What might Max Weber suggest is the primary difference between a lawyer in the United States and the self-made billionaire of a U. S.-based manufacturing company? Answers Answer from: ZacherySpeaks170 SHOW ANSWER The lawyer has high prestige by virtue of his education where as the self made billionaire only has wealth.
Nov 07, 2018 · Answer: The lawyer has high prestige by virtue of occupation, while the self-made millionaire has only wealth. Max Weber was a German sociologist, philosopher and political economist. He is often considered (along with Emile Durkheim and Karl Marx) the founder of …
Jun 22, 2019 · What might Max Weber suggest is the primary difference between a lawyer in the United States and the self-made billionaire of a U. S.-based manufacturing company? Answers: 1 …
Mar 28, 2018 · andriansp. I believe the answer is: . people perceive authority as legitimate, rather than coercive. Power on the other hand could be used to force a certain individuals to do certain things without their consent. Example of power would be when Nazi germany forced France to bow down and surrender to their might. heart outlined.
The lawyer has high wealth by virtue of occupation, while the self-made millionaire does not. a. The lawyer has high prestige by virtue of occupation, while the self-made millionaire has only wealth. 34. Your best friend, who has recently graduated with honors from Harvard University, arrives at a party you're hosting.
8. The text tells us that stratification exists in every culture that anthropology has studied today. We are also told that systems of stratification and power such as class are not intrinsic to human culture. This seemingly contradictory set of statements might be resolved through archaeological evidence that itself suggests that what aspect of human social behavior leant itself to a non-stratified society?
Pierre Bourdieu worked to understand the relationship between class, culture, and power by studying schools in France with the expectation of finding that social mobility was the result of meritocracy. Instead, he discovered that. a. social isolation took place due to the high rate of parental involvement.
In the U.S. it is illegal as well as socially frowned upon to marry certain relatives. This is an example of a society that practices ________,
Even very powerful institutions do not completely dominate people's lives and thinking. Individuals and groups with relatively little power can contest powerful institutions, such as the state, because:
They reinforce the idea that biology alone cannot predict the roles men and women play in a given culture
Home is often considered the domain of women, while men go to work. Although this idea has changed dramatically in many places in the past several decades, it remains a common theme. How does anthropologist Michele Rosaldo see male and female gender roles?
It is a natural reaction to individuals to fall outside the gender binary .
I believe the answer is: . people perceive authority as legitimate, rather than coercive.
During 1958-1961, India’s economic condition was not much better than China. Yet India not have a famine of the kind China had. Why? Explain any two p … oints.
On the other hand, Max Weber took an interpretive methodology. He believes that we must look the society to explore its hidden meaning. That is to understand the societal relationships and meaning we have to interpret them. That is the meaning of the action of a person can be understood through interpretive grasp. He put forward a concept ideal type to help with interpretation. Weber believes that this ideal type said the sociologist to interpret and contrast the actual or real one in its common characteristics and attributes.
On the contrary, Max Weber provides us with a fourfold classification of class. There are propertied upper class, white-collar workers, petite bourgeoisie, and manual workers. This is the more diversified classification of class as compared to Marx.
Karl Marx said that this lead to stratification in society. In which the Haves will exploit the have not’s to get more profit by exploiting them. They will make the workers work more hours and make more money. On the other hand, the workers didn’t get enough money for their necessities. Economic inequality results in stratification according to Karl Marx. The structure of class stratification to him was haves and have not’s. He also believed in class polarization. Karl Marx also believed that the stratification will result in class conflict and lead to socialism and at last led to communism, a classless society.
Karl Marx believes that the economy is the base of everything or economy determines everything in the world. We can also term it as economic determinism. That is, the economy determines everything. Marx opines that economy is the substructure in society which is existed independently, on the other hand, all other matters or all other institutions, individual relationships and superstructure which depends on the substructure or the economic base. According to Marx, every society has modes of production and means of production and ownership of that production. He applied it to all other social and this societies have two opposing and contradictory classes which are haves and have not’s.
He opines that the proliferation of classes based on occupational differentiation is due to the division of labour in society. He is not considering that a revolution is inevitable to tackle down the class barriers of capitalist society.
Karl Marx suggests in capitalism relation between man and labour is perverted. That he believes the classes undergo revolutionary class struggle and might lead to polarization and ultimately it would result in a more classless society and later a socialist society will emerge. He only believes this would happen. He also pointed out that a revolution is very necessary for society to break down the chains of capitalism.
From the above discussion, we can understand that their views are different. For Marx, the basis of all society was the economy. The economy is the structure where all others are dependent. And there will be always two opposing classes that fight for means of production. A person’s class is based on the position and function he had in the process of production. And there are two classes one is a Capitalist who owns the production and the other is a worker who sells their labour. And their conflict will change society.