Feb 10, 2012 · “What can I do if I feel my lawyer overcharged me?” 1. First, and foremost, carefully read over your attorney retainer agreement: does it permit the attorney to do what he... 2. Second, I suggest you put your view into writing, and send it …
NEGOTIATE THE FEE Billing increments. Most law firms bill in six-minute increments. Protest if a firm wants to bill in 15-minute... Photocopying rates. Some law firms charge as much as 20 or 25 cents per copy, which can really add up if there are...
Dec 13, 2010 · In many jurisdictions there is a method in place to “tax” a lawyer’s bill. The client submits to a taxation officer who then reviews the lawyer’s bill. It is a common occurrence that the bill is then reduced. That is the best method to proceed but you will likely not get that lawyer to do any work for you in the future.
Sep 15, 2019 · Shutterstock. When you hire a lawyer, your chances of overpaying are considerable, according to one legal expert. “There is potentially 10% to 30% chance of legal bills for overcharging or over ...
A simple flat fee (plus expenses), agreed to up front, is often best for the client — because it ensures that the cost won’t go over a certain amount . And lawyers often accept a flat fee for simple matters, such as uncomplicated wills or real estate closings.
If you are not satisfied with your bill and can’t get the lawyer to alter it, contact your state’s bar association to find out how legal fee disputes are resolved in your state. Most states offer some form of arbitration. State bar associations can be found through the American Bar Association Web site ( www.abanet.org/barserv/stlobar.html ).
Poorly itemized bills. Your bill should explain what your attorney was doing during each time segment billed. What to do: Insist on a detailed bill. Vague terms such as “research” and “preparation” should be explained.
Billing increments. Most law firms bill in six-minute increments. Protest if a firm wants to bill in 15-minute increments even when, say, only one minute is spent on your case.
Attorneys doing nonlegal work. Your lawyer should not bill you for time that he spent filing, scanning, assembling documents or doing other clerical work. What to do: Tell your attorney that he should have handed off these clerical tasks to a legal secretary. Legal secretaries’ salaries are part of law firms’ overhead and should not appear on your bill. (Do expect to be billed for paralegals’ time, however, at lower rates than for lawyers.)
Some lawyers claim terms are not at all negotiable, but there usually is some room for flexibility or even creative compromise, assuming that the lawyer wants your business. Example: Offer to pay a certain amount that you both consider reasonable as a guaranteed minimum flat fee for the expected amount of work.
Billing for billing. You should not be charged for the time spent compiling your bill or answering questions regarding the bill. Best: Scan your itemized bill for entries related to billing. Try to keep conversations about billing separate from other conversations, and track them in a diary.
In many jurisdictions there is a method in place to “tax” a lawyer’s bill. The client submits to a taxation officer who then reviews the lawyer’s bill. It is a common occurrence that the bill is then reduced. That is the best method to proceed but you will likely not get that lawyer to do any work for you in the future.
Really, the only way to be sure is to get the fee negotiated right up front for what you want done . If you are selling/buying a business, assets, shares, etc. agree to a percentage of the total cost you are comfortable with (not too much now If your lawyer won’t play ball on that then you need to find one who will.
Contingency fee arrangements usually are 30% to 40% and they often increase the longer the matter goes on. For example, if the matter settles prior to questioning or deposition the lawyer may take 25% and this will go up to 35% the second questioning is completed.
Insurance companies are probably the biggest purchasers of legal services and they have been using Legal Billing Guidelines for years. Large companies also use Legal Billing Guidelines. They use them because they work.
Regarding the comment about lawyer’s sticking together, while that might always not be true, it is certainly true with settlement proceeds, sale proceeds, etc. No lawyer will ever agree to have the settlement proceeds paid directly to the client because then they might not get paid. And, as a courtesy most lawyers will pay the settlement proceeds to the plaintiff’s lawyer in trust. That is a battle you will never win.
And yes, lawyers still make piles of money, true. The real problem you face is that someone out there will be willing to pay your lawyer the amount of money he/she wants to be paid to do the same work you need. If you are not willing to pay the lawyer will just move on to someone who is so it’s a no win for you if you want an ongoing relationship.
Every company that purchases legal services should have Legal Billing Guidelines that outlines how the company can be charged, and this suggestion applies even more so to companies that hire big law firms.
The American Bar Association, which didn’t respond to requests for comment, advises members to abide by Rule 1.5 (a) of Professional Conduct. “A lawyer,” the rule states, “shall not make an agreement for, charge or collect an unreasonable fee or an unreasonable amount for expenses.”.
By packaging all the work into one bill over a monthly billing period and not documenting each day’s work, some lawyers inflate bills, said SIB Legal Review VP Joe DiGuglielmo.
There are at least 10 ways for an attorney to overcharge a client who is paying an hourly rate for legal services. Phantom Billing. “Phantom billing” occurs when an attorney invoices a client for work that was never performed. An audit of the client’s file is necessary to detect phantom billing. Unnecessary Work.
In Maryland, most retainer agreements expressly provide that the attorney or law firm will submit monthly invoices. Even if this language does not appear in the retainer agreement, the Maryland attorney or law firm still has a professional duty to submit regular invoices in order to comply with the ethical obligation “to keep the client reasonably informed of the status of his case”. See the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct at Maryland Rule 19-301.4; and Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Roth, 428 Md. 50, 74 (2012) (concluding that an attorney violated Md. Rule 19-301.14 (a) (2) regarding communications with clients by failing to provide the clients with monthly billing statements).
Before the case gets to court, both sides meet with a qualified professional who gets the basic facts, narrowly defines the issues, and works out what evidence is relevant and what is not. The judge gets a neatly defined set of pleadings delineating the issue, the evidence has been twice scrubbed before it gets anywhere near the court room. That allows the judge to deal with the trial with comparative expedition and then move on to the next case in the already overburdened docket.
The legal process can be very unpredictable and lawyers can only offer an initial estimate based on experience with similar cases and his assessment of the case at the time , and because your side is dealing with an adversarial party who will be vigorously defending their interests, the dynamic process can quite easily make a relatively simple case complicated; this is one of the reasons why the final billing might have exceeded estimate.
That is, their fee is “contingent” on winning a monetary recovery for you. The largest possible contingent fee would be 50% of the case, because otherwise the case becomes the lawyer’s rather than yours.
Well, if we are being brutally honest, it is more for the judge’s benefit rather than the litigants.
You don’t give much details other than you were given an estimate. You obviously are unhappy with the bill. Want someone to say you were ripped off. But with those facts it’s impossible to say. Most likely not. And that isn’t much of a bill. You might want to say what kind of case. How long it took. Etc next time.
This is not uncommon from my understanding and I can see why lawyers might be reluctant to even quote a range of costs from best to worse case scenario. Imagine if the case went to trial returning a favorable verdict, but the losing party appealed; you'll have to go through it all again.
No, my client responded — and then volunteered that he himself knew how to remove an igni tion lock.
If you’ve received a bill from your attorney that you feel is unjust, then you can dispute the bill without having to take your lawyer to court. Before disputing your bill, review your initial fee agreement, which should include details on how often you’ll be billed and what the rates will be. Then, review your bill in light of the fee agreement, your own records, and your understanding of what your attorney has done. Try to pinpoint areas where you feel you were overcharged or discrepancies in times or services. Instead of formally disputing your bill right away, call your lawyer and ask them to review and explain the bill. If you still disagree with your bill, write your lawyer a formal letter explaining which fees you're disputing and why. If this doesn't work, check with your state or local bar association to see if they offer free arbitration services. To learn how to prepare for an arbitration hearing, keep reading!
If there is more than one item you want to dispute, you may want to format them in a bullet-point list. Identify the charge you dispute specifically and provide a brief description of why you dispute it.
Look for an attorney who is experienced in handling attorney's fees disputes. Make copies of any documents related to the fee dispute to take with you to the hearing.
Your fee agreement should include details on how often you'll be billed, how costs will be computed, and the rates at which the attorney will bill for work completed.
On the subject line of your letter, include the date of the bill you're disputing and the case name, if any, that relates to the services for which you were billed.
Ask for a detailed accounting. If your bill doesn't go into detail regarding the charges, you should ask the attorney to provide you with one so you can better understand the charges.
If you have the ability to attach documents as exhibits, such as the bill you're disputing or your initial fee agreement , you should do so. Make sure the committee who reviews your application has all the information they need to understand the dispute.
review of the leading cases involving excessive fees ought to establish conclusive principles which courts apply in determining the reasonableness or unreasonableness of an attorney's fee. This is
Legal Fees 131 The case of Cleveland Bar Association v. Fleck50 emphasized the ingenious procedure used by the defendants to obtain larger fees than they were entitled to by special law, rather than the excessive fees which resulted therefrom. And in In re re ill^,^' a two year suspension from the practice of law was based upon the conceal- ment by attorneys of the fact that the value of securities which they had accepted as payment for their services had appreciated sub- stantially in excess of the agreed upon fees. Even in Bushman, the one-year suspension appears to be premised as much upon the attor- ney's solicitation of professional services by advertisement as it does on the excessive fee charge.
Other cases using the circumstances of the client have found the fee charged to be reasonable: Myers v. State Bar of California, 4 Cal. 2d 528,50 P.2d 795 (1935) ($150 for unsuccessful effort to obtain probation for an indigent Mexican); Herrscher v. State Bar of California, 4 Cal. 2d 399, 49 P.2d 832 (1935) (client was an unsavory and ruthless businessman); In re Loring, 62 N.J. 336, 301 A.2d 721 (1973) ($3,500 for successful criminal defense of a tool-maker earning $150 a week);
Although other courts have not been inclined to use the Goldstone test,31 this test appears nonetheless to be the best avail- able in excessive fee cases because it emphasizes a comparison be- tween the fee charged and the services performed. This comparison permits the consideration of factors other than the mere size of an attorney's fee and provides a court with the framework necessary to determine what constitutes an unreasonable fee warranting disci- pline.
However, the determination of a reasonable attorney's fee for services rendered is largely within the discretionary power of the court, and this determination may
Despite the fact that the practice of law is a means of economic livelihood, it is not solely a commercial activity . As the American Bar Association has said, "In fixing fees it should never be forgotten that the profession is a branch of the administration of justice and not a mere money-getting trade."' If the legal profession is to honor its responsibilities to public service, it is essential that the society which it serves should not view the professional abilities of lawyers as representing avaricious and purely personal efforts to obtain wealth. Instead, the goal of the profession should be to impart to all segments of society the understanding that lawyers are primarily devoted to public service and to the pursuance of justice and are allowed a compensation commensurate with professional efforts. If an attorney ignores this philosophy his imprudence should warrant di~cipline.~Otherwise the legal profession will be viewed with cyni- cism and distrust by the very society it seeks to serve, and such discredit can only impair effective legal pra~tice.~
Notwithstanding the existence of numerous objective and prag- matic tests for determining excessive fees, without evidence of fraud, misrepresentation, or moral turpitude, there exists little chance for disciplinary action against an att~rney.~' This general principle was made clear in Bushman:
Anytime you pay an upfront fee, you risk the lawyer not doing much or any work.
Sometimes, law firms use high billing rates to stick clients with unnecessarily expensive bills for research, secretarial work, and other low-level tasks.
Faced with a $2.66 million fee for a bankruptcy case, Vick learned that his lawyers were charging for extensive overhead expenses. As Am Law Daily noted, these included the cost of running air conditioning during the weekend; taxi rides home for employees working late; and $1,200 for plane tickets from New York to Kansas.
Allen Stanford Ponzi scheme recovered only $81 million. According to the AP, the attorneys charged $27 million for three months of shoddy work.
Like a sick person, a company facing litigation is willing to spend big bucks to get out of a trouble. It's entirely justifiable, and lawyers are only too happy to oblige, billing clients for every minute worked, and then some.
Like all consultants, some lawyers find questionable ways to squeeze money out of clients. Some are legal, some aren't, but all will make a CFO's blood boil.
Billing two clients for the same hour of work is dubious legally and ethically. That doesn't mean it's uncommon.