Aug 29, 2014 · I would immediately contact a federal employment law attorney who can review your case for a possible whistleblowing charge, as this area of the law is complex. Furthermore, most employees who work for the post office have appeal rights to the Merit Systems Protection Board, where they can request a hearing to overturn the termination.
Oct 12, 2018 · The Post Office has set out its stall for a new legal panel, adding that it plans to reduce its existing legal offering to seven firms. ... The Lawyer’s new home for 3rd party content and the place to build a community around the sector you work in. Go to the Briefing Room. Briefings. Legal guides, white papers and thought leadership from law ...
Apr 07, 2015 · You will need an employment law attorney who litigates in federal court and, you should ask up front, if the lawyer has experience suing the U.S. Postal Service. It is to your advantage to be represented by attorneys with that experience. They say you get what you pay for, and this response is free, so take it for what it is worth.
Nov 29, 1999 · The Post Office is on the cusp of stepping into the commercial world. ... The Lawyer’s new home for 3rd party content and the place to build a community around the sector you work in ... or receive email alerts for new roles when they go live. Whether you're looking at private practice, in-house legal or an exciting business support role, you ...
Staffed with over 200 career attorneys in offices across the country, the USPS Law Department provides top-quality, in-house legal representation to the United States Postal Service, an independent establishment of the executive branch.
The Postal Service Honors Attorney program offers an excellent and challenging employment opportunity for highly motivated 3Ls and recent law school graduates who are called to public service. Learn more
The EEO Litigation Unit consists of a team of EEO Litigation Advocates who, with the support of a paralegal specialist and legal administrative assistant, represent the Postal Service during selected administrative complaint proceedings before the EEOC nationwide. Advocates defend the Postal Service against complaints of discrimination filed under a variety of federal employment discrimination statutes, including Title VII, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and the Rehabilitation Act. Advocates independently handle all aspects of the litigation, which involves identifying legal issues, investigating factual circumstances, assessing potential liability and damages, preparing dispositive motions and other legal pleadings, communicating with clients, negotiating settlements when appropriate, and representing the Postal Service at EEOC mediations and hearings.
The Legal Strategy team consists of the Commercial and Appellate Litigation Group and the Legal Policy and Legislative Advice Group. Our commercial litigators handle all Postal Service commercial litigation in U.S. District Court and the Court of Federal Claims covering disputes over contracts, intellectual property, real estate, False Claims Act matters, and a variety of other statutory and constitutional issues; our appellate litigators handle litigation in U.S. Courts of Appeals and the Supreme Court regarding commercial matters, as well as tort, labor, employment, and regulatory matters (most litigation matters are handled in coordination with the Department of Justice). Our policy attorneys are responsible for advice on legislation (including technical assistance on bills related to the Postal Service), strategically significant dockets before the Postal Regulatory Commission, issues involving other Executive Branch agencies, the applicability of laws and directives to the Postal Service, constitutional questions (including First Amendment issues and conduct on Postal Property), governance, and election mail.
The Procurement Law attorneys advise USPS purchasing personnel in the expenditure of billions of dollars annually for supplies and services , including automation and robotics technology, air and surface transportation, medical, financial, and consulting services, IT, software, telecommunications, and cybersecurity, and the Postal Service’s fleet of over 200,000 vehicles. Intellectual Property attorneys handle copyrights, trademarks, patents, trade secrets, and rights of publicity, and protect the Postal Service’s interests by drafting and negotiating licenses, prosecuting patents and trademarks before the United States Patent and Trademark Office, enforcing IP rights against infringers, and clearing IP for use in products and advertising. In addition, the Postal Service has a real estate portfolio of more than 31,000 leased and owned facilities to support postal operations, and the Facilities Law attorneys assist with a variety of real estate matters, including leasing, acquisitions, sales, swaps, property management, maintenance, planning, construction, environmental issues, historic preservation, and accessibility.
The Area Employment Law Offices (ELO) provide attorneys with the unique opportunity to work in a team environment, supported by paralegals and legal administrative assistants, to advise operational, human resources and labor relations professionals, on a wide range of employment law issues. ELO attorneys provide comprehensive advice and represent management primarily before the federal District Courts, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the Department of Labor. Attorneys are mentored to quickly assume responsibility to advise and represent management in matters involving Title VII, the Rehabilitation Act, Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), OSHA, and other federal employment and labor laws, along with corporate policies and collective bargaining agreements. As litigators, they engage daily in handling the full range of discovery, witness management, settlement negotiations, mediations, dispositive motion practice and ultimately trials. ELO attorneys are also proactive in developing strategies for avoiding potential USPS liabilities through counseling and training clients in diverse practice areas including workplace discrimination, reasonable accommodation, discipline counseling, workplace harassment investigations and response, retaliation, adverse personnel actions, religious discrimination, and workplace conduct, among others.
The Employment Law Section is divided into the following three subgroups that provide high quality and effective employment law advice, guidance and litigation support to our headquarters and field clients and colleagues nationwide. The first group is the Employment Law group, which partners with departments across the Postal Service in the development and review of policies, agreements and initiatives that impact current, past and future employees and advises on compliance with postal personnel regulations, constitutional protections, and other applicable laws, including the Rehabilitation Act, Family and Medical Leave Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Debt Collection Improvement Act, and Fair Labor Standards Act. The second group is the Merit Systems Protection Board Unit which handles all litigation filed by postal employees with the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) relating to disciplinary adverse actions and prohibited personnel practices, helps management draft MSPB-appealable discipline and advises management regarding Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA), Veterans Employment Opportunity Act (VEOA) and Wounded Warrior leave issues. The third group is the National Employment Litigation Unit (NELU) which defends and advises the Postal Service regarding class and collective actions, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) matters, and eDiscovery-related issues.
It sounds as though you may have a couple of legal issues going on here, possibly discrimination, retaliation and violation of the American's With Disabilities Act, among others. I would suggest consulting with an employment lawyer who can help determine your rights more fully. Best wishes...
You will need an employment law attorney who litigates in federal court and, you should ask up front, if the lawyer has experience suing the U.S. Postal Service. It is to your advantage to be represented by attorneys with that experience.
The best thing to do is to reach out to an employment law attorney who can better determine after a consult if you have any claims to discrimination based on disability or harassment. Good luck!
Duane Morris brought back attorneys Oct. 4 after putting into effect a vaccine mandate at the end of August, resulting in a 95% vaccination rate. In a statement, a firm spokesperson said Duane Morris developed a remote work policy that “provides attorneys with the flexibility to work remotely based on their own individual circumstances while maintaining some form of regular presence in the office.”
The firm has delayed its return to office until Oct. 11, according to an internal firm memo by K&L Gates global managing partner James R. Segerdahl, but that date could change again. It has also told its U.S. workforce to come into the office only after being vaccinated. The updated policy applies only to the global law firm’s 24 offices in the U.S. Read more here
Gibson Dunn & Crutcher is letting its attorneys make their own choices about when it’s necessary to be in the office. In an internal email, managing partner Barbara Becker emphasized that while the firm’s lawyers have always been granted substantial autonomy and flexibility, the pandemic has demonstrated that it’s possible to do more to support remote work and balanced lives. Read more here
The 30-lawyer financial services firm in Washington, D.C. is allowing lawyers and staff to work from home whenever they think it’s appropriate and come to the office whenever the desire calls or the task requires it. Read more here
Jenner will be allowing employees to return to U.S. offices, on a strictly voluntary basis, starting June 7, the firm said, adding that this is subject to government occupancy restrictions and social distancing, as well as individuals being vaccinated or having a negative PCR test. This is Phase 1 of a plan in which the ultimate goal is to have as many offices as possible return to normal occupancy levels, with appropriate flexibility, and to have the office as the primary workspace, the firm said.
Avoid all USPS attorneys! If the are like there Boss the General Councel, Mary Gibbons the will close thier eyes and ears on all formal investigations. What a joke she is still in office.
United States Postal Service [PDF], which alleges that the USPS discriminated against injured workers on the basis of disability when it implemented the NRP. The complaint charges that the NRP fails to provide reasonable accommodation; creates a hostile work environment; wrongfully discloses medical information, and has an adverse impact on disabled workers.
The USPS did so in letters dated July 1 , 2010, which it sent to limited-duty and permanent rehabilitation employees. The letter said that workers are members of the class if they “are or were a permanent rehabilitation or limited duty employee of the Postal Service who was subjected to the NRP between May 5, 2006, and the present.”
The case will determine the rights of class members; any decision will be binding. The EEOC does not allow class members to “opt out” of the class or to choose not to be bound by the decision in the case. If McConnell, the lead complainant, and the USPS choose to settle the case, all class members would be notified of the terms and given an opportunity to object or challenge the settlement.
If you read ECAB appeals, you know that lawyers use the same doctor over and over and the OWCP and ECAB are getting hip to that and having those reports thrown out as well.
The PO absolutely cannot refuse your request to see a doctor of your own choosing at the time of your injury. And anytime you want to switch to your own doctor, you just simply put it in writing and submit it to injury comp. Of course, secops are another story, but I'm not referring to that. oktoots2010-07-25 19:31:03.
You cannot be forced to see a doctor against your will. If my doctor were not open, I would go to the ER and then my own doc the next morning.
The contracting officer must furnish the supplier appropriate notices for posting when such notices are prescribed by the director, OFCCP at the Department of Labor’s Employment Standards Administration. (See https://www.dol.gov/ofccp/regs/compliance/posters/ofccpost.htm .)
Congress afforded the Postal Service broad powers of operation in the marketplace, excluding it from most Federal laws and regulations concerning contracts, property, works, officers, employees, budgets, and funding; as well as the establishment, adjudication, and judicial review of administrative procedures and determinations. Most important, the Postal Service is not subject to the FAR, which is the primary regulation governing all Federal executive agencies in their purchasing of goods and services with appropriated funds. Please see Clauses and Provisions for a complete list of clauses and provisions applicable to the Postal Service.
When the Postal Service is notified that the Department of Labor has imposed sanctions on a supplier for violation of Clause 9-14: Equal Opportunity for VEVRAA Protected Veterans, the contracting officer should put the sanctions into effect as soon as possible.
The VP, SM, may request that the Director, Office of Federal Contracts Compliance Programs (OFCCP), Department of Labor, waive the application of any provisions of Clause 9-13: Equal Opportunity for Workers with Disabilities to a specific contract or group of contracts under 41 C.F.R. § 60-741.4 (b) (1). The contracting officer must submit a justification for any waiver request to the VP, SM.
The Secretary of Labor is responsible for enforcement of the Work Hours and Safety Standards Act and may permit variations and exemptions from the Work Hours and Safety Standards Act’s requirements when necessary in the public interest or to prevent injustice or undue hardship (29 CFR 5.14).
The Postal Service will pay interest on late payments and unearned prompt payment discounts in accordance with the Prompt Payment Act, 31 U.S.C. 3901 et seq., as amended by the Prompt Payment Act Amendments of 1988, P.L. 100—496, in accordance with Clause 4-1: General Terms and Conditions, paragraph i., or Clause B-22: Interest.
Under 39 U.S.C. 2201, the Postal Service may not contract for supplies to be manufactured by convict labor, except for purchase from Federal Prison Industries, Inc. The Postal Service may purchase supplies from firms employing persons on parole or probation under the conditions set forth in Executive Order (EO) 11755, December 29, 1973, as amended, which the Postal Service has elected to follow.
Tell the Truth. If your lawyer doubts you in the consultation, or doesn't think you have a case, while that may change over time, getting over an initial disbelief is very hard. You have to prove your case. Your attorney is not your witness. They are your advocate - but you are responsible for coming up with proof.
If you don't pay your lawyer on the day of trial, or however you have agreed to, then while he or she may be obligated by other ethical duties to do his/her best, they won't be motivated by sympathy for you, and it will show in court.
It's expensive because we have to wait in line too. Going to court is more than dressing up in a fancy suit and knowing what papers to fill out. Attorneys have to wait in line just like the "regular folk" and we are at the mercy of the court staff just like everyone else. If you get a bill that includes time spent waiting in court, it's not usually exaggerated. While some people may stretch the truth - if you want to see whether I had to wait an hour for the case to get called, then just come with me to court. Some courtrooms have more than 50 cases on the call. Your case may not be first or even ninth. I have been number 210 on the list before. It takes time. Most people hired attorneys because they don't want to sit in court. Well, truth be told, neither do I. The difference between lawyer and client is that the lawyer expects it to take a long time and understands. The client typically thinks it's unjustified. So, your hard truth is that each case takes time. Be patient.
Most people hired attorneys because they don't want to sit in court. Well, truth be told, neither do I. The difference between lawyer and client is that the lawyer expects it to take a long time and understands. The client typically thinks it's unjustified. So, your hard truth is that each case takes time. Be patient.
If the judge can see your boobs, he's not listening to your story. If I can see your boobs, then I know you didn't care enough about yourself to talk to an attorney. Dress like you are going to church. Credibility is one of the most important things in this world - and most important in a courtroom.
If no one can confirm that the story is true, you will at least need something external, such as a hard copy document, to prove your case. Be prepared.
While lawyers can certainly take your money and your time and we can file a case that will be very hard to win, if you don't care enough about your life to get a contract, the judge is not very likely to be on your side. At least, not automatically. Oral contracts are extremely hard to prove. What are the terms.