Dec 10, 2013 · Voted as Most Helpful | 1 found this helpful | 2 lawyers agree. Posted on Dec 10, 2013. Posted on Dec 10, 2013. Not only can they request this information, you are required by law to provide all of the following documentation within 45 days of service of the petition, even without a request: (1) A financial affidavit... Undo Vote. Helpful. Undo.
Model Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 3.7 contains the well-known prohibition on lawyer testimony known as the "Lawyer as Witness Rule" or the "Attorney Testimony Rule."
The attorney-client privilege is a rule that preserves the confidentiality of communications between lawyers and clients. Under that rule, attorneys may not divulge their clients' secrets, nor may others force them to. The purpose of the privilege is to encourage clients ...
Example: In a civil suit regarding allegedly stolen funds, the judge orders the defense to turn over to the plaintiff documentation of conversations between the defendant and his attorney. The defense argues that the attorney-client privilege applies, and that the documents are protected. But the documents relate to plans between ...
The duty of confidentiality prevents lawyers from even informally discussing information related to their clients' cases with others. They must keep private almost all information related to representation of the client, even if that information didn't come from the client.
If, for example, if a client tells his lawyer that he robbed a bank or lied about assets during a divorce, the lawyer probably can't disclose the information.
Under that rule, attorneys may not divulge their clients' secrets, nor may others force them to. The purpose of the privilege is to encourage clients to openly share information with their lawyers and to let lawyers provide effective representation.
Preliminary communications between a potential client and a lawyer are normally subject to the attorney-client privilege. That means that lawyers can't disclose what prospective clients reveal in confidence even if the lawyers never ends up representing them. ( In re Auclair, 961 F.2d 65 (5th Cir. 1992).) To be sure, though, you should confirm with a prospective lawyer that the privilege applies before you reveal anything you want to keep secret.
But a client who speaks to a lawyer in public wouldn't be able to prevent someone who overheard the conversation from testifying about it. Similarly, a client can forfeit the attorney-client privilege by repeating a conversation with an attorney to someone else, or by having a third person present during a conversation with the lawyer. No matter who hears or learns about a communication, however, the lawyer typically remains obligated not to repeat it.
Not only can they request this information, you are required by law to provide all of the following documentation within 45 days of service of the petition, even without a request:#N#(1) A financial affidavit.
File a motion for protective Order. If she waived discovery in the divorce she will lose.
Opposing counsel can propound a Request for Production that would require your compliance absent a valid and timely objection. Unless you signed a waiver of Mandatory Disclosure, much of these documents were supposed to be exchanged during the divorce. Unless you committed fraud, this Motion should be denied.
A witness statement is an individual’s account of the facts and events of relevant issues that occurred in a dispute. Although a witness can give their statement orally or in writing, it must eventually be put into a written document and signed by the witness in order for it to be used as proof or evidence in a case.
In particular: (i) it provides protection against the witness attempting to change his or her story; and. (ii) in certain circumstances, a witness’s refusal to provide a written statement may be useful for cross examination at trial.
if the evidence is intended to contradict the witness, the witness’s attention must (before the contradictory proof can be given), be called to those parts of the statement that are to be used for the purpose of contradicting them, and.
Prior to an accused being informed of their right to legal counsel, any statements they make are considered involuntarily compelled and are inadmissible as evidence. After being informed of the right to counsel, the accused may choose to voluntarily answer questions and those statements would be admissible. 2.
Under Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms, a person being interrogated has the following legal rights: 1. Right to counsel. Under section 10 of the Charter, an individual must be informed of their right to obtain legal counsel before an interrogation takes place.
When the questioning is completed, the investigator will ask the witness to provide a signed statement. If the witness agrees, the investigator will prepare a written statement based on the investigator’s own notes and the information given by the witness.
Lawyers often hire private investigators to identify, locate and interview witnesses.
Many courts have recognized that "the only justification for the attorney testimony rule that might be viewed as affecting the rights of the opposing party is that derived from the fear that the jury will either accord such testimony undue weight, or will be unable to distinguish between the attorney's testimony, offered under oath, and his legal argument, offered in rhetorical support of his client's case." Crowe v. Smith, 151 F.3d 217, 233-34 (5th Cir. 1998); People v. Superior Ct. of San Luis Obispo County, 84 Cal. App. 3d 491, 501, 148 Cal. Rptr. 704 (1978).
1. In particular, " [t]he tribunal has proper objection when the trier of fact may be confused or misled by a lawyer serving as both advocate and witness ," and the opposing party has such an objection "where the combination of roles may prejudice that party's rights in the litigation.". Id. § 3.7 cmt. 2.
Model Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 3.7 contains the well-known prohibition on lawyer testimony known as the "Lawyer as Witness Rule" or the "Attorney Testimony Rule." It provides:
It is equally unlikely that a judge, as compared to a jury , will be unfairly influenced by the lawyer's dual roles."). Some courts have held that the attorney testimony rule applies to affidavits as well as testimony at trial.
The question thus arises regarding the extent to which an attorney may "testify" in an affidavit or declaration relating to a motion for summary judgment. It is well established that an attorney's affidavit can be used, in connection with a summary judgment motion, for the simple purpose of placing documents produced in discovery before the court. See, e.g., United States v. Letscher, 83 F. Supp. 2d 367, 381 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) (" [I]t is usual for counsel to put documents before the Court on summary judgment motions as enclosures to counsel's affidavit."); Bank One Lima, N.A. v. Altenburger, 84 Ohio App. 3d 250, 253, 616 N.E.2d 954, 955 (1992) (attorney did not violate the attorney testimony rule by submitting affidavit stating only that documents attached to it were received by him from opposing counsel, and identifying expert witnesses).
As part of their trial strategy, lawyers will call their witnesses in an order that’s most helpful for convincing the jury of the guilt or innocence of the defendant. However, the judge has the ultimate say over when witnesses testify.
Before the trial, as part of the evidence-sharing process known as “ discovery ,” defendants are normally entitled to receive the names and statements of the witnesses that the prosecution plans to call (although prosecutors may not always have to reveal the names of confidential informants). Defendants also have a right to any information that prosecutors have about the identity or whereabouts of other witnesses who might be able to provide relevant testimony for the defense.
Criminal trials follow the same basic order. Following opening statements, the prosecution presents its evidence, including its witnesses. For each witness, there may be two or more steps to the testimony: 1 Direct examination. First, the prosecutor will ask questions intended to bring out the witness’s story. 2 Cross-examination. The defendant’s lawyer will then question the witness in an effort to discredit or at least shed doubt on the testimony. Generally, questions should address matters covered during the direct examination, but the attorney may also ask questions related to the witness’s credibility. 3 Redirect and recross examination. After the cross-examination, the prosecutor may ask the witness more questions, usually to clarify parts of the testimony or address issues that came up during the cross. Then, the defense attorney also has another chance at further questioning, usually to discuss new subjects discussed during the redirect.
Witnesses are a critical part of criminal trials. Strong testimony from even one good witness can sometimes make or break the prosecution’s case. Other than expert witnesses—who give opinions based on specialized knowledge like forensics and DNA evidence—witnesses testify about what they’ve personally seen, heard, or observed.
That personal knowledge is one reason witness testimony can be so persuasive to juries. Sometimes, witness testimony is the only evidence that places the defendant at (or far from) the crime scene. Other times, witnesses provide the context that supports or undermines other evidence. Either way, there are general rules for how ...
Criminal defendants have the right under the Sixth Amendment’s “confrontation clause” to be present when witnesses are testifying against them and to cross-examine those witnesses. There may be exceptions, however, when witnesses aren’t available to testify at trial. Depending on the circumstances, certain types of reliable statements from unavailable witnesses might be admitted as evidence, such as previous testimony at a preliminary hearing or deposition where the defendant’s attorney was able to question the witness.
How Witness Testimony Proceeds at Trial. Criminal trials follow the same basic order. Following opening statements, the prosecution presents its evidence, including its witnesses. For each witness, there may be two or more steps to the testimony: Direct examination.
There's an old saying. “A lawyer who represents himself (herself) has a fool for a client.”
I invoke my right under the Fifth Amendment not to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury.
Back in the old days of English law, there were two courts - courts of equity and courts of law. Courts of law dealt with violations of written code (similar to modern-day criminal law, though not necessarily limited to criminal infractions). Courts of equity dealt with matters of "fairness" outside the codified laws.
writ of certiorari: An order issued by the U.S. Supreme Court directing the lower court to transmit records for a case which it will hear on appeal.
Thanks for the A2A! I love this as I love legalese and love Latin. Quite a lot of the formal legal words/terms are of latin origin, come to think of it, not a great point as most of our language is derived from Latin.
Many lawyers do tend to have a dry and ironic, often dark sense of humor, and this is definitely something that I have regardless of the situation.
Personally, I use very different registers of speech in different situations. I can be all of the above while wearing my lawyer hat, but use a completely different manner of speech while with friends (most of whom are not lawyers) or on a date.
If the lawyer won’t provide a written fee agreement, then you should look elsewhere for a lawyer.
If the engagement letter doesn’t state that, then don’t sign. Instead, call up the lawyer and ask that they include that condition in the engagement letter.
The lawyer should get it to you within 10 days. An itemized bill should also contain a description of the work performed.
For example, a lawyer will typically charge for photocopying, mailing, and court reporters. If you want an itemized bill, then you should ask your lawyer for one.
1. Ask about itemized bills during your consultation. Before hiring an attorney, you should schedule a consultation. At the consultation, you can ask a variety of questions, including about fees. You should ask whether the lawyer will provide you with an itemized bill and whether it will increase your costs.
A lawyer doesn’t commit malpractice simply because you lose a case. However, if they were truly terrible—such as failing to show up to court, or showing up completely unprepared—then you might want to pursue the fee dispute.
You can check the court’s website to find out how much it costs to file a document with the court.
If you have questions about the sentencing process, talk to a local attorney experienced in criminal law.
The people who most commonly speak at a sentencing hearing are the prosecutors, the defense attorney, the victims, ...
The sentencing portion of a criminal case often takes only moments, especially if the judge is rubber-stamping the sentence agreed to in plea negotiations. For example, the judge might sentence a defendant to "a fine of $250, ten days in jail suspended, and one-year probation ," while the echoes of the defendant's guilty plea still reverberate in the courtroom. Even felony cases can wrap up quickly when sentences are negotiated as part of a plea bargain. For example, in a felony drug possession case involving California's three-strikes law, a defendant who pleaded guilty was sentenced to seven years in prison in a hearing that lasted six minutes.
This statement may include the victim's version of the offense and detail any physical, psychological, or monetary damage the victim suffered as a result of the crime.
Rule 32 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure grants both the defendant and defense counsel the right to speak to the court before a sentence is imposed. As can be expected, the prosecutor's comments will tend to highlight aggravating factors in the crime and past criminal behavior on the part of the defendant.
It used to be that the victim played a minimal role in a criminal prosecution. The victim's only job, if any, was to testify at trial about the circumstances of the offense. Now victims participate more, from the beginning, when they are involved in prosecutors' pretrial investigations, to later, when they give statements in court to the judge during sentencing hearings.
In misdemeanor cases, judges frequently hand down sentences immediately after the defendant pleads guilty or no contest or is found guilty after trial. Where the possibility of significant incarceration exists, however, the judge might not impose a sentence until some days or weeks later in a separately scheduled sentencing hearing.
Honor Your Signer’s Choice: Since oaths and affirmations are equally legal and acceptable , the Notary should honor the signer’s choice and use the appropriate wording and gestures. Record It In Your Journal: Note every oath and affirmation you administer carefully in your journal. Once you recognize the basics and have several oaths ...
When administering an oath or affirmation, follow these steps: 1. Require the person taking the oath or affirmation to physically appear before you. Unless expressly authorized by law, oaths and affirmations may not be administered remotely. 2.
Hello. If you are administering the oath or affirmation as part of a jurat notarization, you only need one journal entry.
The affirmation was created to accommodate Quakers, Mennonites and Moravians, who were religious, but believed that passages in the Bible prohibited taking an oath. In the past, oaths were also taken on sacred objects including stones, weapons, and even bear heads by Siberian hunters. Ancient oaths sometimes included a curse as a penalty for making false statements. See http://abclegaldocs.com/blog-Colorado-Notary/history-of-the-oath-930-ad/
An oath or affirmation is a solemn declaration with legal consequences that can be made before a Notary. If one of your customers wishes to take an oath or affirmation, here is what you need to know.
Ask the person for acceptable proof of identification as prescribed by state law. An oath or affirmation may be part of the notarial act of a verification on oath or affirmation or jurat requiring the individual to sign the document containing the sworn statement. Proving identity is a requirement for these notarial acts.
While both oaths and affirmations are notarial acts that compel a person to tell the truth, an oath is a solemn, spoken pledge to God or a Supreme Being, while an affirmation is a spoken pledge made on the signer’s personal honor with no reference to a higher power. Either is considered acceptable, and the choice is left to the signer.