In any proceeding where the subject of a petition for a child in need of protection or services is not represented by an attorney, the court shall determine the child's preferences regarding the proceedings, including informing the child of the right to appointed counsel and asking whether the child desires counsel, if the child is of suitable age to express a preference.
Full Answer
Nov 20, 2011 · Step 1: discuss the matter with the attorney to determine the reasons for his methods. Step 2: if the discussion with the attorney does not allay your concerns, talk with another attorney, or more than one, to determine whether a different counsel would do things differently to a meaningful degree.
Dec 11, 2011 · If you are still have not received a response after reasonable efforts to reach the attorney, then you can either: consult a new attorney for a second opinion and possibly taking over your case; make the communication problems known to the court (without revealing any other information about your case) and ask for time to obtain a new attorney (or, if you …
Mar 26, 2019 · Hire Your Own Lawyer Whenever Possible. Unless you simply cannot afford to hire a lawyer, working with a private criminal defense lawyer is always better than accepting a court-appointed attorney. If you have no other option, than working with a public defender is a much better solution than trying to represent yourself.
You can always replace a court-appointed lawyer (public defender, alternate public defender, or panel attorney) with a private lawyer without the court's approval. And vice versa; if you qualify for appointed counsel, you can always fire your private lawyer and opt for appointed counsel.
If you sincerely feel your attorney is not adequately representing you, then file a motion with the criminal court - before the judge who is hearing your case, and request a new attorney. It is up to the judge. Report Abuse.
If you feel that your attorney has/is not handling your case property your options depend on where your case is in the legal system. If it is in the stage before you go to trial then you can fire your attorney and if hire a new one. If you have an appointed attorney you can hire an attorney to replace your court appointed attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney you can bring a motion before the court to dismiss your court appointed attorney and appoint a new one. If your case has gone beyond the early stages and you are sentenced you can have an appellate attorney file an appeal on your case siting attorney incompetence.
The answer to your question is that it depends. If your attorney is privately retained, then you have the right to seek new counsel (assuming that works out for you financially etc.). If your attorney is a public defender, then you would need to notify your attorney that you want him/her to notify the court that you want new counsel; or you can make the request directly to the court. Keep in mind though when it comes to court appointed lawyers/public defenders, clients do not get to choose who their attorney is. As a result, the court would need to conclude that you and your attorney have a conflict of some sort that warrants new counsel being appointed; the court's decision will be influenced as well by what point your case is at. For example, if you are about to start trial, the court would be less likely to give you new counsel (even with private counsel). My suggestion is that you leave a polite message for your attorney that you want to talk to him/her and that if you do not hear back, you intend to seek new counsel or that you will contact his/her supervisor, if your represented by the public defender. The other option, more drastic and one that I would not recommend unless the attorney is completely ignoring you and completely not doing his/her job as opposed to there merely being a difference of opinion, is that you can contact the State Bar. Good luck.
If he does not return your call, you will need to bring your case to the attention of the Court or consider seeking a different attorney.
If you cannot afford an attorney you can bring a motion before the court to dismiss your court appointed attorney and appoint a new one. If your case has gone beyond the early stages and you are sentenced you can have an appellate attorney file an appeal on your case siting attorney incompetence. Report Abuse.
You can appeal any plea or sentence, generally, and/or request a new lawyer. If you were sentenced, you should have been given an appellate rights form. If the court agrees to a substitution, they may allow you to get a new attorney. If the case is over, you can always get a new attorney.
If you’ve been arrested and can’t afford to hire a private criminal defense attorney, the court will assign an attorney to handle your case. These lawyers work in the public defender’s office and are mandated to defend anyone who has been charged with a crime and is not financially able to employ counsel.
Before agreeing to work with a public defender, a defendant should be aware of the following differences between a private attorney and one appointed by the court:
Unless you simply cannot afford to hire a lawyer, working with a private criminal defense lawyer is always better than accepting a court-appointed attorney.
Understand Which Kind of Problems are Most Likely to Get You a New Lawyer#N#Three areas of concern: 1) significant breakdown in communication, 2) failure to investigate, 3) failure to file meritorious motions to exclude damaging evidence. COMMUNICATION: If there is an "irrevocable breakdown" (cannot be fixed) in atty/client relationship, you would be entitled to a new lawyer, so long as you did not cause it. Examples: persistent refusal to take your calls or to let you explain facts critical to your defense, won't explain strategic decisions or seek input, relationship has deteriorated so that the two of you cannot effectively communicate. INVESTIGATION: Lawyer has a responsibility to investigate your case, including interviewing witnesses, examining/testing physical evidence, consulting with appropriate experts, investigating credibility of state's witnesses, finding evidence to support your defense. SUPPRESSION MOTIONS: Lawyer must protect your rights and seek exclusion of damaging evidence unless there is a good strategic reason to fore go the motion.
A personality clash will not get you a new lawyer. A preference for a male or female, or an attorney of a certain race will not get you a new lawyer. Even if you and your attorney disagree on case strategy, that will probably not be enough to get you a new attorney. The reason for that is simple: the court deems your lawyer to be the expert about how best to protect your interest. The court will not treat you as if you are co-counsel with an equal voice on strategic calls. Your lawyer is responsible for making the strategic decision in the case. The decision to plead guilty, to testify or not, or to have (or waive) a jury trial are your decisions to make. Most everything else is left to your attorney to decide.
Try to Work Things Out with Your Current Lawyer First#N#Talk to your current lawyer and express your concerns candidly. Give your lawyer a chance to explain their views and the reason for their strategic choices. It is not uncommon for lawyers and clients to think differently about the case. You may be relieved to find out that your lawyer actually is working hard on your behalf. Your lawyer may be able to show you why your proposed approach would actually hurt your chances. If, after discussing the problem with your lawyer, you still have concerns or your lawyer refuses to discuss the issue with you, then take it to the next step.
Understand the Risks of Having a Marsden Hearing#N#There are many risks that you should consider before going forward. First, you are likely to lose - mostly because defendants are not usually well-prepared when describing the problems, lawyers are more experienced and know what to say to defend themselves, and the court may prefer to encourage you two to work your problems out. Second, if you lose, you are stuck with the same lawyer you've just publicly embarrassed. If you have a bad lawyer, they may be even more un likely to work hard on your behalf. (Note: If you have a decent lawyer whom you've misjudge, s/he will not hold a grudge. Good court-appointed lawyers understand that dealing with client frustrations are a part of the job.) Third - and, I think, the biggest risk - you may say something that would hurt your case in the future or eliminate defenses if your case goes to trial. See Step 9 for how to avoid hurting your case.
INVESTIGATION: Lawyer has a responsibility to investigate your case , including interviewing witnesses, examining/testing physical evidence, consulting with appropriate experts, investigating credibility of state's witnesses, finding evidence to support your defense.
Learn How a Marsden Hearing Works#N#If you want to get rid a bad court-appointed lawyer, all you need to do is ask the court for a Mars den hearing. The court will order the prosecutor, other lawyers, and the public to leave the court room before conducting the hearing. The only people who will remain in court are: your lawyer, the judge, and the court's staff (bailiff, court reporter, and clerk). The judge will ask you to describe the problem between you and your lawyer. The judge will not help you make a compelling argument. (See Steps 7 and 8 to learn how to make the most compelling case.) Once you are through, the judge will turn to your lawyer and ask the lawyer to respond. The judge will then rule on your motion. If the judge grants it, your lawyer will be taken off the case and you will be assigned a new lawyer. If the judge denies your request, you will be stuck with your lawyer. The court will order the record sealed and will allow others to come back into the court.
If the court refuses to appoint new counsel and you remain adamant that your lawyer is unacceptable, you could file a complaint with the state bar organization. This complaint would cause an immediate conflict of interest between you and your attorney and would require your attorney to ask the court to appoint a replacement.
If you're claiming your public defender is failing to communicate with you, you'll need detailed support showing a lack of communication over a substantial period. Bring documentation such as records of unreturned phone calls, canceled meetings, or missed jail or prison visits.
Updated: Dec 15th, 2020. The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to the assistance of legal counsel in all felony cases. If a person does not have the financial means to hire an attorney, courts will appoint a lawyer free of charge in all cases, including misdemeanors, that have the possibility of incarceration.
If you are dissatisfied with your lawyer, your first step should be to raise your concerns in a conversation. If the problem persists and your lawyer is a public defender, you may contact the lawyer’s supervisor. In rare cases, the supervisor may assign a different public defender. This would be done without court intervention.
At a hearing in which you ask for a new lawyer, the courtroom is typically closed to all but the judge, the defendant, and the appointed lawyer, and the record of the proceeding will be sealed. This means that neither the prosecutor nor the public will have access to a transcript of the proceeding. The defendant presents his grievance, the defendant’s lawyer responds, and the judge normally asks questions to clarify the dispute. The judge will attempt to resolve the disagreement without having to appoint a new lawyer.
Although any one lawyer might be better than another, the general assumption that private attorneys are better than public defenders is not true. Consider the following: Most public defenders are committed to the cause of justice and want to help you get the best result possible.
As previously discussed, not every action or inaction is necessarily a violation of a defendant's right to adequate representation. However, there are some common claims that would usually unfairly prejudice a case. These include an attorney's failure to: Investigate a case. Present supporting witnesses.
As previously discussed, not every action or inaction is necessarily a violation of a defendant's right to adequate representation. However, there are some common claims that would usually unfairly prejudice a case. These include an attorney's failure to: 1 Investigate a case 2 Present supporting witnesses 3 Interview or cross-examine witnesses 4 Object to harmful evidence or arguments/statements 5 Seek DNA or blood testing (where available) 6 File timely appeal (s) 7 Determine if there would be a conflict of interest in representing the defendant
If a defendant's lawyer is ineffective at trial and on direct appeal, the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial has been violated. In analyzing claims that a defendant's lawyer was ineffective, the principal goal is to determine whether the lawyer's conduct so undermined the functioning of the judicial process ...
The deficient performance unfairly prejudiced the defense (i.e. the errors were so serious that it completely deprived the defendant of a fair trial). Unless a defendant proves both steps, the conviction or sentence cannot be said to result from a breakdown in the judicial process such that the result is unreliable.
If a lawyer does not fulfill those obligations then a client might be able to seek recourse for the lawyer’s behavior. Therefore, it is important for clients to understand what their lawyers’ obligations are and what they can do if those obligations are not met.
An attorney has the responsibility to provide competent representation to each client. That means that the attorney must have the legal knowledge and skill to represent the client in a particular matter and be thorough in his or her legal preparation.
The American Bar Association (ABA) has set forth Model Rules of Professional Responsibility. Since many states use the ABA’s model rules to fashion their own professional rules for attorneys, the information used in this article is based on the ABA’s model rules. It is important to check with your state’s attorney regulatory board ...