Section 350 (b) of the Code provides: “A case may be reopened in the court in which such case was closed to administer assets, to accord relief to the debtor, or for other cause.” Rule 9024, which incorporates Rule 60 F.R.Civ.P., exempts motions to reopen cases under the Code from the one year limitation of Rule 60 (b).
Full Answer
Rule 9024, which incorporates Rule 60 F.R.Civ.P., exempts motions to reopen cases under the Code from the one year limitation of Rule 60 (b). Although a case has been closed the court may sometimes act without reopening the case.
This legal language is important, because it indicates whether the closed lawsuit can be reopened at a later point in time. How Was the Case Closed? Cases dismissed “with prejudice” usually can't be reopened.
Situations that could give rise to an attorney's mandatory withdrawal from a case include: the attorney is not competent to continue the representation. the attorney becomes a crucial witness on a contested issue in the case. the attorney discovers that the client is using his services to advance a criminal enterprise.
There are rare circumstances where you may reopen a personal injury case where the other side doesn’t abide by the terms of the agreement, or there’s a mutual mistake in the agreement. However, most personal injury settlements and verdicts are final.
You can't re-open a case, only the prosecutor can do that. Even the police can't do so. ONLY the prosecutor can re-open a case. So talk to the prosecutor on your case.
If the case is dismissed “with prejudice,” the case is over permanently. The case cannot be re-filed and you are in the clear.
If a court file, closed means dismissed, acquitted or convicted.
The modern approach appears to be that a trial court has a general discretion to permit a party to reopen his case after having closed it (S v Christie 1982 (1) SA 464 (A) at 476) and to lead late evidence at any time before judgment is given (Hoffmann and Zeffertt The South African Law of Evidence 4 ed 476-477; O'Dowd ...
You cannot reopen a case once it is settled or compromised. However, if there are any new offence committed by them, you can register an FIR or file a complaint before the court.
A party may be relieved from a final judgment in cases of mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect. If such relief is granted, that effectively reopens the case for further proceedings. Also, a case may be reopened if there is newly discovered evidence which would probably have altered the judgment.
A Disposed Case can be reopened for many reasons: If either the party to the case is not satisfied with the final judgment. Due to some mistake, the relief can be granted. If any new evidence is found relating to the case which can alter the judgment.
When a case is dismissed with prejudice, it's closed for good. Neither party can reopen the case at a later date, and the matter is considered permanently resolved. On the other hand, dismissing a case without prejudice leaves the door open for the case to be reopened down the road.
If you do end up in court, you will have a court record even if you are found innocent or have your charges dismissed. This record will not show a conviction, but it will show that you were charged and went to court.
Yes,there is a limitation of 30 days in reopening of a civil case.It means within 30 days an application is to be filled for reopening the case. BUT if above 30 days has been expired and for filling a restoration petition u have to first file a delay condonation petition with valid reasons.
Criminal and civil civil cases cannot be extended beyond six months without a court's order. The trial court needs to ensure the continuation of the civil and criminal cases on the eve of trial.
Schedule 6 offences include murder when it was planned or premeditated and rape when committed in circumstances where the victim was raped more than once, whether by the accused or by any co-perpetrator or accomplice.
In order to avoid unnecessary cost and delay, the rule is amended to permit reopening of a case without the appointment of a trustee when the services of a trustee are not needed.
In most reopened cases, a trustee is not needed because there are no assets to be administered. Therefore, in the interest of judicial economy, this rule is amended so that a motion will not be necessary unless the United States trustee or a party in interest seeks the appointment of a trustee in the reopened case. ‹ Rule 5009.
See §§701, 702 (d), 1202 (a), and 1302 (a) of the Code. In most reopened cases, a trustee is not needed because there are no assets to be administered.
In a chapter 7, 12, or 13 case a trustee shall not be appointed by the United States trustee unless the court determines that a trustee is necessary to protect the interests of creditors and the debtor or to insure efficient administration of the case.
Although a case has been closed the court may sometimes act without reopening the case. Under Rule 9024, clerical errors in judgments, orders, or other parts of the record or errors therein caused by oversight or omission may be corrected.
In most cases, you cannot reopen a personal injury case. When you settle a personal injury case by agreement, you should assume that the settlement is final. There are rare circumstances where you may reopen a personal injury case where the other side doesn’t abide by the terms of the agreement, or there’s a mutual mistake in the agreement.
You can’t reopen the settlement just because you have second thoughts about it. Even if you walk out of mediation and immediately regret entering into the agreement, the court will still uphold it. However, you can reopen the settlement if the other side doesn’t honor the terms of the agreement or if there’s a mutual mistake.
When you reach an injury settlement, you sign a settlement agreement along with a release of claims form. A release of claims form is a document that gives up your legal right to file or pursue a lawsuit in exchange for receiving the settlement.
The steps to reopen the settlement depend on where you’re at in the case when the settlement occurs. If you settled informally with the other side, you might need to file a legal claim to reopen the case. However, you need to overcome the fact that you already reached an initial agreement in the case and signed a release of claims.
If you’re looking to set aside a judgment in an active Nevada case, you may rely on Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 60 (b). The rule allows for relief from judgment in an existing Nevada lawsuit. For the court to grant your motion to set aside the judgment, you must meet one of the legal grounds for relief.
Even though newly discovered evidence can be grounds to reverse a judgment, reopening a personal injury case based on new evidence is rare. Future injuries and damages are typically not grounds to reopen a judgment. That’s because, in a personal injury case, the parties are aware that medical injuries are often speculative.
The best way to avoid lawsuit regret is to carefully consider all of the aspects of the case before you agree to enter into a settlement. You should have clear information about the approximate value of the case including future damages if your injuries are ongoing.
Even a simple "dismissed without prejudice"case can generally only be refiled once. If you want to attempt to file it third time, you would typically have to provide a legally supportable reason to the court rather than simply following standard filing procedures.
To restart a "dismissed without prejudice" lawsuit, generally, all you have to do is refile it. The same procedures would apply for refiling as when the case was originally opened. In most states, this involves filing a petition or complaint, then delivering it to the court clerk and and filing it for a fee.
Most courts have the power to set aside a dismissal with prejudice if a mistake, fraud, or misconduct by the other party occurred during the lawsuit and those bad actions resulted in the dismissal with prejudice.
It's up to you to make sure a copy of the paperwork is delivered to the other party in the lawsuit. This is called "service" and states have different rules for this, too, depending on the type of case.
For dismissed-with-prejudice cases, you'll have to file a motion with the court , asking the judge to reconsider the dismissal. You would typically do this under the same docket or case number as the original case. Cases dismissed with prejudice can only be reopened with a judge’s permission.
You can resume a case that was "dismissed without prejudice" simply by refiling a new case; if the case was dismissed with prejudice, however, you'll need to ask the judge to reconsider the dismissal.
Cases in which a judgment has been entered cannot simply be reopened. The court must set aside the judgment first, and this can be a long, involved legal process. Dismissals are another matter; the case can often be reopened relatively easily, although the exact process varies by state law. A dismissal is made either “with prejudice ” ...
And in death penalty cases, if the jury in the first trial recommended against death and the defendant secures a retrial, the double jeopardy clause usually bars the court from sentencing the defendant to death if the second trial results in a guilty verdict.
Retrials in criminal cases come up in the following situations: after the judge has declared a mistrial, which halts the trial mid-way, or. after an appellate court has reversed a conviction from the trial court. The following sections explain the general rules that apply in each situation.
When the jury is “hopelessly deadlocked,” the judge will thank them for their work, excuse them, and set the case for a hearing, at which time the prosecution will announce whether it intends to try the case again. Often, the parties negotiate a plea deal, and sometimes the prosecutor dismisses the case.
Most of the time, the ban against double jeopardy will not apply after a judge has accepted that the jury is deadlocked (“hung”) and has declared a mistrial—the prosecutor can retry the defendant.
For example, a case that the prosecution dismisses after losing a pre-trial hearing challenging a search may ordinarily be refiled—jeopardy has not attached because the case had not yet gone to trial. Retrials in criminal cases come up in the following situations:
Facing Charges in State and Federal Court: Not “Retrials”. Though it’s not very common, defendants are sometimes charged in more than one court with crimes arising out of the same incident or course of conduct. These charges may be leveled at the same time, or one after the other.
Defendants who appeal their convictions often entertain thoughts that a reversal will bar a retrial. Alas, such is rarely the case. ( U.S. v. Ball, 163 U.S. 662 (1896).) For example, defendants who argue on appeal that evidence was admitted against them in violation of the Fourth Amendment and win a reversal of their conviction on that ground normally face a second trial. (If the remaining evidence, however, is insufficient to sustain a conviction, the appellate court may direct the lower court to dismiss the case entirely, though this rarely happens.)
the attorney is not competent to continue the representation. the attorney becomes a crucial witness on a contested issue in the case . the attorney discovers that the client is using his services to advance a criminal enterprise. the client is insisting on pursuit of a frivolous position in the case. the attorney has a conflict of interest ...
the client is refusing to pay the attorney for his or her services in violation of their fee agreement. the client is refusing to follow the attorney's advice. the client is engaged in fraudulent conduct, and.
When an attorney withdraws in the middle of a client's case, that withdrawal is usually categorized as either "mandatory" or "voluntary." In this article, we'll explain the difference between these two processes, along with some examples of each. Keep in mind that with either type of withdrawal, the attorney usually needs to ask for and obtain the court's permission before ending representation of one of the parties in a civil lawsuit in the middle of the case.
The attorney must cooperate with the client's new counsel and must hand the client's complete file over as directed. An attorney who has withdrawn from representation has a continuing professional obligation to maintain the confidentiality of all matters within the attorney-client relationship, so for example the attorney cannot become ...
An Attorney's Mandatory Withdrawal. If the circumstances require that the attorney withdraw from representation, the withdrawal is considered mandatory. Situations that could give rise to an attorney's mandatory withdrawal from a case include: the attorney becomes a crucial witness on a contested issue in the case.