The police are not allowed to question you after you have asked for a lawyer. However, if you agreed to talk to them after they read you your Miranda rights and you did so voluntarily (without pressure, duress, coercion, etc), then the questioning is legal and the answers you gave can be used against you.
Thompkins, 560 U.S. 370 (2010) Police may continue to question you until you explicitly and unambiguously invoke your right to counsel. However, at that point, all questioning must cease until either the suspect’s attorney is present or unless the …
Real Estate Law Articles; View Articles by State; View All Practice Areas; More Resources. COVID-19 Resources; Legal Cost and Outcomes; Lawyer Blogs; Ask a Lawyer Ask a Lawyer. Ask a Question; Recently Answered Questions; Criminal Defense Answers; Family Law Answers; Bankruptcy Law Answers; Personal Injury Answers; Immigration Law Answers ...
Dec 18, 2012 · I was told it wasn't neccessary as I wasn't under arrest and they continued questioning me. I was allowed to leave after that and was "officially arrested" a few weeks later. I just didn't know if they were allowed to continue questioning me, at the police station, after I requested a lawyer and no Miranda Rights were presented.
May 19, 2021 · Only give them your name, address and date of birth. Let your attorney speak for you. By chadt | 2021-06-11T20:57:21+00:00 May 19, 2021 | General FAQ | Comments Off on Can the police continue question after I ask for a lawyer? Share This Story, Choose Your Platform! About the Author: chadt.
I agree with my colleague that this is a fact-specific issue. You are going nowhere with the "failure" to read you the Miranda warnings, because they were not required in your situation.
I agree, more info is needed to evaluate whether Miranda was required.
You have asked a very fact specific question which is difficult to answer without all of the facts. Essentially, if you are in police custody (basically arrested and not free to leave) and being subjected to questioning, the police MUST read you your Miranda Rights and get you to sign a waiver of those rights .
Not all police interviews take place after an arrest. In many situations, the police become aware a crime has been committed and must investigate to identify potential suspects. The police may wish to question you about a crime if you were a witness or they believe you were involved.
If the police call you or show up at your door asking for an interview, politely tell them that you are happy to cooperate at a future date when you have spoken with a lawyer. Then, contact a criminal defense attorney. They can advise you on whether or not it is smart to speak with the police. If you agree to be questioned or are arrested, then you ...
Can they continue to question you? Yes. Officers are often encouraged to continue asking questions as the answers can lead to evidence indirectly that can be used against you. Can they use your answers against you? Probably not. As posted above, the demand for a lawyer must generally be clear and unequivocal.
It depends on what the context of you asking for a lawyer was. Simply asking for a lawyer does at some stage of a police contact does not prevent them from Mirandizing you and then asking for a Miranda waiver.
Your attorney should move to suppress the statements. While I do not know if that will be successful, it is certainly something that should be done pre-trial or in limine.
Can the questions you answered be used against you? Maybe. It depends on the circumstances of your case. If you asked for a lawyer then certainly that is a factor pointing toward suppression. Miranda rulings are constantly in flux. Years ago if you asked for a lawyer it was game over for the cops.
No police cannot and no, those statements cannot be used against you. However, a lot of the time, the police will state in their report, they you waived your Miranda rights. You would have to prove that you didn't and then you could suppress any statements made in violation of Miranda...
The police are not allowed to question you after you have asked for a lawyer.#N#However, if you agreed to talk to them after they read you your Miranda rights and you did so voluntarily (without pressure, duress, coercion, etc), then the questioning is legal and the answers you gave can be used against you.
A suspect's assertion of the right to counsel ceases to apply if there is a break in incarceration. The assertion of the right doesn't carry over to the next detention. For example, assume Glen invokes his right to counsel and is released from custody.
If a detainee invokes the right to counsel for only a limited purpose, the police may interrogate "around" that purpose. For example, suppose that, after being Mirandized, Becky doesn't claim her Miranda rights and answers questions. The interrogating officer asks her to sign a written statement, but she says that she wants counsel to read it over first.
A defendant's statements after asserting Miranda may also be admissible if he or she initiates the conversation. But that's only if the police give a fresh set Miranda of warnings once the discussion picks up. For example, assume officers take John into custody and give him the Miranda warnings.
There's no time limit for invoking Miranda rights. After receiving the warnings, a detainee may invoke the rights immediately or after answering some questions. Whenever that invocation occurs, the police must stop investigative questioning. But any statements preceding assertion of Miranda rights are likely to be admissible.
The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent through this site could be intercepted or read by third parties. Once someone detained by the police invokes Miranda by expressing a desire to remain silent, have counsel present, or both, the police must stop interrogation.