Our objective is to provide timely medical record review for attorneys that would considerably lessen their workload. We can help you work more effectively, focusing on more cases and thus improving your business. All our services come with cost savings of 30 – 50% for our valued clients. Call our toll-free number 1-800-670-2809 and speak to ...
In-House Staff Law firms that specialize in malpractice cases often have in-house staff reviewing patient records. The staff consists of individuals with medical and legal backgrounds, such as...
The physician's lawyer has likely already met with the physician to review the events surrounding the claim, the chart, and any other pertinent medical records. During discovery, however, the physician will likely be required to devote some time providing answers to written discovery and gathering any relevant documents requested.
Jan 13, 2021 · Obviously your medical malpractice lawyer is going to be taking the lead in formulating the right strategy for your case when it comes to proving liability. But in any medical malpractice case, a big part of that strategy is going to consist of picking the right expert medical witness(es) to establish the two key elements mentioned above.
The poorly written but voluminous record often increases the liability risk by providing the plaintiff’s attorney with ample material from which to choose the example to build the plaintiff’s case. A well-written medical record may influence the attorney to have the plaintiff drop the matter without further action.
Lawsuits often can be avoided if the nurses indicate they have followed up on a family’s concerns. Avoid using defensive, argumentative, blaming, and vague language. If another person’s entry requires action or follow-up, do it and document the response. The health care professional must use legible penmanship.
A well-written medical record may influence the attorney to have the plaintiff drop the matter without further action. Investing more time in record documentation can be beneficial and can help to avoid the stressful, expensive , and demoralizing effects of malpractice litigation.
Avoid documenting the need for an action that is not going to be taken. Avoid direct disagreement with any other health professional in the record. If an injury occurs to a patient, do not make statements in the record about being careful prior to the injury. Do not blame others in the record.
Medical mishaps should be documented concisely. The incidents should not be overstated or misrepresented, but the mishaps should not be concealed or understated. Legal threats and complaints about the quality of care may be briefly documented in the patient’s record in a non-judgmental, neutral manner.
A reviewer's opinion often determines whether or not an attorney decides to take on a particular client.
Less often, an attorney also has a medical degree. Jane Meggitt has been a writer for more than 20 years. In addition to reporting for a major newspaper chain, she has been published in "Horse News," "Suburban Classic," "Hoof Beats," "Equine Journal" and other publications.
The physician can then inform the attorney whether or not, in his opinion, there is merit in pursuing a case. The doctor can file certificates or affidavits of merit regarding a case. These documents are required in some jurisdictions for a malpractice case to proceed.
There's more to the larger definition of medical malpractice, but in the language of the law, proving medical malpractice usually comes down to: establishing the appropriate "medical standard of care," and. proving that the defendant doctor breached that standard of care (this breach amounts to "medical negligence") In simpler English, that means:
It should be noted here that medical malpractice cases are notoriously difficult for claimants to win, especially when compared with other injury-related claims (those arising from car accidents, for example). And it's not just winning at trial that's a big challenge for patients alleging harm caused by a health care provider's mistake.
Proper case selection is the first and most critical step in the successful pursuit of a medical malpractice, nursing home, or personal injury claim. Let our physicians in the United States perform a flat fee medical malpractice case review to identify and distinguish medical malpractice from mal-occurrence.
We refer Board-certified medical malpractice expert witnesses from some of the best institutions and private practices in the country. Pre-screened and highly qualified, our nationwide network of medical experts are actively practicing and not ‘hired guns’.
Have you always wanted a full-time in-house Physician on your staff but thought it cost-prohibitive?
By performing a flat fee physician medical review, screen the relevant literature, and interpreting key events chronologically, MedMal will assist in “bottom line” analysis of the value of any given medical malpractice case.
Unlike testifying medical expert witnesses, MedMal is available to personally meet and perform a physician medical review with attorneys to review the records, teach them the relevant literature and medicine, and assist in preparing and anticipating the potential arguments and strategy that the opposition may present.
Put a doctor on YOUR side of the table. We are available for attendance at, and consultation during depositions to field the curve balls frequently thrown during medically related testimony. Focus on the law – doctors can speak the language of doctors.
MedMal is available for helping layout a trial strategy for preparation of your medical malpractice trial. In-court consultation is also available. Many attorneys find this service particularly useful and utilize MedMal for trial consultation assistance with Voir Dire and when cross examining the defense medical experts.
A common fact pattern in a surgical malpractice case is that the patient begins bleeding during an operation and the surgeon is either slow to diagnose, or fails to treat, the bleeding. An intra-operative bleed is relatively common, but can have fatal consequences when there is a delay in the diagnosis and treatment of the internal bleeding.
A distributee of the decedent’s estate is usually the surviving spouse and/or children and if there is not a surviving spouse or children, siblings or parents.
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) (a/k/a HIPAA Privacy Rule) establishes individual rights with respect to health information. The HIPPA Privacy Rule provides individuals with a legally enforceable right to see and receive copies of their medical records. This includes the right to inspect or obtain a copy of their medical records as well as to direct the healthcare provider to transmit a copy to a designated person or entity of the individual’s choice.