Feb 25, 2014 · After noticing a peculiar trend -- namely, witnesses in Bergrin's cases often either altering their stories or just straight-up dying -- authorities finally decided to step in. Bergrin was convicted on 23 counts, ranging from murderous conspiracy and racketeering to drug and prostitution offenses.
Oct 20, 2021 · The purpose of having effective assistance of counsel is to ensure a fair trial, not to look back with the benefit of hindsight to determine if the lawyer could have done a better job. A single set of rules wouldn’t work to say what’s reasonable, because the circumstances in each case are different. Also, defense lawyers have to make ...
Awards: Recognized by The National Law Journal as Lawyer of the Year Runner-Up in 2001, for Top Defense Verdicts in 1994 and 1997, and as a "Winning Lawyer" in 1997 and 2003.
Awards: Recognized as a Leading Individual Trial Lawyer in Chambers Global, 2007; one of the Best Lawyers in America for Business Litigation by Woodward & White; and a Super Lawyer in Law & Politics World's Media.
Awards: Named the Lawyer of the Year by the National Law Journal and runner-up for Person of the Year by Time Magazine in 2000. Also recognized as The Antitrust Lawyer of the Year by the New York Bar Association and Commercial Litigator of the Year by Who's Who.
Awards: Recognized in Chambers USA 2009: America's Leading Lawyers for Business; Best Lawyers In America - 2009; and as a Leading Trial Lawyer in US Legal 500 - 2008.
Awards: Recognized as one of the 100 most influential lawyers in the United States by the National Law Journal in 2006, and was listed in every edition of Chambers USA and Best Lawyers In America for Criminal Defense and Business Litigation.
Awards: Named to Super Lawyers 2009, The Best Lawyers in America, and Chambers USA 2009.
Awards: Named "One of the World's Leading Litigation Lawyers" by Euromoney Institutional Investor; "One of California's Leading Litigators" by Chambers; and "One of the Top 3 Trial Lawyers of Choice by General Counsel in California" by California Law Business.
The drug has been on the market since 1991 and the first cases were filed in 2014. “We can assume approximately 30,000 children were born with birth defects because of Zofran,” Ray said.
The IVC filters made by C.R. Bard, Inc. are tiny filter devices that were designed to prevent blood clots from traveling from the lower body to the lungs. They were designed to be temporary. But left in place, the struts of the filters break loose while they are still inside the body, causing serious injury and death.
Transvaginal mesh – a net-like implant, designed to treat pelvic organ prolapse or stress urinary incontinence, that can cause organ damage, chronic pain, bowel and bladder perforation, vaginal scarring, urinary problems and infections . Xarelto – a blood thinner linked to uncontrollable internal bleeding and deaths in patients.
Syngenta released a genetically-engineered corn strain, MIR161, in the US market in 2009. The company announced in an earnings report that it would get approval for export to China “in days,” according to attorney Ryan L. Thompson of Watts Guerra LLP, San Antonio, TX. It was wrong.
Verdict: Guilty . The outcome of the Scopes Monkey Trial resonates in U.S. education even today. In 1925, in Dayton, Tenn., high school teacher John Scopes went to court for teaching the theory of evolution to his students. The state's constitution banned the subject in schools.
O.J. Simpson tries on a leather glove allegedly used in the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman during testimony in his murder trial June 15, 1995, in Los Angeles. Lee Celano/WireImage. Â YeÂar: 1994. Charge: Murders of Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman.
Board Âof Education of Topeka, the 1954 ruling that struck down the concept of "separate but equal" and declared racially segregated public schools unconstitutional. That decision helped spark the Civil Rights Movement, which changed the course of American history.
The murder of Andrew and Abby Borden happened on Aug. 4, 1892 , in Fall River, Mass. Lizzie Borden, 33 years old at the time, was arrested for the murder based on these facts: She was home alone at the time of the murders and there were no signs of a struggle.
ÂRumored to be the basis of the television show "The Fugitive," Sam Sheppard 's trial for the murder of his pregnant wife revolved around an unknown murder weapon and questions aboÂut a possible intruder. Marilyn Sheppard was murdered in her second-floor bedroom early on the morning of July 4, 1954. Sam had reportedly fallen asleep on a daybed on the first floor and was awakened by his wife's scream.
Marilyn Sheppard was murdered in her second-floor bedroom early on the morning of July 4, 1954. Sam had reportedly fallen asleep on a daybed on the first floor and was awakened by his wife's scream. But a shadow of doubt was soon cast over Sam when his account of events seemed somewhat unlikely.
When the infant son of famed aviator Charles Lindbergh was kidnapped from his crib around 9 p.m. on March 3, 1932 , people across the nation took notice. A ransom note for $50,000 was left in baby Charles' nursery, and a broken ladder was found outside of the window.
Lawyers unfairly have a bit of a bad reputation. Yes, some lie for a living and defend murderers for money -- but the system simply doesn't work without them. No doubt most are honest folk who do their jobs within the code of ethics all attorneys work under. But when lawyers do go bad, holy shit do they make the most of it.
Being a criminal defense attorney often involves spending a decent amount of time in prisons, seeing as how the people who pay your bills happen to spend most of their free time there. So, what would be the absolute most unethical way to spend those visits?
Rhode Island estate planner Joseph Caramadre, apparently having had an epiphany that mortuary services and churches were hogging up all that sweet, sweet death money, started advertising in newspapers that he would hand over two grand to any terminally ill individual willing to furnish him with their signature and other pertinent info. Not content to wait for the near-dead to come to him, he also personally solicited the dying, paid visits to AIDS patients, and talked to the friends and families of the nearly deceased -- he got their information, and they got enough money to make all their bucket list dreams come true (assuming their bucket list consisted solely of "have a couple thousand dollars").
By 2007, Bergrin had graduated to the prestigious moniker of pimp, when, after hiring a drug smuggler and the self-proclaimed "King of all Pimps" as his paralegal, Bergrin decided to make himself the heir to the pimp king's crown.
Most criminal cases are resolved by a defendant pleading guilty; very few actually go to trial. The plea bargaining process can be a daunting one, and there are times when a defendant can feel rushed or pushed into pleading guilty. It's extremely frustrating for a defendant whose lawyer doesn't doesn't do a good job explaining the process or ...
One scenario in which a lawyer's shortcomings can lead to the reversal of a guilty plea has to do with immigration consequences. For instance, failure to advise a defendant that a plea will result in deportation can lead to a successful appeal.
A defense attorney has several functions at the plea bargaining stage. Number one is making sure that a client understands and is informed about everything that is going on in the case. An attorney should always explain each aspect of the case, including: 1 the strengths and weaknesses of the case 2 the probable outcome of a trial 3 the terms of the offer, and 4 the possible sentences.
But arguing that you had ineffective assistance of counsel after you have pleaded guilty is a difficult task. You generally have to prove that: 1 your lawyer did a terrible job, and 2 the terrible job made a difference in the outcome of your case.
But if you rejected a plea deal that you didn't understand because your lawyer didn't fully advise you about it, you may be able to successfully claim ineffective assistance of counsel. Situations where courts have found that there was inadequate representation at the plea bargaining stage include: 1 no negotiation at all on behalf of a defendant 2 failure to convey unbiased, complete, or correct information, and 3 understating or overstating risks in order to pressure a defendant either to go to trial or plead.
A defense attorney has several functions at the plea bargaining stage. Number one is making sure that a client understands and is informed about everything that is going on in the case. An attorney should always explain each aspect of the case, including:
The Supreme Court has said that this means criminal defendants are entitled to effective representation during the plea bargaining stage. If an attorney doesn't adequately advise or explain everything to a client, or fails to negotiate a plea bargain on the client's behalf, then the client might have a viable claim for ineffective assistance of counsel.
Under the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, criminal defendants have a number of guaranteed rights, including the “Assistance of Counsel.”. Although it’s not spelled out in the amendment, the U.S. Supreme Court has long recognized that legal representation must be effective if it’s to serve the purpose of ensuring a fair trial.
Effective (or Ineffective) Assistance of Counsel. The Sixth Amendment guarantees criminal defendants the right to effective legal representation. But it can be difficult to prove that you didn't get a fair trial because your lawyer did a bad job. By Rebecca Wilhelm, Attorney. Updated: Mar 4th, 2019.
The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent through this site could be intercepted or read by third parties. Anyone accused of a crime has the right to a fair trial. One way to make sure trials are fair is to require that defendants have effective defense lawyers.
Under what's known as the " Strickland standard," you have to prove two things to support a claim that you didn't have effective assistance of counsel: that the inadequate representation unfairly “prejudiced” you to the extent that you didn’t get a fair trial. ( Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984).)
Reason #1: Your lawyer isn’t returning your calls. Lack of communication is a big problem for some law firm clients. Yes, legal practices are very busy. They have lots of clients — not just you. However, before a lawyer signs on to take your case, they need to know if the firm has the capacity to handle it. There’s no excuse for not returning phone ...
Lack of communication is a big problem for some law firm clients. Yes, legal practices are very busy. They have lots of clients — not just you. However, before a lawyer signs on to take your case, they need to know if the firm has the capacity to handle it.
Yes, legal practice s are very busy. They have lots of clients — not just you. However, before a lawyer signs on to take your case, they need to know if the firm has the capacity to handle it. There’s no excuse for not returning phone calls or emails within a reasonable amount of time.
Before you hire an attorney, you’ll sign a contract that sets forth the lawyer’s fees. Most personal injury lawyers work on a contingency basis, which means they get paid a percentage of the damages you receive. However, they’re also going to charge you for additional expenses that come up while the case is in process.
Your lawyer has a duty to pursue your legal action with zealous representation. That’s legal-speak for the concept that the lawyer should do everything that’s reasonably feasible to advocate for, or represent, their client. Almost every law student is taught about zealous representation in law school, but some might forget or become less motivated as the years go by.
Your lawyer has a duty to pursue your legal action with zealous representation. That’s legal-speak for the concept that the lawyer should do everything that’s reasonably feasible to advocate for, or represent, their client.
Answer. When prosecutors offer a plea bargain to a defendant, they have presumably studied the case and the evidence, spoken with witnesses and victims, and decided on a fair and appropriate sentence. But defendants often reject bargains, and take their chances at trial. Yes, there is a risk that the prosecutor may end up recommending ...
Yes, there is a risk that the prosecutor may end up recommending a harsher sentence than the one proposed as part of the plea bargain. Or, even if the recommendation remains the same, the judge may not follow it. In some cases, a prosecutor's recommendation for more jail time than was originally offered will seem like a punishment ...
But defendants often reject bargains, and take their chances at trial. Yes, there is a risk that the prosecutor may end up recommending a harsher sentence than the one proposed as part of the plea bargain. Or, even if the recommendation remains the same, the judge may not follow it.