Finally, and perhaps most importantly, a good attorney in the process of jury selection will understand that nobody in the room is fair or unbiased, and that not a one of them cares about the case. By proceeding from this assumption, they have the best chance of finding a jury that may be willing to accept their position.
Jury selection is not only–nor even mostly–about selecting (or deselecting) jurors. Your objectives in jury selection are: 1) to build rapport with the jurors, forming a group to include you; 2) to educate the jurors, or to help them educate each other, about the issues in your case; and 3) to find and eliminate unfavorable jurors.
Picking the right jury is the difference between winning and losing a case. The greatest mistake that an attorney will make is trying to find a jury that’s biased towards their side, rather than trying to find one that’s as impartial as possible.
First, the view from 30,000 feet: without picking juries, you will never learn how to pick a jury.
5 Things to Look for in the Jury Selection ProcessRelevant Life Experiences. In selecting (or de-selecting) a potential juror, one important element to consider is the person's previous life experience as it relates to the case at hand. ... Social Pressure. ... Online Activity. ... Legal Opinions. ... Ability to Be Impartial.
Thus, an effective juror must: (1) Be honest, forthcoming, and genuine; (2) Listen attentively and take good notes; (3) Ask questions if you do not understand; and (4) Listen to all the evidence prior to forming any conclusions about the case.
Each district court randomly selects citizens' names from lists of registered voters and people with drivers licenses who live in that district. The people randomly selected complete a questionnaire to help determine if they are qualified to serve on a jury.
After questioning prospective jurors, each side's attorney may challenge certain jurors using two types of challenges: "for cause" and "peremptory." By challenging a juror, the attorney is asking the judge to excuse that juror from the panel.
Don't lose your temper, try to bully, or refuse to listen to the opinions of other jurors. Don't mark or write on exhibits or otherwise change or injure them. Don't try to guess what might happen if the case you have heard is appealed.
Generally, those selected as a jury foreman tend to be well-educated, assertive people who have been on juries before....Selecting a Jury ForemanPatience.Organization.Good communication skills.Professional experience.Leadership abilities.Confidence.
Juries are independent assessors and deciders of facts in legal cases....They must reach a unanimous/majority verdict.They have split function.Discussions are conducted in secret.
The attorneys can also ask questions designed to uncover characteristics or experiences that might cause potential jurors to favor either the prosecution or the defense. But the lawyers aren't allowed to ask overly personal questions, and they aren't allowed ask the jurors how they would decide the case in advance.
Potential jurors are summoned for service from a list of registered voters and licensed drivers called the "jury wheel." Each party may challenge the array only on the ground that the officer summoning the jury willfully summoned jurors with a purpose of securing a conviction or an acquittal.
A challenge that aims to disqualify a potential juror for some stated reason. Typical reasons include bias, prejudice, or prior knowledge that would prevent impartial evaluation of the evidence presented in court.
The attorneys may challenge some jurors and ask the Court to excuse them from the trial. There are two types of challenges; challenge for cause and peremptory challenge.
These are called peremptory challenges. Each side may ask the judge to excuse particular jurors. If a juror is excused, this does not imply something bad and does not mean the juror is not competent. It frequently happens that a prospective juror will be excused in a certain case and accepted in a different one.
This seminal quote from Clarence Darrow — the first great American trial attorney — rings true. Indeed, jury selection is a crucial part of every civil and criminal trial. It presents the first and only opportunity for the attorney to communicate with the jurors during the trial and allows him to test the themes of his case and to mold the jury into favorable fact-finders.
It is equally important to befriend the court staff. Learn their names and understand their roles. The staff is there to help you move the trial along as quickly as possible. The jury is watching every step you take, including how you deal with the staff.
Evaluate your strengths and weaknesses to develop an approach that works for you. If humor isn’t your thing , try a different approach. Just be yourself. You know who likes you and who doesn’t. You know who will be sympathetic to your plight and who won’t. You know who is laughing at your jokes heartily, or nervously. Your client, colleague and jury consultant can be good sounding boards to determine who you want to keep and excuse.
Your objectives in jury selection are: 1) to build rapport with the jurors, forming a group to include you; 2) to educate the jurors, or to help them educate each other, about the issues in your case; and 3) to find and eliminate unfavorable jurors. If you use voir dire simply to find the jurors whom you want to strike, you're missing out on most of the value of jury selection.
So Rule 2 of the Simple Rules for Better Jury Selection was originally The First Date Rule: Treat jury selection like a first date with everybody on the jury panel. But "blind date" is a better metaphor, since the parties to a non-blind date have presumably each chosen the other, or at least formed first impressions.
The MacCarthy's Bar Rule is: Talk in jury selection like you would talk in a barroom. This rule is in part a matter of word choice: don't use lawyerly words. If you might have to define a word for the jury, find some substitute that you won't have to define.
In The Blind Date Rule, I pointed out that the 60 potential jurors, by the time they reach the courtroom, are no longer strangers to each other; they have formed a group.
Get someone on your team to pick the jury. It doesn't have to be a jury consultant. Second-chair jury selection is an excellent assignment for a young lawyer seeking trial experience, but your assistant doesn't even have to be a lawyer.
Reading about jury selection is better than asking other people for their scripts, and watching jury selection (good, bad, or ugly) is better than reading about it, but there's no substitute for getting up in front of 24 or 60 1 people and trying to get them talking about what they feel and believe.
If there's a hair in your food (and you should always assume that there is), better that you should find it; if your jurors have unpleasant or frightening ideas (and they always do), better that they should reveal them in jury selection than conceal them until deliberation.
It takes years of experience and many trials to learn how to be good at picking a jury, and even them some lawyers just never figure it out. Be myself. A lawyer, myself included, must use his own personality as he speaks to a jury. It never works to try to be someone you are not.
It is very important to get your defense in front of the jury as soon as possible to start to chip away at the assumption that most people have that the defendant is guilty or he would not be on trial. Reasonable doubt must be planted as soon as possible.
I have often said that a criminal defense lawyer can lose a case if he makes an error during the trial even though he picked the right jury. However, he can NEVER win the case if he picked the wrong jury regardless of how brilliant he is during the rest of the case.
The juror can give a simple yes or no and you really have not discovered much about his true opinion. The more you can get the juror to talk the more likely it is they will reveal their true opinions and bias. Watching body language. Witnesses sometimes lie and so do jurors (Gasp – no you don’t say!)
Selecting the jury is the only time an attorney has the opportunity to discover the life experiences, biases, beliefs, and attitudes of the people who will decide their case. The last thing any attorney wants is for bias to come out during the trial. Thus, how lawyers pick jurors is an essential indicator of the experience and knowledge ...
Jury selection is a bit like ping pong, volleyball or tennis game where there’s no out of bounds. The ball is always in motion, and there’s a constant back-and-forth going, where it’s important to always react to what you’re getting, without hesitation.
When the plaintiff picks jurors, they’re looking for those who are very sympathetic, who are willing to view the prosecution as the victim in the case. Very often, union employees make for good prosecution jurors as they are used to fighting injustice.
The plaintiff will tell a jury a story of how their client was victimized by the defense, how they’ve suffered at the hands of the defendant.
In this case, “undesirable” means people who are likely to sympathize with the defense.
Good Jurors for the Defense. From a defense standpoint, most of the jurors that look bad for the prosecution are good for the defense. You want people who can relate to the defense, and who were on the defending end of an injury case.
A lawyer can do all the planning they like, but when they’re face-to-face with potential jurors and the other side has their say, all that planning can go out the window. You have to be willing to adapt, adjust, and go with it. It’s in many ways kind of like a blind date.
Here are five factors that you should explore in the course of empaneling the most effective jury for your case. 1. Relevant Life Experiences. In selecting (or de-selecting) a potential juror, one important element to consider is the person’s previous life experience as it relates to the case at hand. For example, if a juror has ever been the ...
The jury selection process is an intriguing — and high stakes — venture into the subtle terrain of human nature. As you meet and interview all members of your venire, you’ll primarily be looking for reasons to de-select the individuals who bring a bias that will run against your case. Here are five factors that you should explore in the course of empaneling the most effective jury for your case.
While juries engage in collaborative thinking and discussion, it’s essential to seat jurors who have the courage of their individual convictions. For this reason, your jury selection process must uncover and eliminate any juror who seems ...
Personal bias results from numerous factors. For example, a juror may simply know too much ahead of time about a case, even if they claim that they haven’t formed any opinion about it yet. You want your jurors to learn about the case during the course of the trial, not to come in feeling that they already know what happened. Having to work against the bias of press coverage is not optimal when presenting the facts in the courtroom.
In fact, it’s very important to closely examine the suitability of such knowledgeable (or pseudo-knowledgeable) people because they can often prove stubborn in actual deliberations. Furthermore, there’s a risk that they could attempt to use their legal knowledge to influence their fellow jurors. 5. Ability to Be Impartial.
Jurors’ life experience, and the common sense that it can instill, is a positive quality — but only if it’s free of specific events that somehow trigger an emotional reaction to your case. 2. Social Pressure. The justice system depends on each member of a jury being confidently able to express their personal opinion.
However, the relevance of any specific life experience can be very subtle, and the voir dire process must seek to uncover unconscious biases that may influence a juror’s ability to be impartial. In a case involving negligence that harmed ...