reducing the burdens on courts and legal services and accelerating the judicial process. There are also situations where using AI might be preferable to interacting with a human, such as for client interviews.
“AI will be a godsend because it’ll give lawyers the information they need to resolve conflicts faster.”.
The legal system, on the other hand, is not as straightforward as coding. Just consider the complicated state of justice today, whether it be problems stemming from backlogged courts, overburdened public defenders, and swathes of defendants disproportionately accused of crimes.
In spite of such developments inside the courtroom, it’s nonetheless hard to imagine how trial lawyers might be replaced by artificial intelligence. For now, a human’s unique ability to create empathy with jurors and judges alike makes them indispensable to legal deliberations.
Expediting the mass processing of people using AI isn’t the answer. It’s the opposite of justice .”. Richardson believes AI can benefit the legal profession, yet she cautions us to be careful how we implement it. Even the best AI needs to be taught, which means it can only be as objective as the people who teach it.
Even the best AI needs to be taught, which means it can only be as objective as the people who teach it. “People often view AI and algorithms as being objective without considering the origins of the data being used in the machine-learning process,” says Richardson, who specializes in the dangers of unconscious bias.
Of course, AI can’t replace all means of collecting information. There are instances in which depositions would be more conducive to fact-gathering.
What seems to be the focus, according to conversations with people at Blue J Legal, is the to focus on areas with strong rules as opposed to standards. The former provide the ability to have clear feature engineering while that later don’t have the specificity to train an accurate model.”.
It is important to note that “employment” is a category of legal issues. Each issue must be looked at separately, and each issue has its own set of features. For instance, in today’s gig economy, “Is the worker a contractor or an employee?” is a single issue.
Our artificial intelligence experience is broad. Whether you represent government, are a supplier of AI, or are procuring an AI solution, we’ve worked with organizations like yours before and know what it takes to ensure your business’ interests are protected.
Our cross-departmental team can help you with the whole range of legal advice around your AI project, from protecting Intellectual Property, understanding the data and data privacy issues, dealing with the cyber security aspects, advising you on governance, transparency and accountabilit y, issues and obligations, putting in place your contract and/or building your sales or procurement templates.
Our lawyers have successfully delivered solutions across the full spectrum of AI law. Our experience includes:
For more information on how we can help, contact our experienced AI lawyers today.