However, the court can sanction you and/or your lawyer for any failure to provide those documents by the deadline. If the court excludes evidence from trial or otherwise limits your ability to present your case due to a failure to meet a discovery deadline, you may appeal that ruling if you lose the case.
Full Answer
Lack of evidence can essentially put an end to a person's legal case. Evidence refers to information that the plaintiff, prosecutor or defendant presents to the court to get the court to rule in his favor.
There are other items of evidence, when in the possession of a criminal attorney, may still trigger ethical and substantive concerns. Thus, if a lawyer or his/her investigator takes evidence from its original location, it may have effectively deprive the government of that evidence, and to that extent certain responsibilities may obtain.
A party to a case may also experience a lack of evidence if he simply cannot find the proof of the case he is trying to make. For example, a prosecutor may be unable to find sufficient witnesses or hard evidence to link a defendant to a crime. A plaintiff may be unable to find the document that proves the defendant committed fraud.
It is possible (although it shouldn't happen if there is no evidence what so ever). Contact a criminal defense attorney in your area to discuss further. * This will flag comments for moderators to take action. No. But your idea of no evidence is probably not the same as the legal standard the courts use.
If there is no evidence against you, under the law, it simply is not possible for the prosecutor's office to obtain a conviction at trial.
Primary tabs. Evidence which fails to meet the burden of proof. In a trial, if the prosecution finishes presenting their case and the judge finds they have not met their burden of proof, the judge may dismiss the case (even before the defense presents their side) for insufficient evidence.
Discovery enables the parties to know before the trial begins what evidence may be presented. It s designed to prevent "trial by ambush," where one side doesn t learn of the other side s evidence or witnesses until the trial, when there s no time to obtain answering evidence.
Formally, testimonial evidence is provided by someone under oath. However, there are other types as well that happen outside of court that may be useful in a case or claim. Sworn statements or affidavits are also a form of testimonial evidence (although some people may disagree with this exact designation).
Evidence can be described as the material placed before a Court for the purpose of assisting a Judge to reach a decision in the matter. A Judge's decision is limited to the evidence placed before them, therefore it is important that a party provide as much relevant evidence as possible to support their case.
You cannot be arrested without evidence. In order to be arrested for a criminal offense a police officer must have probable cause. Probable cause is a legal standard less than reasonable doubt.
Evidence is an item which a litigant proffers to make the existence of a fact more or less probable. Evidence can take the form of testimony, documents, photographs, videos, voice recordings, DNA testing, or other tangible objects.
Can a lawyer object to their own question? Not really; they can withdraw the question or “strike” the verbiage. An attorney may ask an inartful question, realize it's flawed, and say “Strike that.
Why would a good lawyer not tell a client how their case will come out at the initial consultation? A good lawyer knows that every case is different and without doing research. A good lawyer will not guarantee the outcome of any case.
This most often occurs in domestic violence cases, but it can occur in any case where a complainant is able to identify the suspect. There may be no forensic evidence, no camera footage, no witnesses or anything else that supports what the complainant has said.
Offer of Evidence. - As regards testimonial evidence, the offer must be made before the witness authenticates his or her written testimony. As regards documentary and object evidence, the offer must be made after the presentation of a party's testimonial evidence.
The best evidence rule is a rule in law which states that when evidence such as a document or recording is presented, only the original will be accepted unless there is a legitimate reason that the original cannot be used. This rule has its origins in the 1800s.
1. What kind of negative repercussions can occur if no interrogatories or deposition are completed after discovery?
All lawyers practicing law in the state in question, are required to adhere to the Rules of Professional Conduct. These Rules set a floor of acceptable attorney conduct. In other words, the Rules provide a minimum level of acceptable standards that an attorney must provide when representing a client.
If the DA thinks that there is evidence to convict they will charge the suspect with the crime. If the DA wants to pressure a suspect into pleading to a lesser crime they can still charge the suspect with the crime. Without having the case go to court you cannot know what evidence the DA may have. If a person is convicted of a crime that depends on the facts presented in court, the attorney for the defense and the attorney for the state. Then it is up to the jury.
What you need is an attorney to evaluate the evidence that the prosecution claims they have. Hiring private attorneys for murder cases is very unusual because they are very expensive to defend. If you can't afford an attorney, then the public defender will represent him. I wish you both the best of luck. Report Abuse.
Then it is up to the jury. Report Abuse. Report Abuse.
No. But your idea of no evidence is probably not the same as the legal standard the courts use. He wouldn't even have been charged without some evidence. The police and prosecutors don't spend time and money arresting, charging and prosecuting cases without a reason to do so. If they arrest a person, they think they can convict him. He'll get a chance to fight and challenge this through motions, preliminary hearings and trial. When arrested or charged with any crime, the proper questions are, can any evidence obtained in a test, search or confession be used against you, can you be convicted, and what can you do? Raise all appropriate defenses with whatever witnesses, evidence and sympathies are available for legal arguments, for evidence suppression or other motions, or for trial. Effective plea-bargaining, using those defenses, could possibly reduce the potential time and other penalties you face. If you don't know how to represent yourself effectively against an experienced prosecutor intending to convict, then hire an attorney that does, who will try to get a dismissal, diversion program, charge reduction, or other decent outcome through plea bargain, or take it to trial if appropriate.
I have handled many, many murder cases. Your question is more difficult to answer than you might think. The short answer is that if there is truly no evidence to connect your husband with a murder (homicide victim), then he should not be charged and he cannot be convicted. But just because there may be no eyewitnesses, no weapon located, and no DNA does not mean that he cannot be charged and convicted. For example, if the cause of death is a gunshot wound, the manner of death will undoubtedly be determined to be a homicide. The DA will be able to put together enough other facts and circumstances to say it is a murder (intentional killing with malice). Typically, the police do an investigation that leads them to a suspect. They will question that suspect. I cannot tell you how many times, when that suspect gives a statement to the police, he/she ends up giving the police enough evidence to charge and convict him/her of murder. Sadly, in most cases, the accused gives a statement to the police. It is almost always his/her downfall. If you have read any of my past articles you will eventually see where I have advised strenuously against speaking to the police if you are suspected of being involved in the crime - any crime. In the vast majority of cases, you are going to incriminate yourself. I don't care how innocent you may be, or how smart you think you are, the cops are smarter at what they do. They will eventually get you to say something - something about which you may not be aware is incriminating - that will incriminate you. The best, and only thing to do, is to remain silent and ask for a lawyer. Even this will usually not deter the cops from trying to get you to voluntarily waive your rights; they are very shrewd, especially homicide detectives. So, in our scenario here, a victim of a fatal gunshot wound, and an accused incriminatory statement may be enough to charge and convict a person without any other evidence. Your husband really needs the assistance of a qualified criminal defense lawyer. If he is truly innocent, the more he needs one. If he gave a statement to the police, get one yesterday. I hate to tell you this, but if he was arrested and charged there is evidence, some evidence, believe me. I hope you and he take heed.
Since it is up to the prosecution to prove that the defendant committed the crime alleged, if the prosecution does not provide any proof (in the form of evidence), the case must be dismissed. “…beyond a reasonable doubt.”.
To many people, evidence means physical evidence – a literal smoking gun or drugs in the possession of someone caught red-handed. But, in reality, the definition of “evidence” is much broader.
Chemical evidence – If you are being prosecuted for driving under the influence (DUI), the results of your breath, urine, or blood test may be admissible as evidence at trial. Witness testimony – If someone saw you commit a crime, his or her testimony would be considered evidence against you.
Common forms of evidence include: Physical evidence – As suggested above, physical evidence includes any item linking a person to a crime. Along with weapons and drugs, other forms of physical evidence could include an assault victim’s injuries, drug paraphernalia, or a computer in an internet crime investigation.
Electronic evidence – In computer crime, domestic violence and certain other types of cases, text messages, emails, computer files, and other types of electronic records may be admissible as evidence, as well. Keep in mind that whether something ...
Never rely on an article for legal advice as the law frequently changes, information may not be accurate, there may be exceptions to a rule, and reliance may be detrimental. Always consult one of our experienced attorneys for competent, current, and accurate legal advice.
The simple answer is, “no.”. You cannot be convicted of a crime without evidence. You cannot be convicted of a state crime. You cannot be convicted of a federal crime. If there is no evidence against you, under the law, it simply is not possible for the prosecutor’s office to obtain a conviction at trial.
If a lawyer is unable to perform his or her duties for clients, he or she may need to have the person contact another legal representative to avoid negative consequences. It may be possible that if the best possible defense or lawsuit are not initiated and followed through with, the legal professional could face serious effects with ...
When a client feels that his or her lawyer has not delivered the service he or she was expecting, this could lead to litigation or a review with the American Bar Association. The type of outcome depends on various factors of the case, the client and the services utilized during the situation. This means that if the client’s litigation was unsuccessful due to communication problems, he or she may attempt to sue the lawyer with another legal representative. If the legal professional is accused of misconduct or a violation while representing someone, he or she may be facing a review with someone or a board with the ABA.
It also means that if an appeal is attempted that he or she may not act as a lawyer in the interim. Litigation with past clients could also cause complications with the business practice or firm that the lawyer works with professionally.
However, for the legal realm this usually means that the lawyer has given his best possible service to either litigate against someone based on evidence and other factors or has given the best defense through strategy and tactics employed to keep the client from a conviction.
It is important that the lawyer is able to believe what the client says or to take the information and follow through with certain actions. This may mean requesting certain motions, questioning witnesses or seeking additional evidence.
The ethical responsibilities of a lawyer are to ensure the best possible results may be delivered to his or her clients. This means researching the matter, creating the best strategy for the court room, negotiating for the best benefits of the person with opposing counsel and a variety of other items. If a lawyer is unable to perform his ...
However, if a negative outcome does occur, the lawyer may then need to defend against a /lawsuit.
If there's no evidence of a violation, the board will dismiss the case and notify you. If the violation is minor, a phone call or letter to the lawyer usually ends the matter.
When a client fires a lawyer and asks for the file, the lawyer must promptly return it. In some states, such as California, the lawyer must return the file even if attorneys’ fees haven’t been paid in full. Lawyer incompetence. Lawyers must have the knowledge and experience to competently handle any case that they take on.
In most states, you can file your complaint by mailing in a state-issued complaint form or a letter with the lawyer's name and contact information, your contact information, a description of the problem, and copies of relevant documents. In some states, you may be able to lodge your complaint over the phone or online.
Lawyers are given a lot of responsibility and often deal with serious matters, from criminal charges to child custody to tax and other financial matters. When you hire a lawyer, you are trusting him or her to represent your interests in the best manner possible. To protect the public—and the integrity of the legal profession—each state has its own code of ethics that lawyers must follow. These are usually called the “rules of professional conduct.”
Lawyer incompetence. Lawyers must have the knowledge and experience to competently handle any case that they take on. They must also be sufficiently prepared to handle matters that come up in your case, from settlement negotiations to trial. Conflicts of interest.
The American Bar Association publishes the Model Rules of Professional Conduct, which lists standard ethical violations and best practices for lawyers. Some states have adopted the model rules as their own ethical rules, while others use it as a guide and modify or add rules.
In most cases, a board of lawyers and non-lawyers will review the complaint. If there’s a potential ethical violation, the board will give the lawyer a copy of the complaint and an opportunity to respond.