A strong argument is one which has a good analogy, is logical and is supported by facts or law in certain cases. A weak argument is one which is based on poor analogy and fallacies. Weak arguments are those, which do not have legal backing supporting them.
A lawyer’s ability to win an argument can be summed up by a few key skills: organising ideas and delivering them effectively.
Avoid arguing during your opening statement. Because the point of your opening statement is to introduce the jury to your case, you do not want to turn your opening statement into a series of legal arguments. So long as you are assisting the jury in understanding your evidence, your comments should be permissible.
A common defense attorney strategy in opening statements is to start critiquing the state’s case, and letting the jury know that there are two sides to the story. Studies show that jurors often make up their mind about a case right after opening statements, so you need to start strong.
You want to hook jurors with your opening statement. A good opening statement demonstrates your sincerity, knowledge of the facts, confidence and likeability all at the same time. “You don’t want to over-promise or under-deliver in your opening statement,” Soto said, adding that there’s no such thing as being over-prepared.
Opening Statement ChecklistState your theme immediately in one sentence.Tell the story of the case without argument.Persuasively order your facts in a sequence that supports your theme.Decide whether to address the bad facts in the opening or not.Do not read your opening statement. ... Bring an outline, if necessary.More items...•
An opening statement has a narrow purpose and scope. It is to state what evidence will be presented, to make it easier for the jurors to understand what is to follow, and to relate parts of the evidence and testimony to the whole; it is not an occasion for argument.
Some examples:“This is a case about taking chances.”“Mary Jones had a dream and a plan.”“Revenge. That's what this case is all about.”“This is also a case about pain. Mr. Johnson's only companion today is constant pain.”“This is a case about police brutality”
A strong defense opening statement will do the following:Tell a story. ... Plant the defense themes. ... Make concessions only with great caution. ... Make the defense case concisely. ... Humanize the defendant. ... Make no promises about the defendant testifying. ... Argue the defendant's case. ... End on a high note.
The opening statement is the lawyer's first opportunity to address the jury in a trial. Generally, the party who bears the burden of proof (plaintiff in a civil case or prosecution in a criminal case) begins the opening statements, followed immediately after by the adverse party (defendant).
You don't explain why your evidence is better than your opponent's or why your case theory is the one your audience should believe. And you don't tell the judge what conclusions they should reach. These explanations aren't proper in an opening statement; they belong in a closing argument.
These steps will help you write an effective self-introduction:Summarize your professional standing. The first sentence of your self-introduction should include your name and job title or experience. ... Elaborate on your experiences and achievements. ... Conclude with a lead-in to the next part of the conversation.
Opening Statement This is each party's opportunity to set the basic scene for the jurors, introduce them to the core dispute(s) in the case, and provide a general road map of how the trial is expected to unfold.
An opening statement should include :A brief summary of the case.Reference to any facts that are not in dispute.The issues that are in dispute.What has to be decided by the Chairman.How you intend to demonstrate your case through your evidence.What result you are seeking.
Seek agreement on a positive conclusion early. Get your demands on the table first – let the bargaining start from your opening position. Don't start with offering anything until you have something to bargain with. Don't just react to something the other party has said – explain why it is a problem for you to comply.
HOW TO WRITE A PROSECUTION OPENING STATEMENT FOR MOCK TRIALTHE INTRODUCTION. Good afternoon, my name is so-and-so, and it is my pleasure to represent the State of Columbus and to serve as a prosecutor on this very important case. ... THE THEME: ... SUMMARIZE EACH WITNESS:Examples: ... Anticipate the defense theories: ... CONCLUSION:
Here is a template and suggestions for writing a defense closing:The Greeting. ... The Thank You. ... Lack of Evidence. ... Echo Themes and Theories. ... Critiquing the State's Case. ... Burden of Proof. ... Highlight the Testimony from Your Witnesses. ... Conclusion.More items...
An opening should establish the credibility of the attorney giving it so the jury is persuaded to trust the testimony, documents, and other evidence eventually offered for its consideration.
An opening statement, therefore, needs to be carefully planned. It should offer an understanding of the dispute and the parties involved in it. It should give an overview so the jury can better understand the evidence that will later be presented. An opening should establish the credibility of the attorney giving it so the jury is persuaded to trust the testimony, documents, and other evidence eventually offered for its consideration.
After introducing the theme, trial counsel should present the client’s case in the best and most accurate light possible, telling the story in a way that will make the jury want to decide in the client’s favor. Jurors often base their decisions about disputes on the impression received during an opening statement.
If plaintiff’s counsel introduces the bad facts about the plaintiff’s case, defense counsel may not need to address them, or defense counsel may need to clarify and put them in what he or she regards as the more proper context. Addressing a bad fact out of context, however, can lead jurors to give it undue weight.
When lawyers read only from notes or fumble for words, they appear unprepared, and opportunities are lost. Trial counsel should be well prepared and make eye contact, leaving the jury with the impression the attorney is pleasant, professional, and competent, and knows the facts and believes in the client’s case.
An opening should order important facts to support the dispute’s theme. A successful opening also will tell an engaging story from a client’s perspective, describing logically what happened. Chronological organization is often employed because jurors may have an easier time following a linear story.
Failure to deliver on proofs promised in an opening statement can lead to counsel’s loss of credibility. It can give the adversary, at closing, an opportunity to argue that the party’s case was not made. An effective opening statement is built around a theme that can be summed up in a simple word or phrase or in a single sentence.
The opening statement is one of the most important components of any trial. It is your first opportunity to present the case to the jury, and to shape the jury’s perspective of the entire trial. The opening statement also is your first opportunity to present yourself to the jury, and to establish the kind of credibility that will persuade jurors to trust the testimony, documents, and other evidence that you eventually will submit for their consideration. A superb opening can set you on a path toward winning the case, but a disastrous opening may be difficult to overcome. Thus, the content and the presentation of your opening statement must be developed with care.
Use the opening as an opportunity to persuade the jury to like your client. Explain your client’s motivations, and give the jury reasons to feel camaraderie with your client. If you represent an individual plaintiff, convince the jury of your client’s integrity, and persuade them that your client is not just out to make an easy buck; rather, your client suffered real harm. Obviously, a lawyer representing an individual against a corporation may have an easier job personalizing the client, but a management-side lawyer can personalize their client as well, and the need to do so cannot be underestimated. For example, rather than focusing on the corporation itself, a management-side lawyer should tell the jury about the people who comprise the corporation – the relevant supervisors, the human resources representative, and/or the company’s owner. Familiarize the jury with these individuals’ names, and their roles in the drama, so that the jury will be considering the actions of people versus people in the case, rather than a single, sympathetic plaintiff against a huge, faceless corporation.
Lawyers often agree to waive the opening statement in bench trials, but waiving the opening generally is not a wise move. Just like jurors, a judge needs an overview of the case before the evidence is presented, so that the evidence will have some context. Thus, unless the case has been assigned to the same judge for a long time, and you are certain the judge (and the judge’s clerk) knows your case extremely well, do not waive the opening – just make it shorter and less dramatic. Also, feel free to address more law during your opening in a bench trial. Clarify for the judge what legal questions will govern the case, and what standards the judge will need to apply.
To write an opening statement, start with your introductory remarks that summarize the case, state your theme, and intrigue the jurors. Then, go on to introduce your client, as well as any other witnesses involved in the case.
An opening statement is the most important points in a trial and it provides an attorney with an opportunity to engage with the jury about their case. An opening statement should always include an introduction; a body, which includes a story and a discussion of disputes and weaknesses; and a conclusion. Steps.
Begin with remarks that summarize the case, state your theme, and arouse the interest of the jurors. The first couple of minutes during your opening statement is when all the jurors are likely paying the most attention, so you want to capture them immediately.
An opening statement is meant to help jurors comprehend the case, focus on important evidence, and provide context. Before writing your opening statement, you are going to want to grasp why the opening statement is so important.
Prepare your speech for the day of the trial. You should strive to deliver your opening statement from memorization. Doing so will make your opening statement more genuine, believable, and effective. In order to accomplish this, you should:
Avoid arguing during your opening statement. Because the point of your opening statement is to introduce the jury to your case, you do not want to turn your opening statement into a series of legal arguments. So long as you are assisting the jury in understanding your evidence, your comments should be permissible.
Avoid discussing the law in detail during your opening statement. Your opening statement can most likely have a brief introduction to the legal issues on which your case depends. However, you should avoid discussing how the law should be interpreted, and you should avoid applying any of the facts of your case to the law.
When we pick a jury, we are not allowed to tell the jury what the facts of your case are. We are not permitted to tell the jury what the law is in your case. We are prohibited from explaining the details of your claim during jury selection.
The judge brings the jurors into the courtroom. He introduces himself and gives them a few preliminary legal instructions. After a few minutes, he turns to me and says "Mr. Oginski, you may begin with your opening remarks..."
Medical malpractice law is a fascinating area of law. It is technical. It is highly specialized and requires a great deal of knowledge of medicine as well as a high degree of trial skill. In this lecture, which was designed to teach lawyers who practice in other areas of law, what they need to know about medical malpractice law in New York.
An opening statement is essential for any successful trial. It should include an introductory statement, the main body comprising all the relevant information, and a conclusion. Usually, the relevant information must include possible disputes as well as weaknesses.
Before writing an Opening Statement, firstly, you need to comprehend why the opening statement is imperative. This ensures that you write the best opening statement possible. The following three tips will help you accomplish your mission;
In your introductory statement, you need to include the following; Introduce yourself to the jury as a lawyer. Introduction of the client to the jury- introduce your client to the jury in an empathetic way to relate. Provide all the relevant information regarding the client’s case to ensure that the jury understands the client’s nature ...
The first step of writing an opening statement is to start with an introduction describing the intentions and overall purpose of the opening statement. This will allow you the chance to grab the attention of the jury as, at this point, they will be interested in listening to the facts in the form of a story.
An opening statement provides the lawyer with an opportunity to address the jury in a trial and shapes the impression of the case and the jury. It forecasts to the jury the evidence they will see and hear during the trial. In other words, it lets the jury know what to expect and allows them to understand the evidence when it is presented to them.
Create a good rapport with your jury. Ensure that the jury likes you, as you will require them to decide the verdict of the case in your favor. Address them as the intelligent people they are, and be sincere while conveying your beliefs.
Emotion makes it difficult for us to present a convincing argument. Negative displays of body language such as yelling, crying, sighing, eye rolling or name-calling is a waste of the mental energy required to win your argument . It fortifies your opponent’s psychological and emotional defences meaning that from this point, no matter how persuasive you are, you have already lost the battle.
Lawyers stay calm and stick with the facts. When it comes to arguments or negotiations, emotion is weakness. Even if lawyers are provoked, or are emotionally connected with a particular subject, they do not allow their opponent to use it to their advantage.
A strong emotional response to someone challenging these views leaves us not only vulnerable to feelings of personal attack, but also not thinking clearly. This can lead to anger, resentfulness, jealousy, defensiveness or distress.
Subjective opinions are not objective facts. No matter what strategies the opposing side uses to distract you from the main issue, or how tempting it is to draw in other connections, a good lawyer always brings the argument back to the original point. 2. Leave Emotion At The Door!
A common defense attorney strategy in opening statements is to start critiquing the state’s case, and letting the jury know that there are two sides to the story. Studies show that jurors often make up their mind about a case right after opening statements, so you need to start strong. Also remember that as a defense attorney, you ...
So take the opportunity to shoot holes in their case. In theory, you can reserve your opening statement until after the prosecution has rested, but this is rarely done (particularly in mock trial competitions).
However, it also does seem like there are some inconsistencies that are not terrible relevant, and you do not have to cover all of them due to the time restrictions. Even in real trials, lawyers make tactical decisions to not cover everything they possible could due to the limited attention span of jurors.
Opening statement is all about previewing the case for the jury. It is not about arguing the case (if you start arguing, then you may raise an objection from opposing counsel). So your goal is to come off as a teacher while you subtly and gently argue your case in a persuasive way.
To do this, you should implement aspects of what has occurred prior to delivering your opening statement. For example, the judge will most likely talk to the jury a couple of times before you start previewing the case (usually about procedural things).
Similarly, jury selection (or "voir dire" for the fancy folks) comes before Opening Statement as well. So you should always , ALWAYS incorporate tidbits from jury selection into your Opening Statement outline. Doing so will continue the bond that you have developed during jury selection. See how you can do that here.
In other words, your opening statement is not dependent on many variables so you should always write an opening statement script before your trial or mock trial. As a result, there are two things that may impact your Opening Statement.