where does a lawyer present their oral argument

After filing an appellate brief or a motion, you may have the opportunity to present oral argument to the court. Whether you are speaking in front of the Supreme Court or in law school Moot Court, oral advocacy is an important part of convincing judges to decide in your favor.

Full Answer

How to prepare for an oral argument in law?

Jul 24, 2018 · Clerking at an appellate court gives you firsthand experience with this aspect of oral argument. Oral argument occurs after most of the work for a case has been completed. The …

Can an attorney write an appellate oral argument?

Please see all COVID-19 announcements here. The Court holds oral argument in about 70-80 cases each year. The arguments are an opportunity for the Justices to ask questions directly …

Do lawyers need an emotional closing in oral argument?

Nov 07, 2014 · The single most-important component of a great oral argument, according to Glover, is preparation. It is imperative that you find the time. For every oral argument you must …

Do you have to answer the judge’s question at oral argument?

Feb 25, 2020 · Morrison, The Opening Argument Really Matters; The Closing Argument Does Not, in Axelrad, ed, Appellate Practice in Federal and State Courts (New York: Law Journal Press, …

How are oral arguments presented?

How do you present an argument in court?

What is an oral argument in law?

What is the structure of oral arguments?

How do you start an oral argument?

How do you prepare for an oral argument in court?

Where most legal cases are decided?

Do oral arguments matter?

When lawyers for each side are each allowed 30 minutes to argue their case in front of the justices?

How do you win an argument easily?

How long after oral arguments does the Supreme Court make a decision?

Is it bad to be nervous in an oral argument?

Feeling nervous or overwhelmed in preparing for an oral argument does not mean you are a bad lawyer; it only means you are human. Keeping these simple things in mind beforehand can strengthen your argument, boost your confidence and help prevent anxiety later.

What is Murphy's law?

Murphy’s Law dictates that “if something can go wrong, it will.”. Sometimes, it feels like the same could be said for oral argument. Every attorney who has given an oral argument on a motion or brief has a story of when they faced something completely unexpected during their presentation before the court.

What is the purpose of oral argument?

The purpose of oral argument is to help clarify the issues for judges and address any concerns that they have. You should think about oral argument as a dialogue that you will be having with the judges. The judges are not the enemy. Judges may ask hard questions because those are the issues they are grappling with.

What is oral advocacy?

Whether you are speaking in front of the Supreme Court or in law school Moot Court, oral advocacy is an important part of convincing judges to decide in your favor. You will need to extensively prepare, ...

What is reserve time?

Reserve time, if you are the appellant. If you are the appellant (the party bringing the appeal ), then you may reserve some of your time to use for rebuttal. Some courts will require you to tell them ahead of argument how you will divide your time.

Do judges bully you in a Moot Court?

In Moot Court competitions especially, judges may try to bully you to test how well you handle stress. Always remain calm and don’t become snappish. Most Moot Court judges are alumni who are playing a role. They are very friendly outside the competition.

What is a cold bench?

A “cold bench” occurs when no judge has a question and you must simply deliver your argument uninterrupted. You should also practice delivering an argument to a cold bench.

How to write an oral argument?

Outlines encourage rigid thinking. If you rely on an outline too much, you will be thrown off by questions and may repeat information or skip issues altogether. 2. Practice intense preparation. The single most-important component of a great oral argument, according to Glover, is preparation.

What is the most important part of an oral argument?

The single most-important component of a great oral argument, according to Glover, is preparation. It is imperative that you find the time. For every oral argument you must know four things: the facts, the law, your argument, and what you want. 3. Organize and practice your argument.

What is oral argument?

Oral argument is an opportunity for you to have a conversation with the judges or justices who will decide your case. You want to keep their attention and make your points (even if you disagree with an assertion that they make) in a respectful, energetic manner. Speaking in a monotone—or, worse still, reading from a prepared text— will lose their attention quickly.

Do arguments always proceed as expected?

Arguments do not always proceed as expected. But if you follow these best practices, even in the toughest appeals, you will be able to present your best arguments. And over time, your skills and confidence will grow.

What does Benjamin Franklin mean by "by failing to prepare"?

Benjamin Franklin said, “By failing to prepare, you are preparing to fail.” 2 Those words provide a warning and incentive to set aside time to prepare for every oral argument. This process requires figuring out what you need to do and finding time to do it. It should include the easy but important tasks like updating the authorities in the briefs, and the more difficult ones like anticipating difficult questions about the weak points in your argument.

Who said "By failing to prepare you are preparing to fail"?

Prepare, prepare, prepare. Benjamin Franklin said, “By failing to prepare, you are preparing to fail.” 2 Those words provide a warning and incentive to set aside time to prepare for every oral argument. This process requires figuring out what you need to do and finding time to do it.

What is oral argument in court?

Oral arguments that occur during a trial are typically not referred to as formal oral arguments. They are made in support of motions that lawyers file on behalf of their clients during trial. As with pre-trial non-dispositive motions, the oral arguments may be informal and heard by the judge in chambers (with or without the parties to the case present) or argued in the courtroom prior to trial proceedings beginning for the day. For instance, after the trial begins, a party may move to exclude certain evidence that was to be presented by the opposing party. The judge will often resolve this motion immediately upon hearing the parties’ oral arguments on the issue. Oral arguments may also occur if one of the parties moves for a directed verdict at the conclusion of the party’s case-in-chief or at the end of the trial with a motion for judgment as a matter of law.

How to prepare for an oral argument?

One of the most effective tools for preparing for an oral argument is practice. By practicing your oral argument in front of others, you learn how different audiences might have different perspectives on your arguments, and you can receive critique on your theme, arguments, and style. (If you are a law student, keep in mind that you may have limits on permissible collaboration for your oral argument assignment.) When, you practice, have listeners interrupt you with questions so that you can practice transitioning back to your prepared argument. You might even suggest particular questions ahead of time so that you can practice the answers for questions you expect. In addition to practicing before others, practice the argument alone as much as possible to commit the structure of the argument to memory, fit the argument into the allotted time, and refine your arguments. As you practice, it will become more apparent which arguments are essential ones, which points are confusing to your audience, what content needs the most attention, and how to edit the argument to fit within the allotted time. Practice a few times in front of a mirror or video record your practice. As you watch yourself, pay attention to distracting hand gestures and verbal ticks, such as “um,”—those small things that can distract from the substance of your argument.

How long is an oral argument in an appellate court?

Appellate oral arguments typically are given before a three-judge panel, and each advocate is assigned a specific amount of time for oral argument, often thirty minutes. The appellant (sometimes called the petitioner) speaks first, and then the appellee (or respondent) speaks. Some, but not all, courts allow the appellant time for rebuttal and the appellee time for sur-rebuttal. Appellate judges can (and often will) interrupt with questions for the advocates. Often in appellate oral argument, the advocate will not finish the entire argument as planned. Courts do not typically extend the time for an advocate to finish their argument after the time has expired.

What is the theory of the case?

Your theory of the case explains the legal reasons that your client should win and illustrates your overall plan for convincing a judge or jury that your argument is “right.” Your theory of the case contains broad, overarching principles that encapsulate your factual and legal arguments into a short statement, usually expressed in a few sentences. The theory of the case developed for your legal brief (whether a trial, pre-trial, or post-trial motion, or an appellate brief) should be your theory of the case for your oral argument. It will evolve as you become familiar with the facts of your case, develop your research, and understand the law. Your theory of the case is usually based on substantive law or on social values and policies. For instance, the theory developed in United States v. Windsor under the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution is a theory based on substantive law, and the concept of marriage as a right guaranteed to all individuals, as argued before the Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges,20 is a theory based on social values or policies.

Five rules for trial lawyers venturing into appellate courts to follow

Anyone attending a CLE program involving appellate judges, or speaking to appellate judges about their pet peeves, will inevitably hear the same list of complaints. Yet if someone sits in almost any appellate courtroom long enough, she will see a lawyer doing exactly what the judges say bothers them most.

Do Not Frame Your Argument for a Jury

An appellate bench may be hot, throwing questions like big league fastballs as soon as the lawyer stands up, or ice cold, pensively staring as the lawyer presents an argument at length while waiting for the questions to start.

Do Not Avoid Answering the Question

If not engaging on the topic the judge wants to discuss is irritating, refusing to answer her questions is much worse. Any case on appeal has weaknesses on both sides. If the issues were totally one-sided, the loser would not take the appeal, or would settle long before oral argument.

Do Not Interrupt

What mothers and grade school teachers say is true; let the other person finish before speaking. This rule, of more than politeness, did not become passé upon graduation from law school. Yet the problem persists, and not just in appellate courts. Trial judges hate when attorneys interrupt them as well.

Do Not Forgo Reviewing the Record

One of the major costs, both financial and personal, in preparing for oral argument is the time spent reviewing the record. Any shortcuts in this area, however, can have significant negative effects. Initially, this may seem to be an issue only when the attorney handling the appeal is different from the ones who tried the case.