Incumbent. Elizabeth Prelogar The solicitor general of the United States is the fourth-highest-ranking official in the United States Department of Justice.
Government lawyers advise government members on a variety of legal issues including legislation on tax, environment, discrimination, employment and justice. Their main duties include: directing senior government staff in the preparation of proposed bills and debates. researching and preparing legislation.
The Attorney General of Virginia is a publicly elected executive official in the Virginia state government. The attorney general provides legal advice and representation for all state agencies.
Attorney General of VirginiaIncumbent Jason Miyares since January 15, 2022StyleThe HonorableTypeElected constitutional positionTerm lengthFour years4 more rows
Some popular profiles have been listed below. Government Lawyer. Government Attorney. Legal Counsel.1 Apr 2022
The government lawyer of Government of India is known as Attorney General of India and the government lawyer of the state is known as Advocate General. The second category of lawyers as already named is Private Advocates.26 Mar 2017
A person authorized by statute, such as the governor, a member of the General Assembly, a constitutional officer, or the head of a state agency, can ask the Attorney General for an official opinion on the law. Members of the general public are not authorized to ask for opinions.
Features. The Virginia Constitution sets the structure of the state government and limits its power. It also establishes the basic rights of Virginia's citizens. The constitution is the supreme governing document of the state but may be superseded by the United States Constitution and U.S. federal law.
The Virginia Attorney General defends the state in cases or criminal appeals and suits filed against the state. In addition, the VA Attorney General will defend the constitutionality of state laws and collect money owed to various public departments or institutions.
Office of the Attorney GeneralEmailmailoag@oag.state.va.us.Phone(804) 786-2071.Mailing Address 202 North Ninth Street. Richmond, VA 23219.
Being arrested by a federal agent or receiving notice that you are facing federal charges is a frightening experience and a serious matter that will have long-term consequences. Congress passes its own set of criminal laws that apply to all people, regardless of where they reside. Some of these laws apply only to federal crimes, but others mirror the Virginia code.
Federal charges can result in stiff penalties upon a conviction to include lengthy prison sentences, heavy fines, and even confiscation of property.
Parts of Northern Virginia are very close in proximity to Washington, D.C. and many federal agencies operate within the state. Government workers, unfortunately, sometimes are involved in automobile collisions or other negligent acts that may cause injuries to private citizens. While automobile accidents are perhaps the most common cause of injury giving rise to claims under the FTCA, the FTCA allows for private individuals to sue the United States government in federal court for tort damages resulting from the conduct of employees, agencies, and others acting on behalf of the U.S. government. Other examples can include negligent building maintenance or construction, negligent blasting, demolition, or handling of hazardous materials, negligent failure to maintain a national park in a reasonably safe condition, and many sources of injury. If you have been injured by the actions or inaction of a government employee or agency, or an individual acting on behalf of the United States, you may have a claim against the United States under the FTCA.
Virginia residents, and people throughout the United States, suddenly secured the right to make a claim against the federal government- at least under certain circumstances. The Commonwealth of Virginia waived its own sovereign immunity to a large extent through the Virginia Tort Claims Act, which has its own set of procedures.
The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) provides a framework for allowing victims of government negligence to pursue a damage claim in federal court. For this reason, if you think you have cause to use the FTCA contact a Virginia Federal Tort Claims Act lawyer.
Sovereign immunity was the idea that the king could do no wrong. Sovereign immunity in American jurisprudence, however, means that a sovereign state cannot be sued unless it consents. The consent must be given by the legislative branch. In 1946, Congress enacted the Federal Tort Claims Act.
However, if this does not occur or if the agency offers to pay less money than you deserve, you may file a lawsuit within six months days of the day that the agency’s final settlement offer or letter denying your claim is mailed to you.
While automobile accidents are perhaps the most common cause of injury giving rise to claims under the FTCA, the FTCA allows for private individuals to sue the United States government in federal court for tort damages resulting from the conduct of employees, agencies, and others acting on behalf of the U.S. government.
Aside from fraud, there are other federal crimes that fall under the broad category of white collar crime. These include: 1 Money Laundering 2 Insider Trading 3 Bribery 4 Copyright Infringement 5 Kidnapping
Steve's a great lawyer. He is well versed in the law and has a great courtroom presence. He provides top notch legal services at a fair and reasonable price. I highly recommend him.
Our experienced federal criminal defense practice consists of representing individual and corporate clients accused of fraud, financial crimes, drug crimes, and other serious white-collar offenses. Our clients include business owners and executives, board members, healthcare providers and other licensed professionals, politicians, public figures, and companies ranging from small businesses to multi-national corporations, and we handle cases involving all federal agencies and task forces. While federal criminal cases can involve a broad array of allegations under a multitude of different statutes, some of the most-common charges we handle include:
Following an arrest executed pursuant to a criminal complaint, federal prosecutors have 30 days to seek a grand jury indictment.
Under federal law, the targets of federal investigations can also face charges for attempt in the absence of evidence of a completed criminal offense. Often, charges for attempt carry the same penalties as charges for the alleged ly-attempted offense. Due to the potential for attempt accusations, individuals and organizations being targeted for federal prosecution must be extremely careful to avoid relying on defense strategies that could expose them to prosecution for an “unsuccessful” crime.
Another risk in federal criminal cases is the risk of a federal prosecutor obtaining testimony from a confidential informant or an alleged co-conspirator. If someone else who has a vested interest in the outcome of your case testifies against you, you will need to overcome this testimony as part of your defense.
Federal and state criminal proceedings bear virtually no resemblance to one another. From the agencies that are involved to the laws and court rules that apply, everything is different in a federal criminal case. The procedures involved in federal criminal cases are very different from those involved in state criminal cases as well; and, generally speaking, the stakes are much higher if you have been charged with a federal crime.
A criminal complaint is a formal pleading document filed by federal prosecutors at the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Criminal complaints set forth allegations of unlawful conduct; and, once a criminal complaint has been served, this gives federal agents lawful authority to make an arrest. Following an arrest executed pursuant to a criminal complaint, federal prosecutors have 30 days to seek a grand jury indictment.
Many federal white-collar statutes require proof of multiple “elements,” and challenging the DOJ’s evidence of even a single element can be enough to avoid a conviction in federal district court. Many of these statutes contain specific exceptions and “safe harbors” as well, and affirmatively demonstrating compliance can be an advisable strategy in some instances.