Mar 15, 2022 · This lawyer represent me on an immigration and criminal matter. For a Hmong attorney, I am surprised that he is very knowledgeable about the laws and well prepared to argue the facts on my behalf. I did not expect this kind of representation from a Hmong lawyer at all. And his fee was low compared to the white lawyer I called and talked to.
Mar 28, 2021 · Donziger spearheaded a lengthy crusade against the company on behalf of tens of thousands of Indigenous people in the Amazon rainforest whose homes and health were devastated by oil pollution ...
Jun 05, 2007 · Former Minnesota U.S. Attorney Tom Heffelfinger says he's working with members of the Hmong community as they begin to form a legal team for Gen. Vang Pao.
Sep 18, 2009 · — The federal government has dropped its charges against Hmong leader Vang Pao, a former St. Paul resident indicted with 10 others for allegedly plotting the violent overthrow of the communist ...
Steven Donziger has been detained at home since August 2019, the result of a Kafkaesque legal battle stemming from his crusade on behalf of Indigenous Amazonians.
Photograph: Laylah Amatullah Barrayn/The Guardian. Steven Donziger, who on march 28th will have been under house arrest for 600 days. Photograph: Laylah Amatullah Barrayn/The Guardian. Steven Donziger has been detained at home since August 2019, the result of a Kafkaesque legal battle stemming from his crusade on behalf of Indigenous Amazonians.
Steven Donziger, who on march 28th will have been under house arrest for 600 days. Photograph: Laylah Amatullah Barrayn/The Guardian. Steven Donziger has been detained at home since August 2019, the result of a Kafkaesque legal battle stemming from his crusade on behalf of Indigenous Amazonians.
In one of the stranger episodes in this saga, Chevron relocated Alberto Guerra, an Ecuadorian judge, and his family to the US, paid for his health insurance and a car while meeting with him more than 50 times before he provided testimony that Donziger discussed the bribe with him at a Quito restaurant.
Donziger spearhead ed a lengthy crusade against the company on behalf of tens of thousands of Indigenous people in the Amazon rainforest whose homes and health were devastated by oil pollution, only to himself become, as he describes it, the victim of a “planned targeting by a corporation to destroy my life”.
While lawyers can certainly take your money and your time and we can file a case that will be very hard to win, if you don't care enough about your life to get a contract, the judge is not very likely to be on your side. At least, not automatically. Oral contracts are extremely hard to prove. What are the terms.
Well, truth be told, neither do I. The difference between lawyer and client is that the lawyer expects it to take a long time and understands. The client typically thinks it's unjustified. So, your hard truth is that each case takes time. Be patient.
If you don't pay your lawyer on the day of trial, or however you have agreed to, then while he or she may be obligated by other ethical duties to do his/her best, they won't be motivated by sympathy for you, and it will show in court.
Tell the Truth. If your lawyer doubts you in the consultation, or doesn't think you have a case, while that may change over time, getting over an initial disbelief is very hard. You have to prove your case. Your attorney is not your witness. They are your advocate - but you are responsible for coming up with proof.
If the judge can see your boobs, he's not listening to your story. If I can see your boobs, then I know you didn't care enough about yourself to talk to an attorney. Dress like you are going to church. Credibility is one of the most important things in this world - and most important in a courtroom.
Don' t forget that lawyers don't always need to take more cases. Yes, new clients are a great thing, but I don't want clients that will eat all my time and get no where fast. Your tip: keep your communication very simple and to the point.
If no one can confirm that the story is true, you will at least need something external, such as a hard copy document, to prove your case. Be prepared.
To prove slander, it must be shown through clear and convincing evidence that the individual who is being accused of slander knew the statements that he was making were untrue at the time that he made them and were made with the express purpose of harming the victim's standing in the community or workplace.
Defamation consists of any intentional communication, either in verbal or written form, which is made with the intention to damage a person's reputation; decrease the regard, respect or confidence in which a person is held or to induce negative, disparaging or hostile opinions against a person or organization. To prove a claim of defamation of character, proof of the statement must be shown along with evidence that the individual knew or should have known that the statements were false, but made them with a knowing and willful intent. Defamation is an umbrella term for all types of these statements, including slander and libel, as well as repeating the slanderous or libelous statements of others.
Slander, the oral communication of false statements with the purpose of harming an individual or organization's reputation, is grounds for civil action as mandated by state and federal law. For example, sharing a story accusing a charity leader of theft damages both the individual and the organization, perhaps irrevocably. To prove slander, it must be shown through clear and convincing evidence that the individual who is being accused of slander knew the statements that he was making were untrue at the time that he made them and were made with the express purpose of harming the victim's standing in the community or workplace.
Libel is another form of defamation that is subject to civil liability. Libel consists of statements made in print or through visual or Internet-based depictions that present false representations as they relate to an individual or organization's ethics or character. To prove allegations of libel, proof of the false and printed allegations ...
Legal Definition of Defamation of Character. An individual who intentionally makes false accusations against another with the express purpose of damaging the person's reputation can be subject to a variety of punitive measures as permitted by law.
In certain circumstances, negligent or incompetent testimony made on the part of an expert witness in a civil or criminal matter may be grounds for civil suit if it can be shown to have harmed the victim's reputation or standing in the community or the victim's workplace.
If you accuse someone of a crime you know they did not commit, such as cutting car tires, and the police can prove you knew the case was false, you could be charged with filing a false police report. When criminal charges are proven, a civil lawsuit can easily follow.
In some cases, the informant is a council officer or other government official. The person who hears cases and makes decisions in the County Court and Supreme Court. If a judge and a jury hear the case, the judge will be responsible for directing the jury about the law.
In Victoria, the State Coroner is also a judge. When you speak to a judge, you should address them as 'Your Honour'. Judge's Associate (Supreme, County and Coroners Courts) Performs various administrative and court duties to assist the judge.
If the accused is found guilty, the judge will impose the sentence. In Victoria, the State Coroner is also a judge. When you speak to a judge, you should address them as 'Your Honour'. Performs various administrative and court duties to assist the judge.
The person against whom a criminal case is brought. Sometimes referred to as the defendant. Associate Judge (Supreme Court)
Accused. The person against whom a criminal case is brought. Sometimes referred to as the defendant. Associate Judge (Supreme Court) The person who generally carries out the judicial function of hearing and determining issues which arise before and after trial in civil cases. Associate Judges do not hear trials.
Associate Judge (Supreme Court) The person who generally carries out the judicial function of hearing and determining issues which arise before and after trial in civil cases. Associate Judges do not hear trials.
Barrister. A legal advocate who is briefed by a solicitor to present the defence or prosecution case in court. Bench clerk (Magistrates', Coroners and Children's Court) Sits near the magistrate or coroner, and announces the cases and calls people into court.