Top 7 Reasons Why Lawyers Won’t Take Your Case
If the anticipated recovery is not substantially more than the anticipated cost, a lawyer probably won’t take the case. In this situation, the case is more likely to take up a lot of his/her time and end with an unhappy client and little to show for the time invested.
Negligence. Negligence is the most common grounds for a malpractice lawsuit. It happens when your attorney fails to use the skill and care normally expected of a competent attorney. For example, you might have grounds for a negligence suit if your lawyer missed an important deadline, failed to prepare for trial, or failed to follow court orders.
You must show that your lawyer failed to act with the knowledge, skill, and care of other qualified attorneys practicing under similar circumstances (called the “standard of care”). Often times, lawyers must make strategic decisions or judgment calls, which don’t always turn out for the best.
Failure to do so means you may be completely barred from bringing a claim. The reason for this generic uninformative answer is simple. Different lawyers have different standards for what type or level of a case they will handle.
Liability. Liability is one of the most common reasons why a lawyer won't take your personal injury case. Your case might be rejected—even if you were not at fault—because there is simply no way to prove that another person or entity is liable.
Legal malpractice is a type of negligence in which a lawyer does harm to his or her client. Typically, this concerns lawyers acting in their own interests, lawyers breaching their contract with the client, and, one of the most common cases of legal malpractice, is when lawyers fail to act on time for clients.
Dennis BeaverThe attorney does not return phone calls in a reasonable amount of time, and;In a meeting with the client, if the lawyer is being very short, taking phone calls, trying to re-schedule, not giving enough time to the client, does not listen, ignores what is asked or is not answering questions.
If you need a lawyer but can't afford to pay one, two terms you might hear are “pro bono” and “contingency fee.” While these are both ways to get legal representation without paying out of pocket, they are different arrangements with different implications.
Perhaps the most common kinds of complaints against lawyers involve delay or neglect. This doesn't mean that occasionally you've had to wait for a phone call to be returned. It means there has been a pattern of the lawyer's failing to respond or to take action over a period of months.
If you believe that your attorney acted unethically, you should consider filing a complaint with the State Bar. You can complete a complaint form online or download a PDF complaint form from the State Bar's website.
Yes, some lawyers lie, cheat and deceive their clients. But they are the exception, and an embarrassment to most lawyers.
The reasons a case can progress slowly can be summed up into three general points: Your case is slowed down by legal or factual problems. Your case involves a lot of damages and substantial compensation. You have not reached maximum medical improvement from your injuries (this will be explained below)
How To Avoid Legal Representation ScamsPayment needs to happen quickly. You can't ask questions or get clarification.It's an emergency. Someone may threaten you or your loved ones.Requests for money usually happen over text, email or phone.The person contacting you is not someone you recognize.
Under ABA Model Rule 1.5(d), contingency fees are not allowed for the following cases:Divorce cases in which the fee is contingent on the securing of a divorce or the amount of alimoney, support, or property settlement to be obtained. ... Criminal cases.
A contingency agreement is an arrangement between a plaintiff and a lawyer, stating that the lawyer will represent the plaintiff without money to pay up front. In these situations, the plaintiff pays the lawyer only if the lawyer wins the case.
Pro bono cases often involve a conditional obligation to pay costs, in which the client only has to pay the lawyer if they are able to recover costs from the other party.
For example, there may be issues that make it difficult to prove that the facts are as the plaintiff alleges. In law, it is more about what someone can prove than what he or she knows to be true. For example, in an automotive accident case, it may be difficult to prove which driver was at fault when there were no other witnesses to the accident and no surveillance that objectively demonstrates the true turn of events.
As a lawyer questions a potential client about the cause of action, he or she may discover that the other side will have viable defenses that may drastically reduce or eliminate the possibility of recovery. For example, the statute of limitations may have expired on the case. The plaintiff’s own negligence may have significantly contributed to the accident.
A lawyer will consider the possible damages that may be awarded in the best case scenario. If these damages are less than the fee that he or she would likely collect, the lawyer will likely not take the case and recommend that the client not pursue it.
When a lawyer accepts a case, he or she commits to devote time, energy and resources to the case. If a lawyer takes a particular case, he or she may not be available or have enough time to take a different case, which pay off more in the long run.
A lawyer must make an objective assessment of all aspects related to the case, including the potential plaintiff. The plaintiff may have to testify in front of a jury. Negative aspects about the plaintiff may dissuade a lawyer from taking the case. For example, the plaintiff may be someone who has a serious criminal history. He or she may be seen as a serial litigator, pursuing personal injury cases every few years. He or she may not make a good impression on a potential jury or the insurance company. He or she may lack credibility.
For injury, malpractice, and accident litigation, an attorney will want to know whether an insurance company, corporate employer, or government entity is involved. Otherwise, there may be nobody with sufficient assets to cover the costs of a lawsuit.
Before drafting a complaint, your attorney must verify and familiarize himself with the facts of your case, collect your medical records, determine the best legal theory to argue, and research relevant case law. These steps often take longer than clients expect, but they are necessary to avoid sloppy pleadings.
While they may practice the broader area of law, they may not specialize in the niche that you need. Rather than arguing or demanding that they accept your case, ask for a referral to someone with the correct speciality.
The ability to handle expensive cases will vary between firms. Some small firms and solo practices are unable to afford any significantly expensive cases. Others can only handle a few at a time. Larger firms may accept more expensive cases, but even they will reject a case that seems too risky.
It never pays to wait till the last minute to start searching for attorneys. If you have a month or less before your SOL deadline, you may find it difficult to secure an attorney. Most attorneys are unable to drop their current case work to prioritize your last-minute claim.
You may have a clear case of negligence, but if it is not permitted under the relevant Tort Claims Act or the damages are so severely capped that you cannot legally recover enough to cover the damages , this is a common reason why a lawyer won’t take your case. More on suing the government.
lawyers usually try to take on cases likely to make money. Most cases settle before trial because trials are risky. In many cases, at some point, there will be a settlement offer that the lawyer believes is an offer that makes sense to accept.
Under comparative negligence like Texas, a plaintiff can recover so long as his negligence is 50% or less–he just loses the percent of his damage award for which his own negligence is responsible. Where your injury occurs matters and may be part of the reason that a lawyer won’t take your case.
Liability is a big consideration in whether a lawyer will take your case. If liability is not reasonably clear, the likelihood of settlement is lower. This means the anticipated costs are higher. But many times, liability seems clear to the client when it is not.
Time is a defense lawyer’s best friend. The longer a plaintiff tries to handle his own case, the more evidence that can be lost. A lawyer can send letters to defendants that place a burden on them to preserve evidence. Individuals generally do not know to do this. Additionally, the longer a plaintiff delays in seeking advice, the more likely he is to do something to harm his case such as give a recorded statement to the other side, create gaps in medical care, or even commit a crime that ruins the client’s credibility.
First, each state and the federal government have their own set of rules called the Torts Claims Act that defines exactly what you can and cannot sue the state for. If your case is not permitted by the Tort Claims Act, you have none. Second, Torts Claims Acts set caps on damages.
Proximity can be a factor in whether a lawyer will take your case—particularly low-value claims. If you live out-of-state, your medical providers are out-of-state, or the defendant is out-of-state, these factors can increase the cost of pursuing a lawsuit. Proximity issues include:
Some attorneys will handle mostly business or criminal law, then take some personal injury cases on the side. Others may specialize in personal injury law, but perhaps aren’t as good at some types of injuries, such as child sexual abuse or nursing home abuse, to give some examples.
If they’re concerned they can’t win a settlement, so should you. Not all claims are valid, so you may need to ask yourself if it’s even worth your own effort and mental stress to pursue the case. Be sure to ask why the attorney does not feel you have a case.
Don’t assume you don’t have a case if your injuries are minor or you think you can handle it on your own with the insurance company whose only interest is to keep their costs to a minimum and settle low. Instead, call a personal injury attorney. The call is free and you have nothing to lose.
There are strict deadlines set by law for filing a claim. If you have missed that deadline, your claim is invalidated. 2. There is a conflict of interest. It could be something as simple as they are representing the other side, or they may be representing the person you want to sue in another case.
Even if you may be partially at fault, or are unsure about the viability of a settlement, don’t just give up after a few negative responses. You owe it to yourself to get through to an attorney who will truly evaluate your case and take the time to answer your questions about it.
If the defendant is uninsured or underinsured, you may have a case but there will be little chance of collecting on the settlement. Attorneys can’t afford to take on cases like that – at least on contingency.
If you are somewhat or mostly at fault, some attorneys will not risk the time and resources needed to take your case for fear that they’ll be left holding the bag. This is a valid concern.
Liability essentially means whether the person or entity you would like to sue is responsible for what you are saying they did or what you believe they failed to do. Typically when a client comes to me for a consultation I can tell within 2 minutes whether they have a case or not. In many situations, there is a major problem with the case from a liability standpoint. It could be the that the statute of limitations has run or something else. In those kinds of circumstances, an attorney is unlikely to take your case and there is nothing you can really do about it.
I call it the "X" factor because there is no other way to describe it. It’s the same reason why you’re friends with certain people and why you are not with others. The bottom line is that a lawyer has to feel comfortable with a client. If the client seems mentally unbalanced or particularly high-maintenance, I I will not take the case no matter how good the case might be. And I know other attorneys feel the same way because they’ve told me so.
They usually ask for a contingency fee arrangement, which means that the attorney will agree to defer his/her fees for a percentage of whatever is recovered in the case. Because of the uncertainty of this arrangement, a lawyer is unlikely to take on cases where small damages are involved. What is a small case? I would say that a case where the possible damages are less than $100,000 is not worth it from the point of view of most Plaintiff’s attorneys, at least here in Los Angeles. But every attorney is different, so you never know.
There are many reasons an attorney might decide not to represent someone: lack of money, conflict of interest, conflict of personalities, the attorney might not believe in the case or might not trust the client , etc., etc. Why would you want to hire the wife of your husband's attorney?
Yes, a lawyer can refuse to take on any client they don't want to. Not only that, but lawyers are required to refuse to take on some clients. One reason that a lawyer would not be allowed to take a client would be that the lawyer has previously represented someone who would be adverse to the new client - or that they have a close personal connection to someone who did. Your child's father's attorney's wife...