Either the prosecution or the defense can request a continuance, and sometimes even the court can order a continuance of its own accord. Reasons for a Continuance. Lawyers typically seek continuances because they want more time to prepare for trial. Common reasons for continuances include the following. Insufficient Time to Prepare in General
A continuance is a grant of additional preparation time before or during a trial. Either the prosecution or the defense can request a continuance, and sometimes even the court can order a continuance of its own accord. Lawyers typically seek continuances because they want more time to prepare for trial.
Courts will also deny continuance requests if the defendant or defense attorney caused the need for more time through negligence or delay (also known as "laches"). The addition of new facts or crimes to the indictment or information (the document that charges the defendant with crimes) will typically require additional time to prepare a defense.
A defendant contemplating hiring a lawyer at the beginning of their case should appear at their arraignment and ask the judge for a continuance to find an attorney. Sometimes, a defendant can contact the arraignment court clerk before the arraignment and ask for an informal continuance.
Judges are often asked to continue a hearing or a trial for these reasons: 1. At arraignment, to secure counsel. An arrestee’s first court appearan...
Prosecutors must bring a case to trial within the speedy trial window unless the defendant has waived time. If the defendant refuses to waive time...
Judges are normally very careful to document the evidence offered in support of the motion for a continuance, and their reasons for granting or den...
1. I’ve waived time and need more time to prepare my case. What do I have to tell the judge to get the trial date pushed back? 2. If the prosecutor...
Cases are often continued to allow the defense attorney more time to prepare (get discovery, review it, prepare a defense, meet with clients). Typically the defense attorney asks for that type of contiuance.
What Is a Continuance? A continuance in a criminal case allows a party extra time to prepare for a hearing or trial.A party can ask for a continuance any time before trial, beginning with the defendant’s first appearance (sometimes called an arraignment), during the trial, and after trial, up to and including the sentencing hearing.. But know that the law frowns on delays, especially in ...
Letters. Requesting A Continuance For Court Sample Letter. Instruction: this is a model letter. adapt to fit your facts and circumstances. date name address line 1 address line 2 city,state zip code re: dear vs. cause no. ; in the county court...
Johnston Tobey Baruch 12377 Merit Drive Suite 880 Dallas, Texas 75251 214-741-6260 office 214-741-6248 facsimile
Typical Reasons Why Defendants Ask for Continuances. Judges are often asked to continue a hearing or a trial for these reasons: At the arraignment, to secure counsel. An arrestee’s first court appearance is often the arraignment, when the judge reads the charges and asks for a plea.
When that happens, the defense may ask for a continuance to locate that witness. Again, however, the defense will have to convince the court that the witness’s testimony is important and will have to show that the defense used due diligence in trying to secure the witness’s appearance in the first place.
Questions for Your Attorney 1 I’ve waived time and need more time to prepare my case. What do I have to tell the judge to get the trial date pushed back? 2 If the prosecutor asks for a continuance and gets it, can I challenge the delay by filing a writ in the appellate court? 3 I’d like to hire new counsel because I think the one I have is not doing a good job. What do I have to tell the judge to get time for finding a new lawyer?
If the defendant needs to find another lawyer, a court could also give the defendant a reasonable amount of time to secure a new attorney. To deal with adverse pretrial publicity. Occasionally, defendants will ask for a continuance on the grounds of prejudicial publicity.
To prepare for trial. States typically provide defendants with a minimum amount of time between entering the plea and going to trial. But a defendant has a right to adequately prepare defense (which includes the right of counsel to prepare).
In spite of this general approach, both the defense and the prosecution in a criminal case (and the court, on its own motion) may ask for and obtain a continuance, beginning with the defendant’s first appearance, which is typically the arraignment (where the defendant is appraised of the charges and asked how he wishes to plead).
Criminal cases must be heard and determined “at the earliest possible time,” and the proceedings expedited “to the greatest degree consistent with the ends of justice.” (Cal. Penal Code § 1050 (a).) California Rules of Court, Rule 4.113 states that motions to continue criminal trials are downright “disfavored.”.
Attorneys often request continuances because their work on other cases has prevented them from devoting the necessary time to the case at hand. Courts usually allow some leeway in these situations, especially for court-appointed defense attorneys. Time for the defense.
A continuance is a grant of additional preparation time before or during a trial. Either the prosecution or the defense can request a continuance, and sometimes even the court can order a continuance of its own accord.
However, a continuance due to a change in a charging document is warranted only if the change (known as "variance") compromises the defendant's case.
Both the prosecution and the defense are entitled to a reasonable time to prepare for trial. Exactly what constitutes a reasonable time is open to interpretation, and depends on the circumstances and complexity of a particular case. In general, each side must be given sufficient time to: review the evidence.
Both the prosecution and the defense are entitled to a reasonable time to prepare for trial. Exactly what constitutes a reasonable time is open to interpretation, and depends on the circumstances and complexity of a particular case. In general, each side must be given sufficient time to: 1 review the evidence 2 investigate the facts 3 consult with witnesses 4 negotiate a plea agreement (if one is possible), and, 5 in the case of the defense, hold lawyer-client meetings.
It's usually only when the defendant's rights might otherwise be violated that a court will grant a continuance request. Absent a law or constitutional right to the contrary, judges have broad discretion to determine whether to issue a continuance.
It's not uncommon for the prosecution's witnesses to say something at trial that they either never said before (for example, when interviewed by the police) or that contradicts statements they've made in the past. When this happens, continuances are proper if the defense can show that the defendant:
The defense also may seek a continuance if it is unable to locate a witness who was expected to testify on the defendant’s behalf. A judge may be reluctant to grant a continuance if the defense still has sufficient time to prepare, or if the evidence is related to evidence that had been disclosed to the defense.
If the prosecution makes meaningful changes to the facts contained in the indictment, the defense may be justified in seeking a continuance so that they can prepare for the changed facts. If the change is relatively minor and not relevant to the merits of the case , however, a continuance probably is not warranted.
A defendant contemplating hiring a lawyer at the beginning of their case should appear at their arraignment and ask the judge for a continuance to find an attorney. Sometimes, a defendant can contact the arraignment court clerk before the arraignment and ask for an informal continuance.
A determination on a continuance usually comes down to whether the party seeking the continuance has acted with proper diligence in preparing their case. If a defendant decides to hire a lawyer or change their lawyer, for example, they should do this promptly. The party seeking the continuance needs to have made reasonable efforts to move ...
The party seeking the continuance needs to have made reasonable efforts to move the case forward, although they do not need to have done everything possible to develop the case to get a continuance.
Many defense attorneys, especially public defenders, can move only so quickly because they are representing many clients.
If the defense appears to be seeking a continuance simply as a delay tactic, and no unexpected event has occurred, the judge will deny the continuance. The prosecution may have some limits on whether they can request ...
Generally, courts are more reluctant to grant continuances in criminal cases than in civil cases because the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution grants individuals facing criminal charges the right to a speedy trial. In a civil case, there is no similar right, as the outcome of a civil case is typically compensation for the injured party, rather than justice for a victim or an accused defendant.
Common lengths of time for case continuances are six to eight months, but it may take longer or shorter, depending on the case.
If both parties do not agree to the new court date proposed in the Motion to Continue, the court may hear the motion during the motion hearing, then rule on whether to grant the continuance. If the continuance is granted, the court issues a new date.
When the court receives a Motion to Continue, it may, at its discretion, approve or deny the motion. Typically, the court approves motions that cite valid reasons for pursuing continuance. A Motion to Continue has three parts: the Motion, the Memorandum of Points and Authorities and the Declaration.
A case may be postponed as many times as the court deems it to be necessary. As long as there is an acceptable reason to grant a continuance, the court may grant it and prolong a legal proceeding.
California law states that an individual facing a felony charge must be tried within 60 days of his arraignment unless his attorney can provide a good reason to delay the trial. Cases involving special victims like minors and the elderly must be tried within 30 days of arraignment.
This could be because a judge or prosecutor is ill, because the evidence provided has been found to be false, or because one or more proper court procedures, such as filing case-related documents by their deadline, have not occurred. A case may be postponed as many times as the court deems it to be necessary.
Attorneys often request continuances because their work on other cases has prevented them from devoting the necessary time to the case at hand. Courts usually allow some leeway in these situations, especially for court-appointed defense attorneys. Time for the defense.
A continuance is a grant of additional preparation time before or during a trial. Either the prosecution or the defense can request a continuance, and sometimes even the court can order a continuance of its own accord.
However, a continuance due to a change in a charging document is warranted only if the change (known as "variance") compromises the defendant's case.
Both the prosecution and the defense are entitled to a reasonable time to prepare for trial. Exactly what constitutes a reasonable time is open to interpretation, and depends on the circumstances and complexity of a particular case. In general, each side must be given sufficient time to: review the evidence.
Both the prosecution and the defense are entitled to a reasonable time to prepare for trial. Exactly what constitutes a reasonable time is open to interpretation, and depends on the circumstances and complexity of a particular case. In general, each side must be given sufficient time to: 1 review the evidence 2 investigate the facts 3 consult with witnesses 4 negotiate a plea agreement (if one is possible), and, 5 in the case of the defense, hold lawyer-client meetings.
It's usually only when the defendant's rights might otherwise be violated that a court will grant a continuance request. Absent a law or constitutional right to the contrary, judges have broad discretion to determine whether to issue a continuance.
It's not uncommon for the prosecution's witnesses to say something at trial that they either never said before (for example, when interviewed by the police) or that contradicts statements they've made in the past. When this happens, continuances are proper if the defense can show that the defendant: