Examination, Direct Examination, Examination-in-chief:The questions which the lawyer asks his own client or witnesses called by him. Cross Examination:The questions which a lawyer puts to the party or a witness on the opposing side. This is designed to test whether the witness is telling the truth.
In general, clients have the following duties: Be truthful with your lawyer. Cooperate with your lawyer and respond to requests for information in a timely manner. Attend meetings and legal proceedings, such as a deposition or mediation.
Cooperate with your lawyer and respond to requests for information in a timely manner. Attend meetings and legal proceedings, such as a deposition or mediation. Be courteous to your lawyer and his or her team. Don’t ask your lawyer to do anything illegal or unethical. Pay your legal bills in a timely manner.
Except for some very limited exceptions, even a court of law can’t force your lawyer to reveal the content of your discussions. The privilege does not, however, apply to communications for the purpose of committing a crime or an act of fraud.
When you seek advice from an attorney about a legal matter, your private communications with your lawyer are protected by the attorney-client privilege. This means that your lawyer cannot reveal any information that you disclose to him or her in confidence, unless you give your express permission.
Search Legal Terms and Definitions Direct examination is interrogation by the attorney who called the witness, and cross-examination is questioning by the opposing attorney.
See also Texas Bar Opinion 608 (2011) (…the possibility of an organization lawyer having to cross-examine a current client normally creates a conflict that is imputed to all lawyers; unless it obtains the informed consent of both clients, it is disqualified from the child-custody representation.)
Once an attorney makes an objection, the judge then makes a ruling. If a judge sustains the objection, it means that the judge agrees with the objection and disallows the question, testimony or evidence.
Cross-examination occurs after the witness's direct examination. Specifically, cross-examination allows the opposing party's attorney to question the witness in order to uncover information that may not have been disclosed during direct examination or to impeach the witness.
Appearing in court In Pro Per means that you are acting as your own attorney. You are not required to hire an attorney, but before taking any legal action it is highly advisable to consult with an attorney who can inform you about important legal rights.
Cross-examination gives the opposing party an opportunity to point out the weaknesses of a witness's testimony, like holes in their story or a lack of credibility.
How to Handle 4 Types of Sales ObjectionsSales Objection #1: Misunderstanding. This is when a buyer doesn't understand something about your solution or is misinformed about your solution by a competitor. ... Sales Objection #2: Skepticism. ... Sales Objection #3: Drawback. ... Sales Objection #4: Indifference.
The Three Most Common Objections Made During Trial TestimonyHearsay. A common, if not the most common trial objection to a trial testimony objection is hearsay. ... Leading. A close second objection is to leading questions. ... Relevancy. The last of the three (3) of the most common objections is relevancy.
Argumentative objections are often made when the questions directed to the witness attempt to influence the witness' testimony by inserting the attorney's (or self-represented party's) interpretation of the evidence into the question.
Cross-examination is easy because it is a conflict between the lawyer and the witness.
Direct examination questions allow a personal injury attorney to ask key witnesses to explain what they saw, heard, or did in relation to an incident. For example, an attorney in a car accident personal injury lawsuit may call a bystander to testify about what they saw just before, during, or after the accident.
The initial questioning of a witness, by the party that called them to the stand. Generally followed by an opportunity for cross examination.
When you seek advice from an attorney about a legal matter, your private communications with your lawyer are protected by the attorney-client privilege. This means that your lawyer cannot reveal any information that you disclose to him or her in confidence, unless you give your express permission.
Be courteous to your lawyer and his or her team. Don’t ask your lawyer to do anything illegal or unethical. Pay your legal bills in a timely manner. These duties are often implied as part of the attorney-client relationship, even if you didn’t expressly agree to them in a retainer agreement.
If your lawyer violates these rules, he or she can be disciplined or even face a legal malpractice suit.
Each state has its own ethical rules for lawyers, called the rules of professional conduct. When lawyers fail to live up to this code of conduct, the state disciplinary board can take action against them—from a simple warning to disbarment (losing the license to practice law forever).
The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.
represent you competently, zealously, and within the bounds of the law. keep conversations with you confidential, except in specific and rare occasions. communicate with you in a timely and effective manner. keep you informed of developments in your case.
return your money or property upon request, including your client file. If your lawyer’s actions were also illegal, he or she can be criminally prosecuted. And, if your lawyer caused you to lose your case or otherwise suffer a financial loss, you can sue for legal malpractice.
Clientis the term in the US. In the case of a criminal charge the client might also be a defendant, and in the case of a civil court case the client might be either defendantor plaintiff .
At the trial level, the parties are typically called the plaintiff or petitioner and the defendant or respondent. On appeal, parties are called the appellant and appellee.
To dispel any doubt, this sourcemakes it clear that litigant means "plaintiff, defendant, petitioner, respondent, cross-complainant, and cross-defendant, but not a witness or attorney" [my emphasis].
Editing to improve questions/answers is one of the actions encouraged by this site. Rather than being just a Q&A forum, it becomes a valuable internet resource! PS feel free to wait if you think a better answer might be forthcoming, but don't forget to "tick" the answer you think provides the best solution to your question :-)
With all due respect, the answer to that question is emphatically yes, it's not just that it 'might be yes'. One becomes a lawyer's client when one asks a lawyer to incorporate one's business, to draft a contract, to get advice on the legal implications of a proposed business transaction, and so forth. In all these cases, as soon as one consults a lawyer, elaborate rules that govern lawyer-client relationships come into play. The terminological differences discussed in the linked Wikipedia entry do not affect that point.
Only some lawyers are litigators, and only some of their clients are litigants. Moreover, even in the situations in which the lawyer is a litigator and the lawyer's client a litigant, these words do not bring out that they are two parties to the same lawyer-client relationship; they are rather about their respective relationships to the rest of the legal system.
Unhelpfully, it also notes that "litigator" can be confused with "litigant".
Another common reason to question your own client is because you need to elicit facts that will be used to defend an upcoming motion.
Another common reason to question your own client is because you need to elicit facts that will be used to defend an upcoming motion. Since testimony at a deposition will carry greater weight than an affidavit when attached to a legal memorandum--psychologically, if not as a matter of legal rule--it often makes sense to establish the facts at your client's deposition. In sexual harassment cases, for example, it is common for the plaintiff's lawyer to ask questions that will be used to help defend a motion for summary judgment.
Most people hired attorneys because they don't want to sit in court. Well, truth be told, neither do I. The difference between lawyer and client is that the lawyer expects it to take a long time and understands. The client typically thinks it's unjustified. So, your hard truth is that each case takes time. Be patient.
Tell the Truth. If your lawyer doubts you in the consultation, or doesn't think you have a case, while that may change over time, getting over an initial disbelief is very hard. You have to prove your case. Your attorney is not your witness. They are your advocate - but you are responsible for coming up with proof.
Credibility is one of the most important things in this world - and most important in a courtroom. If you care enough only to wear sweats to the courthouse, then the judge will see that you don't care, and that will be reflected in their desire to help you, listen to you, and decide in your favor. Step it up.
If the judge can see your boobs, he's not listening to your story. If I can see your boobs, then I know you didn't care enough about yourself to talk to an attorney. Dress like you are going to church. Credibility is one of the most important things in this world - and most important in a courtroom.
If you don't pay your lawyer on the day of trial, or however you have agreed to, then while he or she may be obligated by other ethical duties to do his/her best, they won't be motivated by sympathy for you, and it will show in court.
If no one can confirm that the story is true, you will at least need something external, such as a hard copy document, to prove your case. Be prepared.
While lawyers can certainly take your money and your time and we can file a case that will be very hard to win, if you don't care enough about your life to get a contract, the judge is not very likely to be on your side. At least, not automatically. Oral contracts are extremely hard to prove. What are the terms.