Full Answer
These symptoms should not be ignored, as IVC filters that are clogged with a blood clot should be replaced. Knowing the symptoms of a clogged IVC filter is also important so you do not confuse them with signs that the IVC filter has broken or migrated – situations that could lead to serious medical complications and an IVC filter lawsuit.
People are getting frustrated. Our law firm has received calls from many victims who are in the IVC filter MDL class action who are frustrated with their lawyers for not advancing their case towards settlement and wanting to hire a new lawyer. But the lack of progress in these cases is unlikely to be the fault of your attorney.
However, blood clot filters do present risks. According to a FDA safety alert, they can lead to life-threatening problems when the following occurs: Device migration – A blood clot filter device may move through the vein and away from where it was originally placed.
The filter was first manufactured in 1979 and has been inserted into over 260,000 patients. Lawsuits are being filed around the country amid reports that too many of these filters cause more harm than good. They are allegedly prone to fracture, tilt, migrate, perforate the IVC walls, and break apart.
Based on the IVC filter verdicts and the history of mass tort litigation, settlements may average between $100,000 and $500,000 for significant injury cases but there will certainly be cases that settle higher and lower than that payout range.
Lawsuits filed in federal court allege that defects in the design of IVC filters manufactured by Bard and Cook make them more likely fracture, migrate, tilt or perforate the inferior vena cava. In some cases, when the devices break, pieces can travel through the body, damaging the heart, lungs and other organs.
Retrievable IVC filter should be removed according to manufacturer and clinical guidelines and assessment. These devices are placed and removed by an IR physician using precision image guidance. The removal procedure is done, usually on an outpatient basis, under light sedation. The process is similar to insertion.
Even if you have an IVC filter placed, you can still get a blood clot down the road. Even if you do have another DVT, this filter helps to lower your risk of a pulmonary embolism and could save your life.
The entire procedure may take anywhere from 30 to 90 minutes depending on the complexity of the technique needed to remove the filter. After the procedure you will remain in the recovery room until you are completely awake and ready to return home or back to your hospital room.
When should an IVC filter be removed? It is recommended that a removable filter be removed when the risk of a blood clot traveling to the lungs has passed, or if a patient can take blood thinners.
According to the FDA and Radiological Society of North America IVC filters should be removed once the danger of a life-threatening clot is over. Although the procedure to remove the filter is also minimally-invasive, removing the device may be challenging especially after prolonged dwell times.
After having a vena cava filter removed, you may feel tired and have some pain for several days. You may have a small bandage where the catheter was placed. This care sheet gives you a general idea about how long it will take for you to recover. But each person recovers at a different pace.
When several clots become trapped in the filter, clot formation down the IVC can cause painful debilitating swelling in the legs. Other signs and symptoms of a problem might include darkening of the skin and ulceration in the lower extremities. Patients may have difficulty identifying the cause of their leg pain.
In patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT), blood clots can break off and travel to the lungs through this vein, causing pulmonary embolism (PE). IVC filters act as a net, allowing blood to flow through them but catching the blood clots before they reach the lungs.
In the most dangerous and serious instances, an IVC filter can cause death, paralysis, bleedings, stroke, or heart attack.
Vena cava filters may be temporary or permanent; the decision is based on an individualized basis. These filters are reserved for patients who are unable to take blood-thinning medications or for those at high risk for developing recurrent DVT with pulmonary embolism (PE).
For a long time, no vena cava filter lawsuits so far have made it through trial with a successful jury verdict. Yet many plaintiffs' attorneys rema...
The settlement value of an IVC filter lawsuit is going to depend on the severity of the victim's injuries. If there is a global settlement, there w...
The FDA has issued a number of recalls and warnings on IVC filters. Two of the recalls were Class I recalls. Class I means there is a reasonable pr...
The easiest path to join one of the MDL class actions involving the IVC filters is to hire a lawyer who is handling these cases. That attorney will...
There are four potential claims: 1) Negligence; 2) Defective design; 3) Manufacturing defect; and/or 4) Failure to warn/ improper labeling.
IVC filter victims typically sue the manufacturer. There are more than a dozen types of filters. But the three main manufacturers include Bard, Coo...
IVC filter victims can sue for both economic damages (such as medical bills and lost wages) and non-economic damages (such as pain and suffering)....
Victims sue individually. But they get temporarily joined in a multidistrict litigation (MDL). MDLs help streamline the pretrial proceedings while...
Many have been. Go to the FDA website for the most current information.
Each state has its own statute of limitations. In most states, victims have two years after the injury to file suit. But it could be less. Therefor...
Blood clot filters are implanted in thousands of U.S. patients each year, most without incident. The company C.R. Bard is one of 11 makers of these devices. Bard's Recovery, G2, and, G2 Express filters are specifically at issue in many of these cases.
Known as inferior vena cava filters, or IVC filters, these devices are designed to reduce the risk of blood clots, pulmonary embolism, and deep vein thrombosis. However, studies now show that IVC filters may actually increase the risk blood clots and death when kept in the body for an extended period of time.
Filter migration to different parts of the body. Persistent chest pain or shortness of breath. Death. As a result of these injuries, the FDA issued a warning in 2010, stating that the filters posed health risks and should be removed as soon as the patient's risk for blood clots subsides.
The filter is meant to work by trapping fragments of blood clots that develop in a person's veins throughout the body, thereby stopping the clots from moving to the heart and lungs and causing strokes and other severe complications.
An IVC filter is a spider-shaped, vascular filter device implanted in the large vein in the abdomen that carries blood from the lower part of the body to the heart, also known as the inferior vena cava.
The FDA updated the warnng in 2014, stating that most devices should be removed within a certain time period after implantation (usually 29-54 days ). This warning came too late for some, however. Plaintiffs began filing lawsuits across the country claiming the filters caused them harm and even death in certain cases.
Companies whose IVC filters have been the subject of many negligence claims resulted in thousands of lawsuits, with C. R. Bard and Cook accounting for more than 5,500 lawsuits each due to issues with their devices. Below are some notable cases against the companies.
IVC filter lawsuits typically claim the adverse events associated with the devices are due to one or more of the following reasons: Design and manufacturing defects. Failure to warn consumers of known risks. Breach of implied warranty on the medical device.
Elizabeth Hill - Florida: The plaintiff, Elizabeth Hill, had the Cook Celect IVC filter implanted in 2010, later suffering from varying complications of pain and fatigue. She alleged the blood clot filter had to be surgically removed three years later after it was found to have perforated her IVC and the duodenum of her small intestine. Ultimately, the jury found her evidence to be thin and the case resulted in a defense verdict in November 2017. This was the first bellwether case against Cook.
An IVC filter is a medical device designed to catch blood clots. It is implanted in a large vein where it can prevent clots from traveling to the heart or lungs. Inferior vena cava filter (IVC filter) lawsuits claim the devices injured people. Patients say their IVC filters broke and moved. Some caused tissue and organ perforation.
Patients have experienced a number of complications from alleged defects in the design of a variety of retrievable IVC filters. These medical device lawsuits have named a number of complications including: 1 Organ damage 2 Organ perforation 3 Blood clot 4 Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) 5 Pulmonary embolism (PE) 6 Filter migration 7 Device fracture
In 2003, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the Cook Gunther Tulip IVC filter for permanent and temporary placement. Cook introduced the Celect vena cava filter in 2008, with FDA clearance following trials in other countries.
District Court of Arizona ruled that the law states that "future injuries and medical care must be established by a medical probability, not a mere possibility.". Ultimately, the jury found for Bard in October 2018.
Updated June 3, 2021 An IVC filter lawsuit is a legal claim by a patient who underwent implant surgery and subsequently suffered serious complications. These lawsuits claim that the manufacturer made a defective product and/or failed to warn blood clot patients of foreseeable risks and complications. At this time, there are thousands of inferior ...
Pulmonary embolism, if the filter has migrated and is no longer in place to prevent a blood clot from traveling up the inferior vena cava vein; Deep vein thrombosis (DVT), as the IVC filter can cause other veins to be partially blocked with blood clots (including lower limb DVT);
(Manufacturers can voluntarily recall their devices as well.) In 2010, the FDA issued a “safety communication” recommending that IVC filters be removed as soon as the risk of pulmonary embolism is lifted.
The FDA uses the 510 (k) clearance process to approve or deny IVC filters. The manufacturer does not have to provide clinical or laboratory studies to demonstrate the filter’s safety. Instead, the manufacturer has to demonstrate that: There already exists a similar filter on the market; and.
2.1 Severe leg pain. While leg swelling and pain is a symptom of a clogged IVC filter, leg pain that is severe and is not accompanied by the swelling is a sign that your IVC filter may have become dislodged and has migrated into your leg.
The good news is that a clogged IVC filter means that the filter has done its job: It captured a blood clot in the inferior vena cava and prevented it from reaching your lungs or heart, where it could have caused severe damage like an embolism.
If the pain is in your abdomen or back, it can also be a sign that the IVC filter has dislodged or broken and migrated somewhere else. If the pain is severe, it can mean that the IVC filter has perforated a vein or become lodged in an organ. 3. What to do if you experience the symptoms of a clogged IVC filter.
The blood clot that is clogging the filter is keeping blood from flowing out of your lower extremities , causing the swelling in your legs. Worse, the strain of holding the blood clot against the flow of blood in your inferior vena cava vein can cause the IVC filter to break down over time.
When an IVC filter has captured a blood clot traveling through the inferior vena cava vein, the filter clogs and creates a host of medical symptoms, including: Swollen legs, Leg pain, and. The feeling of internal pressure in the legs.
The feeling of internal pressure in the legs. Clogged IVC filters cause leg swelling because they are implanted in the inferior vena cava vein. This vein is the largest one in your body, and brings blood from the legs and lower extremities up through your abdomen and to your heart and lungs.
Knowing the difference can help you and your doctor understand what is going on. 2.1 Severe leg pain.
Once implanted, IVC filters work to capture individual blood clots and prevent these clots from traveling through to the heart and lungs, causing serious complications or death.
It is often implanted as a way to prevent potentially life-threatening blood clots from traveling into a person’s lungs. The device can be implanted permanently to address a long-term risk or temporarily to capture blood clots that may develop following a traumatic accident or surgery.
Filter perforation – When a filter is perforated or torn, blood clots might be able to make their way through the vena cava vein into the lungs or heart. If this were to happen, it would likely be a life-threatening event. The FDA received 70 reports over a five-year period of time in cases of filter perforation.
However, blood clot filters do present risks.
Although not all blood clot filters may be dangerous, this particular blood clot filter may be posing a serious risk to the thousands of people who already had the device implanted following an accident or for treatment of a blood clot. If you or a loved one has experienced complications from a Recovery by Bard blood clot filter, ...
One woman, who had the Recovery by Bard filter implanted following a motor vehicle accident, barely escaped with her life, according to NBC. Fortunately, doctors were able to save her in time by finding and removing a sharp piece of the blood clot filter that had broken off and pierced her heart.
However, NBC News recently conducted an investigation into one U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved device: The Recovery blood clot filter by C.R. Bard, Inc. The news organization found the device to be associated with at least 27 deaths and more than 300 cases involving complications.
Experts believe that the main cause of IVC filter perforation is pulsation of the aorta and breathing. This can exacerbate the gradual erosion of the IVC filter into the inferior vena cava. Perforation can occur during insertion, but more commonly occurs gradually over several months. Another severe complication occurs when ...
Several studies have linked the Cook Celect with high rates of perforation. In June 2015, a study linked the Celect filter with a 43% rate of vena cava perforation, compared to a 0% rate for the Option filter made by Rex Medical.
Since their introduction in 1979 , over a hundred thousand Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Filters have been surgically implanted in patients nationwide, primarily to address the occurrence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT).
IVC Filters, along with compression wear (stockings), and blood-thinning medication, are the top three ways doctors treat DVT. The IVC Filter treatment option includes the insertion of a small cone-shaped filter inside the inferior vena cava, which is the human body’s largest vein.
Common signs of infection at the IVC Filter insertion site include swelling or pain at the insertion site that gets progressively worse, fluid leaking from the site, and feelings of warmth and bleeding that does not stop with pressure. If you experience any of these symptoms, please contact your medical provider right away.
Though many patients have had a good experience with IVC Filter placement and procedures, including those who failed conventional medical therapy for DVT, in 2005, the Greenfield Vena Cava Filter produced by Boston Scientific was recalled by the FDA.
DVT can be a serious medical condition caused when blood travels slowly through your veins, where clumps of blood cells form that can easily turn into a blood clot or thrombus. Once clots form deep in the body’s interior, doctors can diagnose DVT, which commonly presents in the lower legs, thighs and pelvic area.
Every year, 2.5 million Americans suffer from blood clots in their veins according to Vein Clinics of America. Anything that prevents the blood from circulating regularly can put patients at risk for developing DVT, including obesity, sitting for long periods of time, injury and other factors.
The filter’s shape can catch a large clot before it reaches the lungs and causes a fatal pulmonary embolism and does have a high rate of success in protecting the lungs, especially in patients who cannot use custom-fitted compression wear and blood thinners.
An IVC filter is one method to help prevent pulmonary embolism. Your inferior vena cava (IVC) is the major vein that brings oxygen-poor blood from the lower body back to the heart. The heart then pumps the blood to the lungs to pick up oxygen. An IVC filter is a small, wiry device. When the filter is placed in your IVC, ...
An IVC filter is a small, wiry device. When the filter is placed in your IVC, the blood flows past the filter. The filter catches blood clots and stops them from moving up to the heart and lungs. This helps to prevent a pulmonary embolism. The IVC filter is placed through a small incision in a vein in your groin or neck.
A filter that travels to the heart or lungs, causing injury or death. A filter that pierces through the inferior vena cava, causing pain or damage to other organs. Problem with placement of the filter. Continued risk of a blood clot that travels to the lungs.
In some cases, a deep clot in a leg vein can break free and stick in a vessel in the lung. This can cause a blockage in the vessel called a pulmonary embolism. Pulmonary embolism can cause severe shortness of breath and even sudden death. An IVC filter is one method to help prevent pulmonary embolism.
The risks of this procedure include: Blockage of blood flow through the vena cava, which can cause leg swelling. A filter that travels to the heart or lungs, causing injury or death. A filter that pierces through the inferior vena cava, causing pain or damage to other organs.
The inferior vena cava is a large vein in the middle of your body. The device is put in during a short surgery. Veins are the blood vessels that bring oxygen-poor blood and waste products back to the heart. Arteries are the blood vessels that bring oxygen-rich blood and nutrients to the body.
When blood flows very slowly through the veins, this increases the risk that cells in the blood will stick together and form a clot. DVT is a serious medical condition that can cause swelling, pain, and tenderness in your leg. In some cases, a deep clot in a leg vein can break free and stick in a vessel in the lung.
Read the script. An inferior vena cava (IVC) filter is a device designed to block blood clots in a vein — usually in the leg — from migrating to the lung. It's a situation that can be life-threatening.
Mayo Clinic Minute: Ins and outs of blood clot filters. A deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a blood clot in a ve in, usually in the leg. A clot can happen if you have certain medical conditions that affect how your blood clots, or if you don't move around for a long time, such as on a long airplane ride or after surgery.
Dr. Knavel Koepsel says they are learning that IVC filters are not perfect, and some should be removed when no longer needed. "The most common problems we see are that the filters themselves can fracture, the pieces can migrate or the filter itself can migrate.
First line treatments are blood thinners or clot busting medications. But some people are not able to take those medications. If so, they may have a filter placed to prevent the clot from breaking off and traveling to the lungs. In this Mayo Clinic Minute, Dr. Erica Knavel Koepsel, a Mayo Clinic interventional radiologist, ...
Also, the filter, because it's a foreign body, can cause an extensive scar formation reaction in the inferior vena cava, which leads to narrowing of the inferior vena cava and sometimes even occlusion or total blockage," says Dr. Knavel Koepsel.