Apr 11, 2018 · BOSTON - The ACLU has filed a class action lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s pattern of separating married couples and families pursuing lawful immigration status. The lead plaintiff in the lawsuit is Rhode Island resident and mother Lilian Calderon, who was recently released from detention as the result of earlier ACLU court action.
Jan 12, 2017 · Experience in Class Action Suits. This one is a biggie. Class action lawsuits require a level of expertise that includes filing the appropriate paperwork, pleading and proving the class exists, choosing the best member (s) to represent the class, and much more. Your future class action lawyer ideally will have tried a number of class action ...
A: A class action is a unique kind of lawsuit that is filed on behalf of a class of people who all have similar claims against the same defendant (or sometimes, against multiple defendants). The case is filed by one or a few class representatives or lead plaintiffs. Once the case is filed, the court will determine whether it is appropriate for ...
Feb 01, 2016 · The 1985 class action lawsuit they filed to strike down the parents-only release policy became Flores v. Meese (for Edwin Meese, the U.S. attorney general at the time, and lead plaintiff Jenny ...
So, who speaks for the "class" in a class action lawsuit? It's the "class representative" or lead plaintiff (sometimes called the "named plaintiff".)
In order to get a lawsuit certified as a class action, under federal procedural rules, the chosen class representative must be able to "fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class .". So, when examining the suitability of the representative parties, it's not enough that the representative's claims (and claimed losses) ...
A lead plaintiff has a pretty big job in a class action case. He or she usually works very closely with the attorneys handling the case ("class counsel") and is often there in the courtroom or at the conference table at key points of the litigation, including during formal settlement talks. So, the class representative usually has to make a significant commitment to the case, as opposed to class members, who essentially do nothing while the class action progresses.
The Class Representative's Responsibilities. A lead plaintiff has a pretty big job in a class action case. He or she usually works very closely with the attorneys handling the case ("class counsel") and is often there in the courtroom or at the conference table at key points of the litigation, including during formal settlement talks.
the representative parties must be able to fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.
not have a history of fraudulent behavior (a criminal record may be okay, but a felony conviction for embezzlement would probably disqualify a class representative)
the class of people affected must be so numerous that joining them all into the lawsuit is "impracticable"
Typically speaking, most class action attorneys work on a contingency fee basis, meaning that the attorneys only get paid if your class action is successful. Even then, the lawyer’s fee is based on a percentage of the amount awarded in the case. As always, make sure you get this agreement in writing before signing on to any lawsuit.
One of the most over-looked aspects of choosing an attorney is your compatibility level . While this isn’t like a dating app where you need to be a “100% match,” finding a lawyer who meets your needs, while concurrently being able to meet the needs of the class, is paramount in your search.
Q: What is a class action? A: A class action is a unique kind of lawsuit that is filed on behalf of a class of people who all have similar claims against the same defendant (or sometimes, against multiple defendants). The case is filed by one or a few class representatives or lead plaintiffs.
A: In most class actions, lawyers are paid a percentage of the amount recovered on behalf of the class, whether that recovery comes via a class action settlement agreement or court judgment. This percentage varies -- usually from 25 percent to 33 percent of the fund -- but it's usually determined by the judge who approved the settlement agreement or entered the judgment. It's increasingly rare that a class action lawyer's fees are based on the amount of time spent on the case, and/or the quality of the result obtained.
A typical class action might involve a prescription drug with unreasonably harmful side affects. The medication could be taken by thousands of people, satisfying the numerosity factor. The side effects may have caused liver problems in these people. That's a common factual claim. Whether the drug maker should have known of the side effects, and limited those risks (or at least provided adequate warning of the risks), is a common legal question. If the class representatives are in a similar boat, and are up to the task of representing the class, the typicality and adequacy factors are satisfied, and it's likely that the case can proceed as a class action.
If the class representatives are in a similar boat, and are up to the task of representing the class, the typicality and adequacy factors are satisfied , and it's likely that the case can proceed as a class action.
Insufficient Investigation of the Case. Some class actions may settle very quickly, especially if the defendant is motivated to limit its liability. A quick and fair (at first blush, at least) first settlement offer might discourage the class attorneys from fully exploring every angle of the defendant's liability and the resulting harm to the class.
A: When it comes to deciding whether a certain dispute is suitable for resolution as a class action, many states mirror the "certification requirements" set out in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP):
In the vehicle example, the named plaintiff's claim can't be connected to a defective airbag while other class members have claims related to the braking system. Adequacy. The class representatives must provide fair and adequate protection for the class.
But the real fight was about detaining the minors in the first place. HolguĂn’s team wanted kids to be released to any responsible adult who would claim them, provided he or she had received the kind of vetting a child welfare agency would use. The INS had never done that and claimed it couldn’t afford to.
Shortly after he started at the center, HolguĂn got the call from the Hollywood actor (whom he declines to name for attorney-client privilege reasons)—and launched into what became the Flores case that, more than 30 years later, is still one of the most important of his career.
The result was the 1997 Flores settlement. Today, it’s one of the key legal protections for unaccompanied immigrant minors who are detained by the federal government. The settlement requires minors to be released promptly or, if that’s not possible, placed in the least restrictive setting appropriate for their situations. It lays out the right to basics like adequate food, water, sinks, toilets and medical care. HolguĂn says it was the basis for a provision in the 2002 Homeland Security Act that took detained minors out of INS custody.
The Flores case garnered widespread media attention because of the 2014 surge of Central Americans seeking refuge from rampant gang violence in their home countries. Much of the publicity focused on unaccompanied minors, whose numbers had been increasing dramatically over the past few years. Federal authorities, trying to keep up, established temporary shelters and “rocket dockets” in immigration court for the minors.
The case had some early victories: The court certified a class, then struck down the strip-search policy. Not long afterward, the federal government entered into a partial settlement—a memorandum of understanding covering the con-ditions of detention.
The Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law in Los Angeles. Photograph by Tony Avelar.
It was a lengthy fight. The plaintiffs eventually won at the district court on due process grounds, but the case was reversed at every stage: a 9th Circuit panel found for the government, the en banc 9th Circuit found for the plaintiffs, and the U.S. Supreme Court found for the government.
This requirement is often met by groups of workers who were deprived of their wages or other benefits. Furthermore, the named plaintiff must have typical claims, such as those related to employment law, which must be common amongst the group. Lastly, the lead plaintiff must be able to represent other class members fairly and effectively.
First, it must have a large enough number of potential class members. Second, it must have a common law and common facts. Lastly, it must include a lead plaintiff with typical claims and an ability to adequately represent the interests of the other class members. These are the main requirements for a successful class-action lawsuit.
The class must also be similar in terms of the law. For instance, it cannot be a case where forty people are injured, as a group, they all must have the same legal problems. Generally, a class action will be a better deal for the plaintiffs and defendants than a solo suit.
The person or persons filing the suit will be referred to as the lead or named plaintiff (s). He or she may also be known as the class representative. This person will work closely with the attorneys representing the class and will have control over the lawsuit and the direction it will take.
What is a class? In a class action, one person (or a small group of people) files a lawsuit on behalf of a larger group of people. The "larger group" – the group of people the lawsuit represents – is the class. When a lawsuit is filed, it will define the proposed class.
Discovery is the pre-trial phase of a lawsuit. During discovery, attorneys representing the class members will request that the company being sued turn over all documents relating to the allegations contained in the lawsuit. This includes both written documents and electronic communications, including company e-mails.
After the hearing, the judge will issue a ruling either approving the proposed settlement or rejecting it.
Under the Class Action Fairness Act, if a class action is filed in a state court and the total damages in the case will likely be greater than $5 million, the company being sued can request to have the class action transferred to a federal court.
If you participate in a class action against your employer alleging workplace discrimination or violations of wage and hour laws, federal law protects you against retaliation by your employer.
At a deposition, a lawyer will ask a witness questions under oath regarding the facts that form the basis of the lawsuit. Lawyers for all parties to the case may be present at the deposition.
For example, a lawyer asked to represent several individuals seeking to form a joint venture is likely to be materially limited in the lawyer's ability to recommend or advocate all possible positions that each might take because of the lawyer's duty of loyalty to the others.
[8] Even where there is no direct adverseness, a conflict of interest exists if there is a significant risk that a lawyer's ability to consider, recommend or carry out an appropriate course of action for the client will be materially limited as a result of the lawyer's other responsibilities or interests. For example, a lawyer asked to represent several individuals seeking to form a joint venture is likely to be materially limited in the lawyer's ability to recommend or advocate all possible positions that each might take because of the lawyer's duty of loyalty to the others. The conflict in effect forecloses alternatives that would otherwise be available to the client. The mere possibility of subsequent harm does not itself require disclosure and consent. The critical questions are the likelihood that a difference in interests will eventuate and, if it does, whether it will materially interfere with the lawyer's independent professional judgment in considering alternatives or foreclose courses of action that reasonably should be pursued on behalf of the client.
The critical questions are the likelihood that a difference in interests will eventuate and, if it does, whether it will materially interfere with the lawyer's independent professional judgment in considering alternatives or foreclose courses of action that reasonably should be pursued on behalf of the client.
General Principles. [1] Loyalty and independent judgment are essential elements in the lawyer's relationship to a client. Concurrent conflicts of interest can arise from the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client or a third person or from the lawyer's own interests. For specific Rules regarding certain concurrent conflicts ...
[21] A client who has given consent to a conflict may revoke the consent and, like any other client, may terminate the lawyer's representation at any time. Whether revoking consent to the client's own representation precludes the lawyer from continuing to represent other clients depends on the circumstances, including the nature of the conflict, whether the client revoked consent because of a material change in circumstances, the reasonable expectations of the other client and whether material detriment to the other clients or the lawyer would result.
[14] Ordinarily, clients may consent to representation notwithstanding a conflict. However, as indicated in paragraph (b), some conflicts are nonconsentable, meaning that the lawyer involved cannot properly ask for such agreement or provide representation on the basis of the client's consent. When the lawyer is representing more than one client, the question of consentability must be resolved as to each client.
Personal Interest Conflicts. [10] The lawyer's own interests should not be permitted to have an adverse effect on representation of a client. For example, if the probity of a lawyer's own conduct in a transaction is in serious question, it may be difficult or impossible for the lawyer to give a client detached advice.