which lawyer first argued that states have a duty to shield the impressionable

by Prof. Orie Nicolas DDS 3 min read

Who argued for the petitioner in the Billy Duren case?

Jan 11, 2022 · Sellers, the plaintiff’s lawyer, argued in filings that “The First Amendment does not protect the military-style incursion into the Capitol led …

Who argued for the appellees in Edwards v Healy?

Aug 22, 2016 · Federal shield statute. Nope. There is no federal shield law, despite many attempts by the Society of Professional Journalists and others to get one passed. State constitutions and common law. In some places, journalists can claim a privilege based on the state constitution, and in other places, journalists can claim one based on state common law.

Was the concealment of immaterial evidence a theft from the court?

Fiduciary duties may be summarized under the general rubric of the duty of loyalty. Owen v. Pringle, 621 So.2d 668, 671 (1993) (“Each lawyer owes each client a second duty, not wholly separable from the duty of care but sufficiently distinct that we afford it its own label, viz. the duty of loyalty, or, sometimes, fidelity.

Who argued for the appellee in the Wiesenfeld case?

Dec 07, 2020 · Ginsburg argued for the petitioner. A jury convicted Billy Duren of first degree murder and first degree robbery. Duren alleged that the selection of this jury violated his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment right to a trial by a jury chosen from a …

What was the name of the lawyer who argued the case before the Supreme Court?

Prior to his judicial service, he successfully argued several cases before the Supreme Court, including Brown v. Board of Education. Born in Baltimore, Maryland, Marshall graduated from the Howard University School of Law in 1933....Thurgood MarshallEducationLincoln University, Pennsylvania (BA) Howard University (LLB)25 more rows

Who was the lawyer who prosecuted Scopes?

William Jennings BryanThe prosecution was led by William Jennings Bryan, a former Secretary of State, presidential candidate, and the most famous fundamentalist Christian spokesperson in the country. His strategy was quite simple: to prove John Scopes guilty of violating Tennessee law.

Which president signed a bill allowing female attorneys to argue cases before the Supreme Court what year did this happen?

President Rutherford B. HayesOn February 15, 1879, President Rutherford B. Hayes signed a new law that would admit women as members of the Supreme Court bar and allow them to submit and argue cases at the high court.Feb 15, 2022

Who was the plaintiff in the Tennessee v Scopes case?

The plaintiff in error was a teacher in the public schools of Rhea county. He was an employee of the State of Tennessee or of a municipal agency of the State.

Who was the first female lawyer in the United States?

Arabella MansfieldArabella Mansfield (May 23, 1846 – August 1, 1911), born Belle Aurelia Babb, became the first female lawyer in the United States in 1869, admitted to the Iowa bar; she made her career as a college educator and administrator....Arabella MansfieldOccupationLawyer, EducatorSpouse(s)Melvin Mansfield5 more rows

Who was the first black woman to argue before the Supreme Court?

She was the first Black woman to argue at the Supreme Court and argued 10 landmark civil rights cases, winning nine. She was a law clerk to Thurgood Marshall, aiding him in the case Brown v. Board of Education....Constance Baker MotleyPolitical partyDemocraticSpouse(s)Joel Motley Jr. ​ ( m. 1946)​Children127 more rows

How are Supreme Court cases argued?

The Court holds oral argument in about 70-80 cases each year. The arguments are an opportunity for the Justices to ask questions directly of the attorneys representing the parties to the case, and for the attorneys to highlight arguments that they view as particularly important.

Why is knowing the ins and outs of the reporter's privilege important?

Knowing the ins and outs of the reporter’s privilege is important when you’re trying to protect sources—but I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention that protecting sources today is as much about technology and electronic security as it is about the law.

How many states have shield laws?

State statutes. Roughly 30 states have passed statutes, called shield laws, allowing journalists to refuse to disclose or testify about confidential or unpublished information, including the identity of sources. The statutes vary significantly from state to state in the scope of their protections.

What is the difference between a search warrant and a subpoena?

That’s a significant difference because a search warrant is challenged after its execution and after officials have seized the materials sought, whereas a subpoena is challenged in advance. There are, however, some exceptions.

What is privilege scheme?

Some privilege schemes are narrow and apply only to full-time employees of professional news outlets, while others are broad and extend to bloggers, filmmakers, freelancers, book authors, and student journalists. In other words, some are inclusive and others are exclusive.

Who wrote the Hurt Locker?

Journalist and filmmaker Mark Boal, who wrote and produced The Hurt Locker and Zero Dark Thirty, has asked a judge to block a subpoena threatened by military prosecutors who want to obtain his confidential or unpublished interviews with US Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, accused of being a deserter.

What is the importance of balancing test?

Balancing tests, on the other hand, typically require a judge to consider the importance of the information to the case (importance favors disclosure), whether the information is available from other sources (availability disfavors disclosure), and whether the case is civil or criminal (criminal favors disclosure).

Is there a shield law for journalists?

There is no federal shield law, de spite many attempts by the Society of Professional Journalists and others to get one passed. State constitutions and common law. In some places, journalists can claim a privilege based on the state constitution, and in other places, journalists can claim one based on state common law.

What did Ginsburg argue for?

Ginsburg argued for the petitioner. A jury convicted Billy Duren of first degree murder and first degree robbery. Duren alleged that the selection of this jury violated his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment right to a trial by a jury chosen from a fair cross section of the community.

How many times has Ginsburg been on the Supreme Court?

Justice Ginsburg appeared before the Supreme Court six times as an attorney. Audio of her arguments may be heard online at Oyez.org. Links to audio and details of each case are found below.

Who was Stephen Wiesenfeld married to?

Wiesenfeld (Argued Jan. 20, 1975; Decided Mar. 19, 1975) Ginsburg argued for the appellee. Stephen Wiesenfeld and Paula Polatschek were married in 1970. Polatschek had worked as a teacher for the five years prior to their marriage and continued teaching after they were married.

Does Social Security cover widows?

Social Security Act provides benefits based on the earnings of a deceased husband and father that are available to both the children and the widow. The benefits for a deceased wife and mother, however, are only available to the children. In 1973, Wiesenfeld sued on behalf of himself and similarly situated widowers.