· To sue lawyer for negligence, you need to be able to prove the attorney didn't use the proper care in your case and missed a deadline, filed the wrong papers, didn't comply with court orders, or made other errors that were not intentional but were sloppy. Negligence happens when the attorney makes mistakes that other attorneys normally would ...
 · Inform clients of a decision requiring the client’s informed consent; Inform clients of how the attorney plans to achieve client objectives in their case; Keep clients reasonably informed about their case; Promptly comply with reasonable requests for information. Consult with the client about limitations on the lawyer’s conduct when the ...
 · 1. Obtain a copy of your case file from your attorney. Gather any other documents that pertain to the case the attorney handled, including bills from your attorney and the contract you signed. If your attorney is not returning your calls, send a letter specifying the reason why you called to create a paper trail.
 · How to tell a good lawyer from a bad lawyer. It’s not as hard as you might think, according to attorney Randall M. Kessler, author of Divorce: Protect …
If you think your lawyer has committed a crime, you can also call the police to investigate.
However, we tend to see common mistakes that lawyers make over and over, including: 1 Inaccurate billing; 2 Missed deadlines; 3 Failing to communicate with the client; 4 Settling a lawsuit without the client’s consent; 5 Giving inaccurate legal advice; 6 Stealing or losing money or property that belongs to the client; 7 Incompetently drafting legal documents that do not protect your rights; 8 Failing to file a case before the expiration of the statute of limitations; and 9 Taking a case despite an existing conflict of interest.
Damages in a negligence malpractice claim are quantified by what was recovered and what would have been recovered but for the attorney’s negligence.
For example, your lawyer might have missed a deadline in your car accident case, leading to your case being dismissed. Had the lawyer properly filed your paperwork, you would have been able to pursue compensation for the injuries you suffered in the collision. In a legal malpractice lawsuit, you can ask for the compensation you would have received but for your lawyer’s professional negligence.
In order to have a successful legal malpractice case, it is not enough to say your lawyer screwed up. Additionally, you must have suffered damages.
Malpractice cases are very fact specific and depend on the specific circumstances of your case. An attorney’s decision must be analyzed at the time it was made. Rarely are decisions made with the benefit of hindsight. A lot depends on what the lawyer knew or should have known.
Lawyers are not required to be perfect or even win your case. However, lawyers must use the same care, skill, and diligence possessed by other lawyers in their community under similar circumstances. A negligent lawyer fails to uphold this requirement, resulting in a less favorable result for their client.
For example, if your attorney accepts your case, but then does nothing with it for several months and the statute of limitations on your case expires, your attorney may be considered negligent.
Determine if your attorney was negligent. An attorney owes a duty to his or her client to act in the client’s interest as a reasonably competent attorney. This means that the attorney must perform services at or beyond a minimum level of competence. If your attorney fails to demonstrate a minimum level of competence while working on your case, it can mean that your attorney was negligent.
Obtain a copy of your case file from your attorney. Gather any other documents that pertain to the case the attorney handled, including bills from your attorney and the contract you signed. If your attorney is not returning your calls, send a letter specifying the reason why you called to create a paper trail. The remainder of the documents can be obtained during discovery after your new attorney files your malpractice case.
You must initiate your case with the court within the state’s statute of limitations. Most states allow three to five years from the time you could have filed your case until the date you actually do, but some states allow as little as one year. Check your statute of limitations or ask your attorney about the statute of limitations on legal malpractice in your state.
Proximate cause is that the harm is reasonably foreseeable and not too far removed from the action to be attributable to it.
Actual cause is often referred to as “but for” cause because you can use the “but for” statement to describe it. For example: But for the attorney’s failure to file the agreement in a timely fashion, the plaintiff would have received a settlement of $XXX.
If your attorney failed to adhere to specific terms in your contract with him or her, then your attorney may have breached the contract. Failing to file an action, research a specific item, or file a lien are some examples of how an attorney may breach a contract.
“If you want to improve your chances of securing the best lawyer to take your case, you need to prepare before you meet them,” advises attorney Stephen Babcock. “Get your story, facts, and proof together well before your first meeting.” This not only ensures that you understand your own needs, but it helps a good lawyer to ascertain whether he or she can actually help you. “We want the best clients too. Proving you’re organized and reliable helps us.”
“ Winning cases can be lost because of a client who lies or exaggerates just as easily as because of a lawyer who tells the client what the client wants to hear instead of what is true.” So when dealing with attorneys, don’t just look for honesty—be honest.
In choosing your attorney and your plan of action in resolving a dispute, it’s important to consider that despite what you see on television, most cases never see the inside of a courtroom. Typically, they’re settled outside the courtroom because of the time and expense involved, according to attorney Darren Heitner, author of How to Play the Game: What Every Sports Attorney Needs to Know.
It’s not as hard as you might think, according to attorney Randall M. Kessler, author of Divorce: Protect Yourself, Your Kids and Your Future. “Shop around and trust your instincts,” he advises. “Does the lawyer listen to you? Do they explain things in a way you can understand? And are they willing to discuss fees and costs? The person you hire will need to be someone you trust and believe in, so be sure you feel very good about them from the start.”
On reading a demand letter, the other person will often say, “this isn’t worth the trouble” and they quickly settle. But here’s a secret from Knight: You don’t need a lawyer to write a demand letter. You can do it yourself. Just make it look as formal as possible, and you may find your dispute goes away—no charge to you.
In fact, a lawyer should try to stay out of court. “In my experience, a good lawyer always finds every opportunity to keep a case from being decided by a judge, and only relents on trying a case before the bench when all alternatives have been exhausted,” attorney, Jason Cruz says.
Instead, politely request that your clients direct any such questions to a lawyer or tax professional.
When a client sues a real estate agent for failing to disclose a property defect, they have to prove the agent knew or should have known about the defect and failed to disclose it.
If a buyer feels misled about anything, a lawsuit typically follows shortly after. Always be truthful about claims you make about a property with no room for misinterpretation.
If you are showing and selling properties in an area that you are unfamiliar with, take extra precaution and do your research first.
One second-home client can turn into many, without resorting to all the tips and tricks ...
Clients who discover defects after signing the papers will be quick to blame the real estate agent. Every bit of damage and every defect found on the property should be thoroughly documented.
Although accidents can still happen, learning how to avoid the most common mistakes can significantly reduce the risk of being sued, and you should still educate yourself to lean on the side of preparedness.
Joseph Sorge , thank you so much for all that you are doing it is so very much appreciated.
If an attorney manages to liase many or all all your issues, then you have already lost, especially if they have told you not to talk to the spouse and they have served their purpose by fait accompli. If it comes down to money, you have lost, that is the level of basic understanding marriage has become for males.
If you do decide to appeal the decisions of the family court, the Supreme Court, no less, will very likely uphold and support the malfeasance of the family court because the antics of the lower court personnel mirror those of the Supreme Court. I bet the family court personnel have recognized this and are busy minting.
Absolutely ! Most have no idea that here in the USA, we do not own our attorneys when we hire them. Attorneys are agents of the court. In essence, we only rent attorneys to represent us in our legal matters. An attorney’s (demanded) allegiance is always to the court first. The client and his/her interests come dead last. The BAR Association (British Attorney Registry) demands that each attorney collude and work for the court. A “client’s best interest” is only a phrase used by attorney’s to catch more clients and make more cash. Attorneys make great actors, they need to be good actors as in many court rooms, they are only acting a part where the script has already been written.
The gal did not investigate any of the leads I gave him. The magistrate had a stay for seven months. And the clerk of courts refused to send out the subpoenas. The clerk of courts told my attorney’s staff they were to short of staff to fax the subpoenas over my attorney’s office the day before the trial.
And your are right, the judges dont know the laws and/or the Florida Statutes, so no one should take for granted that they do. But the reality is,,they dont know them because they dont have to know them, because they just fly by the seat of their pants and there is no one to check them.
You should sue for undisclosed conflict of interest. At the very least, file a complaint with the State Bar Association or whoever it is in your state that hear s such things. Seriously. CLAIM DAMAGES.
Unnecessary delays can often damage a case. If, because of overwork or any other reason, a lawyer is unable to spend the required time and energy on a case , the lawyer should refuse from the beginning to take the case. A lawyer must be able to communicate effectively with a client.
If your lawyer is unwilling to address your complaints, consider taking your legal affairs to another lawyer. You can decide whom to hire (and fire) as your lawyer. However, remember that when you fire a lawyer, you may be charged a reasonable amount for the work already done.
If you believe you have a valid complaint about how your lawyer has handled your case, inform the organization that governs law licenses in your state. Usually this is the disciplinary board of the highest court in your state. In some states, the state bar association is responsible for disciplining lawyers.
A lawyer must be loyal to his or her client. This means that a lawyer cannot represent two clients who are on opposite sides in the same or related lawsuits. And, ordinarily, there can be no representation of a client whose interests would conflict with the lawyer’s interests.
The amount the lawyer charges for legal work must be reasonÂable, and the client should be told the specifics of all charges. Confidentiality. With few exceptions, a lawyer generally may not tell anyone else what a client reveals about a case.
Communication. A lawyer must be able to communicate effectively with a client. When a client asks for an explanation, the lawyer must provide it within a reasonable time. A lawyer must inform a client about changes in a case caused by time and circumstances. Fees.
Among the highest responsibilities a lawyer has is his or her obligation to a client. A number of strict rules and commonsense guidelines define these responsibilities.
Let me walk you through this so you never embarrass yourself like this attorney. How quickly you receive something mailed by opposing counsel depends on a number of factors, including when each side’s office has mail pick up and delivery. Our fine Legislature recognized this, and built it into the system. That’s why you get a full five extra days to respond to service by mail.
The attorney prepares the court document and gives it to the secretary. The secretary prepares and signs the proof of service, makes copies, and then puts the original in the attorney service basket, mails a copy to opposing counsel, and keeps one copy for the file. But that is not proper service.
C.C.P. §1013 subsections (a) and (c) reference the proper way for a party to serve documents via mail and express mail. In both sections, the Code states that the papers shall be deposited in a post office (and the like) and must include the following: (1) “addressed to the person on whom it is to be served,” (2) “ at the office address as last given by that person on any document filed in the cause ,” and (3) “served on the party making service by mail.”
There is no such limitation as to the defendant. As soon as the defendant receives the complaint, he can serve you with discovery, and even though he has not appeared in the action, he can serve that discovery by mail because the plaintiff has appeared. Look it up and stop objecting.
Objecting to discovery propounded before answer filed. The plaintiff must wait ten days after service of the complaint before he, she or it can serve discovery. (And until the defendant appears in the action, it must be personally served.) There is no such limitation as to the defendant.
I had one attorney fight it all the way through a motion to compel on that basis. Yes, you can conduct discovery while a demurrer is pending. Come on people.
If the proof of service you send to opposing counsel is signed, then that means you signed the proof of service, attesting that you mail ed the document, before you actually mail ed the document.
The court held that the woman could sue for IIED because she had “good reason to be emotionally perturbed, humiliated, and embarrassed” by the conduct. [8] Example #2:The Doctor From Hell. A patient was in the hospital receiving care from a doctor.
The court held that the patient could not sue the doctor for IIED because it was a petty insult and not outrageous. [6] Example #2: The Vindictive Boss. An employer was displeased with employee’s work, and began circulating an old mug shot of the employee around the office.
Can you really sue someone for hurting your feelings? The answer is yes. But only if he or she did something outrageous.
The employee sued the employer for IIED. The court held that the employee could not sue the employer for IIED because the conduct did not rise to the level of “outrageous.”. [7] A woman went on a cruise, where the cruise photographer took a photo of her even after she told him not to.
It is permissible for an attorney to write a demand letter and say that he will file suit if you don't pay the demand, but after that, he ought to just sue or shut up. You don't have to meet him personally, and you probably should not. If you have proof proof, not suspicion that he is romantically involved with his client, you could report him to the California State Bar Association, as that is an ethical violation. Don't threaten to report him, as that would be wrong, but you have the right to report him for such wrongdoing. You can also hire an attorney to represent you in this matter, and that will put a stop from the attorney's contacting you at all. Good luck.
If you have proof proof, not suspicion that he is romantically involved with his client, you could report him to the California State Bar Association, as that is an ethical violation. Don't threaten to report him, as that would be wrong, but you have the right to report him for such wrongdoing.
It is not unethical to threaten a lawsuit if you refuse to negotiate a settlement. You, or whoever is receiving the message should offer to consider any demands, but let the lawyer know you are uncomfortable meeting, if you are. If the lawyer becomes uncivil, or threatens action he knows he cannot take, such as threatening criminal charges, that would be unethical.
Sometimes an in-person meeting is a good way of resolving disputes without resorting to a lawsuit. That being said, in the situation you describe, the aggrieved party should at least consult with an attorney to go over the specifics, the background, the evidence and then options and recommendations. It will be worth the cost of the consultation fee.
An attorney cannot use threats against someone to gain an advantage in a civil matter. However, the attorney can warn that person that he is about to file a lawsuit to resolve a matter.